Rebane's Ruminations
February 2015
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary aired on 18 February 2015.]

It’s again hard to know where to start.  At the federal level the administration is tying itself in knots as report after report comes in of Islamic terrorists operating on multiple continents while becoming more united and coordinated.   Our leadership has no idea from what it is supposed to protect America and its allies.  Three European capitals suffer attacks from indigenous Muslims, and now ISIS operates freely on the shores of Tripoli, and demonstrates its reach with a video of its mass execution of 21 Egyptians for the capital crime of being Christians.

Everyone from the Danish prime minister to the pope regales against the jihadi organizations that are united in the global goal of Islamic supremacy.  Yes, even liberal commentators have started to identify the similarity between Nazi Germany’s goal of imposing racial supremacy to the Islamists’ goal of religious supremacy.  And in the White House we are going through contortions wordsmithing daily pronouncements that describe events without ever mentioning their Muslim perpetrators and Christian or Jewish victims.  According to our leaders we are at war with a tactic called terror that is being randomly practiced by unidentified criminal elements.  All the while the world laughs at us and then sadly shakes its head.  January 2017 cannot come quickly enough.


Before we leave Washington, let’s revisit the latest charge that it is the Republicans who will again shut down government, or is it only the Department of Homeland Security, thereby “leaving us defenseless” against those random acts of terror.  Actually it is neither, and the media’s automatic blaming of Republicans is more than just another dollop of yellow journalism.  The DHS funding issue involves only the president’s unlawful executive order giving amnesty to millions of illegal aliens living in our midst.  It does nothing to impede the security services of that agency.

But we hear only Republicans questioned about whether and why they are the ones who will “shut down government”.  The funding bill is stuck in the Senate because the Democrats are filibustering it, yet no one asks Minority Leader Harry Reid why he and his caucus are prepared to shut down government.  Why are the Democrats not willing to let the bill come to a floor vote, and then be passed to the president for his signature or veto?  How come that little light never comes on for any of our crack journalists?

BTW, the informed listener knows that not even DHS will be shut down since the overwhelming fraction of its employees will perform “essential services” that are not affected by such budgetary bickerings.

And coming back to California, we are experiencing what the whole country – at least those who pay attention – know as a government induced or amplified drought.  The drought itself is real, but its economic impact is made surreal by the State Water Resources Control Board, an arm of California’s Environmental Protection Agency, the rabid little brother of the federal EPA.  That board has mandated the daily, yes daily, flushing of 4,000 acre feet of water into the Pacific Ocean.  That daily loss is enough to irrigate 1,000 acres and provide water for 4,000 families for an entire year (more here).

There is even bipartisan opposition to this insane policy that purports to put the hypothetical discomfort of fish ahead of the actual welfare of California’s workers and citizens.  The national press reports that “Senator Dianne Feinstein , Democratic Rep. Jim Costa and five House Republicans this week importuned the five-member State Water Resources Control Board to overrule their executive director” Tom Howard.  But “Citing a “potential additional risk of entrainment” of fish, Mr. Howard rejected the request to pump more water south” instead of into the ocean.

And these are just recent examples that come to mind.  Meanwhile government continues to grow and spend.  And no one seems to recall that the bigger the government, the more inequity there is in the wages and wealth of its people.  So when does ignorance become evil?  The eternal answer to that has always been ‘ignorance become evil, when the ignorant become powerful’.

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on georgerebane.com where the addended transcript of this commentary is posted with relevant links, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[Addendum]  Does everyone understand why Obama’s ‘Immigration Order’ was blocked?  The Left’s loud claims that it was “a political stunt by a George W Bush-appointed judge and would be quickly reversed” is not exactly on the mark.  The president claimed “prosecutorial discretion” as the basis for his ‘executive action’.  Prosecutorial discretion has been the accepted authority for executive officials to set priorities in the enforcement of existing law, and to specifically to refrain from such enforcement in cases where the public interest is least urgent.

However, Obama’s overreach is that his action expands the law, which is and has been for sixty years the Immigration and Naturalization Act.  Under his new amnesty program named Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA), illegal aliens would be granted work authorization, become eligible for Social Security, and numerous other federal and state benefits.  Moreover, almost all non-felon illegals here since 2010 would qualify under DAPA.  In short, DAPA would greatly expand the existing Immigration and Naturalization Act and write new law, a function constitutionally reserved to the US Congress.

So anyone with minimum reading skills should understand that this act by President Obama is illegal and has nothing to do with prosecutorial discretion.  And the injunction handed down by US District Court Judge Andrew Hanen was to stop granting illegal aliens benefits not allowed under current law (more here).

Posted in , ,

64 responses to “Governments’ Wall-to-wall Insanity”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar

    Joe
    Don’t take Todd too seriously. He does the best he can.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    RussS 1020pm – what do you think my 1002pm is based on? Have you read what they consider to be modeling report?

    Like

  3. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Golly Joe Smith, all I asked was some links to back up your allegations and you went personal. You and Paul Emery are cut from the same cloth. All yap no proof. I have to dumb down my questions for you but it still did not work. Sheesh!

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    Can we find something we have common agreement about.
    First can we agree that there is a tipping point on water diversion that can cause irreparable harm to property and the environment.
    Second can we agree that we need to come up with a way of determining that place, much like the Canarie in the mine did for oxygen depletion.

    Like

  5. Paul Emery Avatar

    Don B
    I don’t have a clue about what you’re talking about. Try again using a different translation.

    Like

  6. Russ Steele Avatar

    George@10:30
    No I did not read the report or look at any of the files they called models. I will accept your evaluation, they are models in name only, not in function.

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1039pm – “Irreparable harm” is a dicey concept given the massive climate changes in the earth’s 5B+ year history, and the significant changes in the last millions then thousands of years. As RussS’ 216pm pointed out, the salinity of the Sac delta has had large variations, way more than now contemplated, and has “recovered” nicely if we consider its recent history. But in principle we can say that there undoubtedly are salinity levels that will significantly change delta’s ecosystem for, say, the next century or two, until they recede or new salt tolerant critters and plants establish themselves.
    The problem is that we don’t know those salinity levels. The complexity of the delta yields similar salinity levels as does the earth atmosphere with respect to what is quoted as ‘earth’s temperature’. Neither systems have a single place where you can stick a sensor and read its salinity or temp output that will then be accepted as ‘the’ salinity level or ‘the’ temperature. To find ‘the’ publishable reading that can be used by policy makers, you need to take readings all over the place and then put them into an algorithm (formula) that then spits out a single number. Devising such an algo is a complex technical, and even more complex political undertaking.
    But even if that is accomplished for the delta, you still don’t know the relationship of such a reading to the ‘health of the delta’ (assuming such health is defined as stable flora and fauna population levels). You don’t know how to use these as water diversion policy canary, the data is not there, and according to the California Water Resources Board, neither are the working models. When you go to their site, you see that it’s desperation time in the realm of delta water flow modeling, both its current status and the yet to be defined and funded development program.
    My best guess, according to CWRB documents, is that current claims about fish comfort and salinity levels have been generated by rump models that are neither correct, comprehensive, or validated. But they have been successfully sold to desperate, ignorant, and agenda driven politicians in Sacramento. In sum, there is no there there as far the proper understanding of the science and control technology required to make rational decisions. We are working in the realm of pure politics.
    Even worse, the CWRB most likely does not have the technical or managerial staff to define and manage a development program that can bring a model such as CalSim II, their current poster child, to fruition. That requires a large systems house like SAIC or Lockheed/Martin to pull off.
    H/T to Russ for his input on historical salinity levels and finding the CWRB link. Unfortunately the layman is in no position to understand the modeling status documents published by CWRB.
    So Paul, we are flying blind as far as delta water diversion policy is concerned, and making diversion policy decisions now is something that seems wise only to the state’s innumerates who mostly make up the ‘But we gotta do something!’ crowd. Nevertheless those are modus operandi of agencies who have pissed away public funds for decades and don’t dare admit that they still don’t know what they claim.

    Like

  8. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    In all of this swell discussion of salt water intrusion and irreparable harm, let’s remember there were times past before those terrible dams went up and the white man started messing with the water system that there were droughts of far more epic proportions than any that we’ve seen. The rivers certainly went dry, there was salt water intrusion, the fishies had no where to go and spawn and every body and every thing died. Yet when the Spanish showed up, everything was hunky dory. For some reason, a lot of folks think that what the conditions are in say 1860, are the conditions that must be maintained at all costs forever. At least let’s not kid ourselves that we are acting on behalf of Ma Earth. We are trying to UN-naturally maintain conditions we have become accustomed to for our own economic and recreational well being. The earth and all of God’s creatures (‘cept us) just don’t care one whit.

    Like

  9. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    So George to summarize your view it’s pump away water to the South and see what happens. Do you believe So Cal has a Right to the water from the North State? Also is water a Commons and how should it be regulated for best use for all?

    Like

  10. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 854am – Thanks for reviving the observation that things have been changing for eons, and the Left’s sophomoric desire to define a point in time as a perfection to be maintained is more than foolish. But raising such ‘environmental protections’ is a very handy vehicle with which to impose a command and control society, which after all is their raison d’etre.
    PaulE 955am – Yes indeed, don’t start fixing something about which you have no idea how it works. It’s like putting a chimpanzee into the cockpit of a 747 at 30K feet. That doesn’t mean that you stop monitoring and developing better means to monitor and control (i.e. models and measurments).
    I don’t think that soCal’s draw on norCal’s water comes under the concept of rights (q.v.). It’s a matter of existing contract law, and politics since most of the state’s population lives south of the Tehachapies. And yes, riparian water has been acknowledged as a commons for millennia. Water flows across jurisdictional boundaries have been held sacrosanct – upstream pollution, diversion, or damming such flows have been considered as an act of war among sovereign states. In the jurisdiction of California, water is directed to where it will buy the most votes.

    Like

  11. The dirt man Avatar
    The dirt man

    Pulling salt as well other materials from Sea Water to make it potable, or useful for irrigation is a very expensive proposition as even the water that comes down from the Sierra’s has trace amounts of salts within, and these salts have already made thousands of acres in the San Joaquin valley unproductive.
    The only way to return these lands to useful production is to leach these salts to a area below the root zones of the desired crops, which takes lots and lots of very clean pure water (which is currently non-existent other than the rains), and even that requires the removal, and disposal of this “dirty” water…..
    Rich

    Like

  12. Walt Avatar

    Just which side of the fence has been yapping about tearing down dams? (that would be water storage) ECO nuts please take one step forward. The same crazies have done their damnedest
    to stop any new water storage, all in the name of “pretty”. ( wild and scenic around these parts) Not one hippie ( ECO loon) has yet to tell me(us) how to eat or drink “pretty”.
    Well HI,, “Dirt man”,, What’s your story? Ya’ a Brother ditch digger? ( there is no way but up for our kind)

    Like

Leave a comment