Rebane's Ruminations
February 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

FCC to make the Internet into another plodding government regulated utility.  If tomorrow’s vote goes as expected by the progressive Left, the rapidly innovative years of the World Wide Web will be over for all Americans.  The liberals’ dream of so-called ‘net neutrality’ will be achieved, sold to the true believers with the promotion of five prominent myths –

1. The internet has always been neutral;

2. Net Neutrality regulations are the only way to preserve an open internet;

3. Net Neutrality regulations improve broadband competition;

4. All prioritized network services are harmful to users;

5. Net Neutrality rules will make broadband cheaper and internet services like Netflix faster.

For anyone with even a smidgeon of knowledge about how the internet works and what motivates businesses, these pretensions are laughable.  Unfortunately, the truth on all counts is exactly the opposite, but the entire initiative for additional government takeover is based on the tried and true Saul Alinsky rules (q.v.).  The Mercatus Center at George Mason University gives a short and clear refutation of the matter here.

Productivity_JobsRobots will ultimately take your job, and give no guarantee to create another one that you can or are willing to do.  That realization is even reaching the high towers of learning at government funded MIT Artificial Intelligence Labs.  There a conclave of the country’s leading AI and robotics researchers meet monthly to discuss such matters.  Heretofore, they and other such groups have been regularly issuing the pabulum that ‘not to worry, technology’s advance will create at least as many new jobs as the old ones it makes redundant.’  Well, that considerable bit of fiction hasn’t proved to be true in the recent past, and will continue to contribute to systemic unemployment with every passing year.  But RR readers have known that for a long time now.

However, the advances in job eliminations are now proceeding at such a pace that it’s hard to keep putting out these agenda-driven dreams for public consumption, especially from those working in the field who still want to look at themselves in the mirror without blushing – “Experts rethink belief that tech always lifts employment as machines take on skills once thought uniquely human”.  The truth, as reported here, is that the mid-level jobs are disappearing most rapidly.  This leaves behind low-end jobs and more high-end jobs, but netting out to fewer jobs for humans as productivity continues to grow as shown in the nearby figure.  (more here)


Is Obama also the nation’s first Section 8 president?  That realization is coming to more and more people as he entered his lame duck years.  He has demonstrated incomparable incompetencies in literally every undertaking that the chief executive’s office demands.  His lack of planning ability reflects the reason that his background has been so assiduously hidden from us.  What other president in our history has his past sealed – all of his school records, works, writings, relationships, projects, …, anywhere there might exist a record to be evaluated – so as to cover up a man of no accomplishments or demonstrated intellect.  As has Elizabeth Warren with her American Indian ancestors, so has Obama with his black Kenyan father ridden the color of his skin to heights otherwise denied.

A most glaring illustration is this week’s in camera veto of the Keystone pipeline bill for the stated reason that it “cuts short thorough consideration of issues that could bear on our national interest.”  Only an office thoroughly depleted of intellectual capital would issue such a statement.  Keystone has been studied and approved (even by his own administration and supporting special interests) for over an interval of six years.  This pipeline “has been in regulatory limbo for about 2,300 days in perhaps the most extensive permitting review in the history of American government.”  What lets him get away with such lamebrained statements is that his own constituencies are too stupid to realize that the President has called them stupid.

But it doesn’t stop at the top, the crap also flows downhill when you look at the likes of top advisor Valerie Jarrett and AG Eric Holder whose sense of justice does not go beyond the proviso that the progressive agenda justifies any and all means for its achievement.  In addition to the DoJ’s scandals and cover-ups, take a peek at what he still pursues in the matter of the Ferguson shooting (here).

The latter theme is expanded by national columnist and commentator Jason Riley (Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed) in a speech he recently gave at Hillsdale College.  He again highlighted the sad truth that our politicians and the lamestream hide or misreport the major reason why race relations are pandered when law enforcement comes up for discussion, and that major reason is black criminality.  Riley presents and excellent review (here) of the crime statistics that arise from the cultural gulf between non-black and what is commonly called black culture.  (RR also covered these arguments here.)

Riley concludes, “Blacks ultimately must help themselves. They must develop the same attitudes and behaviors and habits that other groups had to develop to rise in America. And to the extent that a social policy, however well-intentioned, interferes with this self-development, it does more harm than good.”

[26feb15 update]  Stupid rules!  This morning the WSJ reports, “The Federal Communications Commission voted Thursday to regulate Internet service like a public utility, expanding the U.S. government’s oversight of a once lightly regulated business at the center of the country’s commercial and social activity. … The vote was 3-2 along party lines and starts the clock ticking on an expected legal challenge from the telecom and cable industries.”

Posted in , , ,

9 responses to “Scattershots – 25feb15 (updated 26feb15)”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    Many citizens in Nevada County get their Internet from wireless providers. These are mom and pop business that do not have the staff necessary to provide the flood of federal paperwork that will be required once the Feds take over the Internet under FCC Title II. These ISPs will have to hire more staff to handle the reporting, this will increase the price of the service. This increased cost will be added to the special fees that are now on phone bill will soon be on Internet service bills, this will also increase the cost of the services and the cost of collection by the ISPs.
    Many families do not have Internet today, due to the cost. As the costs of Internet increases under Title II, more citizens will drop their connections, and go back to using Internet Cafes and Library Tech Centers. This will have an impact on the wireless providers bottom line. Many of the mom and pop wireless providers will be forced out of business by Federal regulations. One fairness law suite under Title II will finish off these mom and pop ISPs even faster than the cost issue. Stay tuned.

    Like

  2. Walt Avatar

    “Screw you Congress, We have a solution in need of a problem. And nope, I’m not going to tell you what it is.. I work for Obama, and I don’t have to talk to you..”
    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/414380/fcc-chair-refuses-testify-congress-ahead-net-neutrality-vote-andrew-johnson

    Like

  3. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    And you will benefit off of these regulations? You’ve got it- Those who have he most money to spend. They are afraid of somebody actually sharing information freely and people breaking out into independent thoughts, especially when it comes to the very cozy private/ public sector relationship. Calling everything conspiracy theory is the insult of the times for such independent thinking.

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 1116am – Translation please.

    Like

  5. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Perhaps we can talk about the specifics of the ruling. I did not see anything that seemed too threatening. But, who knows how it will play out.
    http://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-adopts-strong-sustainable-rules-protect-open-internet

    Like

  6. Russ Steele Avatar

    In reference to my comment above, the FCC rules may exempt the mom and pop WISPs from reporting, thus reduces staffing needs.
    Order adopts a temporary exemption from the transparency enhancements for fixed and mobile providers with 100,000 or fewer subscribers, and delegates authority to our Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau to determine whether to retain the exception and, if so, at what level.

    Like

  7. fish Avatar
    fish

    I did not see anything that seemed too threatening.
    It very rarely does!

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    Net Neutrality – Here’s the simple version of what all this is about. First, we have to understand that there are two dimensions to the stuff (packets of ones and zeros) transmitted over the internet – spatial and temporal, or quantity and time. There are also two kinds of traffic on the internet – that required for the administration and control of the network (pipes and nodes), and the traffic containing content (data and program code) for which the internet was developed. The content traffic is the revenue producing part of the internet. Content is further divided into two types – realtime files and non-realtime files. Realtime files contain data like movies and music, and to be enjoyably consumed, they have a temporal component to their transmission. You don’t want to be listening to a song that suddenly gets timed out for few seconds while waiting for the rest of it to arrive. Realtime files are consumed in the perceived time dimension, and its pieces (burst transmitted) must therefore arrive in your home computer in a timely manner so that the pieces can be stitched together and played seamlessly. Non-realtime data files, which includes most web pages, don’t have that requirement.
    At this point, most readers will understand that for all kinds of files to be transmitted across the WWW, some must have priority over others – either transmitted over broader band links or being jumped up in the server ques at the various nodes in the cloud. This has always been the capability of the internet, and it has been practiced without fuss or any regulation. But recently, people have started offering services that use the cloud like broadcast airwaves, transmitting all kinds of realtime files from here to there. In other words, in this kind of environment every packet is just not like any other packet. As this kind of traffic begins to dominate, internet infrastructure providers say that this kind of special treatment of realtime files has added costs, and some of that should be passed on to service providers like Netflix and/or consumers. You know, regular open market type stuff.
    Of course, realtime file services are protesting and want to spread the higher costs of their transmissions over the entire population of internet users – they want the net to be cost ‘neutral’ as to the kinds of packets that are transmitted regardless of the requirements of their timely arrivals. These guys have hired lobbyists who have made the case to Leviathan that here’s another area to regulate for our benefit – the same old story we’ve heard so many times before. And since the prime purpose of Big Government is always to become bigger and more encompassing, that has been an easy sell, especially since we have had the current batch pinheads in the White House.
    But the real bad part of the net neutrality regs is what they portend for the future development of the web and web services. Heretofore we’ve enjoyed “permissionless innovation”, but soon that will be no more. The naifs in the audience will holler that there is nothing in the just adopted regs that call for all this heavy-handed stuff, but the reality here, as before in so many areas, is that these regs set nothing in stone about the level and scope of future enforcement. That always grows over time until sclerosis sets in as it has in so many other industries. Take a peek at what the libertarian think tank Cato has to say about it.
    http://www.cato.org/blog/fccs-net-neutrality-nuclear-option#j0UmzE:41X

    Like

  9. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    “I did not see anything that seemed too threatening.”
    Yeah – the income tax started out at 1%.
    “But, who knows how it will play out.”
    Well, let’s see, Brad. The fed govt just grabbed control of the most powerful information and commerce system in this country.
    I’m quite sure it will be sunbeams and stardust for everyone.

    Like

Leave a comment