Rebane's Ruminations
December 2014
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 3 December 2014.]

I intended this to be a wrap-up on the Ferguson riots, but sadly there is no wrap possible, because Ferguson is just the latest chapter in the marathon effort to fundamentally transform America.  So all we can do is pause here and take stock of recent happenings with the Michael Brown shooting by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson, Missouri on 9 August last.

Michael Brown was a product of our broken black culture.  He was an underachiever with an attitude, a racist, and on that day, a criminal.  He met his end by having the audacity to walk down the center of a trafficked street and challenge a policeman on patrol responding to a 911 about a convenience store robbery in the neighborhood.  It turned out the robbery was committed by Brown, a fact then not known by Wilson.  The criminal grand jury was presented all the evidence about the shooting, which it considered for over 12 weeks before concluding that Officer Wilson shot Brown in the line of duty, and the case required no indictment for a subsequent trial.


However, to those with agendas that far overarched the town of Ferguson, this was a tragedy not to be wasted.  To put things in perspective, we consider that blacks murder almost 5,400 people annually, and whites murder almost 4,400.  Given that blacks make up 13% and whites 63% of the population, blacks kill people, overwhelmingly each other, at a rate at least six times higher than do whites.  Over the last 40 years of government programs and transfer payments, black crime rates have soared while their families were decimated.  The resulting despair and misery in their neighborhoods have become the enduring national ‘poster child’ that have kept progressive vote-buying policies and programs in high gear.  So when a white cop is reported shooting an unarmed black teen-ager, there is hay to be made regardless of the facts, the jurisdictions involved, or the legal due process followed.

The Ferguson incident had to support the narrative that the shooting was prima facie evidence of white-on-black racism still alive and well in the country, a racism that must be continually acknowledged, and a racism that must give rise to ever more investigations, oversights, wealth transfers, and special race-based remedies for the aggrieved and the alleged offenders.  Our federal government was quick to draw attention to all those necessities through the personal appeals of President Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder.  Holder flew down to make sure that no one misunderstood the nationally significant incident that was now being manufactured from a confrontation between a criminal youth with an attitude and an officer of the local police.

From there the commissioned riots were expanded and inflamed by the ever-willing media.  Some lamestream outlets like CNN even attempted to misreport the riots as peaceful spontaneous demonstrations, while they tried to keep the burning cars and buildings out of their video shots.  Nevertheless, enough thousands of useful idiots could be and were assembled in over a hundred cities to dutifully riot, burn, and plunder while shouting ‘Hands up, don’t shoot!’ – itself a manufactured mantra that according to the grand jury had nothing to do with what happened in Ferguson.  The show had to go on, and we have yet to hear the last of it.

Why?  Because for no apparent reason other than to inspire continuing dissatisfaction with the current national order, the federal government stepped in to launch an investigation and potential prosecution of Officer Wilson for – seatbelts please – for violating Michael Brown’s civil rights.  And then to launch an add-on investigation to see if the Ferguson police practices had racial overtones which might require more federal regulations to saddle police departments across the land.  And why all this after judicial due process determined that the shooting was justified in the line of duty?  Well, it’s the agenda stupid, it’s the agenda.

As I reflect on this insane tragedy and try to put it into some reasonable perspective, the question occurs to me – are those hoodlums torching cars and buildings, and gleefully carrying merchandize out of neighborhood stores; are they trying achieve the same American dream that you and I are working daily to maintain in our country?  I cannot answer for you, but my own answer is a definite NO.  They are nothing like me or mine, and they have a very different direction in mind for our land, the progress along which their elite leaders are doing everything they can with the shooting in Ferguson.

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on this and related themes on georgerebane.com where the addended transcript of this commentary is posted with relevant links, and debated extensively.  However my views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[Addendum]  The one-sidedness of the Ferguson shooting is what infuriates the millions who seek to inform themselves.  The fraction of blacks shot to death in the St Louis area by white police is 2%.  Yet scumbags like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson fly around the country during these occasions doing their best to convince their constituents that white cops shooting black kids is an epidemic.  An epidemic that needs to be stopped by the most dramatic of street outpourings.

What is more reprehensible to me is that the Sharptons and Jacksons are lauded by liberal leaders.  That their personal lives are such that they would lack any moral credentials in less disadvantaged public forums is totally papered over by the national progressive leadership.  They are seen and celebrated in congressional conclaves and White House gathering to address or acknowledge this social problem or that.  And sadder yet is when some of their real credentials leak out to their constituents, then those are taken as confirmation that all are birds of a feather, and that it’s not only OK but ‘normal’ to do and say the things such degraded public persons do and say.

Now I believe that all police killings should become a detailed matter of public record.  However, that is not the case today.  Nationally there are about 18,000 law enforcement agencies, and all of them report their officer killings to the FBI at their pleasure.  The FBI attempts to keep records on such shootings, but an analysis by WSJ staff (reported here) discovered that during recent years there were actually 45% more police justifiable homicides than in the FBI tally.  Whenever government kills, it should become a matter of open public record so that we can keep tabs on the trends that move Leviathan.  All should know that governments in modern times have been the biggest killers of their own citizens.  Governments have killed more of their own than have died in all the wars (here and here).

[4dec14 update]  ‘Staten Island cigarette vendor Eric Garner was killed by the NYPD on 17 July 2014.’  ‘Lifelong criminal Eric Garner was caught selling black market goods on Staten Island on 17 July 2014, and died while resisting arrest by officers of the NYPD.’

From what we know now of the Garner case, buttressed primarily by the video (chokehold, aftermath) of his arrest and death, and the grand jury’s verdict exonerating the officer involved, I throw in my own two cents worth here.

1. The Ferguson and Staten Island cases involved totally different encounters with their respective victims Brown and Garner.

2. From the arrest video it does not appear that Mr Garner resisted arrest; the police assaulted him before there was any physical evidence of any resistance (e.g. his hands were already in the air), although there may have been a verbal exchange indicating otherwise.

3. Mr Garner’s takedown was a clumsy affair with any attempt at a carotid hold immediately slipping into a visible choke hold.  Nevertheless, the coroner indicated that his windpipe had not been crushed or suffered permanent damage.

4. From his arrest record Garner appears to have been a lifelong, unsuccessful, petty criminal reduced to selling individual cigarettes on the black market.

5. The grand jury presumably studied the arrest video and its aftermath in detail.  Using that and other evidence presented, it decided not to indict Officers Daniel Pantaleo and Justin Damico.

6. Since choke holds by police are illegal, there had to be extenuating evidence which made this potentially unnecessary and clearly botched takedown exculpable.  Else, in my opinion, the grand jury made a grievous mistake.

7. There is no evidence that the Garner case and the Brown case had any relation, especially being connected by protester allegations that both are part of a systematic nationwide vendetta by white police against innocent blacks.

8. We are told that the transcripts of the grand jury hearings will be made public soon.  I am willing to wait until that information comes in.

[6dec14 update]  Having watched the Staten Island video over 20 times, many in freeze frame, I am more disturbed than ever at how the NYPD handled the situation.  Not only did Mr Garner offer no resistance, there was absolutely no immediancy to the entire situation.  Mr Garner was a petty criminal selling individual cigarettes – doing business as a willing seller with willing buyers who happen to approach him.  Who was aggrived in these transactions?  Most certainly not the buyer or seller or the local community – it was the state.  The state was denied its pound of flesh in the transactions, and therefore its apparatchiks went into thoughtless action just because they could.

Since there was no immediacy involved, if the cops on scene thought Mr Garcia was a bit slow in compliance (not evident from the video), then take your time.  Pull up a chair, grab a soft drink and talk to the man and explain the matter to him in plain language while all parties let the heat of encounter dissipate.  Hell, take fifteen minutes to chat about it; Garcia was not going to go anywhere or hurt anyone.  So yes, the NYPD needs a lot of retraining if these cops were exemplars of New York's finest.  They need to crank up their situational awareness so that they can tell when it's time to use peremptory force or not.

[8dec14 update]  And now for the expected politically incorrect coda to this post, let's consider the matter of white police killed by blacks.  These occur quietly across the country with no protests, no AG visits, no outrage from black leaders (nor even whites), and, of course, no national news coverage.  Here are just four recent ones picked up by a blogger.  (H/T to reader).

Posted in , , ,

112 responses to “Ferguson Wrap-up (8dec14 update)”

  1. Bob Hobert Avatar
    Bob Hobert

    Bryan Fischer Director of Issue Analysis and Host of “Focal Point” on Eric Garner”:
    “So a black officer ordered the crackdown, black business owners called for the arrest, a black officer ordered the arrest, and a black officer supervised the arrest itself.”
    Eric Garner, a 43 year-old father of six, is dead. This is a tragedy, regardless of the circumstances. We rightly mourn with his wife and children. They will never see their husband and father again, and that should break everyone’s heart.
    When we witness a gut-rending tragedy like this, we want to know who is responsible. Who is to blame for depriving this family of its husband and father? As the facts emerge, it becomes increasingly clear that, as tragic as this situation is, in the end the culpability for Eric Garner’s death rests with Eric Garner.
    To put it as simply as possible, if Mr. Garner had not broken the law and then resisted arrest, he would be alive today.
    While protesters are trying to make this about race, it must be noted that the police showed up in response to complaints from black business owners. The arrest was ordered by a black officer, and the arrest itself was supervised by a black officer, a female sergeant.
    A crackdown on the sale of illegal, untaxed cigarettes – called “loosies” since they are sold in singles rather than in packs – had been ordered just days before Garner’s arrest by the highest ranking black police officer in the NYPD, Philip Banks.
    So a black officer ordered the crackdown, black business owners called for the arrest, a black officer ordered the arrest, and a black officer supervised the arrest itself. It’s also worth noting that the 23-member grand jury which refused to indict the arresting officer included nine non-white members. Ask yourself how many of those facts you have heard from any member of the race-obsessed, low-information media.
    Garner had been arrested 31 times, and eight of those had been for selling loosies. His rap sheet goes back decades and includes arrests for assault and grand larceny.
    At the time of his death, Garner was out on bail after being charged with multiple offenses, including illegal sale of cigarettes, marijuana possession, false impersonation and driving without a license.
    So he certainly knew the law, knew he was in violation, and knew doing it again would likely lead to his arrest, a drill he’d been through dozens of times before.
    There were 228,000 misdemeanor arrests in New York City in 2013, the last year for which figures are available. All of them put together led to precisely zero deaths.
    Garner, all six-foot, three inches and 350 pounds of him, clearly resisted arrest, swatting away the arresting officer’s hands while loudly exclaiming, “Don’t touch me!” After he was taken to the ground, he growled, “This ends here!” That could be taken any number of ways, but in the heat of the moment it certainly could be read reasonably as a declaration that he was going to fight arrest until he was subdued by compelling force.
    The patrolman who wrestled Garner to the ground, Daniel Pantaleo, did it by the book, using a takedown maneuver every policeman is taught at the academy. He did not, in fact, use a chokehold, which is defined by the NYPD as “any pressure to the throat or windpipe, which may prevent or hinder breathing or reduce intake of air.” Now Garner was clearly able to breathe, since that’s the only way he could repeatedly say, “I can’t breathe.”
    The autopsy explicitly declares that there was no injury to Garner’s windpipe or to his neck bones. This was a wrestler’s headlock, not a chokehold. (As a sidenote, chokeholds, while contrary to police policy, are not in fact illegal in the state of New York when an officer uses one to restrain a resisting subject. They are not even illegal in New York City, at the insistence of liberal mayor Bill DeBlasio.) Patrolman Pantaleo was not indicted for the simple reason that he did nothing wrong.
    Garner’s death likely should be attributed to the fact that he himself suffered from severe asthma, something the arresting officers had no reason to know. According to Garner’s friends, his asthma was severe enough that he was forced to quit his job as horticulturist for the city. He wheezed when he talked and could not walk so much as a city block without having to stop to rest. Garner “couldn’t breathe” because of his asthma, not because of a chokehold.
    In addition, he suffered from heart disease, advanced diabetes, hypertension, obesity and sleep apnea. Contrary to public perception, he did not die on site, nor did he die of asphyxiation. He suffered cardiac arrest in the ambulance and was declared dead about an hour later at the hospital.
    So it turns out that almost everything bleated out by the race-mongers and the low-information media has turned out to be wrong. As the wisest man who ever lived wrote 3000 years ago, “The one who states his case first seems right until the other comes and examines him” (Proverbs 18:17).
    Eric Garner and Michael Brown both fought the law, and the law won. In the end, they have no one to blame but themselves.
    New York Post columnist Bob McMcanus concluded his column on Eric Garner this way:
    “There are many New Yorkers — politicians, activists, trial lawyers, all the usual suspects — who will now seek to profit from a tragedy that wouldn’t have happened had Eric Garner made a different decision.
    “He was a victim of himself. It’s just that simple.”

    Like

  2. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Bob,
    In most of these cases it is not about race, it is about unaccountable police abuse of power. Race is just a piece of the issue. Where Bob McMcanus gets it wrong is looking at Eric Garner as a single event that led to his “decision” instead of the myriad of incidents that put Eric Garner and the police officer in the position that caused his death.

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 1141am – I sincerely believe that your non-response to BobH’s 1117am is nothing more than so much progressive pabulum. To elevate it, you need to be much more specific about your “myriad of incidents” that by YOUR implication are an unlawful overreach of local police powers continually exercised nationwide.

    Like

  4. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George and Everyone,
    Here are two links that are presented in more detail than I care to research and type myself. I don’t fully agree with everything but it clearly points out what my position that has fell on deaf ears at RR. Racism is built into the system on purpose and those who have been on the bottom of the pile since day one, people of color or African Americans. I don’t particularly like term “African Americans” because there are plenty of people of color who don’t come from the continent of Africa in any modern sense.
    This systemic or institutionalized racism has made it much easier for white males than the rest of the people to gain security at every level.
    1)interview with the author of the article of link 2.
    http://billmoyers.com/episode/facing-the-truth-the-case-for-reparations/
    2) The Case For Reparations
    http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2014/05/the-case-for-reparations/361631/

    Like

  5. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Ben Emery | 12 December 2014 at 01:44 PM
    I generally try not to spend any significant time with Mr. Coates as what little I have spent seems wasted. Did he come up with a number that he thought would satisfy the legitimate descendants of slaves with verifiable claims?
    I am to the point where I think that it might be better to have this put behind us!
    So Ben…..how much does he think is fair? One time after which we are done, no more affirmative action, no more set asides, no walking on eggs around these people for what others did to “not them” in the past.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    Comment from BobH that he asked me to post for him –
    I Rise Today in Support of the NYPD
    http://www.afa.net/the-stand/news/i-rise-today-in-support-of-the-nypd/

    Like

  7. Bob Hobert Avatar
    Bob Hobert

    Ben, thanks for clearing up for me that four black officers and one non-black officer directly involved in Garner’s arrest is a teachable example of white police racism. Good one.

    Like

  8. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Fish,
    I don’t think reparations are the answer but its an effective way to get people to read the article. What he gives examples of how law after law have been passed that favor one segment of the population over another, therefore causing damage or suffering that can never be recovered or rectified. He makes my point that for centuries we are programmed to think of people of color as less worthy for xyz and it is baked right into the system or recipe.

    Like

  9. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 420pm – Did we all miss the plan to go forward with “damage or suffering that can never be recovered or rectified”?

    Like

  10. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Nope, first we have to all admit that these policies and institutionalized racism existed/ exist and have given white males a very unfair advantage over others.

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 516pm – OK, let’s assume the mea culpas, then what?

    Like

  12. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Ben Emery | 12 December 2014 at 04:20 PM
    I don’t think reparations are the answer but its an effective way to get people to read the article.
    Then why do both the articles make the case for reparations?
    And right on schedule here’s the “bait and switch”…from the 5:16 post….. get the accused to acknowledge the charges during negotiations and then there is no going back.
    Ben the argument can be made that the “reparations” were paid by the “Great Society” programs and have been squandered in large measure by the recipients during subsequent decades. You make the claim for still more compensation and use, “…these policies and institutionalized racism existed/exist and have given white males a very unfair advantage over others” as justification. Since numerous members of the “aggrieved” parties have managed to thrive during this horrible, horrible period but are never, never acknowledged when these matters are discussed it is rather more likely that the system is not as oppressive as you claim and this just still more race hustling.
    I’m not interested in SJW denunciations and show trials…..I’m interested in the United States settling what at this point is a giant nuisance lawsuit….come up with a number, a way to identify legitimate claimants, and a cutoff date or otherwise piss off!

    Like

Leave a comment