Rebane's Ruminations
August 2014
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

When seeking solutions to society's problems, always hold government guilty until proven innocent.

Modern progressivism is the most cynically named socio-political ideology since the world of Orwell’s 1984.  Evidence abounds that there is literally nothing progressive for organizing human society in the (niggardly revealed) tenets and expanding practice of progressivism – it gives rise to arguably the most regressive politics in the so-called free world.  Thomas Sowell, celebrated social theorist, economist, political philosopher, and senior fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institute, argues convincingly that “growing evidence suggests that we are living in a post-thinking era.”

He joins many learned observers of the human condition to conclude that in America we are wallowing in a rising mire of dumbth in which main street is no longer capable of thinking through even the most basic concepts that ultimately impact their lives.  This deficit is the visible preamble to not being able to reason about simple decisions from what they read, see, and experience.  Progressives throughout the land are uniformly blind to that state of affairs and continue promoting programs and public policies guaranteed to remove the last vestiges of independent and critical thought from the public forum.  (In this context consider the online outpourings of local progressives.)

Dr Sowell gives examples to underline his assertion in ‘If people would just think things through …’.  When we focus on the particulars presented it is simply mind boggling that an advanced society like ours can be induced to regress as rapidly as we have witnessed in the past decades of impeccably regulated politically correct thought, speech, and conduct.  None of this should be a surprise for RR readers; we review it here because the speed of our downward spiral is picking up.

To underline this trail of tears for those who still can and do think, I draw your attention again to the Common Core education standard much covered and discussed in these pages.  UC Berkeley professor emerita and honored mathematician Dr Marina Ratner recently examined Common Core’s math standards and the curricula that it has inspired across the land.  She presents a summary of her analysis and professional conclusions in ‘Making Math Education Even Worse’.

There she begins by joining many of us in amazement that we have ignored the successful instruction methodologies and texts used in advanced countries that regularly beat America's youth in international math ratings, and instead have spent almost $16B in devising a new standard that is “several years behind old standards, especially in the higher grades”, and specifically “vastly inferior to the old California standards in rigor, depth and the scope of topics.”

Common Core is so flawed that even one of its authors, Jason Zimba, admits “that the new standards wouldn’t prepare students for colleges to which ‘most parents aspire’ to send their children.”  To this the good professor gives sufficient examples and details to make your eyes roll and heads spin (assuming you are not among the sad cohort described by Thomas Sowell).

Dr Ratner concludes that “American students are already struggling against the competition.  The Common Core won’t help them succeed”, but instead “will move the US even closer to the bottom in international ranking.”

My point here is that this may well be the progressives’ long sought coup de grace to take America down from its position of world greatness and leadership.  As pointed out here and by noted national thinkers over the last years, there is a definite agenda being followed by collectivists to bring the US to heel in the community of nations.  Dinesh D’souza takes his readers through an expanded trail of evidence for this assertion in his recent America: Imagine a World without her.  Saddened I continue to observe how willingly and without whimper we travel this path to oblivion from the pages of post-tipping point history now being written.  And yes, it is all due to the spread of the stifling and  diseased memes of progressive thought already metastisized in America.  We should think about it while we still can.

Posted in , , , ,

80 responses to “We can’t think about Common Core, or anything else …”

  1. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Thanks, Russ.
    From The Union:
    ““It allows teachers to go deeper into subject matter,” said Nevada County Superintendent of Schools Associate Superintendent of Educational Services Shar Johns. “The old 1997 standards, people have said would take a K-12 curriculum, because there were too many of them and so they were a mile wide and an inch deep.”
    California’s previous educational content standards were adopted in December 1997, and according to Johns, focused a lot on rote memorization in the application of passing a test.”
    That’s pure fantasy. The California Content Standards were just that… content standards for textbook publishers. Books were reviewed by the state Dept. of Ed for the content. There was no testing requirement in the standards; the STAR exam predated the content standards. Kids were not required to learn ANYTHING by rote, nor were any of the approved textbooks based on rote.
    John’s appears to be shilling for the CCSS push.

    Like

  2. Michael R. Kesti Avatar
    Michael R. Kesti

    I was complimented for a bit of multitasking I performed at work this week and am certain that a lifetime of playing bass while singing has contributed greatly to that ability. It may be part of having ridden 250,000 street miles on motorcycles without any significant injury, too.

    Like

  3. fish Avatar
    fish

    It may be part of having ridden 250,000 street miles on motorcycles without any significant injury, too.
    Lucky bastard!
    I had 13 whole miles on my bike before a woman decided, in mid turn, that she didn’t want to go to the church on the right but that she much preferred the denomination on the left and made a fishhook like turn that left me to lovingly cradle my new Yamaha with my left arm, leg and ribs so it wouldn’t sustain significant damage on the asphalt.
    Of course the left side of my body still wonders if I made the right decision.

    Like

  4. Joe Koyote Avatar
    Joe Koyote

    “For decades, the goobermint has reacted to increasing college costs by making it easier for students to borrow ever increasing amounts of money based on what the admissions departments were telling kids about the value of the education they were about to buy.”
    Does anyone think the banks (who profit the most from student loans along with ‘for profit’ schools like U of Phoenix,etc) have had anything to do with this? Have the banks lobbied congress for more lax student loan requirements? In some cases up to 85% (the regulated maximum) of fees charged by for profit schools comes from student loans. Any duplicity here?

    Like

  5. fish Avatar
    fish

    So what’s the problem Joe…..we heap the majority of the blame on the government where we feel it belongs. You heap the majority of the blame on the banks where you feel it is more properly directed.
    In the end…all guilty parties stand properly accused.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    JoeK 1002am – that is a precious example of progressive thought illustrating our downward spiral. Of course banks will lobby government for all kinds of programs that will allow them to lend the most with the lowest risk – that is their raison d’etre. But for some to breathlessly attempt to blame banks for the school loan/debt debacle is like holding the father blameless while blaming the unlicensed teen, who pines for his dad’s car and then wrecks it, for the accident. We elect and suffer the hubris and antics of government for it to be the wise arbiter of public policies which are and have always been lobbied for favorable tweaking by special interest groups.
    The progressive mind holds the private for-profit guilty and government innocent when shit hits the fan. In such cases the conservetarian holds government guilty until proven innocent.

    Like

  7. Walt Avatar

    “I was complimented for a bit of multitasking I performed at work this week”…
    OK,,,, a “complement” for walking and chewing gum at the same time. And a nice shinny star if you add texting without walking into a sign post. ( points lost for not seeing that low hanging tree limb, or open mine shaft.) Plenty of youtube videos that bare that out.

    Like

  8. Walt Avatar

    LIBS love to stack bullshT on top of bullsht and try and feed it to our kids as fact.
    Now AGW and common score are bedmates?
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/08/new-york-common-core-test-quizzes-kids-on-global-warming/
    GOD help the parents that bitch to the school boards. They may need a bake sale to raise bail money.. Damn… Forgot bake sales have been outlawed as well.
    And decent from a parent has been deemed a threat of bodily harm to school officials, and many a parent have been hauled away in handcuffs because they spoke up against “CC”.
    Let’s just hope that doesn’t happen in good ol’ Nevada Co. We have already witnessed the militant Left is capable of, and that was just about a bill board with a cross or two on it.

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Banks arent involved in the federally insured student loans anymore, folks. The feds loan the money and it doesnt matter how bankrupt you are, or why you are bankrupt.

    Like

  10. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    https://www.wellsfargo.com/student/federal-loans/
    is where the big money flows originate and Wells Fargo was cut out of that in 2010

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 349pm – My only point was that Wells Fargo is still actively in the student loan business as the URL in my 314pm indicates. They claim no federal guarantees on their loans, but then the feds can make you pay them back also (if I recall, your subsequent bankruptcy declaration does not include your federally guaranteed student loan). But I believe the fed actually guarantees repayment to their hidden lenders of the student loan money which may include banks. The feds basically act as a loan broker. Is that also your understanding?

    Like

  12. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The federal programs are about 80% of the dollar volume, the big enabler of excess of colleges and the weighing down of students with a rillion bucks of debt that many will not be able to repay.

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “The feds basically act as a loan broker. Is that also your understanding?”
    Not anymore.

    Like

  14. Walt Avatar

    ” rillion bucks”.. Don’t let LIBS know that exists. Soon that may be our new debt limit.

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    The 2nd Commandment of Big Brother: Do not criticize the Sacred Cow.

    Like

  16. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Mr. Walt. Our dear close personal friends of the liberal affliction have been asking what comes after a trillion bucks every since the one two punch of the Toxic Asset Relief Program and The B. H. Obama Stimulus Recovery Act of 2009 hit us like a 2×4.
    Our dear friends continue to say we need more money but do not know what comes after a trillion. Now we can say it’s a Rillion. Sorry Mr. Gregory, it was just too delicious to not pass up. :). Olive juice

    Like

  17. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    The “rillion” was a result of posting using an Android phone while attending a child’s birthday party in Reno; text manipulation isn’t as secure using a tiny text window on a phone.
    One never knows how entertaining a typo is going to be to someone; I expect it will get old to you eventually.

    Like

  18. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Regarding student loans, perhaps this entry from the wiki will make the current situation more clear to George and others:
    “Following the passage of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, the Federal Direct Loan Program is the sole government-backed loan program in the United States. Guaranteed loans—loans originated and funded by private lenders but guaranteed by the government—were eliminated because of a perception that they benefited private student loan companies at the expense of taxpayers, but did not help reduce costs for students.”

    Like

  19. George Rebane Avatar

    re Gregory’s 530pm – A more careful reading of my post and subsequent comments will reveal that the marginal clarity provided here is zero. Nevertheless, such attempts to educate the less enlightened of us should not be curtailed.

    Like

  20. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Maybe this careful reading will help you, George:
    “But I believe the fed actually guarantees repayment to their hidden lenders of the student loan money which may include banks. The feds basically act as a loan broker. Is that also your understanding?” -GR 4:03PM Aug 9
    “Direct Loans are low-interest loans for students and parents to help pay for the cost of a student’s education after high school. The lender is the U.S. Department of Education (the Department)”
    http://www.direct.ed.gov/student.html
    So no, the Feds are not a broker… they are the loan maker. Is that now your understanding?

    Like

  21. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 1033pm – Let me be more specific about my student loan confusion, and perhaps you can then provide some clarity. Today students can debt finance their education through 1) private loans (no govt involvement), 2) govt guaranteed private loans, 3) “govt backed” loans, and 4) govt loans. In 1) the private lender markets, sets the terms, lends its own secured funds, and takes the hit if the loan goes sour. In 2) the private lender markets, sets the terms, lends its own secured funds, but is held harmless by the govt if the loan goes bad. In 3) the govt markets, sets the terms, lends money obtained from a private lender at fixed terms and who is held harmless with the govt taking the hit for bad loans. In 4) there is no private lender involvement, the govt markets the loan, sets the terms, uses legally prescribed money out of its own general fund, and, of course, suffers the hit for bad loans.
    So I do understand that type 2) loans are no longer available. But is the govt involved in type 3) or 4) or both 3) and 4) types of loans? Or do ‘govt loan’ and ‘govt backed loan’ just suffer from sloppy labeling and really mean the same thing? Then which kind of loan is it?

    Like

  22. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    George, it is my understanding that only your type 1 (private loans without government guarantee, mostly sourced from the former GSE Sallie Mae) and type 4 loans (loans made by the government) exist at the moment. Some or all of the type 4 (the government is the actual lender) loans are serviced by banks but the bank has no exposure; they are just a middleman between the Federal Dept. of Ed and the student.

    Like

  23. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Rather than “exist” I should say “made”. Loans made prior to the Feds taking over in 2010 continue under the terms of the contract.

    Like

  24. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 126pm – By “serviced by banks” I understand that the banks handle only the administrative tasks of debt service by the student/borrower for which they charge a fee. But such banks have “no exposure” because their own money never enters such transactions and therefore is never at risk. BTW, having only type 1) and 4) loans was not my understanding. I thought that today only type 1) and 3) student loans were available. I have no handy information to back my (mis?)understanding.

    Like

  25. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    “In 3) the govt markets, sets the terms, lends money obtained from a private lender at fixed terms and who is held harmless with the govt taking the hit for bad loans” -GR
    In a word, no.
    The government is lending government money, although I suppose you could make the case for it being a type 3 with the private lender being the People’s Republic of China or other buyers of federal notes, but that would be a stretch.
    George, this was put in place with Obamacare bill reconciliations in 2010, you might have been distracted, but the ‘type 4’ federal lending is said to be about 80% of the total with 20% being type 1 with crappier terms, since it’s private money and private risk.
    I can find no source that backs your “type 3” view of current Federal student lending.

    Like

  26. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    Checking a trade school that has a Roseville location, Heald “College”, the private type 1 loan maker they have lined up charges 14.9%. Ouch.
    I can only imagine the hard sell the Heald financial aid “advisors” make to some kid who can’t get more Federal money and have to resort to what amounts to credit card interest rates to get a diploma for some low level trade. I remember an academically weak nephew of my first wife who got a hard sell from a similar school and he had a hard time walking away from them, but he did. I’m pretty sure had he taken that route he’d have been saddled with many thousands of debt, probably no diploma and no related job.

    Like

  27. George Rebane Avatar

    Gregory 259pm – “In a word, no”??!! We may be talking past each other again. I have defined 3) as stated, which is my prerogative in such a discussion. Are you stating that a type 3) loan cannot be so defined, or are you saying that type 3) loans (as defined) don’t exist? I think you meant the latter with your curt statement.
    So the best evidence is that the govt only does type 4) loans, and gets the money from its general fund. I’ll keep my eye open for any possibility that they are really (also?) doing type 3) loans. Thanks.

    Like

  28. Gregory Avatar
    Gregory

    ” I think you meant the latter with your curt statement.”
    Give that man a cigar.
    “So the best evidence is that the govt only does type 4) loans, and gets the money from its general fund.”
    The only evidence is that the gov’t only does type 4. Here’s one example, repeated from above:
    “Direct Loans are low-interest loans for students and parents to help pay for the cost of a student’s education after high school. The lender is the U.S. Department of Education (the Department)”
    http://www.direct.ed.gov/student.html

    Like

Leave a comment