Rebane's Ruminations
December 2014
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Our high tech industry is literally the last refuge of employment meritocracy, and the increase in our quality of life it has provided is unquestionable.  That may all be coming to an end if our so-called civil rights leaders like Jesse Jackson have their way.  You see Jesse and his crew have noticed that there is perverse reason why the make-up of companies like Google, Apple, and Intel don’t mirror the make-up of the country’s population.  And they are uniting under banners like ‘Rainbow Push’ to set things right and insure that the proper levels of diversity also come to places like Silicon Valley (more here and here).

From my rather intimate experience working with Silicon Valley high tech firms, there has never been any discrimination against blacks, Hispanics, or females.  In fact, it has been exactly the other way around.  Such companies have bent over backward to hire qualified blacks, Hispanics, and females.  The problem is that the supply of such people is low for a number of reasons discussed elsewhere that are neither the fault nor the responsibility of the employers.  But that is not how our progressive cadres see what they gladly tell you is a “lack of diversity problem” that needs to be solved.

And according to simplistic socialism, the solution will be simple – put race and gender first, and demote the requirement of being able to do the job.  The companies’ human resources departments will implement such policies until the population quotas are met, and everything thereafter will be hunky dory.  At gatherings where this lack of diversity problem is discussed, the attendance includes appropriate representatives from the leading high-tech companies in the land.  It does not pay to be absent from such obviously beneficial initiatives, and the threat of such quota systems becoming law is ever present given our gruberized electorate.

The bottom line is that these high tech enterprises will do what they have to do.  But you can be sure that this industry will not benefit any more from employment quotas than have the other industries so inflicted.  And maybe even less because of the nature of work involved.  The learning curve for high tech skills is a lot steeper and longer than for jobs involving manufacturing, parcel delivery, sales, and hospitality services.  This, of course, will make no never mind to Jesse and his halo of supportive NGOs that see lots of grants coming down to have them ‘advise’ corporations on how to meet their high tech hiring quotas.

[12dec14 update]  Quota systems have been in place in Europe for quite some time now.  The big headline today is that Germany will now follow those economic powerhouses of France and Italy with a new law that heralds ‘Corporate Germany set for Gender Revolution’.  That’s right, EU’s real economic powerhouse Germany will henceforth require their big companies to install at least 30% women in top management slots, and divers other percentages in other jobs.  The law will require even smaller companies to submit to government their plans to hire more women.

Germany’s leading employers and industry associations issued a joint statement declaring “a quota ignores that professional qualification must be the decisive criterion for filling a supervisory board position.”

This, of course, will hit their high tech and manufacturing sectors the hardest, where more often than not both management and line workers are required to have degrees in relevant fields of engineering and sciences.  High tech companies, according to chip maker Infineon Technologies AG, typically must have most of their management positions filled with people having “an academic degree in mathematics, computer science, natural science or technology, with the focus on electrical engineering and physics, where the number of female students is low.”

Given the continuing funk of Europe’s economies – most are now in double dip ‘recessions’, more correctly a continuing depression – this latest socialist salve is one more kick in the groin for its wealth producing sectors, and will do nothing to solve their employment problems.  By devaluing meritocracy in their hiring criteria, it will definitely make their companies less competitive in the global markets, which will be a critical problem for Germany.  However, in places like India and China they are toasting Angela Merkel, the new diva of diversity in Europe.

Posted in , , , ,

9 responses to “High Tech Quotas (updated 12dec14)”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    According to my contacts, people seeking jobs in Silicon Valley tech companies, many of the top companies are adopting the Google interview process for technical people. The Interviews are about 5 hours long and during the interview the potential employee is given a technical problem to solve with a two hour limit. The color of a persons skin, gender, or sexual orientation is not going to help solve this problem. The potential employee either has the skill sets to solve the problem of they do not.
    A lot of the government contracts the aerospace company I was working in the late 1980s and 1990s, had requirements that a certain percentage of the contract had to go to 8s minority subcontractors. We chose women owned and operated 8a companies when ever possible to score some extra points. Managing these 8s subcontract was a challenge. Some were awesome and some took more time to manage, than it took to do the work in house. It was all about satisfying the government auditors.
    If the tech companies are doing government contracts, I can see how Jessy and his Rainbow thugs might have some leverage. But how will Jessy and his Rainbow thugs deal with the Google interview process? Will they get interview problem solving out lawed?

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    RussS 240pm – as mentioned in my post, I think outfits like Rainbow will do exactly that – they will try to do everything possible to hobble job skills determination in the interview process. The list of questions you can no longer ask an applicant has grown longer over the last 25 years, and this is simply the last stage of achievement for the America Last storm troopers. We already off-shore a lot of our tech work due to a number of factors, availability of appropriate skills is one of them.

    Like

  3. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Whatever you do, don’t ask the applicant if they have a criminal record. That would be unfair and put the applicant of a particular social-economic at a disadvantage on the application, thus resulting in unintended racism, consequences, and pre-judging. But you with your White Privilege don’t understand that criminals are our brothers and sisters and neighbors. Diversity for diversity’s sake is what will keep us in everlasting mediocrity. We need the less qualified, the less ambitious, the sluggards and whiners to make us strong no matter their training and background is comprised of. Some some empathy. Yeah, right.

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    Walt 739pm – that NYT piece corroborates everything RR has maintained for years about systemic unemployment, but it is also full of socialist shibboleths that point to dysfunctional solutions. Little was evident in the piece that recognized jobs are created out of the need for skills delivered at a price affordable by the employer. We would expect nothing less from the NYT than the insane combination of implying that entry level wages are too low, while at the same time complaining that the cost of low level services (e.g. child care for working parents) is too high. The socialist does not recognize that you can’t have it both ways.

    Like

  5. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Of course you can have it both ways – just subsidise the low wage workers with govt money. Put it all on the natl credit card. The govt always has the perfect wisdom of what to support to win the most number of votes at election time.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 1048am – You are right as long as there is an appropriate delay in that ‘new money’ flowing through the economy to compete for goods/services thereby raising prices for all the people getting the new money.

    Like

  7. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Oh – they have learned a few tricks in fed land. Starting with the ‘earned income credit’ and moving into freebies such as day care from day one, the low income folks have been heavily subsidized at every turn for quite a few years.
    You can work for minimum wage or even a bit more and be quite comfortable.
    But the employers don’t have to pick up much (or any) of the direct cost. It is a constant source of amusement to me when lefties complain that the Walmarts and so on are being “subsidized” by the tax payers as their workers don’t make enough to be able to buy all their goodies on their own salaries. Walmart never asked for any of those subsidies. The left did. It keeps inflation low and the costs go on the credit card. Now we have cheaper gas (I just paid $2.19 a gallon in New Mexico) and the funny money continues to issue forth in various ways to keep the cost of borrowing capital low. It will all come back to bite us, but as long as they keep learning new ways to game the system, it will continue until it doesn’t.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    For the observant reader, please note the diminished interest in this post the topic of which, if implemented, will have an enormous and dreadful impact on the quality of all of our lives. And we wonder why such diktats find their way into the US Code.

    Like

Leave a comment