Rebane's Ruminations
September 2014
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

The ISIS fatwa urging all Muslims in the world to ‘kill ‘em wherever you find ‘em’ is finally starting to cause some serious concerns among western leaders.  The news services are reporting frustrating communiques being issued by presidents, prime ministers, intelligence service heads, and national police forces.  The problem comes with the radicalized Muslims returning from the Mideast, and also our indigenous Muslims motivated by the call to kill in response to the new coalition air strikes in both Iraq and now Syria.  And what puts a bow on the whole thing is Islam’s carte blanche to use ‘taqiyya’ in the preparation for their murderous attacks.  Taqiyya has been the scripturally bloody staple in ‘green on blue’ attacks American troops have suffered from their Muslim comrades in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Now our authorities are telling us (correctly) that they have no means of stopping such attacks on civilians in the west by seemingly moderate Muslims – Major Hassan’s rampage at Ft Hood may serve as Exhibit A, along with the street killings of British and French GIs.

It turns out that repetition and exercises are needed to learn mathematical concepts.  The government schools have been telling us for some years that doing ‘rote exercises’ was of little use after a student claimed to have understood the concept underlying a newly introduced mathematical idea.  Engineering professor Barbara Oakley reports in the 23sep14 WSJ on some recent research that again confirmed that it is repeated applications of the concept is what really locks it into your brainbone.  Her point, “Achieving ‘conceptual’ understanding doesn’t mean true mastery. For that, you need practice.”

Those of us who have based our careers on the understanding and practice of some fairly hairy mathematics (I have a minor in math, and my graduate engineering work has been basically all math) have known this since day one – I even had to learn it the hard way in an early math course.  Common Core standards continue with this breezy misunderstanding of how math is learned.  But it will be up to the school districts and classroom teachers to come up with curricula that re-introduce the ‘practice makes perfect’ approach to teaching math.  Don’t hold your breath.

Today the medical marijuana Measure S circus comes to town.  The two sides on this new ‘medical’ marijuana cultivation issue have had a rocky road putting together a debate on the matter under a single roof, and wound up blowing a tire (Bob Crabb’s cartoon filched from the 22sep14 Union again nails it).  The story of who agreed to what and when and then changed their mind(s) is too complex to repeat in these pithy remarks.  But, as reported in this morning’s (23sep14) Union, each side has added a “rally” to celebrate their respective convincing arguments.  The ‘No on S’ faction is headed by Sheriff Keith Royal who will be interviewed at 5pm by Union publisher Jim Hemig at the Rood Center; don’t know about any subsequent Q&A.  Then Mr Hemig will skedaddle across town to the Nevada Theater where at 6pm he will be asking the same questions of the ‘Yes on S’ folks.  But we can expect shouting and happy dancing to follow the sober phase of both presentations at their respective venues.  Perhaps the distance separating these two seriously enthusiastic groups was not such a bad idea after all 😉

RLCrabb140922

Posted in , ,

118 responses to “Ruminations – 23sep14”

  1. George Rebane Avatar

    Re MartinW 1050am – [This comment by Jo Ann Rebane is posted here because it’s easier for me to attach the photograph of the county’s Measure S leaflet as the RR administrator than for her to insert it into her comment from her computer. gjr]
    For the record –

    1. Don Bessee has “led Jo Anne(sic) to believe …” in nothing regarding Measure S. My work product on the issue is based on my own research (including the Coalition’s support allegation, see below).
    2. The above photograph of the county’s ‘Argument Against Measure S’ leaflet includes among the signatories Ariel Lovett, signing as “Director, Coalition for a Drug Free Nevada County of Nevada”, not as a private individual. I also posted this information on The Union’s website right above Mr Webb’s comment, information which he has apparently chosen to ignore again.
    3. The BoS had EVERYTHING to do with County Ordinance 2349. The “writing of the text” of legislation and ordnances is almost always done by people (staffers, lobbyists, counsel, other agencies, …) other than the elected officials/legislatures. My stating that they ‘wrote’ 2349 follows the convention of ‘institutional ascription’. I shouldn’t have to remind anyone that it is the legislating bodies – BoS, Congress, etc – and their elected members who are responsible and held accountable for the legislation that is issued by such bodies. To niggle about who did the actual wordsmithing for an ordinance or law on the books is a diversion and waste of time.
    /s/ Jo Ann Rebane
    2nd VP, Legislative Chair
    Republican Women of Nevada County Federated

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    re BradC 212pm – Yes, ALL my commentary transcripts are posted on RR and can be accessed by searching ‘KVMR commentary’. Also KVMR archives my commentaries – at their own leisure – which can be replayed from their website http://www.kvmr.org/ . I think PaulE is the KVMR person responsible for posting the audio.

    Like

  3. Paul Emery Avatar

    The last commentary aired Monday instead of Friday. It is part of the Monday newscast which is up on a podcast. Scroll down to Mondays news. The piece is around 20 minutes in.
    http://www.kvmr.org/podcasts

    Like

  4. fish Avatar
    fish

    Thanks you gentlemen. I’ll sample a few!

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar

    BTW, did everyone notice that the ISIS fatwa as the latest insult from Islam didn’t raise a single hackle? Apparently no one gives a crap any more what the ragheads say or do. If they start cutting off heads in Amsterdam, Manchester, Lyon, or Pittsburgh, so what? The odds are in my favor for keeping my head, and anyway, it’s the feds’ problem. I got Thursday night football on my do-list.

    Like

  6. Martin Webb Avatar
    Martin Webb

    Jo Ann, I dare you to call the Coalition and find out you’re wrong. That would be real research that would give you facts instead of flawed analysis. Or I could forward you the email directly from them if you’d like, explaining that they do not oppose Measure S or support the sheriff’s ordinance and never have. We are neutral on both.
    Your research was very poor if all you did was look at the argument against S. That is indeed the signature of an individual not speaking on behalf of an entire organization. The argument submitted on county letterhead is also a violation of election code, thanks for posting it as further proof. Yes, legislative bodies work with staffers on crafting text, but they do not simply tell the top law enforcement official to write the laws and get a little input that he may or may not listen to, which is what happened here. That’s a big difference.
    Here, to stop your constant repeating of a falsehood based on poor research and your basic misunderstandings of what ballot argument signatures mean, this is the email from Shelley Rogers, cc’ed to Ariel Lovett, in response to Don’s latest threatening and harassing email to me:
    Dated Sept 16th, one week ago…
    Hi Martin,
    I wanted to respond, albeit a little late.
    You are indeed correct that just like you, Ariel signed as an individual
    citizen. You are also right that the Coalition does not have an official
    positon on this legislation or past legislation. I will clarify this with
    Don.
    Please know that Don’s contacting is not on behalf of the Coalition. Lastly
    the Coalition is not “actively evaluating” etc… and I don’t know what he
    is talking about.
    In regard to his emails to you, what I can do is ask again that he not
    communicate in any way on behalf of the coalition.
    Sincerely,
    Shelley
    Shelley Rogers, Program Coordinator
    Coalition for a Drug Free Nevada County
    Can we put this issue to bed now? You are wrong. You assign an inappropriate inflated value to an individuals signature, but can’t seem to admit it or even be willing to consider it. Whether Don played a role in that is moot. In this regard, you are spreading misinformation and you should stop trying to convince me otherwise.

    Like

  7. Walt Avatar

    Martin… “S” stands for SUCKS, and is far from ” sensible”.
    Stop the whining. I’m pretty confident the Rebane’s research into this matter is rock solid. A supposed email is not what I would call irrefutable evidence.

    Like

  8. jarebane Avatar
    jarebane

    MartinW 656pm – The county document speaks for itself. It is time for Ms Ariel Lovett to step forward and state what she was attempting to convey when she signed as the “Director, Coalition for Drug-Free Nevada County of Nevada”. The leaflet has been in public circulation for a month and no one has stepped forward to dispute the other signatories in their representations for the Sheriff’s Department, Board of Supervisors, and so presumably Ms Lovett for the Coalition. Did Ms Lovett misrepresent the Coalition on such a public document? If so, why has the Coalition not denounced that action, or voted her out? How does a private email to you by the Coalition’s ‘Program Coordinator’ become the final public word on the question? Does not the Coalition’s and Lovett’s silence on the matter attest to their respective satisfaction with what the document clearly conveys?
    But I do appreciate your making Shelley Rogers’ email public. Hopefully this will motivate the Coalition to speak with one voice on Measure S.

    Like

  9. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Martin Maritn Martin, there you go again. The community is making a value judgment on Director Lovett and her life of dedication to the community and CORR v a head shop owner. We all know you are intimating legal action about the drug free grant fund use and the use of the rood center last night. Project SAM has demanded the Obama admin officially clarify the Drug Free Grantee rules. That’s why the IFBC said screw the grants and does fine funding without them. It lets us tell the hard truths. I know we are just a bunch of stupid white folks here who can not see that you are so much smarter than us and if we could only stop thinking and reading. The fact is the window to file a formal complaint was closed when we found out. As I told pattie and you there are many who have standing to file a complaint or suit. The Coalition has no money for lawyers but I would have made it happen and you know it. Now don’t be depressed by this but you are not a member of the steering committee and never will be. The kind ladies of the coalition will always try to sooth you but you are not in the mix in the real world conversations that matter. Go ahead and come to the open to the public meetings and complain about the Andy Capp cartoons promoting drunkenness. Let me help you with that since as usual you miss the real point, Andy Capp is a cautionary tale. He is the butt of the jokes and always ends up badly. It is too fumy that today the Marijuana Policy Project filed papers in CA for the 2016 effort connected to Gavin ( picture of teenage date with champagne while mayor gavin )Newsoms gov run. The state of things in Nevada County and the State make me wish it was in effect now. Counties like the home of the Air Force Academy and Olympic Training Center, CO springs opted out of legalization. MMJ 3 plants, grow within 1000ft of a school FELENOLY! Sounds good to me. Since you have obviously been reading too much HUFFPO I can send you the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) report on CO after legalization. Want a copy? You guys can keep trying to kill the messenger but there are way too many of us! What is really gratifying is going to groups like tonight were you all have peddled your propaganda and share the facts. Its kind of like you and pattie are laying a walkway of pavers made of propaganda and I am right behind you pulling the courses up and replacing them with the facts. Converting voters all along the way who may have sipped the Kool-Aid but not actually drank it to the point they can not think for themselves anymore. I DOUBLE DOG DARE YOU TO review the BOS minutes on your rant that excluded you from the process that developed 2349. Its so cute your posturing about the current and former DA where you were spewing your stuff and claim it was counseling them yet neither of them subscribe to your world view and both are NO ON S.

    Like

  10. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    In terms of capacity, I’m pretty certain the Nevada Theater seats more than the Rood Chambers.
    I am delighted to see Obama appears to have taken my advice from back on Sept 11th,
    “A third night of U.S.-led air strikes late on Wednesday targeted Islamic State-controlled oil refineries in eastern Syria as the United States and its partners moved to choke off a crucial source of revenue for the militant group, U.S. officials said.
    Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates joined in the strikes by piloted and drone aircraft targeting facilities around al Mayadin, al Hasakah, and Abu Kamal, the U.S. military said.
    The military said the targeted refineries, which are prefabricated and constructed off-site so they can be transported and made operational quickly, were capable of producing millions in revenue and provided fuel for Islamic State operations.

    you can see my original here: http://farstars.blogspot.com/2014/09/rubio-and-obama-both-miss-obvious.html

    Like

  11. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Doug , You are correct on the seating capacity of the old theater that is home to kvmr. The Rood is actually disabled friendly in a Legally required way and so is the parking lot. The video shows they did not come near to filling as promised. I however really tried to coax a debate as they agreed before and after the Union got conned and printed the story believing them. At Rood we had Lake the pot lawyer (check judge votes) and the head shop owner with the guy who demanded plant count be damned and give us our freedom to manage our crop! The owner of the classy head shop who said the BOS hearings on 2349, apx I as a divorced parent do not want my kid exposed to it and that’s why I do not grow in my house. == To which I responded more or less, Its interesting that Mr Webb sees the benefit of excluding access to his child, yet we are expected to accept it in our neighborhoods. If its good enough for his child so why not ours being protected too?’ – Having kids loiter for up to a half hour at bus stops every day means they see everything and they are not stupid. Only 4 bus stop issues this year. 2 on properties over 10 acres, really? The pot profiteers cant find a spot 1000ft from a stop on 10 acres? Wow, Terry Lamphier, does that really make everyone unable to grow?

    Like

  12. RL Crabb Avatar

    Andy Capp? I tried to unseat that lout twenty years ago, to make room for my comic strip about squirrels getting run over on the road. It didn’t work then either, even though I exposed him as a wife abuser. If it had been today and he had been in the NFL instead of soccer it might have turned out differently.

    Like

  13. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Wouldn’t an orginizaton associated with an action, or proposed action, only be mentioned by the name of the organization. For example, The League of Women Voters does not sign as individuals, they sign as the organization when they publish their voter guides.
    Perhaps, someone (gasp!) made a mistake in including the organization they worked for, when that organization does not take those kinds of positions.
    It sounds like neither Ms. Lovett nor Mr. Bessee are the ‘voices’ of the Coalition for a Drug Free Nevada County of Nevada.
    Besides that, this organization is apparantly in the state of Nevada.
    What a hoot!

    Like

  14. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Don
    You know your expostulations would be a lot easier to read if you learned how to use paragraphs. Paragraphs are used by writers who carefully organize their thoughts in writing allowing breathing time for the brain when changing topics. They also look good on paper.
    I just thought I’d offer an idea to make your rants more comprehensible to the casual reader.

    Like

  15. Walt Avatar

    Now Paul is the “spellin” and “grammar” police.. LOL!!!
    Funny,, I didn’t have one problem with the read.
    Some here can’t remember what was said by the end of the three lines of the third paragraph.
    Hell You can’t remember what you wrote last week. ( you keep repeating the same line.)

    Like

  16. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Just trying to be helpful Walt. Don B seems to be trying to say something. I sure can’t figure out what is is though. Life is better if we help each other.

    Like

  17. Walt Avatar

    Dougy.. Lat off that “Labrador” aged weed. We are damned sure “O” didn’t seek your advice, let alone read your email.

    Like

  18. fish Avatar
    fish

    Posted by: Walt | 25 September 2014 at 09:37 AM
    Way to play the “Cheech and Chong” card Walt! That takes me back!

    Like

  19. Walt Avatar

    You have made PLENTY of errors of your own Paul, yet you see fit to chastise others? (yet no one really calls you out on those.)
    This ditch digger will be more than happy to “correct” you on the next ones. More than happy “to help”.

    Like

  20. Walt Avatar

    Thanks Fish,, I wore that cassette tape out back in the day.
    On another note, LIBS will cover-up ANYTHING. Even the killing of a Groundhog. ( I even watched him do it! http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/09/25/groundhog-dropped-by-new-york-mayor-de-blasio-died-week-later/?intcmp=latestnews

    Like

  21. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Thanks Walt
    You’re a gem.

    Like

  22. Walt Avatar

    Glad to be of assistance.
    BTW,, get the breaking news? AG Holder is in deep trouble, and is about to step down!!
    Who will protect “O” now!? All his stalling has come to an end..

    Like

  23. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Actually Holder is leaving with the same decor as when Ashcroft hightailed it in ’05. Actually he lasted a little longer.

    Like

  24. Walt Avatar

    So? Ashcroft didn’t have the phone book of scandals he was trying to shield Bush from.
    F&F news is about to hit the fan.

    Like

  25. Don Bessee Avatar
    Don Bessee

    Measure S league of woman’s voters Debate —- Oct. 16th 7p Rood Center.

    Like

  26. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Are you kidding?
    http://www.salon.com/2005/01/18/scandal_11/
    1. Memogate: The Senate Computer Theft
    The scandal: From 2001 to 2003, Republican staffers on the Senate Judiciary Committee illicitly accessed nearly 5,000 computer files containing confidential Democratic strategy memos about President Bush’s judicial nominees. The GOP used the memos to shape their own plans and leaked some to the media.
    The problem: The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act states it is illegal to obtain confidential information from a government computer.
    The outcome: Unresolved. The Justice Department has assigned a prosecutor to the case. The staff member at the heart of the matter, Manuel Miranda, has attempted to brazen it out, filing suit in September 2004 against the DOJ to end the investigation. “A grand jury will indict a ham sandwich,” Miranda complained. Some jokes just write themselves.
    2. Doctor Detroit: The DOJ’s Bungled Terrorism Case
    The scandal: The Department of Justice completely botched the nation’s first post-9/11 terrorism trial, as seen when the convictions of three Detroit men allegedly linked to al-Qaida were overturned in September 2004. Former Attorney General John Ashcroft had claimed their June 2003 sentencing sent “a clear message” that the government would “detect, disrupt and dismantle the activities of terrorist cells.”
    The problem: The DOJ’s lead prosecutor in the case, Richard Convertino, withheld key information from the defense and distorted supposed pieces of evidence — like a Las Vegas vacation video purported to be a surveillance tape. But that’s not the half of it. Convertino says he was unfairly scapegoated because he testified before the Senate, against DOJ wishes, about terrorist financing. Justice’s reconsideration of the case began soon thereafter. Convertino has since sued the DOJ, which has also placed him under investigation.
    The outcome: Let’s see: Overturned convictions, lawsuits and feuding about a Kafkaesque case. Nobody looks good here.
    3. Dark Matter: The Energy Task Force
    The scandal: A lawsuit has claimed it is illegal for Dick Cheney to keep the composition of his 2001 energy-policy task force secret. What’s the big deal? The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer has suggested an explosive aspect of the story, citing a National Security Council memo from February 2001, which “directed the N.S.C. staff to cooperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it considered the ‘melding’ of … ‘operational policies towards rogue states,’ such as Iraq, and ‘actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields.’” In short, the task force’s activities could shed light on the administration’s pre-9/11 Iraq aims.
    The problem: The Federal Advisory Committee Act says the government must disclose the work of groups that include non-federal employees; the suit claims energy industry executives were effectively task force members. Oh, and the Bush administration has portrayed the Iraq war as a response to 9/11, not something it was already considering.
    The outcome: Unresolved. In June 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to an appellate court.
    4. The Indian Gaming Scandal
    The scandal: Potential influence peddling to the tune of $82 million, for starters. Jack Abramoff, a GOP lobbyist and major Bush fundraiser, and Michael Scanlon, a former aide to Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas), received that amount from several Indian tribes, while offering access to lawmakers. For instance, Texas’ Tigua tribe, which wanted its closed El Paso casino reopened, gave millions to the pair and $33,000 to Rep. Robert Ney (R-Ohio) in hopes of favorable legislation (Ney came up empty). And get this: The Tiguas were unaware that Abramoff, Scanlon and conservative activist Ralph Reed had earned millions lobbying to have the same casino shut in 2002.
    The problem: Federal officials want to know if Abramoff and Scanlon provided real services for the $82 million, and if they broke laws while backing candidates in numerous Indian tribe elections.
    The outcome: Everybody into the cesspool! The Senate Indian Affairs Committee and five federal agencies, including the FBI, IRS, and Justice Department, are investigating.
    5. Halliburton’s No-Bid Bonanza
    The scandal: In February 2003, Halliburton received a five-year, $7 billion no-bid contract for services in Iraq.
    The problem: The Army Corps of Engineers’ top contracting officer, Bunnatine Greenhouse, objected to the deal, saying the contract should be the standard one-year length, and that a Halliburton official should not have been present during the discussions.
    The outcome: The FBI is investigating. The $7 billion contract was halved and Halliburton won one of the parts in a public bid. For her troubles, Greenhouse has been forced into whistle-blower protection.
    6. Halliburton: Pumping Up Prices
    The scandal: In 2003, Halliburton overcharged the army for fuel in Iraq. Specifically, Halliburton’s subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root hired a Kuwaiti company, Altanmia, to supply fuel at about twice the going rate, then added a markup, for an overcharge of at least $61 million, according to a December 2003 Pentagon audit.
    The problem: That’s not the government’s $61 million, it’s our $61 million.
    The outcome: The FBI is investigating.
    7. Halliburton’s Vanishing Iraq Money
    The scandal: In mid-2004, Pentagon auditors determined that $1.8 billion of Halliburton’s charges to the government, about 40 percent of the total, had not been adequately documented.
    The problem: That’s not the government’s $1.8 billion, it’s our $1.8 billion.
    The outcome: The Defense Contract Audit Agency has “strongly” asked the Army to withhold about $60 million a month from its Halliburton payments until the documentation is provided.
    8. The Halliburton Bribe-apalooza
    The scandal: This may not surprise you, but an international consortium of companies, including Halliburton, is alleged to have paid more than $100 million in bribes to Nigerian officials, from 1995 to 2002, to facilitate a natural-gas-plant deal. (Cheney was Halliburton’s CEO from 1995 to 2000.)
    The problem: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits U.S. companies from bribing foreign officials.
    The outcome: A veritable coalition of the willing is investigating the deal, including the Justice Department, the SEC, the Nigerian government and a French magistrate. In June, Halliburton fired two implicated executives.
    9. Halliburton: One Fine Company
    The scandal: In 1998 and 1999, Halliburton counted money recovered from project overruns as revenue, before settling the charges with clients.
    The problem: Doing so made the company’s income appear larger, but Halliburton did not explain this to investors. The SEC ruled this accounting practice was “materially misleading.”
    The outcome: In August 2004, Halliburton agreed to pay a $7.5 million fine to settle SEC charges. One Halliburton executive has paid a fine and another is settling civil charges. Now imagine the right-wing rhetoric if, say, Al Gore had once headed a firm fined for fudging income statements.
    10. Halliburton’s Iran End Run
    The scandal: Halliburton may have been doing business with Iran while Cheney was CEO.
    The problem: Federal sanctions have banned U.S. companies from dealing directly with Iran. To operate in Iran legally, U.S. companies have been required to set up independent subsidiaries registered abroad. Halliburton thus set up a new entity, Halliburton Products and Services Ltd., to do business in Iran, but while the subsidiary was registered in the Cayman Islands, it may not have had operations totally independent of the parent company.
    The outcome: Unresolved. The Treasury Department has referred the case to the U.S. attorney in Houston, who convened a grand jury in July 2004.
    11. Money Order: Afghanistan’s Missing $700 Million Turns Up in Iraq
    The scandal: According to Bob Woodward’s “Plan of Attack,” the Bush administration diverted $700 million in funds from the war in Afghanistan, among other places, to prepare for the Iraq invasion.
    The problem: Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 of the U.S. Constitution specifically gives Congress the power “to raise and support armies.” And the emergency spending bill passed after Sept. 11, 2001, requires the administration to notify Congress before changing war spending plans. That did not happen.
    The outcome: Congress declined to investigate. The administration’s main justification for its decision has been to claim the funds were still used for, one might say, Middle East anti-tyrant-related program activities.
    12. Iraq: More Loose Change
    The scandal: The inspector general of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq released a series of reports in July 2004 finding that a significant portion of CPA assets had gone missing — 34 percent of the materiel controlled by Kellogg, Brown & Root — and that the CPA’s method of disbursing $600 million in Iraq reconstruction funds “did not establish effective controls and left accountability open to fraud, waste and abuse.”
    The problem: As much as $50 million of that money was disbursed without proper receipts.
    The outcome: The CPA has disbanded, but individual government investigations into the handling of Iraq’s reconstruction continue.
    13. The Pentagon-Israel Spy Case
    The scandal: A Pentagon official, Larry Franklin, may have passed classified United States documents about Iran to Israel, possibly via the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a Washington lobbying group.
    The problem: To do so could be espionage or could constitute the mishandling of classified documents.
    The outcome: A grand jury is investigating. In December 2004, the FBI searched AIPAC’s offices. A Senate committee has also been investigating the apparently unauthorized activities of the Near East and South Asia Affairs group in the Pentagon, where Franklin works.
    14. Gone to Taiwan
    The scandal: Missed this one? A high-ranking State Department official, Donald Keyser, was arrested and charged in September with making a secret trip to Taiwan and was observed by the FBI passing documents to Taiwanese intelligence agents in Washington-area meetings.
    The problem: Such unauthorized trips are illegal. And we don’t have diplomatic relations with Taiwan.
    The outcome: The case is in the courts.
    15. Wiretapping the United Nations
    The scandal: Before the United Nations’ vote on the Iraq war, the United States and Great Britain developed an eavesdropping operation targeting diplomats from several countries.
    The problem: U.N. officials say the practice is illegal and undermines honest diplomacy, although some observers claim it is business as usual on East 42nd Street.
    The outcome: Little fuss here, but a major British scandal erupted after U.K. intelligence translator Katherine Gun leaked a U.S. National Security Agency memo requesting British help in the spying scheme, in early 2003. Initially charged under Britain’s Official Secrets Act for leaking classified information, Gun was cleared in 2004 — seemingly to avoid hearings questioning the legality of Britain’s war participation.
    16. The Boeing Boondoggle
    The scandal: In 2003, the Air Force contracted with Boeing to lease a fleet of refueling tanker planes at an inflated price: $23 billion.
    The problem: The deal was put together by a government procurement official, Darleen Druyun, who promptly joined Boeing. Beats using a headhunter.
    The outcome: In November 2003, Boeing fired both Druyun and CFO Michael Sears. In April 2004, Druyun pled guilty to a conspiracy charge in the case. In November 2004, Sears copped to a conflict-of-interest charge, and company CEO Phil Condit resigned. The government is reviewing its need for the tankers.
    17. The Medicare Bribe Scandal
    The scandal: According to former Rep. Nick Smith (R-Mich.), on Nov. 21, 2003, with the vote on the administration’s Medicare bill hanging in the balance, someone offered to contribute $100,000 to his son’s forthcoming congressional campaign, if Smith would support the bill.
    The problem: Federal law prohibits the bribery of elected officials.
    The outcome: In September 2004, the House Ethics Committee concluded an inquiry by fingering House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas), saying he deserved “public admonishment” for offering to endorse Smith’s son in return for Smith’s vote. DeLay has claimed Smith initiated talks about a quid pro quo. The matter of the $100,000 is unresolved; soon after his original allegations, Smith suddenly claimed he had not been offered any money. Smith’s son Brad lost his GOP primary in August 2004.
    18. Tom DeLay’s PAC Problems
    The scandal: One of DeLay’s political action committees, Texans for a Republican Majority, apparently reaped illegal corporate contributions for the campaigns of Republicans running for the Texas Legislature in 2002. Given a Republican majority, the Legislature then re-drew Texas’ U.S. congressional districts to help the GOP.
    The problem: Texas law bans the use of corporate money for political purposes.
    The outcome: Unresolved. Three DeLay aides and associates — Jim Ellis, John Colyandro and Warren RoBold — were charged in September 2004 with crimes including money laundering and unlawful acceptance of corporate contributions.
    19. Tom DeLay’s FAA: Following Americans Anywhere
    The scandal: In May 2003, DeLay’s office persuaded the Federal Aviation Administration to find the plane carrying a Texas Democratic legislator, who was leaving the state in an attempt to thwart the GOP’s nearly unprecedented congressional redistricting plan.
    The problem: According to the House Ethics Committee, the “invocation of federal executive branch resources in a partisan dispute before a state legislative body” is wrong.
    The outcome: In October 2004, the committee rebuked DeLay for his actions.
    20. In the Rough: Tom DeLay’s Golf Fundraiser
    The scandal: DeLay appeared at a golf fundraiser that Westar Energy held for one of his political action committees, Americans for a Republican Majority, while energy legislation was pending in the House.
    The problem: It’s one of these “appearance of impropriety” situations.
    The outcome: The House Ethics Committee tossed the matter into its Oct. 6 rebuke. “Take a lap, Tom.”
    21. Busy, Busy, Busy in New Hampshire
    The scandal: In 2002, with a tight Senate race in New Hampshire, Republican Party officials paid a Virginia-based firm, GOP Marketplace, to enact an Election Day scheme meant to depress Democratic turnout by “jamming” the Democratic Party phone bank with continuous calls for 90 minutes.
    The problem: Federal law prohibits the use of telephones to “annoy or harass” anyone.
    The outcome: Chuck McGee, the former executive director of the New Hampshire GOP, pleaded guilty in July 2004 to a felony charge, while Allen Raymond, former head of GOP Marketplace, pleaded guilty to a similar charge in June. In December, James Tobin, former New England campaign chairman of Bush-Cheney ’04, was indicted for conspiracy in the case.
    22. The Medicare Money Scandal
    The scandal: Thomas Scully, Medicare’s former administrator, supposedly threatened to fire chief Medicare actuary Richard Foster to prevent him from disclosing the true cost of the 2003 Medicare bill.
    The problem: Congress voted on the bill believing it would cost $400 billion over 10 years. The program is more likely to cost $550 billion.
    The outcome: Scully denies threatening to fire Foster, as Foster has charged, but admits telling Foster to withhold the higher estimate from Congress. In September 2004, the Government Accountability Office recommended Scully return half his salary from 2003. Inevitably, Scully is now a lobbyist for drug companies helped by the bill.
    23. The Bogus Medicare “Video News Release”
    The scandal: To promote its Medicare bill, the Bush administration produced imitation news-report videos touting the legislation. About 40 television stations aired the videos. More recently, similar videos promoting the administration’s education policy have come to light.
    The problem: The administration broke two laws: One forbidding the use of federal money for propaganda, and another forbidding the unauthorized use of federal funds.
    The outcome: In May 2004, the GAO concluded the administration acted illegally, but the agency lacks enforcement power.
    24. Pundits on the Payroll: The Armstrong Williams Case
    The scandal: The Department of Education paid conservative commentator Armstrong Williams $240,000 to promote its educational law, No Child Left Behind.
    The problem: Williams did not disclose that his support was government funded until the deal was exposed in January 2005.
    The outcome: The House and FCC are considering inquiries, while Williams’ syndicated newspaper column has been terminated.
    25. Ground Zero’s Unsafe Air
    The scandal: Government officials publicly minimized the health risks stemming from the World Trade Center attack. In September 2001, for example, Environmental Protection Agency head Christine Todd Whitman said New York’s “air is safe to breathe and [the] water is safe to drink.”
    The problem: Research showed serious dangers or was incomplete. The EPA used outdated techniques that failed to detect tiny asbestos particles. EPA data also showed high levels of lead and benzene, which causes cancer. A Sierra Club report claims the government ignored alarming data. A GAO report says no adequate study of 9/11′s health effects has been organized.
    The outcome: The long-term health effects of the disaster will likely not be apparent for years or decades and may never be definitively known. Already, hundreds of 9/11 rescue workers have quit their jobs because of acute illnesses.
    26. John Ashcroft’s Illegal Campaign Contributions
    The scandal: Ashcroft’s exploratory committee for his short-lived 2000 presidential bid transferred $110,000 to his unsuccessful 2000 reelection campaign for the Senate.
    The problem: The maximum for such a transfer is $10,000.
    The outcome: The Federal Election Commission fined Ashcroft’s campaign treasurer, Garrett Lott, $37,000 for the transgression.
    27. Intel Inside … The White House
    The scandal: In early 2001, chief White House political strategist Karl Rove held meetings with numerous companies while maintaining six-figure holdings of their stock — including Intel, whose executives were seeking government approval of a merger. “Washington hadn’t seen a clearer example of a conflict of interest in years,” wrote Paul Glastris in the Washington Monthly.
    The problem: The Code of Federal Regulations says government employees should not participate in matters in which they have a personal financial interest.
    The outcome: Then White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, spurning precedent, did not refer the case to the Justice Department.
    28. Duck! Antonin Scalia’s Legal Conflicts
    The scandal: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia refused to recuse himself from the Cheney energy task force case, despite taking a duck-hunting trip with the vice president after the court agreed to weigh the matter.
    The problem: Federal law requires a justice to “disqualify himself from any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
    The outcome: Scalia stayed on, arguing no conflict existed because Cheney was party to the case in a professional, not personal, capacity. Nothing new for Scalia, who in 2002 was part of a Mississippi redistricting ruling favorable to GOP Rep. Chip Pickering — son of Judge Charles Pickering, a Scalia turkey-hunting pal. In 2001, Scalia went pheasant hunting with Kansas Gov. Bill Graves when that state had cases pending before the Supreme Court.
    29. AWOL
    The scandal: George W. Bush, self-described “war president,” did not fulfill his National Guard duty, and Bush and his aides have made misleading statements about it. Salon’s Eric Boehlert wrote the best recent summary of the issue.
    The problem: Military absenteeism is a punishable offense, although Bush received an honorable discharge.
    The outcome: No longer a campaign issue. But what was Bush doing in 1972?
    30. Iraq: The Case for War
    The scandal: Bush and many officials in his administration made false statements about Iraq’s military capabilities, in the months before the United States’ March 2003 invasion of the country.
    The problem: For one thing, it is a crime to lie to Congress, although Bush backers claim the president did not knowingly make false assertions.
    The outcome: A war spun out of control with unknowable long-term consequences. The Iraq Survey Group has stopped looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
    31. Niger Forgeries: Whodunit?
    The scandal: In his January 2003 State of the Union address, Bush said, “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”
    The problem: The statement was untrue. By March 2003, the International Atomic Energy Agency showed the claim, that Iraq sought materials from Niger, was based on easily discernible forgeries.
    The outcome: The identity of the forger(s) remains under wraps. Journalist Josh Marshall has implied the FBI is oddly uninterested in interviewing Rocco Martino, the former Italian intelligence agent who apparently first shopped the documents in intelligence and journalistic circles and would presumably be able to shed light on their origin.
    32. In Plame Sight
    The scandal: In July 2003, administration officials disclosed the identity of Valerie Plame, a CIA operative working on counterterrorism efforts, to multiple journalists, and columnist Robert Novak made Plame’s identity public. Plame’s husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had just written a New York Times opinion piece stating he had investigated the Niger uranium-production allegations, at the CIA’s behest, and reported them to be untrue, before Bush’s 2003 State of the Union address.
    The problem: Under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act it is illegal to disclose, knowingly, the name of an undercover agent.
    The outcome: Unresolved. The Justice Department appointed special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald to the case in December 2003. While this might seem a simple matter, Fitzgerald could be unable to prove the leakers knew Plame was a covert agent.
    33. Abu Ghraib
    The scandal: American soldiers physically tortured prisoners in Iraq and kept undocumented “ghost detainees” in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.
    The problem: The United States is party to the Geneva Conventions, which state that “No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever.”
    The outcome: Unresolved. A Pentagon internal inquiry found a lack of oversight at Abu Ghraib, while independent inquiries have linked the events to the administration’s desire to use aggressive interrogation methods globally. Notoriously, Gonzales has advocated an approach which “renders obsolete Geneva’s strict limitations on questioning of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions.” More recently, Gonzales issued qualified support for the Geneva Conventions in January 2005 Senate testimony after being nominated for attorney general. Army reservist Charles Graner was convicted in January 2005 for abusing prisoners, while a few other soldiers await trial.
    34. Guantánamo Bay Torture?
    The scandal: The U.S. military is also alleged to have abused prisoners at the U.S. Navy’s base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. FBI agents witnessing interrogations there have reported use of growling dogs to frighten prisoners and the chaining of prisoners in the fetal position while depriving them of food or water for extended periods.
    The problem: More potential violations of the Geneva Conventions.
    The outcome: An internal military investigation was launched in January 2005.

    Like

  27. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    Oh, well, nobody’s perfect!

    Like

  28. Walt Avatar

    Nice cut and paste job Paul, Which “Blame Bush” LIB web site did you pilfer that from?
    Now put up Holder’s dastardly deeds. ( to be fair)( Yaa…. right)

    Like

  29. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1047am – Well, accepting all that as God’s truth, it sure looks like Obama has a built up an account of Bush scandals that’s bankable with the liberals. I guess the argument is that since those happened then, anything now is a go. Good explanation of how the lamestream views the goings on of this administration. Thanks.

    Like

  30. Walt Avatar

    BTW.. FIRST to be held in CONTEMPT. Then hides behind “O”‘s skirts.
    he did a fine job of not prosecuting anyone who was a LIB.
    No interest in justice. He is political 100% protectionist.
    And he went after your pot clan despite “orders” not too. You should be happy!
    Take off those round rose colored glasses ( is colored a racist term now? Not sure these days.) and stop protecting him because he’s a Progressive in deep trouble.

    Like

  31. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    “Obama has built up an account…”? Peter Dizikes is a science journalist based in Boston.

    Like

  32. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    The above list of “Bush-isms” is no less bankable than all the, so-called, progressive gotchas that have been belabored here and elsewhere. It is just politics. Just finished watching the Roosevelt documentary and was reminded that this kind of crap has been going on, and on, and on, for centuries.

    Like

  33. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I’m just trying to put things in historical perspective.

    Like

  34. Walt Avatar

    Paul. If Ashcroft picked the wrong stall in the bathroom to crap in, LIBS wanted an investigation. ” Historical prospective”. If LIBS couldn’t find a damned thing, evidence was manufactured. ( Rathergate?)
    Back then LIBS were on the terrorists side. How dare we make those bad guys the least bit uncomfortable. TORTURE!!!! the camp guards had to handle their “holy book” with white gloves. All at Congressional LIB demand. Look at today at what it got us.

    Like

  35. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC 1131am – You misunderstood my 1114am. I stated that PaulE’s list of “Bush-isms” IS bankable by the Left. And clearly, the Left does NOT consider the current spate of “Obama-isms” bankable.

    Like

  36. Walt Avatar

    The comment that will live in infamy ” Not a smidgen of corruption”. Right Brad?
    Wait till the Senate is in Conservative hands. The Senate has the power to send people to jail. The House doesn’t.
    Why do you think Holder want’s out,, and FAST?
    The latest from Holder. ” The justice system is unfair to Blacks”

    Like

  37. fish Avatar
    fish

    I’m just trying to put things in historical perspective.
    This is why it’s ridiculous to get upset at either faction of the bi-factional ruling party.
    Did Bush do it…the litany of crimes that Paul posted……absolutely he did!
    Where Team Red State can feel just a little more sanguine about the whole sordid state of affairs is that I don’t recall Bush campaigning that he was going to “undo” all the crimes committed buy the Clinton Administration (he did say that his administration wasn’t going to engage in “Nation Building” and then turn around and invade Iraq though…so there’s that) he wasn’t going to be as sleazy as Clinton (well sleazy appearing anyway). Contrast that with President Hope n’ Change….. the “most transparent” administration in history was going to roll back all the abuses of civil liberties that Bush’s domestic security apparatus wrought, grow a just and expanding economy, give you free quality health care, improve race relations, and get your teeth their whitest!
    I submit that Obama has failed on all five counts, Bush did manage to appear less sleazy than his immediate predecessor.

    Like

  38. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    As a former Obama supporter I agree that he has many “bankable” scandals although we may disagree on specifics. One thing that I can say for certain is that I did not vote for him second time around which is something that the genetic Republians on this blog cannot say about Bush in ’05. I say enough is enough. No more Republicrats for me.

    Like

  39. Paul Emery Avatar

    Libs on the terrorist side Brad? Not long ago you and your ilk were bragging about the Dems support support for the war Iraq in ’02. You can’t have it both ways.

    Like

  40. Paul Emery Avatar

    Typo
    Thats” Libs on the terrorist side Walt”

    Like

  41. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul Emery you are correct, I voted for Bush in 2004 because I agreed with him. There you have it, and I guess many did too as your hero, John Kerry could not sell his brand of lib BS.

    Like

  42. Walt Avatar

    I will stand by that Paul,, Sadam had it coming. Bush caved to LIB demands because our attacks were “TOO” one sided. ( highway of death pictures, as the murderous thugs and pillagers fled Kuwait ) Then he gassed his own people.( Use of WMDs)
    How did all that ” talking to our enemies” work out?
    “O” trades the top terrorists for one traitor.
    LIBS bashed Bush for the Patriot act yet not a peep when it’s been used against us.

    Like

  43. Brad C. Avatar
    Brad C.

    George, 1150am- Yes, the Bushisms are stored in a lockbox by the Left and, likewise, the Obamisms are stored in undisclosed location by the Right to be trotted out during future political arguments.

    Like

  44. Walt Avatar

    Remember Paul? NOTHING could be said that could be even the slightest, that might hurt the radical Muslims feelings and ideals. Yet Christian bashing was accepted and encouraged.
    (9/11 was an inside job and Bush knew) Bush caused hurricane Katrina, Bush lit the fuse to blow up the levies. Bush ordered the shootings of the survivors.
    Remember all that?

    Like

  45. Walt Avatar

    I can see the Pardons list now. No need to name names,, it will just cover the entire Obummer administration, and every appointee, their next in command, and six levels of underlings. ( or just write ” PARDONED” on the current D.C. Liberal capital Hill phone book.)

    Like

  46. fish Avatar
    fish

    …..and in other news…
    “Local man trumpets not grandstanding about local issue by grandstanding about related local issue”.
    He’s right….you can’t make this stuff up.
    ….and as always LOL!

    Like

  47. Walt Avatar

    Rush nailed it today.
    LIBS said the war in Iraq was all about oil.( yet we didn’t get a free drop)
    So this attack on Syria is all about votes.( LIB votes)
    Someone must have sent “O” a set of prosthetic balls. There is no way he did this for “the right reasons”. The only time LIBS do the right thing is when they act like Conservatives.

    Like

  48. Paul Emery Avatar

    Just to satisfy my curiosity Walt what do you think the war in Iraq was about?

    Like

  49. Walt Avatar

    What the hell difference does it make Paul? ( to quote a Progressive) You will find fault with my opinion no matter what I say.( damn the facts)
    It sure wasn’t about free oil as LIBS claimed. Click on over to Berkeley U of the net.(wiki)
    I’m sure it has the answers to the wonders of that universe.

    Like

Leave a comment