Rebane's Ruminations
December 2016
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[Mr Norm Sauer is a retired attorney, member of The Union Editorial Board, and a regular columnist for the newspaper.  He submitted the following article to RR and The Union which also published it today (here).  In this piece Mr Sauer reflects on the election's aftermath and its portents; it is posted as received.  gjr]

Norm Sauer

“Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” (Declaration of Independence, 1776)

On November 8, 2016, Americans withdrew their consent to being governed by the elite globalists.  The presidential election was America’s Brexit.

Aside from the coastal states, the Democrats and Hillary were crushed.  Michael Barone reported in the Washington Examiner, 11/9/16, “The heartland—roughly the area from the Appalachian ridges to the Rocky Mountains, with about two-thirds of the national vote—went 52–44 percent for Trump.”

Voters turned over the White House, the Senate, the House of Representatives, and about two-thirds of the nation’s governorships and half the state legislatures to Republicans.

Nationalism: The American people this election cycle were clearly nationalistic. They felt a bond with their country, believing citizens should love their country and that government is duty-bound to protect its own people. 

Voters rejected the belief that comfortable, sexually satisfied consumerism, wedded to gauzy notions of universal brotherhood was all people wanted, thus undermining the drive by the governing elite to integrate world markets, merge populations across borders, and dissolve the sovereignty of our nation.

Trump’s offer of the nation-state and ideas of greatness were more than what liberalism was offering.  Voters stopped worrying what was good for other countries and decided it was time to worry about what was good for America.

President-elect Trump: Trump has shown he is one of the greatest intuitive political geniuses in history. 

As a wealthy businessman with no political experience, he prevailed over more than a dozen experienced politicians and won the presidential nomination of a major party.  He then ran an unconventional campaign and managed to become the president-elect of the most powerful nation on earth.  His was an astonishing accomplishment.

In winning, Trump beat back a hostile press, smears by his opponents, outrage by foreign leaders, vast campaign spending by Wall Street and the wealthy one-percent, as well as vows by actors and rock stars to leave the country if he was elected president.

Working to create or keep jobs, he has already kept from moving to Mexico Ford’s SUV facility in Louisville, Kentucky and over a thousand jobs with Carrier in Indianapolis, Indiana.  Seemingly tireless, he is out front and does not ‘lead from behind.’

Media bias:  Main-stream media was the establishment committed to making Americans believe their elite lies.  They laughed at Trump, told us he could never win the nomination, nor did he have a chance to win the presidential election.

On November 8, Trump and American voters rejected media’s fabricated world.  Having lost the people’s respect, journalists must learn they need humility, objectivity, impartiality, and elimination of group-think.

The Clintons: After all her years of preparation, the millions of dollars raised, the numerous endorsements, and the multiple consultants it wasn’t enough to put Hillary in the White House.  “All the queen’s horses and all the queen’s men could not pull Hillary Clinton over the line.” (National Review, p. 14, 12/5/16) 

Her criminal violation(s) of national security, pay to play through the Clinton Foundation, chronic lying, exposure by WikiLeaks, and lack of message to voters worried about jobs and health care, doomed her.  

Trump’s win means the end of the Clintons’ era of corrupt power-brokering.

Obama’s legacy: President Obama was a savvy, charismatic, superb rhetorician who tapped into our white-guilt as a black man and knew how to use his charms to win the White House twice. 

Once in office he slapped down Republican congressional leaders and the American public with an “I won” philosophy and then relentlessly marched forward with innumerable executive actions on a strictly party-line bent to deconstruct America.

But, Obama could not transfer his personal popularity to other Democrats or Hillary.  Consequently, Hillary’s electoral loss was also the loss of Obama’s legacy.

Trump’s win foretells the repeal of the Affordable Care Act and Dodd-Frank, two of Obama’s biggest legislative accomplishments.  Also, Obama’s executive orders on Immigration, environmental rules, and HHS mandates and more, can be reversed with the stroke of President Trump’s pen. The same goes for the Paris Accords on climate and the Iran deal where Senate approval was never sought.

America:  As a result of Obama’s far left globally-focused governance, the American working people screamed “enough.”  The election of Trump as president is a self-correction of our country back to the center-right, to a state of normalcy, and to our country’s exceptional character under which power lies with the people, not the elites.

Posted in , ,

152 responses to “Election 2016 Fallout”

  1. Walt Avatar

    If you listen to the Left, they blame everyone but themselves for the loss.
    “Russia did it”. Has anyone seen ANY credible proof of that? The Left getting beaten at their own game in the election dirty tricks dept.?
    Whoever DID spill the beans on Clinton and the Left, did the nation a huge favor. The truth always will find a way out. The truth is the Progressive’s worst enemy.
    They even keep Pelosi in power.(Those on the Right,, say “Thanks!”)

    Like

  2. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    They just don’t give up – “It’s not FAIR – wahhhhh”
    “Hillary was supposed to win, so it must be the Rooskies!!!”
    I seem to recall the Dems claiming the emails were fake. What happened to that lie? Are they going to hire Debbie back and apologize to her?
    https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-russia-meddling-us-election-dont-believe-142014369.html
    ‘The New York Times quoted a senior administration officials as saying there was “high confidence” that the Russians hacked both the Democratic and Republican National Committees, but leaked only documents damaging to Clinton through WikiLeaks.’
    OK – what are the damaging documents from the Rs?
    As if I’m going to put much credence in the NYTs quoting an Obama official.
    And right on cue, there’s going to be a ‘thorough investigation’.
    Right – like the ones for Benghazi and Hillary’s email server in her home.
    Of course, those little incidences were just Russian meddling, right?

    Like

  3. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Even if the Russians hacked the e-mails, the Russians did not write the e-mails. No doubt from my uninformed perspective the Chinese, Russians, Germans, Israelis, French, friend and foe alike were in Hillary’s laughably undersecured computers and servers.
    Now, who wrote the e-mails? That is the elephant in the room that is neatly avoided.
    Blame the election results on the FBI Director? If you don’t want to the FBI involved in the election, don’t nominate someone who is under FBI criminal investigation(s). There were two criminal investigations.
    If you didn’t want the FBI (a solely investigative agency) to make the call about prosecution, then don’t have our Attorney General recuse herself after getting caught red handed spending a private one on one with the target’s husband.,
    Before I even knew who and which Republicans would run for office in 2016 a few years back, I figured there was only one crack in the fortress wall to have even the slightest chance of beating Hillary. That one flaw was simple: Hillary is not Bill Clinton.
    Bill’s surrogates and supporters were and still are highly loyal to Bill Clinton. They were not as loyal or enthusiastic about his wife, Hillary. I witnessed this after her loss to Obama. Several top dogs on Hillary’s team not only did not give it 100% to back her, some even disliked her as a person. That proved true in 2016, which had less of the ole Friends of Bill on board than in 2008.
    What was Hillary’s economic policy? Raise the estate tax and raise taxes on the rich to pay for those who do not work. What was her foreign policy? A no-fly zone in Syria. What was her immigration policy? What was her biggest domestic policy? Expand paid family leave and subsidized student loans. Job creation? Crime?
    There are numerous factors to point to why Hillary lost or why Trump won. Why did Hillary lose? She was a bad candidate and she had a stunning lack of message. Strike that. Her only message down the stretch was Trump is bad. Trump may be bad, but why did Trump win? His message was clear. America First. The candidate made the hugely important connection with the hearer. As Joe Piscopo remarked after Trump let him speak at a rally, “I felt it myself.. It was a movement, not a machine.”
    The fallout of 2016 appears to be the utter refutation and demolition of the direction President Obama took the country. Obama made our country less secure, less prosperous, and less optimistic. It wasn’t about Hillary. It was Obama’s ideology that gave the wide opening for Trump to pass through. And Hillary purposely positioned herself to be unseperatable from Obama.
    Remember, it was corrupt Democrats that wrote the e-mails, not the Russians.
    https://www.facebook.com/lastamericapatriots/photos/a.235087906641439.1073741826.235086849974878/760550214095203/?type=3&theater
    https://www.facebook.com/RowdyConservatives/photos/a.217983685002343.55586.217926015008110/974091319391572/?type=3&theater

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Bill if a political campaign took advantage of letters stolen from a mailbox or from Illegal wiretaps would you considers that ethical?

    Like

  5. Walt Avatar

    Paul. The Left doesn’t give a crap about “ethics”. If they did, Hillary would be in jail, and put there by her own party.
    Repubs do have ethics.(at least they used to.) It wasn’t the DEMS that chased Nixon from office. The was Repub “ethics” at work.
    Was what Eric the With-Holder did (and didn’t) do ethical? How bout the monkeyshines of Loretta Lynch? Meeting with Bill Clinton was sure ethical,,, wasn’t it?
    And even now the only ones saying “Russia” did it, are “un-named sources”.
    It looks more like an inside job.

    Like

  6. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Walt
    If a political campaign took advantage of letters stolen from a mailbox or from Illegal wiretaps would you considers that ethical? How about breaking into someones home or business for the same end. Doesn’t matter f the Russians did it. Was it ethical to use stolen material for political advantager?

    Like

  7. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Do you have a chime on this matter?

    Like

  8. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery, so what is your position on this? If the emails are hacked but show illegal activity, is it ethical to release the info on the illegal activity? Or just toss them?

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    ‘Was it ethical to use stolen material for political advantage?’ HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHH!!!! Didn’t hear any sniveling when wickileaks did the Snowden dump or how about the Pentagon Papers? The dems have not denied the authenticity of the content, elections have lots of moving parts and some deliver too much unintended truth, you know like; TRUMP WON! 😉

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I say it’s unethical to take advantage of stolen material. What is your view? Much of the information was not necessarily illegal but revealing of typical political intrigue. Besides nothng is illegal until proven by a jury after an indictment. Remember “innocent till proven guilty”
    what exactly was illegal in your mind and has their been any arrests?
    Todd in your view is it ethical to use stolen material for political advantage?

    Like

  11. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Paul, I did not see the Republicans hacking anything.nor did they distribute the DNC/Hillary Campaign e-mails between various parties as far as I know. The stolen e-mails were put on the internet by Wikileaks for many many media sources, internet sites, and indivuals to download and read as they pleased.
    Did Trump quote the e-mails? Yes. Did I? Yes. Did not all of the e-mails that made the light of day contain just chatter between campaign staffers, CNN, ABC, MSNBC, and a few Clinton PACs? Yes.
    Did the stolen e-mails made any difference on the election results? No. A big fat no. Americans had had enough and they opened their windows, hung their heads out, and screamed as loud as they could, “I’m mad as hell and I am not going take it anymore!”
    —–Or as Norm wrote:America: As a result of Obama’s far left globally-focused governance, the American working people screamed “enough.” ——
    Stolen e-mails made zero difference in the big picture. Even the most embarrassing ones about the sleazy slush fund non-profit Foundation only confirmed what we already knew: The Clinton’s became very rich.
    Now, e-mails released under FOIA did make a difference to some, but they were redacted and released by our own gov’t in accordance with the law. The Deplorable comments were captured on Spanish TV (unknown to most) as well as an audio of her pitch to donors two days later.
    So, was it ethical? Ask Bernie. The most damagingstolen e-mails hurt Bernie the most, not Hillary. Blame DNC Debbie for that unethical behavior. Hmmmm. Wasn’t DNC Debbie Hillary’s co-campaign chairperson in 2008 none other than DNC Debbie?
    Unethical ? Only if you blame Bush. Hey Paul, you wrote clearly and unequivocally on RR that Julian Assange was a “hero”. I remember than well. Blame your hero, Mr. Assange. At least he did not illegally steal Trump’s tax returns and publish them in the NYT and was used repeatedly used by Hillary several times in more than one debate to hammer her political opponent. That was unethical.

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Todd
    If I am accusing you of a illegal activity am I justified is stealing your mail to prove my contention?

    Like

  13. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery, if a third party steals some emails revealing illegality or unethical behavior do you reveal them?

    Like

  14. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery, can you cite the laws against hacking a political email server?

    Like

  15. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Is that your contention Todd? That means we can hire people to illegally steal from our opponents private information if it is contended that it is illegal. Keep in mind the material was stolen before it’s contents were revealed. Are we in agreement that thee information was indeed stolen?

    Like

  16. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Poor Paul – clinging to a lone thread of hope that there is still a chance that Hillary just might still win.
    Paul loves to ask questions but will never answer directly if at all.
    Look Paul, most American voters didn’t have one damn clue about most of what was in the Wiki leaks. All they cared about was the fact that Obama lied and lied and Hillary promised more of the same. I doubt things will improve much for the American worker with Trump because a lot of what is happening in the work force would happen anyway, no matter who sits in the Oval Office.
    But please, Paul, for goodness sake stop making a total jackass out of yourself with this pious BS about hacked emails. Are you going to say we should not have read or distributed any of the Pentagon Papers?
    Innocent until proven guilty? What was Tricky Dick ever convicted of?
    Bernie complained over and over about irregularities in the conduct of the DNC. The emails simply proved his point. Why don’t you scold Bernie about using the info from the leaked emails? Why did the DNC get rid of Debbie if the emails were not to be used? What crime was Debbie ever convicted of? Yet Paul blows all of this off and cries about the Rs. The Rs didn’t engage in anything illegal. The Russians didn’t do anything to change the election results.

    Like

  17. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    There was an indictment in both the cases of Snowden and Daniel Ellsberg of the pentagon papers. You are still squealing about this one and were cheering Snowden and likely the pentagon papers. By the way, President Trump WON! 😉

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    It’s illegal to hack email under any circumstances. Can you show me under what circumstances where it is legal to steals someones email information without a search warrant? Also Todd howis that different from stealing mail from a mailbox?

    Like

  19. Walt Avatar

    Paul, what Hillary did was illegal,, how come she still walks free? LIBS will never jail LIBS. Care to speak of the “ethics” of that?
    If you want to go down the road of “ethics”, and what is “legal”, Most of the elected LIBS
    should be behind bars today.
    I know,, I know… It’s OK when a Liberal does it.
    As for your,, “If a political campaign took advantage of letters stolen from a mailbox or from Illegal wiretaps”,, Really????? There are FED laws about messing with mailboxes. You should know that. Do tell where “illegal wiretaps” have been used. (Good GOD man….)
    So we should have fully ignored the facts and voted for Hillary… “Just because”…. Right?
    You can ignore the facts that have come out about the cooking of books on AGW. Falsifying
    GOV. documents is also a crime. I don’t see you bitching about that. NASA and NOAA have been caught doing just that. Now get on your soap box and whine about those “ethics”.

    Like

  20. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    So Walt no problem to you in using stolen correspondence for political gain. Just wanted to make that clear.
    Scott
    I voted for Gary Johnson not Hillary.
    Also Tricky Dick was pardoned by Ford so whats the point.

    Like

  21. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Is that PE shilling for madam liar liar pantsuits on fire to get a pardon from 0? 😉

    Like

  22. Bill Tizer Avatar
    Bill Tizer

    So Paul, blame the hackers.

    Like

  23. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery, You have not supplied the law that says it is illegal to hack a political person’s email. Do you have one or not?

    Like

  24. Bill Tizer Avatar
    Bill Tizer

    Paul is acting like somebody hacked his computer, lol. It wasn’the me. Not surprised that Paul is mum on Trump’s stolen tax returns taken illegally and published in the NYC. Crickets. Guess he first asked about ethics, now it’s legality. Now we are safe. The left will never as about the morality of the situation. It’s all relative, lol. Paul, you have the liberal affiction.

    Like

  25. Walt Avatar

    So what’s worse Paul? The lying criminalistic behaviour of an elected politician being protected by another lying son of a bitch with an important gov. title, or the “improper”
    mode of distribution of their treasonous ways?

    Like

  26. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    BillT you have nailed the hypocrite. Nothing about all the crapola made up on Trump and the DNC fake news about him. Just the DNC and Hillary are Paul’s concern. Kinda makes me think he is lying about a vote for Johnson.

    Like

  27. Bill Tizer Avatar
    Bill Tizer

    Opps. The left will never ASK about morality. Yes, go ahead and lay the groundwork for impeachment. Paul reminds me of those jailhouse lawyers, aka, inmates, aka “It was the other dude” defense. Miminize your gigantic faults, exaggerate the other dude’s shortcomings.
    Time for a new playback, Mr. Paul. We already know exactly what you will say next. Illegimate!!!! It’s illegimate!!

    Like

  28. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The historical realities of election dirty tricks seems to have eluded KVMR’s news guy. It was ok to release Trumps taxes since it was the NYT and the ‘progressive’ thing to do, right? Face it PE the sack of back stabbing snakes that is the DNC did ol’ Bernie every which way but loose and conspired to steal the election with their house slaves in the ‘press’. You are sounding like you are singing the approved party line song PE. Perhaps that tired old song would play better in the Dark Lords Liberal Lament Land. RR is not an uneducated voter website so the song is old and sounds flat. 😉

    Like

  29. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 348pm – I don’t think you are correctly representing what happened, and then going on to ignore what journalists and politicians have been doing since age immemorial. The purloined emails were published in the public domain. Their source was not known, nor has evidence been presented to this day as to their source. The emails clearly made their authors and higher ups culpable of being first rate sleazebags. The authenticity of the emails has never been denied or brought into question – no one would perjure themselves since copies of the emails exist in other repositories.
    The only thing you guys on the Left have to harp upon is some never before practiced code of la-la-land ‘ethics’. The fact of the matter is that the real unethical behavior relating to Democrats was revealed in the emails, about which the Left (including you) are understandably silent. It would have been butt stupid for the Repubs to have ignored this wonderful treasure trove that was placed in the world’s lap, for it revealed to all the nature of the beast and gave voters one more measure of it.

    Like

  30. Bill Tizer Avatar
    Bill Tizer

    Never look a gift horse in the mouth. The Children of Israel got in trouble when they started complaining about the mana falling from heaven. Lord have mercy on their ungrateful souls.

    Like

  31. Walt Avatar

    Hay Paul,,, “Russia” ? Then why the Democrat, mob style hit of a mole?
    http://www.inquisitr.com/3402098/seth-rich-murdered-for-leaking-dnc-emails-julian-assange-suggests-that-dnc-staffer-shot-to-death-was-a-wikileaks-source/
    What did I say earlier about an inside job?

    Like

  32. Walt Avatar

    WOW!! A conservative artist ? Gotta love his style. Hay Paul. Get this guy to do some
    art in Nevada City.
    http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/12/11/trump-themed-star-wars-posters-featuring-milo-spotted-around-rogue-one-premier-area/

    Like

  33. Bill Tizer Avatar
    Bill Tizer

    Walt more proof that we answer to a higher calling.

    Like

  34. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Paul once again plays the troll – demands answers to his questions and answers none himself.
    Trump won, Paul – so what’s your point?

    Like

  35. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Walt 847 🙂

    Like

  36. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George would your response be the same if the messages were stolen letters taken from a mailbox?

    Like

  37. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Hey I have a new respect for George Boardman. He stuck to his guns about the 47 million dollar bond for the schools. And he took the schools to task for raising the fees for new construction. The school official did the ropa-dope answer to that. Oh if we don’t raise the fees we woun’t be eligible for state money yada yada yada. My goodness these school admins are just typical politicians. Gotta protect their “money” at all costs. Anyway, GB took them to task. Go George!

    Like

  38. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Thanks for the link, Brad. Total left wing lunatic.
    “Immigrants are taking coal jobs”.
    No one is claiming that, but straw man arguments are the left’s stock in trade.
    Hillary promised to shut down the coal industry and throw thousands out of work.
    If coal is truly the more costly energy under a free market system, there’s no need to have the govt shut down production.
    A national $15 an hour wage would savage the low wage job market. Even more jobs would be off-shored or replaced by cheaper automation.
    Any time the govt steps in to decide the value of goods or wages, our freedoms are lessoned and the economy suffers. Once you give the govt the power to dictate the monetary terms of financial transactions, you have given it the power to run your life.

    Like

  39. fish Avatar
    fish

    From the always invaluable Instapundit…..

    FLASHBACK: Remember When the Russians Hacked the White House’s Computers? “While we pounded away at the story, the White House refused to respond to our inquiries. The Washington press corps, which must have known that the White House’s computers were out of action, maintained a discreet silence, declining to write about the Russian hack, even though many D.C. reporters no doubt followed the story on Power Line. Why the coy silence? Because it was October 2014, weeks before the midterm elections, and the story reflected poorly on the Obama administration, which didn’t even discover the intrusion itself. It turned out that American officials were alerted to the Russian hack of the White House and State Department by an unidentified ally (I’m guessing Israel).”
    Likewise, the extremely serious Chinese personnel-records hack got very little attention. But that’s because neither of these events was connected with Democrats losing power. That’s what it takes to get the press upset.

    Money quote in bold at the end!
    http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/12/remember-when-the-russians-hacked-the-white-houses-computers.php
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/14/federal-records-hack-china-pearl-harbor-column/71210018/

    Like

  40. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1127pm – Perhaps you did not understand my 729pm answer. It doesn’t matter who from where placed those emails into the global public domain. Their unquestioned contents exposed virulent and despicable characters in our country’s political life and leadership. For the opposition to use that information to bolster its case for rejecting such people was not only ethical, it was their duty. To have sought to bury the information (a la Team Hillary) was unethical.
    But for completeness I should also point out that your mail box example is not a functional equivalent of hacking email servers. Stolen snail mail never reaches its addressees. I assume what you meant to describe was someone taking the snail mail, scanning its contents, and returning the mail to the mailbox where it was received by its unalerted recipients – then later posting those contents in the public domain. In either case it doesn’t matter since the thief and the subsequent readers/interpreters of the message contents were different people acting in totally different legal contexts.

    Like

  41. L Avatar
    L

    Just a week ago, the MSM was everywhere complaining about ‘fake news stories’, and this week they’re spreading yet another example. There’s no there, there. L

    Like

  42. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    The Washington Post is spreading more fake news today. They are shameless.The Russians are coming! What a hoot!

    Like

  43. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    My my. Good link, Mr. Fish. After hearing that MSM (yawn) played the endless loop all weekend long, one has to look at motivation.
    Too early to prove at the present time, but I have an inkling to the motivation behind the PAC’s and Dem fundraisers and media’ joining together at the Wailing Wall. They lost fair and square. But they must justify their existence. It is their livihood at stake, their status, their life mission, and nobody else will hire them. The show is going on without them. Have you seen the job market lately? What will they do now?
    “Oh no Mr. Bill, what are we going to do? Suddenly we have nothing to do!! What shall we do to remain revelant, to keep all those cards and letters coming? By Jove, I got it. Recount!, yeah that will get the money flowing. That will stir the pot.”
    Well, the recount sputtered. By Jove, I got it! The Russians influenced the elections! They must be stopped. Conflagulate Russians hacking and evil and stealing an election…..not just any election, but the most horrible terrible election in the history of the World….that Trump…oh, we can’t even say it….that Trump won. He cheated!!!
    No proof that the “Mad Russian” hackers were nearly as successful as journalists are in distorting reality…yet. Ok, I will say that the Rooskies tried to influence an election through propaganda. But not to the extent that Obama tried to influence the Israeli elections. Need not matter. Rally the troops! The Russians did it! Quick, send money to carry the fight all the way to Dec. 19th….then Jan. 20th, then….keep those cards and letters and stories coming. Emergency, Emergency, Danger Will Robinson, Danger.
    Check motivation.

    Like

  44. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: BradC | 12 December 2016 at 10:19 AM
    Now Brad you should know better than linking to anything scooper related…….you’ll get a certain local all spun up about his jilting by your local fish rag!

    Like

  45. Norm Sauer Avatar
    Norm Sauer

    With respect to George’s 8:52am comment: “To have sought to bury the information (a la team Hillary) was unethical,” consider the following: “WikiLeak’s disclosures were buried by CBS, NBC, and ABC morning and evening shows between October 7 and 13 which spent 4 hours 13 minutes on Trump alleged sex assaults versus 36 minutes on various WikiLeaks’ disclosures during one week.”

    Like

Leave a comment