Rebane's Ruminations
March 2016
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the linked transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 2 March 2016.]

The next thing to become illegal will be our ability to pay for something with cash.  Certain politicians in America are working hard to catch up with their European counterparts in outlawing transactions using that “ancient relic”.  And it is all supposed to be for our own good.

Socialists and their central planning elites have that objective in mind since they will then enjoy unfettered freedom to tax everything and also control the buying and selling of everything.  Politicians have hated cash for decades – first, because it makes confiscatory taxation impossible; second because cash enables hard-to-tax underground economies; and third, because it allows consumers to pay anonymously.


Corporatist banks support government efforts toward a cashless economy because then they can earn substantial fees on all electronic transactions, and more so when the government mandates the reporting of all transactions to the IRS, and other jurisdictions that tax and collect fees or fines.  In the EU Denmark, Sweden, Greece, Italy, and France have quietly made the most headway.  Denmark has the highest tax rates in Europe and therefore hosts a booming shadow economy.  France and Italy have lowered the cash payment ban to €1,000, others are soon to follow.  In Scandinavian countries the governments are already looking at people who like to pay cash as being suspect criminals or terrorists.  Sweden will soon double down and start charging (negative) interest for keeping your money for you.  Think about it, in a cashless society you have to keep all your money on someone’s government registered server where its comings and goings can be carefully watched.  Bottom line, “If you are paying cash, something is wrong.”

Alongside this rush to comprehensive government monitored transactions is the fledgling electronic currency Bitcoin.  Bitcoin supports anonymous transactions, and it is gaining ground around the world as another convenient alternative to cash.  But governments are not far behind, since you will still need to keep you Bitcoin account with some trusted online repository, and into those, governments will sooner or later sink their hooks.

In the US banks are already filing routine SARs or Suspicious Activity Reports with the feds when you deposit or withdraw more than $5,000 in cash.  And our Treasury is preparing to stop printing $100 bills and start removing them from circulation, thereby requiring five times more room in your mattress for storing your emergency stash of cash.  It’s all done in the name of reducing crime since the C-note is the most popular bill in the world as legal and illegal tender.  But the real problem we should all become aware of is the next big step in forfeiting another layer of privacy that further reduces our freedoms.

As the aim of gun control advocates is to eliminate all civilian ownership of firearms, so is the collectivists’ aim for complete state control of all economic activity.  Making cash transactions first hard and then illegal is their easiest path outlined in such playbooks as Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness by Cass Sunstein, President Obama’s former head of his Orwellian named Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.  That agency is charged with developing and implementing ways for government to slowly but firmly manipulate or nudge American society into compliant lifestyles deemed equitable, just, and sustainable by our progressive betters.

This social experiment hearkens back to the pseudo-science of eugenics promoted by progressives a century ago to improve mankind here and in Europe.  Federal and state governments then introduced eugenics-designed programs that mandated nationwide birth control, abortion, and sterilization to unabashedly improve America’s breed.  Today for some reason union schools no longer teach this chapter of our socialist history.

In a similar vein we may look forward to a time when, through cashless transactions, governments will track all of our income and purchases.  And then using dynamic taxation, it will set prices on goods and services to automatically nudge us to how much of what we can or cannot buy with our credit and debit ‘cards’.  Life will then be much simpler – no taxes to file, fees to pay, or wrong things to buy.  It will all be managed automatically for the greater good.  So what’s not to like about such a cashless world?

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on Rebane’s Ruminations where the transcript of this commentary is posted with relevant links, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[More background on the advancing cashless world can be obtained by googling ‘sunstein, cashless’, or reading the following postings from Stratfor and Cato.]

[4mar16 update]  People all over the developed world have started stashing cash in response to more and more governments initiating negative interest rates and announcing plans to begin limiting its availability and eliminating its uses.  The 4mar16 WSJ summarizes some of the global happenings (‘The New Cash Hoarders’) –

• High denomination notes are in great demand by people from Switzerland to Japan as a store of value – “cash hoarders are responding rationally to monetary policy”;
• Sales of safes for home storage are soaring;
• Former SecTreas Larry Summers calls for a global ban on notes worth more than $100;
• Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff one ups Summers by calling for a total ban on cash so that would allow central bankers to set negative interest rates without people “bailing out into cash”;
• Cash hoarding “lets people shield themselves from monetary policies that would force their savings into weak economies that can’t attract sufficient spending or investment on their own. These economies need reforms that boost incentives to work and invest, not negative interest rates and cash limits that raid the bank accounts of law-abiding citizens.”

Cash hoarding is yet one more clear lesson on the limits of quantitative easing and other forms of Keynesian monetary policies that call for ‘pump priming’ as opposed to growing the economy through lower taxes, liberalized labor laws, freer competition, among other reforms.

A prominent footnote to these worldwide realities is the progressives' abysmal ignorance of not only economics but current events reporting such economic behavior.  Their left-leaning lamestream outlets are loath to report such failures of central planning, leading them to expose their intellectual deficits when they do run into sourcesnot among their vaunted outlets – e.g. RR – that report on such happenings.  An example appears in the comment stream below where one such worthy even goes so far as to as to be astounded that I “would write a column in 2016 that express(es) concerns regarding cash”, and calls such a report as “something from the twilight zone of the past century.”

The manufacture of such products of the progressive intellect were foreseen by Lenin a hundred years ago – “Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted.”  Under their tutelage for considerably more than four years, the Great Society schools have now given us a population that is finally ready to accept socialism about which to his followers in the west Vladimir Ilyich was unambiguously clear– “The goal of socialism is communism.”  Today we can feel the Bern.

 

Posted in , , , ,

36 responses to “Freedom in a Cashless Society (updated 4mar16)”

  1. rl crabb Avatar

    Yeah, I remember when paying for your groceries with a C-note elicited suspicious looks, but these days $100 will get you three bags of groceries. It is the new twenty.

    Like

  2. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Four bags

    Like

  3. jon smith Avatar
    jon smith

    George, you are a generation older than I, but I expect that your girls have Bitcoin accounts. I certainly do and have been using it for several years without Uncle Sam having the slightest idea regarding my transactions.

    Like

  4. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    “I certainly do and have been using it for several years without Uncle Sam having the slightest idea regarding my transactions.”
    I do hope you realize that can change in a heartbeat.
    And then what will you do?

    Like

  5. jon smith Avatar
    jon smith

    Scott- My guess is that you are over sixty years old and one of those sheep that thirty years ago bleated (and still bleat) that Apple was going to fail in a heartbeat. My assets are diversified as are my views on the world of monetary exchange. That George would write a column in 2016 that express concerns regarding cash is something from the twilight zone of the past century.

    Like

  6. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    jon smith – You guess wrong about my thinking that Apple would fail.
    I notice that you can’t refute anything George wrote but you are quick to simply throw rocks and make fun of the topic.
    You might want to make notice of a rapidly approching reality.
    http://cointelegraph.com/news/sweden-to-become-worlds-first-cashless-country
    Would you care to comment on the main point here?
    If all legal commercial transactions require electronic transfer of funds, how much freedom would be lost?
    Do you really believe the govt won’t ever be able to control all e-trade?

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 1106pm – the ignorance of liberals as to how the world works and what is happening in it is literally beyond comprehension, but fully explains their support of central planning and collectivism. jons’ 937pm about the cashless debates now ongoing in advanced economies, especially his characterization of it as “something from the twilight zone of the past century” can be viewed as Exhibit A attesting to the depth of such ignorance.

    Like

  8. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Scott, are you serious? How out of touch are you anyway? Ever worked with a crew of anarchistic geeks like the rest of us at one time or another? LOL. How can the taxman possibly control ALL e-trade when they are unable to even access the data within a single chunk of basic hardware?

    Like

  9. drivebyposter Avatar
    drivebyposter

    jon 11:20 (which sounds like a Bible verse)
    Arguing for the sake of arguing. I can’t see any suggestion here that absolutely 100% of transactions would be done via government monitored exchanges on centralized databases. There would always be a fringe set of activities via direct exchanges of property or labor (which should be taxed BTW), Bitcoin or it’s relatives, perhaps movement of precious metals in a private storage facility in Singapore, whatever….
    The whole deal is similar to the increasing ability of the government and large private parties to monitor, and more importantly parse, the communications of the public. This ability will be used to ‘manage’ the public over time to a greater degree than was formerly possible.
    This is all pretty obvious stuff and you can essentially count on it happening. I never foresaw the camel getting his nose in the tent via surveillance-based advertising, but in a modern economy dominated by BS web-based firms and Goldman Sachs, I suppose it was inevitable.
    Just remember that it’s for the children.

    Like

  10. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Jon (or jon smith, who knows) -at 11:20
    “How can the taxman possibly control ALL e-trade when they are unable to even access the data within a single chunk of basic hardware?”
    I agree that the govt will never be able to control absolutely 100% of anything and everything.
    There will always be a teeny percent out at the edge doing pretty well as they please, as long as what they please doesn’t involve owning any real property or travelling very much, or … you know – like the folks living under the bridge.
    When you mention the govt not being able to access data from a chunk of hardware, I assume you mean the current case involving the San Berdoo shooter’s Iphone.
    All of that can and probably will change. When? I don’t know, but it will.
    China is showing how govts can and will control the internet in ways that the founders of the internet claimed wouldn’t be possible.
    And remember – as Bobby Dylan sang – “to live outside the law, you must be honest…”
    But it seems very often that there is no honor among thieves. Once you put some or all of your assets into some form of illegal currency (gold, bitcoin etc) it could sorta just disappear and who ya gonna call?
    Oops.
    There are all sorts of things we used to do that today would land us in jail pronto.
    It doesn’t take an army of govt watchers to sit staring at screens any more to control the masses – ala 1984 or East Germany.
    And, as always (see drivebyposter’s last line above) all of this will come about because the masses will want it or simply acquiesce as long as they have the Kardashians to keep track of.

    Like

  11. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Can I barter my future chickens for a steak?

    Like

  12. drivebyposter Avatar
    drivebyposter

    TJ @ 7:35
    as long as you file a 1099-B

    Like

  13. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    I think some are not looking up from their keyboards long enough to realize that most of our transactions are already cashless. I see people in Starbucks paying with their special Starbucks cards either physically or on their smartphones. The IRS charges you a penalty fee if you don’t file and pay electronically. People have been writing checks for decades. I rarely use cash at the grocery store. Most of my bills are paid online.
    I would miss the $100 bill.
    Let’s go back to gold dust!

    Like

  14. George Rebane Avatar

    With regard to the topic of my commentary it is important to not confuse today’s fraction of cashless transactions with the objective of eliminating cash as legal tender for such transactions, and moreover, eliminating cash as a store of value, unit of account, and medium of exchange. These are quite different notions.

    Like

  15. Walt Avatar

    How dense can one be? A transaction isn’t done on “one chunk of hardware”.
    Your “holdings” are not on it. Even if you use an “E” bank. Think the Bitcoin is totally untraceable? Maybe today,, but tomorrow.

    Like

  16. Walt Avatar

    Now if you really want to use something that’s tough to “trace”, use gold or silver.
    a scale is all one needs.

    Like

  17. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Dr. Rebane. I am surprised you did not mention Norway. I have been following this issue you raised for months. I do not like it one bit. I am tempted to quote my dearly departed mother and say 666, but I won’t.
    “Today, there is approximately 50 billion kroner in circulation and [the country’s central bank] Norges Bank can only account for 40 percent of its use. That means that 60 percent of money usage is outside of any control. We believe that is due to under-the-table money and laundering. There are so many dangers and disadvantages associated with cash, we have concluded that it should be phased out.”
    http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2016/01/norway-wants-to-phase-out-cash.html
    Big Brother’s appetite for controlling every detail of one’s life is insatiable. Like the man who worries that his well will run dry, he draws water that will never quench his thirst, ergo Big Brother.
    Noticed little is mentioned about what happens to digital transactions when the grid goes down for long periods to time, due to either a cyber attack, sun bursts, or a nuke detonated in the atmosphere above our nation.
    Remember when Verizon went down when a car hit one measly telephone down near Lime Kiln Road? Oh, you would have thought the world ended, lol. Even the BOS got involved because of the humongous outcry due to a minor inconvenience. Or having a major snow storm knock out power for 6 days. Try using debit cards at stores….I learned then that cash is king…and cash gets you food and supplies when nothing else works.
    A man gets upset with his bank. He asks to close his account and take all the cash out. The teller…then the bank manager tells him they cannot do that, but they will be happy to transfer his funds to another bank. The man is told they can only give him a grand in cash at this moment. The man asks for and receives a bank draft issued to him, even if there is a transaction fee. The fee was waved because the man was a 30 year customer. That man was me.
    When the shit hits the fan….or if you want a couple grand in your pocket to drive around and buy a used little crankster gangster 4 banger cheapo economy car, good luck in a cashless society…not to mention getting money out of a bank. When buying a used piece of crap car from private parties, they don’t like the idea of taking a check.
    My apologies to Mr. Paul for using an antedotal example. 🙂

    Like

  18. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Is not going cashless in effect requiring every citizen to have a bank account? I know a handful of young people who do not have an account. They cash checks at the bank it was written against, albeit lately they are being told that they have to have an account there to cash even a cashiers check written against the bank and branch they are trying to get cash.
    Even old geezers have to have an account somewhere now to receive their SS checks…er…deposits. Hope their accounts are not hacked.

    Like

  19. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Walt at 9:27 – “a scale is all one needs.”
    Wasn’t there a certain gold dealer in NC a while ago that had a scale? The scale was fine, but the gold wasn’t. If gold is made illegal again, folks like that will proliferate.
    Yes, George – Brad misses the point entirely. Like most folks, I’m using electronic transfer all of the time. But I still have (and use) the hard currency option.
    It seems hard for some folks to grasp the enormous shift in the ease of control of the masses by the govt if only e-money is legal.
    Remember when we had gold certificates? Silver certificates? What was promised on the bills?
    Govt promises sure seem to come and go.
    And of course – if you like your money, you can keep your money! The govt promises it!

    Like

  20. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Why would anyone want to hold gold? In today’s connected world, it makes no sense as a source of real value. If the world’s e-commerce system blows up, you’ll have bigger problems than counting your gold bars..

    Like

  21. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Gold is always accepted as currency by all countries and most people. You have to be totally stupid “jon” to disregard that.

    Like

  22. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Scott, if you are that paranoid, you can cash out of dollars and go into pesos, or you can buy gold coins and silver dimes.
    In a cashless society you would not be able to pay people under the table who don’t want to pay income tax to Uncle Sam. You wouldn’t be able to pay cash for a gun at a gun show, or buy a semi truck full of ammo with $100 bills. Oh well, why would you want to do that anyway?
    I also take exception to the notion that gun control advocates want to take our guns away. That sentiment is the exception, not the mantra of all gun control advocates. I would prefer not to have to have government control of much of anything. But there are varying degrees of gun control, and transaction tracking that seem acceptable to me. The only thing we might disagree with it the degree of control. Does more sharing/tracking of information equal less freedom? Can you still do what you want with the e-funds? Could you trade a restored 57 Chevy for a load of drugs?

    Like

  23. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    “Gold is accepted as currency by most people?” Todd J.
    One of the dumbest comments of all time, and that’s saying quite a lot. 🙂

    Like

  24. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The ‘jon’ should go and try to explain to the Chinese why they should stop their voracious gold buys. I am sure they will follow his macro economic planning model. You can always tell when someone has no assets to manage. 😉

    Like

  25. drivebyposter Avatar
    drivebyposter

    “Does more sharing/tracking of information equal less freedom?”
    BradC
    Potentially, yes. Cash has been phased out for years, and truly large transactions (which dwarf consumer spending) haven’t involved paper or metal for quite some time, but the interest now is in removing even the possibility of anonymity. The heavy lifting, in terms of social control, is in the backend systems. People have written checks for centuries, for instance, but only in the last few decades has it been less than a huge hassle for the .gov to examine them.
    Listen, if you think that having complete surveillance of all electronic (plus most in-person) communications, combined with public visual surveillance (via cctv), combined with passive surveillance of households (drones, the infamous ‘Smart Meters’, sniffing wireless communications), combined with surveillance of 100% of economic activity, all done by higher quality AI over time, doesn’t present risks in terms of misuse, there’s nothing I can say to change your mind.
    Just think what President Trump, VP David Duke, and Attorney General Hitlers-brain-in-a-jar might do with all that information. Hopefully you’ve done nothing to displease them in any way. You voted for them didn’t you?
    Privacy will matter to the Left the moment the overall political winds shift. Good luck on unscrewing the pooch on this one.

    Like

  26. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Don, good for the Chinese buying gold. Is there something positive about the Chinese economy and government you would like to emulate?

    Like

  27. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    1229 the ‘jon’- still unarmed.

    Like

  28. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Don, wanna buy some gold coins? I’ve had about 20 of them since a kid, but are still crappy investments.
    How’d your gold do the last 5 years vs. CA muni bonds? LOL.

    Like

  29. George Rebane Avatar

    Contrary to what our liberal readers know, there were simply too many countries going toward outlawing cash to include in my short radio commentary. I included Norway (per Mr Tozer’s 937am) under “Scandinavian countries”.
    What makes all those comments about the worthlessness of gold so childish is that 1) no government believes it, their central banks and treasuries store massive amounts of the stuff, 2) gold has been the default currency for millennia and there is not a shred of evidence that it will not become so again in the shadow economies that will arise as soon as any country finally outlaws cash, and 3) all governments (as opposed to our local liberals) know that people will revert to gold once fiat money is withdrawn or made illegal, that is why they will outlaw the ownership of gold. FDR already demonstrated that in 1933 when he confiscated Americans’ gold under executive order.
    It is beyond my comprehension that people so naïve about fiscal and economic matters appear otherwise normal looking as they mingle undetected with the more normal people in the public square – what did they study and who were their teachers?
    One such pilgrim is offering to sell his gold coins. I’m interested; what are these coins and what is he asking (the price itself should be very revealing and may help recover his reputation)?

    Like

  30. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Brad C at 11:00 – “You wouldn’t be able to pay cash for a gun at a gun show, or buy a semi truck full of ammo with $100 bills. Oh well, why would you want to do that anyway?”
    Uh – so I don’t have to pay a surcharge for using a charge card and they won’t accept an out of state check?
    But maybe you like to fork over your money to banks needlessly. It’s not as if they don’t have enough already. You go, Brad!
    “I also take exception to the notion that gun control advocates want to take our guns away.”
    Only the fringe, like the NYTs
    “…and, yes, it would require Americans who own those kinds of weapons to give them up for the good of their fellow citizens.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/opinion/end-the-gun-epidemic-in-america.html?_r=0
    and
    http://www.truthandaction.org/connecticut-gun-confiscation-letters-now-confirmed-by-fox/
    and
    http://www.youngcons.com/democrats-in-georgia-introduce-bill-to-confiscate-assault-weapons/
    So take all the exception you wish, Brad.
    Meanwhile I live in reality land. The whole point of the 2nd Amendment was make sure that citizens had the right to obtain and keep weapons of self defence and to be able to resist tyranny. That’s not my interpretation, that’s the stated reason by the folks that helped to make sure we had that in writing right up front. I’m sure when the govt is done whittling down the type of guns we can own we’ll still have single shot, bolt action 22s and pump shotguns.
    Remember Al Gore the idiot and his “hunter’s rights”.
    And finally –
    “Scott, if you are that paranoid, you can cash out of dollars and go into pesos, or you can buy gold coins and silver dimes.”
    Out of facts and it’s down to name calling. OK, Brad.
    What does it say on paper money? Don’t bother, I’ll help you out, here.
    ‘This note is legal tender for all debts public and private’.
    The word ‘debt’ here is not used in the sense of paying back a loan but in the sense of any financial obligation you might have, such as paying for something you wish to buy.
    Now Brad – you get some of that cash and go to the airport and put the bills on the counter and tell them you want to buy a ticket to anywhere. Go ahead. What’s the matter, are you paranoid?

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    I draw your kind attention to this post’s 4mar16 update.

    Like

  32. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    We used to have $500, $1,000, $5,000, $10,000, and even $100,000 bills. Where was the outrage when these denominations were discontinued? If the $100 bill goes away from general circulation we will still be using the “Dollar” as our standard.
    Big Brother (BB) is here. Yesterday I saw a parking meter “maid” not chalking the tires, but entering license plate numbers into the system. Now, BB can tell where potential evil-doers were parked at a given time. I heard semi-trucks have gps enabled to allow employers to monitor location, speed, down time, etc.
    More and more people are using card readers with smart phones at craft fairs, etc. Some people are willing to pay for the convenience of not having to handle cash.
    Interesting wrinkle: at MJ dispensaries they do not usually accept debit/credit cards as national banks don’t want to run afoul of Fed drug laws. But dispensaries can have ATM machines onsite to dispense cash to pay for MJ.

    Like

  33. Bonnie McGuire Avatar

    Many years ago I read that the government plan was to eliminate cash and all transactions would be by bank cards. Doesn’t this ring a bell….totalitarian? How discouraging it’s becoming to feel like cattle, or sheep being herded to and fro by those herding (not representing) us. Anyone with half a brain regarding the history of dictators knows this mentality destroys ambition. A simple example was the gold rush era that encouraged people to seek their fortune. Even if many failed and lost everything, others created something for the benefit of all concerned. We explored and studied the history from the southwest United States to Alaska where Mark Twain waited for the boat at Dawson watching discouraged gold miners gambling away what little gold they had for their return trip home. But what impressed us most was the advanced self-sufficient technology the isolated mines had developed.
    By the way, Donald Trumps dad was one of those who went northwest during the gold rush and opened a restaurant, like our great grandmother did in Nevada.
    For example, our grandfathers mine in New Mexico. http://www.mcguiresplace.net/Stories/Mogollon
    Closer to home. John McFarland was a 49er gold miner who brought the first running water (by flume) into Placerville. In 1852 he bought 1,800 acres near the Cosumnes river (eventually totaling 2,000), where he became a successful rancher and grain farmer. He named the city of Galt after his former home town in Canada. We came into the story during April 2000 when the Sacramento County Dept. of Parks and Recreation had us saw lumber on the McFarland Ranch to be a “Living History” ranch providing a tangible way for school children and tourists to learn about farming as it was in pioneer days, and times in history that are no more. In other words…where their food comes from.
    http://www.mcguiresplace.net/McFarland%20Ranch%20Project%20At%20Galt
    Personally, from today’s trend of mentality, we’re looked upon as cattle to provide food for those who rule over us. How discouraging to freedom and ambitious people who create all the wealth those in control want for themselves.

    Like

  34. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    The Fed has been monkeying around with our currency for 150 years.
    See the Banking Acts of 1863-66
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bank_Act

    Like

  35. Lucas Fernandez Avatar
    Lucas Fernandez

    This is an very interesting read, I think we do need to take into account the unwritten rule that anything the Fed’s create private citizens will find a way around. While you take for granted the inevitability of the Fed’s learning to track bitcoin, I would argue that newer and harder to track forms of electronic payment will become available. However as in the case of Bitcoin one will have to be motivated and technically minded to use it. Those who wish to stay under the radar will, while the general, law abiding population sacrifices their privacy.

    Like

  36. George Rebane Avatar

    LucasF 808pm – Your point is well taken. By the feds’ tracking of Bitcoin I do not imply that the scenario you describe would not come true. Undoubtedly it will, thereby creating a progressive world in which the law-abiding will be denied both private transactions and bearing arms, relegating both privileges only to the purview of government and criminals.

    Like

Leave a comment