Sandbox – 6jan17

January 2017
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

OUR LINKS

YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

Sandbox – 6jan17

06 January 2017

[Apologies for another overdue sandbox. Boy, they sure fill up fast. I would personally enjoy readers' thoughts on airport massacres, the new venue of choice for terrorists and madmen to carry out mass shootings in highly crowded environments where the shooter is guaranteed by the federal government to be the only one armed (save the readily identifiable and evadable security personnel). And the best part of such exchanges is to once more hear the pinhead progressives conclude that too many CCWs are the real problem. gjr]

Posted in Comment Sandbox

270 responses to “Sandbox – 6jan17”

Walt

09 January 2017

Bloody great. First, things get heated with Russia, now “O”and Co. are picking a new fight with the Germans.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/fbi-arrests-volkswagen-executive-1483971808
Merkle isn’t going to be happy.

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

09 January 2017

You can’t make this stew up:
Even Soros is blaming Angie Merkle for things not going the way this he wanted them to. The claws are coming out. Those Globalists are spending a time out in the pressure cooker. Oh, this is too much fun..
I usually would not recommend a third term for Obama, but if I did it would be 25 to life.
OMG! Now Zerobama says he made the economy better. He has totally lost it. Off the rails. Whatever happened to No Drama Obama?
https://www.facebook.com/RowdyConservatives/photos/a.217983685002343.55586.217926015008110/1003831119750925/?type=3&theater

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

09 January 2017

Yo BarryO!. Putin said to remember extra mustard and no mayo on his ham sandwich and hurry up bringin him his coffee.
https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2017/01/09/iran-shows-obama-not-trump-putins-biggest-lackey/?ref=yfp

LikeLike
Paul Emery

09 January 2017

Utah Phillips wound say about Trump “You can’t make this up” What a hoot!!!

LikeLike
Paul Emery

09 January 2017

You can’t make this up Kellyanne Conway Says Donald Trump Shouldn’t Be Held Accountable For The Things He Says
“New Day” host Chris Cuomo called out Trump for mocking a disabled New York Times reporter during a 2015 rally. But Kelly Anne Conway insisted that’s not what he was doing.
“Why is everything taken at face value?” she asked. “You can’t give him the benefit of the doubt on this and he’s telling you what was in his heart, you always want to go with what’s come out of his mouth rather than look at what’s in his heart.”
So you can’t believe a word Trump says right?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kellyanne-conway-trump-comments_us_58738edae4b043ad97e475d5?3l4yztxhbs9ejyvi

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

09 January 2017

Paul Emery, you are making a fool of yourself.

LikeLike
Walt

09 January 2017

Just finding that now Paul?

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

09 January 2017

Paul, why don’t you go over and gnaw on Hillary’s cankles until you get it out of your system. Besides, every one of those wannabe reporters at the NYT are by definition mentally disabled. So exactly which spastic retard at the Times q are you referring to?
Good job Mr.President-elect Trump. . A few tweets and their heads are spinning so fast they already forgot about the Hack of the Century. Worked like a charm. See Paul, you ain’t the only one who knows the art of distraction, changing the subject, bob and weave, then strike. Float like a butterfly and sting like a bee.
Soon, Trump and Putin will have all the oil, all the gas-o-line, and all the natural gas in the world, hahahahahahaha.. Then they will take out those goat humpers ISIS and take their children as slaves, hahahahahhaa.

LikeLike
Walt

09 January 2017

Hay Paul! Hillary broke her deal with Trump. You don’t do that. Now we have those new emails with plenty of classified goodies.(which our enemies now have) Hillary was warned about that. Nope,, can’t play the stupid card. Lets mark the tape Paul, will “O” pardon her? or let Trump have his way with here?

LikeLike
Paul Emery

09 January 2017

Walt,Bill, Todd
I can hardly believe you condone Trump mocking a physically disabled person.

LikeLike
Walt

09 January 2017

Sure Paul… You worry about Trump “mocking” one person. Never mind LIBS “mocking” the American people. That sure came back to bite.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

09 January 2017

That is not what he did. It was made up. Trump does those things to make a point and afterall, the guy was a “journalist” and the issue was 16 years prior that he screwed over Trump. So sorry Paul, go cry in your room alone. We don’t give a shit.

LikeLike
Walt

09 January 2017

Uhhhmmm,,Paul,,, Believe what gov. tells ya’? How does it feel to be played a fool?
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/09/exclusive-18-years-of-energy-data-manipulation-entirely-unacceptable-no-proof-doctoring-has-ended/

LikeLike
Gregory

09 January 2017

Dig further, Paul… Trump has used the same spaz routine to mock non-handicapped foes. He’s an equal opportunity schoolyard bully and that was known long before Nov 8.
It’s pretty sad you’re having to recycle through old news that didn’t stick the first time around… that one is baked into the cake.

LikeLike
Russ

10 January 2017

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach at WUWT on the latest from Science Magazine.
I fear that Science magazine has beclowned itself as badly as the Nobel Peace Prize Committee. They’ve published a “scientific” policy paper by the noted climate scientist Barack Hussein Obama. Not a paper with Obama as one of the signatories. No, Science magazine claims that the President wrote the deathless prose all by himself, not a co-author in sight.
[ooo] See example clip https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/01/09/barack-obama-climate-scientist/
Now I gotta ask … is there anyone on the planet who thinks that:
a) Barack Hussein Obama was the sole author of this piece of drivel? … or that
b) Any of this is anything but politics? … or that
c) We should get our climate science advice from op-ed political pieces by outgoing politicians? … or that
d) Science magazine is doing its reputation any good by publishing this puff piece? … or that
e) Obama made it into Science magazine (or to be the Editor of the Harvard Law Review) on his own merits?

I quit reading Science Magazine over ten years ago when they went full anthropogenic global warming, real scientist keep an open mind.

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

10 January 2017

Oh my. Meltdown continues. Now Jeff Sessions is trying to hold back from laughing. Trying to keep a straight face requires much effort. I was wondering where Code Pink has been hiding. Popcorn time.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Eschenbach is worth ignoring.
http://www.populartechnology.net/2013/10/who-is-willis-eschenbach.html

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

10 January 2017

Sessions is kicking leftwing ass. What a great pick!
Looks like the man hater Hillary Hodge is at it again. What a sad sack.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

Senator Sessions this morning said he “had no reason to dispute” the findings of the “Assessment of Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”. You guys are out on a lomb with the Trumper on this one.

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

10 January 2017

Paul, Session said you are ok. He said good people don’t smoke pot. So, if Sen. Sessions said that, I will take that under consideration, good buddy.
Of course, Senator Sessions did not say in the recent past. Hmmmm. If this keeps up, I will wear out my popcorn machine.

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

10 January 2017

Russian agents? Paul, you have to keep up. That is so yesterday. Focus, and this time try it will feeling. Take two. Roll camera….

LikeLike
Walt

10 January 2017

Maybe Paul can tell us just which LIB invited the protesters. Being a spectator there is by invite only from what I find.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

He said that this morning Bill

LikeLike
Russ

10 January 2017

More Global Warming: Extreme cold and snow pound the northern hemisphere as some scientists warn of the potential for ice age conditions.
• In Russia Moscow celebrated the coldest orthodox Christmas in 125 years.
• Snowfall paralyzed the city of Istanbul, Turkey.
• Massive snow falls across the Balkans, Italy and Greece.
• Dozens of Europeans have since frozen to death.
• Northern Albania villages have been cut off by 120 cm of snow.
• A temperature of -62°C (-80°F) was recorded in Chanty-Mansijsk (Russia).
Yes, I know it is just weather, however, the next ice age has to start sometime. The periods proceeding the last mini ice age were highly variable, but the overall average was a declining temperature over multiple decades, just like the warm up progressed over decades. With “the pause” reaching twenty years, we are on the cusp of change, with the downturn starting any day now.
http://notrickszone.com/2017/01/10/pravda-scientists-now-warn-of-a-new-ice-age-as-temperature-plummets-to-80f-in-russia/

LikeLike
fish

10 January 2017

Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 10 January 2017 at 09:44 AM
If you could whine in print it would sound something like this…..

“During the 2016 presidential election, we saw the greatest of glass ceilings just above our heads, heard it cracking, and watched again as it stayed just out of reach. Mothers awoke with their daughters the day after the election to once again explain why the man gets to go first. Women and girls watched as one of the most qualified candidates in U.S. presidential history, a woman, received three million more votes but ultimately lost to a man with no credentials and no decorum.”

LikeLike
Russ

10 January 2017

Gregory@09:37 OK, if you say so. I find Willis analysis of climate change data sets most interesting. One does not have to be a climate scientist to find errors in data sets and the subsequent analysis. Some computer programming and math skill seems to be the basic requirements, not a climate science degree. Is Willis ways right? No. But he is open to being corrected, something many climate scientists are not.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Paul 1006
The problem with the report isn’t so much what it says but what you think it says.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

Pretty clear what it says Gregory. Not much “thinking” involved in understanding it.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Paul, innuendo is innuendo, guessing is guessing. Hackers hit the GOP and didn’t get in, hackers hit the DNC and waltzed in the front door.
It doesn’t say what you want it to say, and “we assess” really does mean “we guess”. A guess informed (or malformed) by their past experience, but a guess nontheless.
There’s no there there.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

What “thinking” is involved to understand this assessment.
Russian intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.

We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

Gregory
The defination of assessment:
Yhe act of making a judgment about something.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Paul, “US Victim Data”?
Is that the same thing as evidence of bad acts by Clinton, Podesta & friends, documented by their own statements to each other?
Did KVMR newscasts include that “victim data”, or did you ignore it?

LikeLike
ScenesFromTheApocalypse

10 January 2017

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2017/01/the-download-on-the-dnc-hack/

LikeLike
Walt

10 January 2017

That’s it Paul, piss and moan more about the DNC getting infiltrated than Hillary’s bootleg server, which was full of classified data.
Just what was “classified” on the DNC’s computers? Your priorities are sure questionable.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Russ 1044
Willis E’s work reminds me of the multicolored posters one might see at a science fair. More art than science, which really does take sustained effort to climb onto the shoulders of giants before one can take advantage of the view.
Here’s the aftermath of one real physicist who couldn’t get through to Eschenbach
http://www.sciencebits.com/reply-eschenbach
Watts’ knee-jerk reaction to criticism of Eschenbach are disappointing, and his blog is the lesser for it.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

10 January 2017

Pelline is now defending NAMBLA and Terry Lamphier. He says we are all going to be run over by a train if we don’t accept his perversions. You cannot make this stuff up.
Also, Hodge says there are women’s organizations springing up all across America in response to Trump’s election. No links, not a wisp of proof but only her delusions. And Pelline says the Republican Central Committee and Women are no longer in charge. Say what? The man sure is a libnut.

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

10 January 2017

My, back from a nice leisurely walk with my furry friends and I see I did not miss anything. Beautiful day. Paul is a good person, but it is usually only a select few that think so. 🙂
I think the hackers/leakers were just trying to help Obama keep his solemn promise on making his Administration the most transparent in history. Only took much whining and gnashing of teeth, and a boatload of FOIA requests that got stalled for two years by Administration operatives, but more will be forthcoming in the months ahead.
I love transparency.
A side issue on the report is WHY did the Clinton Campaign refuse to allow the FBI to look at their computers to determine who the hackers were? Very counterproductive if you ask me. Denied repeated requests by the FBI investigators trying to get to the source. That is the question I have. Why? Who benefited from denying our FBI looking at the Clinton Campaign computers?? Who benefited? What were they hiding? I thought we wanted to get to the bottom of this, but what do I know….or care less with each tweet.
Predictable as day follows night, Robby Mook (My Gal’s campaign bigwig) said that we need to pay more attention to Cyper Security, ROFLMFUEO.
I think I know who the dirty rotten scoundrels that did this are. Putin has been dropping hints and the pieces are coming together. Motivation is still a mystery.
https://patriotpost.us/memes/46802

LikeLike
George Rebane

10 January 2017

re PaulE’s 1006am ff. – I would answer Paul, but that doesn’t do any good. Mr Emery continues to circle the barn here. No one is denying that there’s a high likelihood that Russia was involved in the hacking, and most certainly that Russia is an enemy who seeks to counter US interests, and even that Putin favored Trump over Hillary. The response here and across the history-literate nation is ‘So fu@%ing what??!’ That’s like braying in the headlines the discovery that bears shit in the woods, with equivalent impact on the 2016 election, and a fact that not even the intelligence guys are willing to amplify.

LikeLike
Don Bessee

10 January 2017

PE- Got your bunker stocked up yet? 10 days to Trumpagedon. 😉

LikeLike
Walt

10 January 2017

Damn Paul!, your side sure know how to step in it.
“Starting tonight Senate Dems are on Snapchat,” said a message on Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s Twitter account. “Add to hear more on our fight to protect healthcare and tell GOP Don’t #MakeAmericaGreatAgain.”

LikeLike
Bill Tozer

10 January 2017

True colors from the party of the good people. Their soul sickness knows no bounds.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/10/mtv-host-mocks-jeff-sessions-asian-grandchildren/

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

George, I am astonished that you take that position. Can you assure me your perspective would be the same if Hillary had won the election and the Russians would have hacked and lobbied for her. If your answer is yes I will respect your view. If it’s no then your position is total bullshit.

LikeLike
Gregory

10 January 2017

Paul 236
Chill out. Enjoy the weather.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1ZYhVpdXbQ
Hypotheticals are rarely useful, including your 236. The facts are that computer security has been a real issue for decades, and the mere fact the DNC (not to mention Sec’y Clinton and her Dog Patch server) were so cavalier about it is probably fitting the results.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

10 January 2017

Paul Emery, you got nuttin man and you are talking to the wrong people. Please convince us of what you speak. Oh, you can’t? And in what capacity did the exposure of Podesta’s emails change the election? You have made no case for that either. But you never answer us. You just “circle the barn” of incompetency.

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

I am looking for a consistent viewpoingt devoid of petty partisan influence Gregory. If the assessment is total bullshit, as George describes it, than it should be so considered no matter what faction it applies itself to. What is your position on that idea?

LikeLike
Walt

10 January 2017

LOL “jon”Paul. “IF” Hillary won cyber security would be the last thing we would be talking about. Miss the memo? “O” and Co. didn’t give a shit about security right up until Hillary lost.

LikeLike
Todd Juvinall

10 January 2017

Password is his password Paul Emery. Even you could hack him.

LikeLike
Don Bessee

10 January 2017

PE- 236 You can always be counted on for giggles. You are like the little kid who is a continuous line of why? why? why? in response to anything. 😉

LikeLike
Paul Emery

10 January 2017

Well I’m finding things in common with Sessions that he spoke to in today’s hearings. First his support of the CIA assessment on Russian hacking and now his affirmation that Trump was bragging about himself sexually assaulting women.
“A fellow senator asked the next attorney general of the United States on Tuesday whether the actions described by President-elect Donald Trump ― grabbing a woman “by the p***y” ― would constitute sexual assault.
“Is grabbing a woman by her genitals, is that sexual assault?” Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-V.T.) asked Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) during Sessions’ Senate confirmation hearing.
“Clearly it would be,” Sessions said.”

LikeLike
Walt

10 January 2017

Ignore Paul’s pussy grab. Hillary’s name comes up today.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/10/ethics-official-takes-heat-for-knocking-trump-cabinet-hearings-giving-clinton-pass.html
““Walter Shaub gave Hillary Clinton a complete free pass on her unethical activity, especially her lucrative paid speeches,” Scott Sloofman, the PAC’s rapid response director, told FoxNews.com. “His outburst over the weekend reeks of partisan politics from an embittered Democrat still reeling from November’s election result.” ”
Reminds me of Paul….

LikeLike