Rebane's Ruminations
July 2015
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

 

George Rebane

Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez murdered four US Marines in Chattanooga before dying in a gunfight with police.  The FBI immediately took charge of the investigation, discovered some culpatory tweets from unknown locations, and briefed the President.  Our president then assumed his long-established stance of immediate amelioration by identifying this obvious raghead as just a “lone gunman” about whom there is an ongoing federal investigation.  The words ‘radical Islam’ again never left his lips, nor were any obvious dots connected to let the nation know that our law enforcement is not as dense about what is happening in the world as is the White House.  In fact, more astute commentators this afternoon are correctly concluding that Obama did everything he could to “disconnect the dots.”

Contributing to the President’s pabulum was Ray Mabus, the U.S. Navy secretary, who called the shootings “both devastating and senseless.”  Senseless??!!  Again one more administration official from another planet.  When considered from the viewpoint of organizations like ISIS or Al-Qaida, these long-promised attacks make all the sense in the world.  Yet the administration disconnects another set of dots with inane statements like this.  At least he got the ‘devastating’ part right.

What surprised me most was the Chattanooga mayor telling the nation that he “was surprised” that such an attack could have happened.  Where in hell has he been?  Even those poor souls who could not add two and two have been told from the highest law enforcement levels that murderous radical Muslims are living among us; that we should expect such lone wolf attacks whether directed from overseas or self-motivated.  Polling America’s Muslims has revealed that hundreds of thousands of so-called moderate Muslims believe perpetrating violence in America to achieve Islamic ends is fully justified. (more here)  Abdulazeez was by no means the first moderate Muslim turned murderous Islamist within our borders, and you can bet the ranch that he will not be the last.

As a footnote, it also turned out that the feds’ pronouncement of the existence of ‘no credible threat’ surrounding the July 4th holiday was a lie (aka 'untruth') as reported by Catherine Herridge chief Intelligence Correspondent of Fox News.  Therefore such statements in the future will have about as much credibility as Hillary describing the disposition of her emails.  But the credibility we now seek is from the real moderate Muslim communities in America rising up with one strong unassailable voice to denounce not only the latest raghead, but also that interpretation of Islam that gives rise to his ilk.  And some better polling results would be much appreciated.

[17jul15 update]  This update is offered as a public service to the FBI and other federal agencies currently confounded by and busy attempting to determine the motive that Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez had for his 16jul15 attacks in Chattanooga.  While their claims of being puzzled about such things are remarkable in themselves, their mischaracterization of this radical Muslim is even more disturbing.

Let’s clear up the motive first.  Abdulazeez launched his attack to make existential the longstanding threats of international Islamic jihadists like ISIS and Al-Qaeda to demonstrate that Islam’s ability to project terror knows no bounds.  They and their indigenous adherents are already in place everywhere, and there is nowhere – especially in the very heart of the Great Satan – that they cannot strike to kill the infidel and sow fear into the hearts of those who would resist the spread of Islam as Allah has commanded.

And please don’t confuse motive with the exact nature of the relationship(s) Abdulazeez would have had with various overseas sponsors of Islamic terror.  That is a wholly separate area of investigation.  The thing to always remember is that such terrorists can arise from the midst of our moderate Muslim communities, unknown and unannounced to the best of our intelligence efforts to predict and interdict such attacks.  One-way communications from terrorist websites to resident Muslims who are psychologically and spiritually prepared is all that is necessary and sufficient to carry out, continue, and expand such attacks indefinitely.

Also, you folks seem not to know with whom you are dealing, especially those of you high up in the ranks of law enforcement and counter-terrorist agencies.  In front of cameras you sound like know-nothing politicians when you describe people like Mr Abdulazeez as being a “coward” or “cowardly”.  Given Islam’s perspective of western civilization as interpreted within their belief system, Abdulazeez was anything but a coward.  This young man, raised and educated in America, concluded on his own to sacrifice his life for his god and civilization to perform what he knew to be a limited yet very symbolic act that would unambiguously communicate the success and dedication of Islam in striking at the heart of its greatest enemy.  He knew his sacrifice would inspire thousands of like-minded Muslims who daily contemplate how best to offer their own contribution to the spread of Islam.  To those thousands, both here and worldwide, his was an act of supreme and glorious sacrifice to be admired and imitated.

(And we on our side abet and invite more such sacrifices as we writhe in our various attempts to mollify Islam, especially in America.  An example and object of such contempt to the zealous jihadists is the mayor of Seattle who is seeking ways – fasten seat belts – to facilitate the influx of Sharia law-abiding Muslims into the greater Seattle area by finding ways they can finance home purchases without having to pay the interest so loathsome to Islam’s true believers (more here).  Is this elected public official addled, or does he represent a broader sensibility of progressives working to transform America?)

[21jul15 update]  It's not clear whether the FBI peeked at the above correct answer, but today they announced that Abdulazeez's murderous rampage was indeed an act of terror.  Now you, I, and at least another 100M American's knew that within the hour of the news report.  But when government competence is considered, then we can rejoice that it took only a week for them to reach the conclusion.  And that, for some mysterious reason, then allowed the White House to fly its flag at half staff.  Go figger.

Posted in , ,

227 responses to “Another Moderate Muslim turns Radical Raghead (updated 21jul15)”

  1. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    “The states were free to establish an official religion.”
    Under the establishment clause which prohibits the favoring of one religion over another states would not be free to establish an official religion.

    Like

  2. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    A person doesn’t have to go any further than the first treaty of the US to understand that the US is not a Christian nation. They did not want the government they set up to be corrupted by organized religion and they didn’t want organized religion to be corrupted by government.

    Like

  3. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Scott,
    Are you trying to make a 10th amendment argument for establishing an official religion?

    Like

  4. joe smith Avatar
    joe smith

    Scott (and Todd) just exactly what do you NOT understand about the separation of church and state?? Coming of age in Ireland I have have a VERY distinct notion of the separation that you good old boys born and bred within the confines of a white America have nary a clue. Put a sock in it until you have actually experienced the world view. If ignorance is bliss, you must be some happy fellows indeed.

    Like

  5. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    “Are you trying to make a 10th amendment argument for establishing an official religion?”
    No – are you trying to make haberdashery a mandatory profession?
    “Scott (and Todd) just exactly what do you NOT understand about the separation of church and state??”
    I dunno – probably nothing. Are you referring to the 1st amendment?
    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…” – please point out where this separation thingie is.

    Like

  6. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    joe smith | 19 July 2015 at 09:31 PM
    So let me get this straight. You came of age in Ireland where there is nary a person of a color other than white and say “white America”? Are you daft? America is all races on the planet under one roof here you cracker. Besides, White Irish plantation owners were into slavery for a long time in the south and they were democrats. Jeeze! What a load you dump Joe Smith,
    Regarding history and the US Constitution. You have no idea what the “eperation” means or where it comes from. Go find out, then slap yourself more silly than you are.

    Like

  7. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Scott, the term “separation of church and state” first hit the news in the 1800’s via a Supreme Court ruling. The phrase cannot be found in the founding documents.

    Like

  8. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Darn it BillT, we wanted the lib JoeS to go find it. LOL!

    Like

  9. joe smith Avatar
    joe smith

    Bill 728 and Todd-
    The term Separation of Church and State was first voiced in a speech by Jefferson in 1802 that was reprinted in a local newspaper. Some 80 years LATER the Supreme Court cited his words and stated that they were an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the First Amendment. If you are going to pretend to be factual, at least use facts.

    Like

  10. George Rebane Avatar

    Re ‘Separation of Church and State’ – there are many aspects to this phrase with regard to the Constitution and constitutional governance. The discussion above is all over the map ranging from who said what to the legality of displaying religious symbols and texts on public buildings and property. I wish the discussants would focus on one aspect so that the boundaries of their beliefs can at least be outlined.
    One thing is clear from the physical evidence available in every city and town across the land – our ancestors did not consider the expressions of any one faith on public property to be the joining of church and state. But they did consider it an expression of the people’s religion(s) regarding justice, morality, law, etc that intersected with government. And by doing so, it legitimized government and created a more intimate relationship between government and the governed.
    Today the expunging of religious symbols and words from public properties abets the view that government is ‘them over us’ instead of it being the beneficial organization of ‘us’ to handle our collective cares.

    Like

  11. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    George, you’re certainly welcome to question the mayor of Seattle about any proposal specific to Muslim residents, but I would think you would tend to emulate the economic powerhouse they have going up there. The city and environs are booming with economic growth. Rather than mocking one proposal, I would more be interested in finding out their secret to success.
    I’m sitting back in amazement at the rest of the dog whistle commentary on this thread. Its pretty clear many of you would prefer a Christian Theocracy within these borders.

    Like

  12. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    More comic stylings from the ‘jon @1010- Trying to give the socialists in Seattle credit for Boeing and Microsoft is a big joke and there you go again with more straw man arguments with the Christian theocracy that no one here brought up other than you. I think the EPA needs to regulate your carbon output considering the amount of hot air you blow that has nothing to add or is related to the topics.

    Like

  13. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    joe smith | 20 July 2015 at 09:46 AM
    You obviously have no knowledge on the origin of the term “separation of church and state” JoeS. It was in a letter from Jefferson to a Church. You have to be a public school graduate. There is no words like that in the Constitution. It amazes me the liberal brain thinks the Federalist Papers mean nothing yet when it comes to a issue they like, then by all means they mean what they say. Being a Irishman as you said, my guess is it is not your fault that you are ignorant, so I will overlook the lack of knowledge you possess. I would surmise your claiming I don’t know about the First Amendment scope is just snark.
    However, I would surmise you don’t feel the same about the Second Amendment reagrding “arms” right?

    Like

  14. George Rebane Avatar

    JoeS 946am – It’s hard for me to conceive the way you have ordered the world in your mind. As DonB 1213pm observes, it’s a stretch to attribute the capitalistic success of the Puget Sound area to socialists. Due to the region’s recent leftward course, companies (e.g. Boeing) are locating their headquarters and expansions out of state. And searching for future economic growth through the attraction of Sharia-observing Muslims boggles the mind – but, of course, not yours.
    And inducing that my remarks represent yearnings for a Christian theocracy is so far beyond the pale that it truly starts bringing out the humor in these exchanges. Thanks again for illustrating that there is no middle ground left between our polarized ideologies. Perhaps a more fruitful discourse would be an attempt to identify how such widely different belief systems can beneficially coexist within common national boundaries.

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Why are we even discussing church and state when the topic is moderate Muslim runs a mock, turns into raghead?? Simple. It’s because of the Muslim problem. With all the churches and places of worship representing countless sects, groups, organizations, and associations of every imaginable belief from the 4 Corners of the globe, why do we have just one religion pushing the envelop??? Just one. We are not talking about the Quakers or Shakers here.
    The Muslim problem is interesting because it pushes the limits of most people’s tolerance level and stretches the limits of the Bill of Rights. Just one religion.
    About the only poll I read of American Muslims was about 6 months or so ago. 60% of the American Muslims polled said they want Shira Law to be the law of the land.
    Now, what do we do with that???????????

    Like

  16. George Rebane Avatar

    BillT 227pm – Mr Tozer, please tell me that your memory is in much better shape than that. Unless you were sleep-reading ‘The Tangled Threads of Our Times’, you were exposed to a more recent poll right here under which you even recorded some enthusiastic repartees 😉
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2015/06/the-tangled-threads-of-our-times.html

    Like

  17. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Sorry good doc. I thought that thread was about liberal/progressive/totalatarian forms of iron fisted government worship. Now I see you were talking about ragheads, not far left purple lefties. It”s sooooooooooooo hard to tell them apart.
    But, yes, I am busted. I only glanced at that former thread to see the pictures.

    Like

  18. Bonnie McGuire Avatar

    You’re so right Scott. The environmental movement that took over our government is the ancient religion of Gaia….Mother Nature worship. Look out! You’re dealing with survival of the fittest. A violent environment where the dumb and weak are preyed upon by cunning predators. Our government has made it an incredibly powerful and rich dictator. That’s why our Founders wanted no state church because they saw what happened to people in Europe because of the collusion between state church….the harlot described in Revelations. Masonry came into being because if you weren’t a member of the state church you couldn’t get a job. As for our Constitution be inspired by Christianity….most early Americans learned to read using the Bible. Jefferson (and others) liked Jesus teaching, so published the Jefferson Bible containing only what Jesus taught….Obviously His teachings and history influenced writing our Constitutions concerns over human rights. Pretty obvious if you study what they went
    through putting it together.

    Like

  19. joe smith Avatar
    joe smith

    Ahh yes, Bonnie being Bonnie once again. “Masonry came into being because if you weren’t a member of the church state you couldn’t get a job”. Talk about a deep understanding of masons!!! Did you learn this from that set of “UN guide books” you so like to quote, but of which can never seem to find a source? You know absolutely NOTHING about Freemasonry. What you think you know is wrong.
    You are confusing the hodgepodge of Christian religions with the teachings of Jesus. Jefferson’s paradigm was shaped by Jesus Christ and NOT Christianity – that is precisely why he made his own bible.

    Like

  20. Walt Avatar

    Are you a Mason Joe?

    Like

  21. joe smith Avatar
    joe smith

    Walt. Compass me a riddle.

    Like

  22. Walt Avatar

    A simple yes or no will do. ( BTW,, Pops was a Potentate.)
    Bonnie is right.
    Being a Freemason gets you places you otherwise would never get to. Be it a job or politics.
    Nope,, not playing the secret handshake game with you.

    Like

  23. Bonnie McGuire Avatar

    Joe Smith…My Uncle was a Mason. He told me it was the first labor Union in Europe and why. As for my views on religion. I studied many, and found Christ’s teachings magnificent if you’re looking for a better life. And yes most who love his teachings aren’t motivated by the rituals, interpretations and doctrines of men. However, the Church lifts the consciousness and teaches self discipline. The choice is individual, and so are the consequences. http://www.mcguiresplace.net/Stories/The%20King%20James%20Bible/

    Like

  24. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Guess the FBI didn’t all get the message as FBI agent Ed Reinhold told reporters this morning that its too soon to tell if the scum bag had been radicalized and scolded the press ‘to be responsible when talking about the case and not to jump to conclusions about what happened.’

    Like

  25. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Bob Hobert | 23 July 2015 at 08:08 AM
    Expect some variation of the “No True Scotsman” argument shortly Bob.

    Like

  26. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    BobH 808am – Lamestream outlets cover up illegal alien crimes. Unfortunately BenE is therefore misinformed.

    Like

Leave a comment