Rebane's Ruminations
March 2016
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

The so-called Valemax bulk carrier ships at 400,000 tons deadweight are among the largest vessels on the world’s oceans, each being almost 1,200 feet long with 200+ foot beam and drawing about 75 feet fully loaded.  The ship class was chartered by Vale SA, a Brazilian mining company, to carry iron from Brazil to the world’s markets.  China, after some foot dragging prohibited Valemaxes calling in their ports, has now changed its mind and ordered its shipyards to start building 30 Valemaxes to the tune of $2.5B.  The ship’s size lowers its ton-mile transport costs by 25-30% over existing very large vessels.  Today there are about 35 of these behemoths in service. (more here)

Valemax

What interests me is what drove Vale to introduce such ships that are larger than a modern nuclear carrier (over four times the displacement) in every dimension.  Brazil export markets have a location problem – the sources of their bulk ores, ag products, etc are situated farther than their competition from where they are being consumed or further manufactured.  In short, they are off the beaten path where there is an added cost to get their stuff onto the beaten path, and that makes their exports cost more.  One obvious way to become more competitive is to reduce transportation costs to their markets, hence enter the Valemaxes.

(That China is now planning to eat the lunch of the world’s bulk carriers is another story for another time.  Stay tuned.)

So how does Nevada County fit in?  Readers know that for years RR has been dunning those who promoted manufacturing in these foothills as a solution to our economy’s growth.  An obvious reason (there are others) why manufacturers have left the county is that we too are located off the beaten path.  It costs extra to bring raw materials up from the I-80 corridor distribution and transportation hubs, and it costs more again to get our products down the hill to places where they then begin competing with similar stuff made a few minutes away.

The obvious question then is what can we learn from the Valemaxes.  All other problems to manufacturing here being equal (adequate worker pool, cooperative local government, econut sanity, NIMBYs neutralized, …), would NC manufacturers be able to compete on cost were we to have a regularly scheduled service of very large trucks – our Valemaxes – plying up and down Highways 49 and 20 to move raw materials and goods between a west NC freight depot and distribution centers in the greater Sacramento area?

Such a service could be operated by established transport companies like UPS and Fedex.  Local manufacturers would be responsible for getting their stuff to and from the depot in a timely manner given the scheduled departures and arrivals of the ‘Valemax trucks’.  The parcel delivery companies could, of course, also service the local transport needs with their existing smaller vehicles as part of the ongoing operations.  Additional features might be incorporated from seaborne freight like smaller standardized secure containers  that could be efficiently loaded and unloaded (e.g. palletizing) at Valemax depots and transferred onto smaller vehicles for local transport.

The bottom line is that unless we have some means to level the playing field in the cost of moving materials, manufacturing will continue to languish, if not altogether disappear, in the GV-NC region of Nevada County.  I have no idea whether this concept will pencil out given what remains of our manufacturing industry, or whether we could solve the chicken/egg problem of attracting new manufacturers with the promise of starting such a Valemax truck service.  But given how hard economic development has been in the county, it might be worth taking a closer look at the numbers and what’s involved in pulling this off.

Posted in , ,

14 responses to “Valemaxes for Nevada County?”

  1. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Seems like trains would be our Valemaxes. Colfax/Auburn/Yuba City could be nearby distribution “ports”. We would still have that “last mile” problem, getting the materials/products to/from the rail lines, to deal with.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC 1153am – Sadly, we’re much better at tearing out rail lines but not very good at building new ones – see the history of Nevada County. Trucks seem to be the ubiquitous land transport solution, and such a Valemax truck service could be started quicker and with much less expense. I think that the ‘last mile’ problem is already solved with the parcel delivery service in operation.

    Like

  3. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    It’s unclear what could happen first, a new rail line from Grass Valley or Nevada City to join with the mainline in Colfax or Auburn, or a matter transporter powered by a dilithium crystal reactor core able to transport anything anywhere on the planet in the blink of an eye.
    I think I’d bet on the transporter but it would be close.

    Like

  4. Walt Avatar

    Grass Valley has gold, but what most don’t know, is that just West of PV is an iron belt.
    The ore is so good, a common magnet will stick to just about every rock. Another resource that will never be.
    There was an iron mine within .308 distance from me, that supplied the Nevada City foundry.
    Sorry Brad, like the Dr. says. no rails for us. OH how the people along 174 would howl if plans to revamp the old rail grade were mentioned. From the remote possibility of an endangered critter that might get squished or disturbed, to the gross polluter and noisy train. (then who would be on the wrong side of the tracks, finger pointing)
    Remember. it was “huge mine trucks rolling down Main St. every 30 seconds” that was the big lie that helped kill IMM.

    Like

  5. rl crabb Avatar

    Well, when Trump takes over he can just eminently domain those sissies along 174, build the railroad, and make them pay for it.

    Like

  6. drivebyposter Avatar
    drivebyposter

    I expect you’ll see unmanned trucks (and road trains) long before there’s a huge increase in rail capital spending. It would be interesting to see what the optimal truck layout is given the disappearance of driver labor cost.
    In any case, local manufacturers mostly haven’t been particularly affected by shipping cost (with a couple of exceptions like the now expired furniture maker). It’s probably worth checking the cost to a business of sending a largish box from Grass Valley to somewhere like Atlanta vs. sending it from LA or Sacramento. I doubt there’s much difference.

    Like

  7. Walt Avatar

    Shipping by rail is cheaper than by over the road truck no matter which way you look at it.
    We had to have a piece of equipment fabricated. It was cheaper to have it made in Roseville than locally. Just the cost of raw materials alone was worth the trip down the hill.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    drivebyposter 507pm – I don’t know what the materials and product distribution nets look like geographically. But I suspect there are some big depots in the Sac area since moth major highways and transcontinental raillines run through it.
    Your point about current marginal shipping costs is a good one. We have to remember though that we’re talking about minimum form factors of about one cubic meter and more than a one-man carry weights when comparing costs. We’re not talking about parcel deliveries here.

    Like

  9. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    “it was “huge mine trucks rolling down Main St. every 30 seconds” that was the big lie that helped kill IMM.” Walt 3:30
    Would like to see your source for that bizarre statement Walt. You’ll never find it however.

    Like

  10. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Walt, just so you know, I would wholeheartedly support the re-opening of that iron mine in PV. Are you sure its a .308 distance from you?
    I would think more like .315.

    Like

  11. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Hay Walt, regarding the old Never Come Never Go, you do realize the main issue is that any line would run through people’s developed property, right? You’re a strong supporter of property rights I know, so would expect you to line up for the many homeowners.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    “jon” you sure don’t know diddly about the county. Every post you make a fool of yourself. Walt knows more than you ever could. But as they say, ignorance is bliss. You are very blissfull.

    Like

  13. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Jon – Walt’s statement about the trucks is true. I remember reading that in the Union.
    There will never be a rail line again between GV/NC and Colfax. It would have to span the canyon over the Bear River, among other obstacles. The cost of that bridge alone would bury any savings over moving freight by the highway. The average person has no clue how expensive railroads are to build. Hence – the HSR debacle.
    There simply isn’t the potential for enough dollar value of manufactured goods in Nevada County to justify the cost of a new rail line to Colfax. When the Never Come/Never Go was built, they were bringing bullion out of the mines in huge amounts. And the mines needed the rail line to supply them with all manner of very heavy equipment.

    Like

  14. Russ Steele Avatar
    Russ Steele

    I wrote a transportation article for Comstock’s Business about ten years ago. One of the things I learned is that most of the distribution centers are in Reno/Sparks area, not in Northern California. Yes, there are some distribution centers in Woodland and West Sacramento, but the majority are out of state. It has to do with inventory taxation. At the end of the day, stores send their requests to these distribution centers the replacement products are picked up over-night and delivered to the stores between 6 AM and 8 AM, where is it stocked on the shelves by opening time at 10 AM.
    I am still not sure how self-driving trucks will handle the Sierra snow storms, nor how large trucks will deal with California highway weight limits. To be economical, the truck would have to carry the max load. My Dad was a trucker for part of his working life hauling logs, lumber and heavy equipment. He knew all the back roads around the CHP weigh stations. Will the self-driving truck use these routes when loaded to the max? Or, more likely regulations will limit the size and weight carrying limits for self-driving Vale type vehicles, reducing profit margins of Vale trucks.
    Transportation patterns are going to change in California once the new locks are opened in Panama this year, allowing medium to large container ships to go from China to New Orleans. The new locks cannot support the largest containers ships or the Vale mode bulk carriers. However, shippers will take advantage of the lower shipping cost with access to New Orleans ports and the central US, avoiding the costly long haul from the west coast ports.

    Like

Leave a comment