Rebane's Ruminations
December 2016
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[Mr Norm Sauer is a retired attorney, member of The Union Editorial Board, and a regular columnist for the newspaper.  He submitted the following article to RR and The Union which also published it today (here).  In this piece Mr Sauer reflects on the election's aftermath and its portents; it is posted as received.  gjr]

Norm Sauer

“Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” (Declaration of Independence, 1776)

On November 8, 2016, Americans withdrew their consent to being governed by the elite globalists.  The presidential election was America’s Brexit.

Aside from the coastal states, the Democrats and Hillary were crushed.  Michael Barone reported in the Washington Examiner, 11/9/16, “The heartland—roughly the area from the Appalachian ridges to the Rocky Mountains, with about two-thirds of the national vote—went 52–44 percent for Trump.”

Voters turned over the White House, the Senate, the House of Representatives, and about two-thirds of the nation’s governorships and half the state legislatures to Republicans.

Nationalism: The American people this election cycle were clearly nationalistic. They felt a bond with their country, believing citizens should love their country and that government is duty-bound to protect its own people. 

Voters rejected the belief that comfortable, sexually satisfied consumerism, wedded to gauzy notions of universal brotherhood was all people wanted, thus undermining the drive by the governing elite to integrate world markets, merge populations across borders, and dissolve the sovereignty of our nation.

Trump’s offer of the nation-state and ideas of greatness were more than what liberalism was offering.  Voters stopped worrying what was good for other countries and decided it was time to worry about what was good for America.

President-elect Trump: Trump has shown he is one of the greatest intuitive political geniuses in history. 

As a wealthy businessman with no political experience, he prevailed over more than a dozen experienced politicians and won the presidential nomination of a major party.  He then ran an unconventional campaign and managed to become the president-elect of the most powerful nation on earth.  His was an astonishing accomplishment.

In winning, Trump beat back a hostile press, smears by his opponents, outrage by foreign leaders, vast campaign spending by Wall Street and the wealthy one-percent, as well as vows by actors and rock stars to leave the country if he was elected president.

Working to create or keep jobs, he has already kept from moving to Mexico Ford’s SUV facility in Louisville, Kentucky and over a thousand jobs with Carrier in Indianapolis, Indiana.  Seemingly tireless, he is out front and does not ‘lead from behind.’

Media bias:  Main-stream media was the establishment committed to making Americans believe their elite lies.  They laughed at Trump, told us he could never win the nomination, nor did he have a chance to win the presidential election.

On November 8, Trump and American voters rejected media’s fabricated world.  Having lost the people’s respect, journalists must learn they need humility, objectivity, impartiality, and elimination of group-think.

The Clintons: After all her years of preparation, the millions of dollars raised, the numerous endorsements, and the multiple consultants it wasn’t enough to put Hillary in the White House.  “All the queen’s horses and all the queen’s men could not pull Hillary Clinton over the line.” (National Review, p. 14, 12/5/16) 

Her criminal violation(s) of national security, pay to play through the Clinton Foundation, chronic lying, exposure by WikiLeaks, and lack of message to voters worried about jobs and health care, doomed her.  

Trump’s win means the end of the Clintons’ era of corrupt power-brokering.

Obama’s legacy: President Obama was a savvy, charismatic, superb rhetorician who tapped into our white-guilt as a black man and knew how to use his charms to win the White House twice. 

Once in office he slapped down Republican congressional leaders and the American public with an “I won” philosophy and then relentlessly marched forward with innumerable executive actions on a strictly party-line bent to deconstruct America.

But, Obama could not transfer his personal popularity to other Democrats or Hillary.  Consequently, Hillary’s electoral loss was also the loss of Obama’s legacy.

Trump’s win foretells the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and Dodd-Frank, two of Obama’s biggest legislative accomplishments.  Also, Obama’s executive orders on Immigration, environmental rules, and HHS mandates and more, can be reversed with the stroke of President Trump’s pen. The same goes for the Paris Accords on climate and the Iran deal where Senate approval was never sought.

America:  As a result of Obama’s far left globally-focused governance, the American working people screamed “enough.”  The election of Trump as president is a self-correction of our country back to the center-right, to a state of normalcy, and to our country’s exceptional character under which power lies with the people, not the elites.

Posted in , ,

152 responses to “Election 2016 Fallout”

  1. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Motivation? At first I thought fake news was coming from Hillary. Next, I thought it was coming from Lamestream Media. After that, I thought it was coming from the White House. Now I know it’s all the same.
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/12/12/sore-loser-obama-turns-to-russian-hacking-to-delegitimize-trumps-triumph.html
    Looks like Obama is undermining the sanctity of the election.
    It’s illegimate!

    Like

  2. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The NY Times was very pious over WikiLeaks… stolen information, unethical to use. They were also very pious over the Climategate emails… stolen information, unethical… except many experts still believe it was an insider who leaked the Climategate files because of the many ethical breaches.
    However, those ethics went out the window when it came to Trump’s old income tax return, stolen and illegal under federal law to publish. Or the Trump videotape… recorded illegally… can’t record private conversations in California.
    Regarding the supposed sexual assaults, that’s a false narrative. If a woman “lets you” grab her fun parts, that’s by definition consensual. It helps to be filthy rich (or on your way to becoming filthy rich) if you’re looking for easy consent.
    I asked a woman whose fun parts I’d grabbed in the past if I could grab them, and her answer… if you ask, the answer is no. More, I will not say. 🙂

    Like

  3. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    To make it simple Trump took advantage of stolen private information for his own gain and purposes. That certainly brings into question his ethics and character. What information, by the way does he possess that the CIA does not have about the involvement of Putin and the Russians in the acquisition and distribution of this material and how did he acquire that information.

    Like

  4. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul 11:01
    It was no longer private information, Paul.
    So, if an unauthorized release of information takes place and, overnight, it gets chiseled into Mt. Rushmore, anyone looking at Mt. Rushmore has to promise to ignore the information? No, once the information is common knowledge, there is no ethical breach in using the information. Doubly so if it’s an email that was erased rather than disclosed according to a lawful subpoena.
    Not even Clinton is charging Trump with cyberthefts.

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1101am – We truly live in different worlds. BTW, the advantage that Trump took also benefited the entire nation, and continues to do so to this day. Thanks for making it simple, however a reread of my 852am may be warranted.
    Your second question supposes an assertion that Trump never made, but has been made a lot over the last days by people who think like you. What, pray, has the CIA – as opposed to mysterious spokesmen, yellow journalists, and agenda driven politicians – released to the media about the Russians. Trump just doubts the reports about alleged CIA conclusions until more information arrives.

    Like

  6. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Well, Sister Theresa was not on the ballot, neither was Peter, Paul, and Mary. Now, if only Col. Sanders gave a damn about those e-mails, he might have crushed Crooked Hillary.
    https://www.facebook.com/PatriotPost/photos/a.82108390913.80726.51560645913/10154254470340914/?type=3&theater

    Like

  7. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    So Gregory you have no problem with Trump using information that the Russians stole and provided to influence the election in his favor. that’s according to 17 US intelligence agencies.
    “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

    Like

  8. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Let’s be clear… as far as I can tell… the only information we have as to what the CIA knows, or doesn’t know, is that a WaPo reporter says someone in the CIA told them so, and the NY Times has repeated it. No actual report, no one who stakes their name to the validity of the report.
    https://theintercept.com/2016/12/10/anonymous-leaks-to-the-washpost-about-the-cias-russia-beliefs-are-no-substitute-for-evidence/
    Believe it or not, there are partisan Democrats in the CIA. There are also people in the CIA who, despite being properly non-partisan, who are just wrong.

    Like

  9. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    So what information does Trump have to dispute the 17 Agencies cited above and how did he obtain it? the quote above is not from the WA Po but directly from Intelligence agencies. Of course Trump is “too smart” to bother attending intellibence breifings.
    https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

    Like

  10. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    I have not seen a definitive report the Russians did anything. What are you citing? And remember these departments are run by Obama minions.

    Like

  11. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, if that was a release from the Bush II (or Bush I) administration, you’d be more skeptical than I am.
    Hint: “consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts” means they don’t have anything solid. Best guess. Sure looks like it.
    Now, how many of those hacked emails made public… were fraudulent? I know of not a single bit of information that has been denounced as false. Not the reports of Donna Brazile passing “town hall” questions to Hillary, not the efforts of the DNC to derail Bernie S. Nothing.
    Now, tell me with a straight face that you think Hillary’s home brewed server, connected to the internet and storing bona fide top secret information, wasn’t a target? This brings us back to the criminal negligence at the heart of the Hillary matter.

    Like

  12. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Here is another chance for PE to do the cricket dance. Why do you only care now when the 0 administration has been hacked for its entire tenure and did nothing about it? DOD personnel files with security backgrounds, Pentagon, over and over and over, WH, every major defense contractor and so on. How about some indignation at the utter failure to mitigate these ongoing efforts from many state actors by the 0 administration.
    Oh, I forgot, those FACTS do not fit your lame party line narrative that has no facts, only WAG’s (wild ass guesses). 😉

    Like

  13. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Todd
    Read my 11:51 link for the answer to your question

    Like

  14. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    I did there is nothing in it that is concrete. Get real Paul.

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Well, if the Russians have the 33,000 lost Hillary e-mails, they haven’t turned them over yet. Paul is just upset cause some of those local unpaid DJ’s with funny accents might get deported for extending their stay beyond the terms and conditions (signed) of their visas. No visible means of support.
    This is what happens when we elect an anti-establishment outsider to office.
    Yep, Trump is a bad boy. It is so refreshing. Bust their balls, Citizen Trump. Rip the flesh off their faces. You get down on your bad self, Mr. Bad Trump. I am sooooo upset.
    Hey Paul, why don’t you write a nice Letter to the Editor about someone jaywalking or gasp!, spitting on the sidewalk. I heard someone lit up a cig behind KVMR. Call 911. It was me!
    Now, let’s see what Paul’s mentor has to say on this horrific topic.
    https://www.facebook.com/JoeTalkShow/photos/a.10150167237660019.423328.106854275018/10154693530405019/?type=3&theater

    Like

  16. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Gregory
    I didn’t vote for Hillary why should I be defending her? You didn’t vote for Trump but you sure seem to be his saddle pal.

    Like

  17. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery we don’t believe you did not vote for Hillary. For goodness sake, all year you have defended her and the democrats. And trashed Trump. Sorry, we know you.

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Voted for Gary Johnson Todd.

    Like

  19. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Todd
    this isn’t “concrete?”
    The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process.

    Like

  20. Walt Avatar

    Paul.. Why is your ass baboon red that the truth got out? I bet you wouldn’t as peeved if all the emails painted Trump as a raper of barnyard animals.Something tells me you would be singing a different tune, and how someone did the nation a favor on exposing it.
    That vote for Johnson really paid dividends… Didn’t it?

    Like

  21. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Hey PE, its nice to see you have gotten over the Bush WMD intel debacle and are in the bag for 0’s intel. It must be because 0 has only allowed intel to flow to the WH that fits the narrative, so say many former intel types who have been forced out for failing to tell the emperor he has nice clothes. ISIS is a jv team is the sum of 0’s message consistent intel. I know one former General who will be telling President Trump the truth, no flim flam from Flynn! 😉

    Like

  22. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    We’re at the “pal” stage, are we?
    Paul, you’ve been shilling for Hillary since last Winter. Remind me… how many times did you tell me, grinning ear to ear like the Cheshire Cat, that the “Pubbies” were going to be destroyed on the Tuesday following the first Monday in November? Got to cut Trump loose from the ticket else the Grand Old Party be demolished for a generation?
    Instead, when the smoke cleared it became clear to all that the GOP was in the best shape it had been in a century. Literally.
    What did I tell you? The USC/LA Times Daybreak poll, developed at the RAND Corp, was showing a tight race, they were also tied with being the most right in 2012. So, where were you getting all your nuggets of wisdom? Slate? HuffPo? WaPo? NYT? Not even 538 were so giddy.
    Who was most right in 2016?
    I’m looking forward to a Scalia clone or two to be appointed to the SCOTUS.

    Like

  23. Walt Avatar

    Paul. You got sucked in by LIB “fake news”.
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/12/cia-russian-hacking-story-sham/
    And Paul,This is the same CIA that supposedly flooded America with cocaine from South America in the ’80’s and 90’s right?

    Like

  24. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    “we are confident”? That is your proof? Come on Paul Emery, you were the Bush Derangement Syndrome guy all these years and dissed the WMD stuff from the intelligence community. Now they are your best friends? Jeeze, no wonder no one believes you “journalists”.

    Like

  25. Paul emery Avatar
    Paul emery

    Todd what information do you have that the CIA was wrong and where did you get it.

    Like

  26. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul where did you find the information that says unequivocally the Russian hacked the DNC and Podesta? And why are you now believing the intelligence agencies when you trashed them for 12 years?

    Like

  27. George Rebane Avatar

    For the interested reader about the CIA thread. The fact that the CIA has made no announcement re Russian involvement, and the reports of it are from second hand sources was first pointed out in my 1120am. This was ignored, and that same barn has now been circled numerous times since. Mr Paul Emery has summoned corps of crickets to respond, and has done a yeoman’s job changing the subject. Now in his 126pm he suddenly asks another commenter to prove a negative – that the CIA was wrong about its non-announcement – which was never asserted. Some people just don’t understand that when someone demands more cogent evidence to make the case, that someone does not then logically assert that the insufficient evidence shows the case to be false. Amazing!

    Like

  28. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, where did you find a statement by the CIA on the latest?
    There is nothing on the record; the USIC is not the CIA.
    The hilarious hypocrisy of Democrats remains… all those pious pleadings for Trump to declare he’d accept the results of the election and the declarations of his refusal to do so being tantamount to tearing down our system of elections.
    It’s as if Democrats are trying to destroy our village in order to save it. For themselves.

    Like

  29. Walt Avatar

    It’s only OK when the Left monkeys with elections according to the Paul theroy.
    That’s what they do. ( And there is PLENTY of proof on that matter.)
    So Paul,, are you saying LIBS got beat at their own game?

    Like

  30. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Even Tea Party stalwarts like Joe Walsh are blasting Trump on this one:
    ““For Donald Trump to come out and attack our men and women in the CIA, that’s almost treasonous,” Walsh said. “Russia attacks us and Trump attacks the CIA. He ought to be the one calling for an investigation.”
    Trump specifically said the CIA was wrong when he said on Fox News ”
    “President-elect Donald J. Trump said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that he did not believe American intelligence assessments that Russia had intervened to help his candidacy, casting blame for the reports on Democrats, who he said were embarrassed about losing to him.
    “I think it’s ridiculous. I think it’s just another excuse,” Mr. Trump said in the interview, on “Fox News Sunday.” “I don’t believe it.”
    George
    this is pretty specific representing the opinion of the intelligence community. What more do you want?
    “The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.”

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 154pm – Your quotes say nothing about Trump’s assertion that the CIA was wrong – read again the difference between disbelief and asserting falsity. And who stated the lengthy quote referring to the USIC in the third person. Most certainly it was not the USIC issuing such a statement talking about itself. Who are you quoting?

    Like

  32. Walt Avatar

    I’m getting Paul a drum of Preparation H for Christmas.
    Let’s say Paul is right.(just for the sake of argument) Then the Commies did us a favor.
    Think of the world of hurt the U.S. would be in if Hillary go coronated.

    Like

  33. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    This is a perfect time to say not all Gov. Johnson’s voters are like Paul. Nah, we must not use the broad brush just because of one misguided poster. In fact, there are at least two Gary Johnson voters who post here frequently that are reasoned and seasoned good fellows. In fact, I would say it did not break their hearts to see Trump win, if only to hear the exploding heads of the arrogant condescending liberals who come here to say “Hee, hee, hee, you’re going to lose.” I like that popping melon sound myself.
    The Johnson voters, besides being fine upstanding college educated men of great wherewithal, also possess the fantastic asset of possessing a sense of humor. Odd, when God passed out sense of humors, for some reason known only to Providence, He did not give liberals a viable sense of humor. Puzzling and beyond my pay grade to gleam an insight. Paul is just an example of this seemingly miscarriage of Justice.
    I figured it out. Paul was “I’m With Her” until he read Wikileaks and switched his vote. Mystery solved. He must be mad as hell.
    Paul, while I appreciate your passion……

    Like

  34. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    From John McCain
    “Responding to intelligence officials’ report that Russia tried to influence the U.S. presidential election in favor of President-elect Donald Trump, Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain (R-Arizona) on Sunday said he doesn’t know what to make of Mr. Trump’s dismissal of the issue.
    “I don’t know what to make of it because it’s clear the Russians interfered,” he told CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “Whether they intended to interfere to the degree that they were trying to elect a certain candidate, I think that’s a subject of investigation. But facts are stubborn things. They did hack into this campaign.”
    From Lesley Graham
    Graham on Tuesday pledged to work with Trump, despite their disagreements, but urged fellow senators to check Trump’s power.
    “Clearly me and Donald have issues, and I will do everything I can to help him because he will be commander in chief in dangerous times,” Graham said. “I worry about Russia.”

    Like

  35. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Bottom line: Did Wikileaks influence the outcome of the Election? Did the Pope, the President of Mexico, the President of the United States, the VP, the First Lady, the Chinese, the Zillionaires, the Media, Academia, the Haugue, Metkel, The Prime Minister of Britain or Canada, the Globalists, the International Bankers, the International Corporatists, the Shieks, the Freaks, our enmities, our “friends”………did they influence the outcome of the 2016 election, try as they may????
    Did they influence the outcome of the election, did they Wally?????
    Answer that question first and foremost. To what extent did stolen e-mails composed exclusively by unethical corrupt sleazebag Democrat Party operatives influence the outcome? Sure, it was just little part of the drip, drip, drip narrative put out by the Republicans and Berners and Libertarians, but all that was dismissed by the MSM and the Democrat Party and hundreds of pundits.
    Paul, did stolen e-mails change the minds of 50 voters? Was our national election process compromised? Was it a game changer? In theory or in reality? That is the question we all should be asking. The other stuff will be dealt with in both the near term and mid term.
    I will wait and see if you are on to something or just pissing into a headwind again…and again….and again.

    Like

  36. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Breaking News!!! The Russians are bad people and Putin is a nasty man. Berry berry bad people.

    Like

  37. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Bill
    To the extent that Trump took advantage of their availability I’d say yes the intent was to influence the election. Why would he have made such a big deal about it. |Also Trump kept saying words to the effect that said “stay tuned, we’ll have a new batch from Wikileaks any time now” that is a testimony to the value to his campaign of transmitting the stolen personal correspondence provided by the Russians. Why would they provide it if it wasn’t to their advantage to promote Trump?

    Like

  38. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 221pm – Now those quotes are pretty lame, but we do understand that is the best you can do to make your case. And what does your 244pm have to do with proving that the USIC stated the Russians did it?
    For the record, I believe there’s a high likelihood that the Russians were somehow involved in hacking the DNC and Hillary’s illegal private servers. And I for one am glad that the hacked data was then made public instead of being kept in the back allies of the world’s intelligence communities. I and others like me wanted to see what everyone else in the world was looking at.

    Like

  39. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Would you have felt the same way ethically if the releases would have been of Republican private emails? Certainly a moral equivalent would have been the release of the now famous pussy grabbing video featuring our President elect. You have no problem with that do you or any other amplified private conversation Trump may have had?

    Like

  40. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    I guess I shouldn’t offer my spare inauguration ticket to Paul. 😉

    Like

  41. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 305pm – Sure, goose and gander and all that.

    Like

  42. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Paul, do not confuse attempts to influence with successful determining of the outcome. If it is from Russia, it’s called propaganda. If it is from the Major Networks, it’s called fake news. Unless….unless….unless….you think Wikileaks is why Trump won. No one is that stupid. Trump’s grabbing a handful of hair pie comments would have sunk anyone in this day and age. Wikileaks was small potatoes after the Primaries, IMHO.
    Yes, I wave the flag and want our communications secure and want the friggin hackers dropped from a plane at 10,0000 feet. Don’t mess with The United States of America. We will find them and open up a big can of Whoop Ass on their sorry heads. Escpecially hacking trade secrets, aircraft designs from Boeing, my house, your work, my country.
    Putin a a dangerous man in a very dangerous world. Separate issue.
    Now, National Security and the CIA. You just don’t get Trump, do you? I am delighted that he twitted what he did about the CIA. Absolutely delighted. He just told the CIA that business as usual is over and time to cross every T and dot every I. No more bull pucky and predetermined political issuances. Cut the shit. Now, he will get along just fine with them lickity split.
    Trump just did not like the fact that the CIA phycologists prepped Hillary before the debates about how to get to Trump. Hill’s first thing out of her mouth was about him “borrowing 14 million from his Daddy.” Threw him so far off guard and it worked magnificently. Donald is protective of his daddy and it was less than 14 million. He never recovered from that on the first debate. But, Trump is a quick learner and it was his first debate in his entire life. Besides that and a mistrust of the CIA (like your “Bush lied, people died” broken record), it will be kiss and make up time soon enough.
    Let me explain Trump to you cause you don’t do sarcasm well or Trump speak.
    Look, everybody and Trump know you can legally burn the flag. He tweets about off with the flag burners’ heads and while you guys are running around like chickens with your heads cut off, Trump is off over at another place doing his real business. He just wanted/needed to change the opposition’s narrative. Worked. You were looking in the wrong place. He just did so and so behind the scenes.
    He tweets on Lady Gaga or something and the media is racing to proveit wrong and get all worked up in a lather and…..oppps….he changed the narrative and announces another Cabinet pic. He operates on a level that might be called planned chaos, friction. It works as a method to get things done…important stuff….you are taking it as planned. He is playing you Paul, but not as much as your news sources are playing you. Not even close.
    Yes, cypher warfare is what is happening. It’s our new brave world reality we did not plan on. Wikileaks is just the first one that caught your attention. The Chinese are a hell of a lot more ruthless and greedy and destructive…and better financed. See the forest from the Wikileaks tree.

    Like

  43. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Paul, let’s be real here. The damning emails were not strictly private, and some were emails that had been under subpoena. There were Emails between DNC officials detailing collusion between the DNC and journalists… including journalists being pushed to push the easiest to defeat Republicans, the real bad ones, and they were doing it… Trump, Cruz and Rubio. They got the opponent they wanted and, on Nov 9, had a real bad case of buyer’s remorse.
    “Where did we go right?”- Max Bialystock.
    Of all the folks standing around looking for blame regarding the sorry state of US Election integrity, journalists deserve the most derision. For a good laugh, read the journalist’s creed, written a century ago:
    https://journalism.missouri.edu/tabbed-content/creed-2/

    Like

  44. Walt Avatar

    Paul. You still are dodging all the questions. I now call for an embargo on answers to anything you put a question mark after. You have yet to answer why the truth getting out is a bad thing.

    Like

  45. Walt Avatar

    THIS JUST IN….
    http://dailycaller.com/2016/12/12/wisconsin-recount-ends-with-trump-expanding-lead-over-clinton/
    “But instead of exposing widespread fraud on Trump’s behalf, the recount found no major discrepancies and expanded Trump’s lead. After a week and a half of recounting, the final tally discovered 1,769 more votes than were counted on election night, and Trump’s lead increased by 162 votes.”
    The Russians did it…. Right?

    Like

  46. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Ok, peace offering. How about another nice bipartisan Blue Ribbon Commission to look into this delicate manner. All better now.

    Like

  47. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Breaking news!!! One of the electors that is demanding an Intell briefing is none other than……..drumroll please…….Noneother than Botox Nancy’s daughter.
    Go pound sand, but the peace offering still stands. She needs a bigger participation trophy.

    Like

Leave a comment