Rebane's Ruminations
June 2015
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[I am writing this moments from when the earth's northern hemisphere tilts maximally in its summer nod to the sun.  And it's also Father's Day, a day when our young'uns take notice and tell us they really did appreciate our being around as they were growing up.  I've always thought of Father's Day as being a consolation prize bestowed so as not to leave the blatant worship of mothers and Motherhood in too stark of a contrast on the calendar of annual family observances – giving the old man a nod now and then goes a long way to complete the picture.  I invite readers to share a paragraph or two about how their own dads bent the twigs of trees now grown – I'll start.

My own dad was his parents' firstborn on the family farm, soon followed by a brother and sister.  His dad (after whom I am named) was a gruff man with little education and a lot of energy and courage – a veteran of both the Russo-Japanese War and the Estonian Revolution.  The farm was supposed to go to my dad, but he had been drafted, served in the Estonian Army's Signal Corps, seen the bright city lights, and was discharged as a skilled journeyman electrician.  No farm life for this son of the sod.

With a friend he started an electrical contracting business in Viljandi, married mom, and was surprised when I came soon after Hitler and Stalin had started dividing up Europe.  My dad's wisdom, recounted elsewhere in these pages, saved our collective hind ends when he got us out of Estonia before the Red Army invaded.  During the war he was a hero many times over, saving us and others to enjoy our lives in post-war displaced persons camps and then emigrate to freedom.

My dad knew how to do everything – he was also an artist and artisan, but that's another story.  The Rebanes climbed the economic ladder by working any and all kinds of jobs available, and buying and rebuilding fixer-upper homes.  As a consequence my youth was filled with lots of work after school – that was not unusual, in those times it was the norm.  Starting at the age of 11, my dad taught me to do everything needed to build a house.  He was just following in his dad's footsteps, and let me know that I was starting out a little late.  On the farm he already knew all the stuff I was just learning.  Imparting gratuitous self-esteem was not his strong suit.  By the time I was fourteen, dad had taught me to build an entire house from laying the foundation, through framing, roofing, drywall, electricity, plumbing, and painting.  My proudest moments were when he came home from work, looked over a piece of work I had done after school, and said "That'll do." before laying out tomorrow's jobs.  And then after mom (who also worked) had cleared supper, dad would get to work on the next building task.  I grew up in a construction zone.

But my dad never thought for a moment that I would follow in his footsteps, he made sure my Job One was getting an education because I would be going to college, the first in our family to do so.  After getting some years under my belt I would look back and see that everything he did was to enable me to have a better life than he and mom did.  And then, without first checking with me, he died when I was 31.  He left too early, and I still miss him.  gjr]

Posted in ,

220 responses to “Sandbox – 21jun15”

  1. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Fish 6:59 AM
    That is the question and the answer is of course YES> The left is in bed with the government agencies who then send them grants worth billions and on on the merry-go-round. The taxpayers get hosed the place is going to hell. But NRDC etal get their pie of the pie.

    Like

  2. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 25 June 2015 at 07:06 AM
    I’m sure that “True Believer”™ approves.

    Like

  3. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I wonder how the “true believers” Iphones will get charged when they shut down all the coal plants. Revolution!

    Like

  4. fish Avatar
    fish

    SCOTUS decisions flowing like water.
    Looks like Steve will be seeing forced demographic changes in Truckee….I’m sure he approves.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-upholds-key-tool-used-by-obama-administration-to-fight-housing-biasw/2015/06/25/5851fa2a-1b43-11e5-bed8-1093ee58dad0_story.html
    …and in the “the law is what we say it is not what legislators, regulators, and bureaucrats actually write down” category looks like federal Obamacare subsidies will continue to flow to states without state plans.
    …and the left wonders why we aren’t similarly awed by the magnificence of government?!

    Like

  5. fish Avatar
    fish

    ‘In this instance, the context and structure of the Act compel us to depart from what would otherwise be the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase’…

    …for only they possess the power of divination…to know the mind of god.
    There is a reason that these guys wear priestly garments.

    Like

  6. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I knew the SCOTUS would do this. They are part of the Government and protect it at all costs. Roberts is the turn coat like Earl Warren was. We can expect more government hegemony and less individual rights as the SCOTUS make up from whole cloth this stuff. We must disavow Marbury v Madison and return the SCOTUS to a lesser role as envisioned by the Founders. It will get worse and worse and we see why no one believes these are pointy heads are smart. They are just bureaucrats. God help the country.
    We are all just stupid in their eyes. The words really don’t say what they say and so GRUBER wins! And he was right! Only he was right about issue as SCOTUS is now the panel of derision.

    Like

  7. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    How’d you like to be sitting round the dinner table at the Scalia house tonight? LOL.

    Like

  8. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Jon | 25 June 2015 at 07:51 AM
    One of the perks of being old and protected from from most government diktats.
    I’m sure he’ll be sharing a wry chuckle at his congress, his fellow justices and the citizenry in general.

    Like

  9. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Jeff Pelline | 25 June 2015 at 07:56 AM
    Other than your natural inclination to cause local seismic disturbances in the Nevada City area by “Rolling on floor, laughing out loud” why are you chuckling at this mornings events?

    Like

  10. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The progressive knee jerk ad hominems never stop. They’re not my cup of tea but one only needs to peruse the website to find evidence the “Center for Security Policy” is anything but a “right wing wacko tank. Planet Paranoia. Its the modern version of the Russians are Coming, The Russians are Coming”. They’re a serious group.
    It is a right wing 501c3 thinktank lauded by the likes of Ronald Reagan. Honest and serious actors on the stage (not including “Jon”) would take what that Center has written and attack that critically rather than just pointing and issuing a guttural scream ala Invasion of the Body Snatchers.

    Like

  11. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “I only speak for myself Kesti, why do you ask?” -Todd
    Because you used the royal “We” which indicates you were speaking for all, and I’m quite sure that was not the case. Kesti was spot on.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Actually I thought the SCOTUS made themselves irrelevant when they tossed Prop 187 out. So for me this is not a surprise. They don’t care what the people pass as voters, they don’t care what the State’s desire and now they can’t even follow the law they swore to uphold. The “plain reading” of a word or phrases is what they are taught. That is no longer the case. So, anyone expecting justice from the SCOTUS new lib majority, good luck.
    Also, I never cared for the California Supremes either. When I was active in politics and we had Republican governors, they appointes “conservative” justices. Well, they never saw a property rights case they wouldn’t screw the property owner over for. They all become bureaucrats.

    Like

  13. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I love when people correct me. LOL!

    Like

  14. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Somewhere in the recent past I suggested the SCOTUS vote would be 5-4 tanking Obamacare or 6-3 upholding it, with Roberts writing the opinion which is the Chief’s prerogative . Roberts would have voted to tank, but by siding with the five who formed the majority he could limit the damage.
    Elections mean things and one of the most lasting acts of a president is the makeup of the SCOTUS.

    Like

  15. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Todd,
    “We must disavow Marbury v Madison and return the SCOTUS to a lesser role as envisioned by the Founders.”
    I agree.

    Like

  16. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Gregory | 25 June 2015 at 08:17 AM
    I’m looking forward to years of entertainment resulting from this!

    Like

  17. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Well if the Republicans can use this decision to take the White House, perhaps things may change. But I have no confidence that would be the case. I saw the people running and winning office become part of the bureaucracy rather than what I believes was the purpose of elections. So, all this is just hooey. The American people are not interested in “nuance” decisions. One only needs to read the SCOTUS decision on “wetlands” from last decade to see how the bureaucracy twists things to maintain the status quo and their power.
    The SCOTUS is making law and that was supposed to be the venue of the Legislature or the people. The slippery slope is occupied.

    Like

  18. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Ben Emery, welcome aboard.

    Like

  19. Barry Pruett Avatar

    Todd:
    “We must disavow Marbury v. Madison and return the SCOTUS to a lesser role as envisioned by the Founders.” I think that John Roberts agrees with you.
    Honestly, the Supreme Court should be finding paths that uphold legislation from the People (by and through our elected representatives). It is very clear that both Roberts and Kennedy are of this same school of thought. Whether or not Obamacare should exist is a political decision and not really a decision for the Court.
    That said, tomorrow will be more interesting in connection with redistricting and same-sex marriage.

    Like

  20. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Barry, as an attorney are you not taught that words mean what they say? That is apparently not the case with Roberts. Twice he has created law and that is not how things were set up. Common people read the Gruberized wording as plain language, so if Roberts and Kennedy wanted to be true legal people they would have read the language as the common folks do. Oh, and thirty plus states!

    Like

  21. Barry Pruett Avatar

    First, Obamacare is a tax. That is pretty clear.
    Second, and if the president is expanding upon the law and not executing the laws as written, the People cannot rely on the Court all of the time. Congress can impeach the president, but because Gingrich et al decided to try to impeach Clinton for a stain on a blue dress, the American public is very jaded about such constitutional provision.
    I like that stayed out of it. I wish that they would do that more often.

    Like

  22. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Todd,
    Been on board for a long time.
    Barry,
    They were very careful in the wording of this law. I am glad the court upheld the law in the case.

    Like

  23. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Barry who stayed out of what?

    Like

  24. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Ben Emery | 25 June 2015 at 08:57 AM
    Indeed! Upholding the will of the masses. Just like they will do with the TPP.

    Like

  25. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Good for SCOTUS in interpreting the meaning of the words. I think we all agree that with the billions of words contained in historic legislation, mistakes are made. It finally became clear to Roberts and Kennedy that without the Federal exchange the entire financial structure of the ACA would have imploded. Of course that was not the intent of Congress.
    Amazingly John Boehner came out this morning and doubled down on the Republican desire to keep fighting this law. The guy is delusional and irrational. How about proposals to fix provisions that are not effective or efficient? Oh no, that’s not what the base wants..

    Like

  26. Barry Pruett Avatar

    Ben said: “They were very careful in the wording of this law.”
    I think that the exact opposite is true. The democrats and the president rushed an ill-conceived and poorly worded statute through Congress by a dubious procedural method. I am only glad that the Court stayed out of a legislative issue, and I hope that this trend continues.
    On a political note and in order to get any fundamental healthcare reform, a Republican president needs to be elected who will actually work with Congress in an honest fashion and without all of the arrogance.

    Like

  27. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Fish,
    Just because I like the ruling and feel that it was correct in this case doesn’t mean I like this court. Affordable Care Act was very carefully written to withstand all these attempts to deny millions of Americans health insurance/ health care. I think that is one of the reasons why it took thousands of pages. I didn’t support the law when voted on because of the way the bill was created and there was not a public option, which 70% of American’s supported. Once passed I support the law and will do whatever I can to make it better and expand to all Americans.
    I support Single Payer Health Systems at the state level with a national/ federal base being mandatory. This guarantees all people access to health care. Private Health Insurance then becoming strictly supplemental if you do not feel the state insurance program gives you enough coverage or care. It makes basic health care a human right not a privilege in America. We will join the rest of the developed world.

    Like

  28. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Barry,
    So far every time challenged in the courts the wording has stood up to the test. I would say that is very carefully written.
    I agree with you on how the law was created. If I were the republicans that is the angle I would challenge the law but then again the republicans pass laws through dubious procedural methods all of the time.
    Maybe cutting off their noses to spite their face might actually start the domino effect of getting all of this corruption out of our government.

    Like

  29. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, do you really see a whole lot of anger out there about the SCOTUS decision today? Where would it be – Fox and Friends? Don’t watch it so don’t know. I know my friends with their small home business really appreciate it, when they were finally able to finally afford coverage and get hooked up with a doctor for their little girl with needs. You would have pulled it out from under them?

    Like

  30. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Actually Barry yhey jumped right into the legislative process. Roberts created a tax so he could uphold the law. Now he says the words don’t mean what they say. My goodness, this just makes more people say who cares. The courts are now corrupt and Roberts is leading the way.

    Like

  31. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Ben Emery | 25 June 2015 at 09:43 AM
    Ben you are a very nice man but you are mistaken. Had this law been better written there would certainly not been this court case. One of the primary architects of the law admitted that it was passed using less than ethical means.
    It is now incumbent upon congress to make their monster work.
    I look forward to seeing them do that.

    Like

  32. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, did you really say that Chief Justice Roberts is CORRUPT?
    Pretty serious charge for an incredibly respected jurist. So what you are saying is that GW Bush was an idiot for nominating him? You would have preferred Harriet Myers- the family lawyer? LOL.

    Like

  33. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Jon 9:61 AM
    Don’t watch Fox and Friends so I have no idea what they say.
    All the millions that lost their insurance and their doctors believing what Obama said over 23 times does not bother you Jonnie? Where that $2,500 a year saving for the working people? The deductible skyrockets to many thousands of dollars for the poor doesn’t bother you jnnie? You are just a liberal foot soldier for this and could care less about the real world affects are. Besides, we were told there were forty million uninsured poor and this boondoggle has supposedly helped 8 million? And those are subsidized by working people. And what about the “cadillac” plans that people paid extra for to get better medical care on the free market. ObamaCare will now tax them into oblivion. Jeeze, why are you such a sychpoant for the farce? Seig Heil Jonnie!

    Like

  34. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Jonnie, yes corrupt in the sense of being a terrible lawyer. I have no idea if he owns medical stock or has a relative in the field. Who knows. No he is corrupting the common people’s idea of what justice means (Maybe the blacks are on to something?). The true meaning of words. You can do your own research to see if he is beholden to something or someone or maybe blackmailed. That is not my meaning.

    Like

  35. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, you don’t know what you are talking about in regard to health insurance. The poor can obtain get on one of the many new Medi-Cal policies in CA- there are no sky high deductibles. If you are in FL with idiot governor, you are indeed out of luck. As for the middle class, I’ve had sky high deductibles for nearly a decade now with group coverage- its the reality of nearly all group private insurance. The ACA only has no deductibles for high cost major medical costs, which one could argue should be lower. But for the first time, millions of people have some small protections against having to go bankrupt if they have an accident or come down with a chronic illness. I am with Ben- the best model would be an expanded Medicare for all- some type of universal coverage.

    Like

  36. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    typo- meant to say- The ACA only has HIGH deductibles for high cost major medical costs.

    Like

  37. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Fish,
    My guess it was written so it could withstand these challenges, therefore carefully written. Or would you prefer politically written description? I agree with ethics part of your statement.
    Todd,
    It was written as a tax, Roberts didn’t make that up out of think air. One of the benefits of not belonging to either the D’s or R’s I listen to interviews from both camps. They were talking about the tax long before it reached SCOTUS.

    Like

  38. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd and other Republican politicos- you would seem to favor making this a 2016 campaign issue.
    BEST OF LUCK TO YOU! I do wish you well.

    Like

  39. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, totally disagree with you about the literal meaning of words and the SCOTUS purpose. The highest calling of the Court is to INTERPRET and uncover INTENT. Not just rely solely on a poorly written sentence or phrase in some piece of legislation.

    Like

  40. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    No you don’t Jonnie. You wish us ill. The Tea Party will now generate more candidates to boot out the lefty and repubs that they feel are not looking out for America. I am not a member.
    Regarding the ACA jonnie. Tell us all how you know what you know and we don’t. You say I don’t know what I am talking about so tell us how you know. My guess is crickets.

    Like

  41. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Jonnie 10:16 AM
    How do you know that? Who told you that? Jeeze, you don’t know squat. They are to say if a law is Constitutional not interpret and rewrite legislation. My goodness are you a product of public schools?

    Like

  42. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    fish 9:56- It is now incumbent upon congress to make their monster work. I look forward to seeing them do that.
    Could not agree more, fish. Boehner is making a massive tactical mistake right now if we are to take him at his word today. The dour sounding moron wants to keep fighting the ACA. But he and his party have a great opportunity to actually do something to fix it-and use it in 2016 as a campaign issue. Obama has said he is fully open to working on those things. Surely Mitch McConnell and the Senate would go along.

    Like

  43. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Ben Emery | 25 June 2015 at 10:13 AM
    My guess it was written so it could withstand these challenges, therefore carefully written.

    Well then it hasn’t been “carefully written” it’s been carefully rewritten by SCOTUS decisions.
    “Today’s opinion changes the usual rules of statutory interpretation for the sake of the Affordable Care Act. That, alas, is not a novelty. In National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, this Court revised major components of the statute in order to save them from unconstitutionality. The Act that Congress passed provides that every individual “shall” maintain insurance or else pay a “penalty.” This Court, however, saw that the Commerce Clause does not authorize a federal mandate to buy health insurance. So it rewrote the mandate-cum-penalty as a tax.
    The Act that Congress passed also requires every State to accept an expansion of its Medicaid program, or else risk losing all Medicaid funding. This Court, however, saw that the Spending Clause does not authorize this coercive condition. So it rewrote the law to withhold only the incremental funds associated with the Medicaid expansion.
    Having transformed two major parts of the law, the Court today has turned its attention to a third. The Act that Congress passed makes tax credits available only on an “Exchange established by the State.” This Court, however, concludes that this limitation would prevent the rest of the Act from working as well as hoped. So it rewrites the law to make tax credits available everywhere. We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.
    Congress now needs to make this work….how they will do that remains a mystery.

    Like

  44. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, same public schools as you. LOL. BTW, they already determined the law was constitutional, it was not at issue in this decision.

    Like

  45. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Sorry jonnie, this illegal act by the SCOTUS will galvanize the people and more democrats will get booted at all levels of the country. The Presidency is assured now for a Republican. This will be the gift that keeps on giving for the “right”. Then when the old broad Ginzburg leaves as well as Breyer, we can be a lot more certain to get conservatives who know the Constitution.

    Like

  46. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd, I say- Go Go Tea Party!
    Oh, but too bad it had its peak about 5 years long years ago when people got mad about the financial crash. Last November, its favored candidates were swamped by the establishment almost everywhere in America.

    Like

  47. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    The law was created by SCOTUS jonnie. Van’t you read?

    Like

  48. Barry Pruett Avatar

    Today on CNN when asked by Wolf Blitzer about skyrocketing health insurance costs for the majority of Americans, Jen Psaki replied with all of the responses by Jon above – 16 million with insurance, pre-existing condition coverage, etc. She never answered the question asked by Blitzer, and being a horrible journalist and in the tank for the democrats (like our local leftwing blowhard), he did not press for a direct answer. The answer is that healthcare premium are up nearly 80%, and the administration’s position evidence by their non-answer is as follows: It is okay that middle class Americans are paying significantly more for health insurance because they are subsidizing others. Any replacement to Obamacare will likely include the popular provisions, but we need to get the exploding costs for middle class Americans under control.

    Like

  49. Jon Avatar
    Jon

    Todd 10:27- you’re a real class act there. Nice stuff. But don’t believe you have a very good history at political prognostication.
    Galvanize which people? Its over Todd. Tweak the ACA, but its going nowhere.
    The Tea Party hasn’t been able to galvanize anything of note since about 2010. Suddenly another grass roots, angry, white, conservative male group is going to emerge for 2016?

    Like

Leave a comment