Rebane's Ruminations
November 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

We woke up to President Obama’s news conference from the G20 meeting in Turkey.  Since last Friday’s Paris attacks the calls have intensified for our Community Organizer to face the reality of radical Islam expanding (see also ‘Wake up, Mr President’).  At the news conference even lamestream reporters were asking the president pointed questions about the effectiveness of his entrenched Mideast strategy, especially the one he is executing against the Islamic State (more here).  Obama gave each question an extended answer laced with generous dollops of pabulum that informed little but effectively ran out the clock.

What we took away from the president’s answers could be easily summarized as –

1. My strategy against ISIS continues to work and I have no intention of changing it, but now I will “intensify” it.

2. I’m already doing all that my critics are suggesting, except that I will not commit more ‘boots on the ground’ to make a difference.

3. If I put 50K troops into Iraq/Syria to defeat ISIS, then I’ll have to do the same if Al Qaeda starts acting up more in places like Yemen.  And that’s not a sustainable policy.

4. What I’m doing now in the Mideast is in concord with my security team and Pentagon’s military advisers.  There are no better ideas to implement.

5. And I’ll be damned if I will use the word ‘Islam’ or ‘Islamic’ in any of these remarks, the closest you’ll get out of me is a reference to “ISIL’s caliphate”, so there.


No one called his assertion that what he does to defeat ISIS must necessarily be replicated in other places where Islamists are overturning existing governments.  No one reminded him that he has now restructured his senior military into a cadre of compliant and career concerned flag officers who understand the rules of the game as laid down by Team Obama.  (Recall it was Gen Stanley McChrystal who first told him that his Mideast policy was going off the rails.)  One only hears of the surprising number of resignations and retirements from conservative media outlets which feature articles, interviews, and commentaries by these military retirees now turned media pundits.

In reality what has happened after Obama’s premature and erroneous pullout from Iraq is a Russia and Iran ascendant, and the growing chaos we have witnessed in the Mideast and Africa.  And now add Europe with hordes of economic migrants flooding across its borders made up of Muslims of all ideological and theological stripe determined to pursue objectives that range from colonizing Europe to killing infidels in the centers of western civilization.

In response, western governments are today finally changing their minds about replicating Israel’s policy of building physical barriers on their southern borders to control free ingress (and abrogate EU’s Schengen Agreement).  Progressives went apoplectic when this was first supported on the blogosphere (including RR).  Now reason enters – better late than never.  But our crack journalists (where do they get these people?) are referring to these as “a new Iron Curtain”, apparently having no clue as to the purpose and direction of movement that communism’s Iron Curtain was supposed to implement.

While France is enraged and busy “showing no mercy to ISIL”, its ability to project force with a shadow military is practically non-existent, and will have no noticeable impact on the rampaging ragheads in Syria and Iraq (or Europe).  But France’s deployment may provide some backbone to America’s leadership from behind as it becomes the first real part of the fraudulently advertised ‘coalition’ that Obama claims to have set up in his grand strategy against an enemy he dare not name.  The only real member of that coalition is the already-there Kurdish Peshmerga, whom we grudgingly and belatedly have begun arming.

Reuel Marc Gerecht, formerly with the CIA and now senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, writes on the possibilities of expanding the west’s efforts against radical Islam that the Paris attacks may now enable.  But he too laments “President Obama’s inability to have an adult conversation about Islam’s manifest problems with modernity, which also tore Christianity apart, have kept the West’s loudest bully pulpit from provoking contentious and entirely appropriate debates among Muslims.” (more here

Finally, President Obama concluded with his grand claim that he and his team have anticipated this course and turn of events; they knew all along that there would be “good days, and bad days”, and now Paris was one of these bad days.

This reminds me of the story of the proud and bombastic 19th century Mississippi riverboat captain who was regaling his feats while conducting a tour of the wheelhouse as the boat made its way through a particularly treacherous and winding part of the river.  A visibly concerned lady asked the captain however could he with such confidence navigate his way through the half submerged trees, tricky eddies, and hull-crunching shallows visible on both sides of the steaming vessel.  Grasping the big wheel firmly with one large hand, he held out the other for all to see, and proclaimed loudly, ‘Have no concern dear lady, I know this river, its tricks, and all its sandbars like the back of me hand …’ as a loud grinding sound from below brought the big vessel to a dead stop.  With not so much as a blink, he concluded, ‘… why, there be one of them now!”

Posted in , , ,

36 responses to “Unperturbed, Obama stays the course”

  1. Tom Durkin Avatar

    My son is a high-ranking strategist in the U.S. Army. His opinion is that an invasion of Syria would only make it worse. Look what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. We cannot fight a conventional war against an unconventional enemy.

    Like

  2. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    One need only look to the recent statements from the flocks of departing defense and State employees on the subject. The universal theme is that 0 simply ignores the professionals recommendations like giving Ukraine anti tank weapons or imbedding forward air controllers with Iraqi troops and so on. What are we to expect from a hood organizer that really does think a good jobs program and a war on global warming will take care of everything isis related? Even Senator Feinstein burned him in an interview.
    They see the military as just a bunch of crackers clutching their bibles and guns.
    We can only hope for a Reagan effect with the incoming Republican President like we had after the peanut farmer. The willingness to really strike the enemy has its own unique deterrent effects and changes the shape of the battle space immediately.

    Like

  3. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Its was announced that the French selected their targets from our list of target options?!?! How is it we still have a ready list after years of 0 bombs? Just loved the report that they dropped leaflets yesterday before bombing the fuel truck park.
    Didn’t 0 previously claim we had destroyed all the oil distribution under control of the jv?

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    TomD 1223pm – I would agree with your son Mr Durkin if his assessment includes the post-invasion establishment of new governments and deportment of our forces. Both the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions were a success; we screwed up in what we attempted to do afterwards.
    When people today talk of sending in combat troops into Syria and Iraq, they intend for those troops to decimate and destroy ISIS for which there is no necessity to set up and administer a post-ISIS regime. There would be no direct invasion of Assad’s regime, save perhaps of setting up a no-fly zone and then arming and logistically supporting the non-religious Syrian revolutionaries (along with the Kurds). I agree with this strategy.
    I would also add that after knocking out ISIS, we could establish a secure stronghold in the east of Syria and maintain strike teams there that could be deployed and withdrawn on a per-mission basis for some time afterward. There would be no US involvement in setting up, let alone administering, a new regime in Damascus. But this strategy would counter balance the Russian forces now permanently set up on the Syrian seaboard. I would offer that as part of my humble Rebane Doctrine over which we can have a lively debate.

    Like

  5. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: George Rebane | 16 November 2015 at 12:48 PM
    I would agree with your son Mr Durkin if his assessment includes the post-invasion establishment of new governments and deportment of our forces. Both the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions were a success; we screwed up in what we attempted to do afterwards.

    These cultures are ungovernable by our/Western standards. That’s why removing the Husseins, the Assads, the Mubaraks is a recipe for failure.
    The best we can do is wash our hands of those cultures and people and deal with whomever finds his way to the top of the pile over there.
    Inviting them here in numbers is slow motion suicide.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    fish 103pm – Agreed Mr fish. That’s why I would not have us be involved in the replacement of the Damascus regime. That task has already been undertaken by rebelling Syrians, and they will sort things out. Our national interest there is twofold – 1) removing Syria as a base and staging area for anti-western ragheads, and 2) thwarting Iran’s incipient hegemony in the Mideast to include Syria and Iraq. There the balance of power should be maintained between Turkey and Iran for as long as possible given that Turkey is creeping toward a theocracy. Were Turkey to resume its model secular Islamic stance, then we should favor Turkey as the Mideast hegemon that would also be a strong bulwark against Russia’s current southern expansion.

    Like

  7. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    That 0 calls it un-American to refuse the untraceable jihadis US residence at the same time his state dept. is seriously claiming that Christians in ISIS territory are not subject to genocide is very telling. So the Christians do not get recognized as a priority refugee status. Can someone send them the jihadi tube video link and a few pictures of the mass graves please? 0 makes it clear who he thinks should be the beneficiary of refugee status and they are not our friends and mean us harm. I agree the Kurds would (Turkey’s sensibilities notwithstanding)do just fine running that corner of Syria as a blended protection zone. With our air cover and adequate weapon supplies as a basic requirement.

    Like

  8. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Brit PM Cameron today- It is not good enough to simply say Islam is a religion of peace and then to deny any connection between the religion of islam and the extremists. Why? Because the extremists self identify as muslims. Brittan must show the same resolve it displayed against Hitler in the blitz in order to defeat the threat from isis.’ Hello, 0? Are you listening to our NATO allies yet? No. Didn’t think so.

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    It’s Great Britain, Don. Sorry to be the spelling nanny today, Kesti has taken an extended powder.
    If even 1% of the refugees from Syria and environs are ISIS & Company, the West is in for a ride.

    Like

  10. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Yes it is, friggin auto spell check!

    Like

  11. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    I prefer Islamic cult. It differentiates between the bearded whack jobs and the 99.9% of Muslims who just happen to share the same nominal religion. David Koresh Branch Davidians are an example of a splinter cult of Christianity. I am sure the vast majority of Adventists and other Christians do not subscribe to Davidian beliefs or how Koresh interpreted them and would resent being lumped in with them. And it was not Christians who put an end to Koresh, it was a national police force (staffed, I assume for the most part, by Christians).
    One of the many problems in the Mid-East is that there seems to be a lack of law enforcement that is not corrupt (and/or not afraid of ISIS gangland style retaliation).

    Like

  12. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    They sure meet the definition of a murderous death cult (89 virgins and all that for martyrs). Islamic terrorist cult, cult of terrorist muslims or any permutation works.

    Like

  13. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    What does the terrorist chick get when headed to heaven?

    Like

  14. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    89 virgins!

    Like

  15. George Rebane Avatar

    “Cult”??!! I invite readers to look up its definition and then compare it to the organizations, societies, and even countries that share a version of Islam which calls for the destruction of the US and western civilization as abominations in the eyes of God.
    Comparing ISIS to Branch Davidians who only wanted to be left alone is beyond delusional.
    Tens of thousands of ISIS members (men, women, children) and millions of Iranians (and Saudi Wahabis and Afghani Talibans and …) have the same objectives. ISIS is yet dispersed enough to be able to attack under its own name and banner; Iran being an established nation with established borders and vulnerable infrastructure cannot. So Iran does the same amount of killing, but only through the proxies that it funds and supplies. Iran is not a cult, but a devoted practitioner of Islam as it and many other millions of Muslims understand it.

    Like

  16. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Delusional, not. One percent of a billion is 10 million and I don’t believe there are 10 million ragheads heading for the USA (or anywhere else) so that means that more than 99% of Muslims are not out for infidel blood.
    I will stand with ‘cult’.

    Like

  17. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC 520pm – You are making up definitions for words, and also putting words into people’s mouths. You are free to do the former at any time, just share your definitions. But when you assume both sides of a conversation claiming an absent person is taking part, then you are on your own. No one claimed there are 10M ragheads heading for the US. But you can be certain there would be considerably more than 10M Muslims headed here were we to open the gates.

    Like

  18. Walt Avatar

    Brad may want to consider that in today’s day and age, it’s the radical minority
    that is making the changes (for better or worse). “The squeaky wheel gets the grease”.
    From the under educated burger flipper demanding 15 bucks and hour, ( and now getting it)
    To the lunatic spoiled brat at some collage.(who believes that some wealth distributor passed them over and gave their cut to the likes of Trump.)
    Brad. Back at our own revolution time, it was only 14% of the population that kicked King George’s boys back across the pond. The rest sat it out, and let the chips fall where they may.
    We have too many pacifists that are willing to give the ragheads what they want.
    Europe is already caving in places. Sharia law has been implemented in many places where the Muslim population are the majority.
    More then a few demand it here. You think that would be a great idea? I don’t.
    With “their law”,, it’s OK to rape little kids. It’s OK to kill a family member if they somehow disgraced the family. It would be OK (in their law) to kill you, if you didn’t subscribe to their beliefs.
    So how far do you want the camel’s nose to go under OUR tent?

    Like

  19. Walt Avatar

    And here is the spawn of “O” and their answer to getting one upped by ISIS.
    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/16/report-black-lives-matter-protesters-assault-students-dartmouth-hurl-racial-epithets-f-filthy-white-fs/
    A hate crime that will go unpunished.

    Like

  20. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    I prefer to use the noun Islam. Islam is a political, cultural, legal, and social system. Emphasis on political and legal systems. Islam’s adherents are Muslims. When I say Islamic terrorist, I am talking about and meaning exactly that.
    A cult exists in a closed system and does not seek to force all the inhabinitants of Earth to convert to their political, legal, cultural, and religious co-mingled system.
    Well, looks like my gal is the only lefty out there that really really wants to bomb them (with proper notice, of course). Yes, she still bristles with the term “Radical Islamic Terrorist”, but I bet she calls it “war” someday soon if she hasn’t already. Oh my, if they are not Radical Islamic Terrorists, maybe they are Moderate Islamic Terrorists.

    Like

  21. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Didn’t they report the student leader, president? was from an extremely wealthy family worth 20 Millions? He had to back off some of the most incendiary hyperbole since it was bullshit. Who ever sees the page 3 retraction or refutation of a page 1 slanted story? The real 0 administration issue is they can not recognize the real threats to the future of our children. Do they care about American children at all?

    Like

  22. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    No poop swastikas, no one shouting the “N” word. It is all contrived. Pretty soon these idiots will be shooting. Mark my words. But these little babies have created their “safe zones”. I wonder if ISIL will honor them?

    Like

  23. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Todd, of course ISIL will honor safe baby cribs…..er….safe zones. That is a Big 10-4, as long as there are no infidels within the safe zones. Odd, we have two totalitarian movements flexing their pecs at the same time. Both are against free speech, intolerate of dissentient views, and boy are they both pissed. Now, what can we learn from ISIL and American college campuses?? Hmmmm?

    Like

  24. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Unperturbed, Obama stays the course. Well, I have always liked Di-Fi’s independent side, at least when it comes to affairs overseas.
    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/feinstein-contradicts-obama-isis-is-not-contained-its-expanding/

    Like

  25. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Walt, I find it pretty ironic that you refer to “undereducated” people.
    I’d bet you a dollar 99.9% of them could spell “college” and “area”.

    Like

  26. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    The POS aka the’jon’ in its abject failure on any real world issue brings that giggly gem forward. It would seem the ‘jon’ is a compellation of the usual subjects.

    Like

  27. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Jon step away from the vodka, there you go again. Walt is much more educated than you. You have no common sense.

    Like

  28. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Boy, this Paris attack is causing waves. The policy of containment is being replaced with the policy of annihilation across peaceful Green Party Europe. Belgium to close certain mosques, Poland chomping at the bit to fight with France, Russian to send 150,000 troops to Syria to wipe out those responsible for downing their commercial aircraft, and suddenly the demands and hissy fits being thrown by refugees waiting in lines demanding this and that are no longer being taken as a urgent matter to rush over and make them happy. Nope, you can wait or go home. Pasta tonight or go hungry.
    The backlash is getting a bit extreme, with some European bloggers advocating gassing all Muslims in the chambers like the Nazis gassed the Jews. People are pissed and meanie Hungary is saying “I told ya so”. In fact, thousands in Europe are echoing “I told ya so.” as they suddenly realize fences with razor wire and walls actually work to define borders.
    Even this group, which normally sticks it to the Man and his evil geopolitical imperialism, is going after ISIS, aka, Syrian ragheads.
    http://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/1.686424?utm_source=paid-outbrain&utm_medium=desktop&utm_content=htzcom-desktop-paid-outbrain&utm_campaign=article-before-promotions-page

    Like

  29. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    In other news…heck, there is no other news until the FBI makes a decision to forward criminal charges against Hillary (or more likely her aides and sacrificial lambs) to Justice, so we are stuck with containment of radical Islamic terrorists.
    http://patriotpost.us/posts/38931
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=863805320404645&set=p.863805320404645&type=3&theater

    Like

  30. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    cult
    kəlt/Submit
    noun
    a system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a particular figure or object.
    “the cult of St. Olaf”
    a relatively small group of people having religious beliefs or practices regarded by others as strange or sinister.
    “a network of Satan-worshiping cults”
    synonyms: sect, denomination, group, movement, church, persuasion, body, faction
    “a religious cult”
    a misplaced or excessive admiration for a particular person or thing.
    “a cult of personality surrounding the leaders”
    synonyms: obsession with, fixation on, mania for, passion for, idolization of, devotion to, worship of, veneration of
    “the cult of eternal youth in Hollywood”
    See the 2nd definition.
    The 10,000,000 figure I threw out there was to illustrate just how insignificant a minority of the Muslim “beliebers” ISIL actually is. Even if ISIL were 100,000 strong, they would represent only 0.01% of the 1 Billion+ Muslim practioners.

    Like

  31. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Come on now Brad. All it takes is one you know… Any potential .0001% of our tiny trickle of Syrian refugees being potential ISIS converts at some point in the future is a lot more scary than the home-grown full blooded, mostly white American terrorists committing mass murder against innocents every few months in America. Don’t you get it?

    Like

  32. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC 1105am – I don’t think your proportionality argument will really fly in how all the rest of us would use the appellation ‘cult’. According to you then there are tens/hundreds of Christian denominations that should be called cults when their numbers are divided by the total Christians in the world. And that “relatively small” definition simply will not wash. See this for numerical examples –
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations_by_number_of_members
    Moreover, the number of Muslims who wish us harm and are willing to sacrifice their all to harm is already sufficiently high to have changed our open western society over the last twenty years. And this will become more evident as they see people in cohorts like yours publish repentant apologetics.

    Like

  33. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    George, so I guess you will cower in mortal fear the rest of your days on earth?
    Wow, what a way to live life.
    Muslims aren’t going to disappear here, or anywhere else in the world. Short of extermination of an entire religion, or Manzanar style camps being re-established in every Western nation on earth, not sure what your ideas might be to contain and control nearly 2 billion human beings. But I’m sure the chicken-hawks envision another future scene with a smiling conservatarian President posing with MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banners surrounding him.

    Like

  34. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “Jon” sure writes like Michael P. Anderson today.
    “Jon”, do you lock your door at night? Is it because you are cowering in fear, or because you think it a reasonable precaution?

    Like

  35. George Rebane Avatar

    Jon 140pm – Another revealing non sequitur of logic here – where did “cower in mortal fear” come from?? When the radical Islamist threat really makes itself known in the US – and they mean to make it so – we will put in place appropriate controls to defend ourselves. To think that we will live in perpetuum cowering in mortal fear is ludicrous – Americans don’t do that, especially armed Americans. Over time the ‘good Muslims’ will demonstrate their assimilation and acceptance of our culture as they mature their own religion into a real religion of peace. But that’s a bit down the road, and made more so by people who really do want to cower in mortal fear instead of responding to the attacks as they come.

    Like

  36. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “Islam” as a word in Arabic just means submission or surrender. Many Moslems in the West are going to have a problem in the future if they don’t come to the same conclusion as the 39% of American Moslems who believe US law should supersede Sharia.
    I’ve no problem with two American Moslems choosing to submit to a Sharia arbitration but civil courts must always be available by demand of either party and criminal actions will always belong to the police and state and federal courts.
    On a perhaps not totally separate matter, Obama’s last year is said to be focused on gun owner control… I’m not too sure the events at some gun free zones in Oregon and Paris are playing out the way he might want.

    Like

Leave a comment