Rebane's Ruminations
April 2014
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Recently the Media Research Center released two reports on how Americans are exposed to what is happening domestically and in the world.  The data in those reports show that most of us who depend on the lamestream and Spanish language outlets get a totally different picture of what is happening – mainly the leftward lean of these stations is obvious in what is not covered and what is brushed aside with a mention of a few seconds on Saturday night.

For example, Hispanics who restrict their news sources to Univision or Telemundo receive a fairy tale version of the Obama administration that has no domestic or foreign policy blemishes let alone gross screw-ups (more here).  They hear nothing of the NSA scandal, Fast and Furious, Obamacare’s shortcomings, IRS targeting of conservatives, Benghazi, or the fiascos in Syria and Ukraine.  Even the nation’s immigration reform picture is tailored for them.

Speaking of immigration reform, the rest of the lamestream led by ABC, CBS, and NBC have uniformly suppressed the news that “immigration enforcement has totally collapsed” (Sen Jeff Sessions R-AL).  The DHS reported that the administration, under DOJ direction, chose to release in the US over 70,000 illegal aliens with criminal records last year instead of deporting them as called for by law.  In its stead, Team Obama is crowing that it “deported” over 250,000 such aliens.   But no lamestream is picking up that these deportees were persons caught crossing the border and simply returned immediately to Mexico.  Such catch and return cases have never been included in the reported deportation numbers that formerly involved only illegal aliens who had successfully established themselves in some manner, and then discovered by ICE and deported after due process.

This list can go on indefinitely and is definitely lopsided when it comes to comparing the completeness of news coverage by right vs left-leaning media.  So when we consider what people know and believe, we are definitely of two separate worlds.  And this division does not even include those folks with little or no ability to assimilate any kind of news because of other cognitive deficiencies.  And they are the ripe pickings of Democrats and the progressive message.

It must be this cohort that the voter registration forms, pre-marked by some liberal worthy, were sent to as part of Covered California’s outreach to include voter registration with Obamacare sign-ups.  Apparently the political party of choice was ‘Democratic Party’ marked with a bold ‘x’.   See if you can find any mention of that beyond Fox News.

Posted in , , , ,

8 responses to “Media Bias – Living in Separate Worlds”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    George,
    Local couple upset after receiving pre-marked voter registration card …
    http://www.10news.com/…/local-couple-upset-after-receiving-pre-mark…‎
    KGTV
    3 days ago – … Covered California with a letter discussing voter registration and a … to how the voter registration card pre-marked Democrat ended up in…
    Couple Upset After Receiving Pre-Marked Voter Registration Card …
    ►►
    abcnews.go.com/…/couple-upset-receivin…‎
    ABC News
    2 days ago
    … website pre-marked with an “x” in the box next to Democratic Party. … Receiving Pre-Marked Voter …
    Some of the TV station have covered the story.

    Like

  2. Brad Croul Avatar
    Brad Croul

    “FY 2013 ICE Immigration Removals
    Overview
    In addition to its criminal investigative responsibilities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) shares responsibility for enforcing the nation’s civil immigration laws with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). ICE’s role in the immigration enforcement system is focused on two primary missions: (1) the identification and apprehension of criminal aliens and other removable individuals located in the United States; and (2) the detention and removal of those individuals apprehended in the interior of the U.S., as well as those apprehended by CBP officers and agents patrolling our nation’s borders.
    In executing these responsibilities, ICE has prioritized its limited resources on the identification and removal of criminal aliens and those apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the United States. This report provides an overview of ICE Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 civil immigration enforcement and removal operations:
    In FY 2013:
    ICE conducted a total of 368,644 removals.
    ICE conducted 133,551 removals of individuals apprehended in the interior of the U.S.
    82 percent of all interior removals had been previously convicted of a crime.
    ICE conducted 235,093 removals of individuals apprehended along our borders while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S. 1
    59 percent of all ICE removals, a total of 216,810, had been previously convicted of a crime.
    ICE apprehended and removed 110,115 criminals removed from the interior of the U.S.
    ICE removed 106,695 criminals apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S.
    98 percent of all ICE FY 2013 removals, a total of 360,313, met one or more of ICE’s stated civil immigration enforcement priorities. 2
    Of the 151,834 removals of individuals without a criminal conviction, 84 percent, or 128,398, were apprehended at the border while attempting to unlawfully enter the U.S. and 95 percent fell within one of ICE’s stated immigration enforcement priorities. 3
    The leading countries of origin for those removed were Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador.”
    As you can see, the right(wing)stream media sources, in their hysteria, are also failing to deliver complete news. Team Obama is not reporting – ICE and Homeland Security are reporting.
    Also, Homeland Security would have approved the “70,000” criminal releases. They must have had their reasons.
    Additionally, the word, “criminal”, is kind of vague.
    Are they felon pot smokers, did they fail to pay for some parking tickets, or what? However, no doubt about it, there could be some genuine bad apples in the bunch that got released for lack of evidence, or whatever.

    Like

  3. fish Avatar
    fish

    … website pre-marked with an “x” in the box next to Democratic Party. … Receiving Pre-Marked Voter …
    Well didn’t you think there would be a quid pro quo for bestowing decidedly mediocre health insurance upon a dimwitted populace?

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    RussS & BradC – thanks for expansions. Question still remains, why release any illegal aliens who have been caught for whatever other reason (jay walking?). Have they not already committed a crime by being here illegally?

    Like

  5. RL Crabb Avatar

    Scandal? What scandal? Leland who?…

    Like

  6. Walt Avatar

    The FEDS claim “they” have sole authority over illegals, and the states are to quit crapping on their lawn. At the same time gripping about being overworked, and under funded, and just can’t take the time and expense of deportation.
    Our Boarder isn’t a trout stream with “catch and release” rules.
    A few episodes of “Boarder wars” or the like, gives a little perspective.

    Like

  7. Walt Avatar

    Well don’t count on LIB news to “be all over this”. The LIB infested EPA has been doing “human testing”. ( without full disclosure it seems)
    http://dailycaller.com/2014/04/02/report-epa-tested-deadly-pollutants-on-humans-to-push-obama-admins-agenda/
    Didn’t the Geneva Convention frown upon this before?
    The Left has a history of more than questionable ” human testing” for the “public good”.
    But of COURSE the White House has “no knowledge” of any of this going on.
    Just add this to the list of “things they didn’t know”.

    Like

  8. Walt Avatar

    I have a question that I can’t find the answer to. I recall the tale, but can’t
    find evidence of fact.
    Just who’s grand idea was it for our trained fighting men in uniform to stop carrying their “issued” weapons on base? ( all branches)
    The Army and “Jar heads” never went anywhere without said weapon “back in the day”.
    I find fingers pointed at Clinton, but I believe it goes back farther than that.
    How far, is the question.
    The story I remember was that some General’s wife took issue with “all those guns” walking around the base. Like I said. I can’t find anything on that.
    But the same can’t be said about ” nose art” on bombers. Yes, a woman did put a stop to that. How dare someone paint a topless lady on an aircraft. The vulgarity!!!

    Like

Leave a comment