Rebane's Ruminations
December 2013
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

PISA2012resultsRR has been preaching for years the importance of education for our country’s continued prosperity, security, and its envied quality of life.  Researchers and academics like Niall Ferguson  have warned us that our public education system long ago reverted from operating for the benefit of the student to the benefit of education workers, especially those represented by the big teachers unions abetted by progressive legislators and academics across the land.  The result has been a steady decline in the performance of America’s schools and its students, especially as they compare with their peers worldwide.

The detrimental impacts of this national dumbing down are apparent in our workforce skill levels, cultural degradation, economic/fiscal understanding, political ignorance/indifference, and overall literacy/numeracy.  Today this downward spiral continues as reported in the just released results of the 2012 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA).  From the nearby figure (click then zoom) we see the big picture.  In more detail, “the U.S. slipped from 25th to 31st in math since 2009; from 20th to 24th in science; and from 11th to 21st in reading, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, which gathers and analyzes the data in the U.S.”  (more here)

PISA exams are arguably the best tests available in that they measure “whether students can apply (their) knowledge to real-life problems.”  (Here in Nevada County SESF’s annual TechTest is designed on the same principle, and therefore challenges students in a manner that is absent in their normal classrooms.)  It is that ability to transfer the use of classroom tools that most effectively motivates and measures a student’s critical thinking and problem solving abilities.

But our highest level government officials still don’t get what is happening.  Witness SecEduc Arne Duncan, to him these results are a “picture of educational stagnation” that is “at odds with our aspiration to have the best educated, most competitive work force in the world.”  Stagnation, my a$$!  The sumbich doesn’t even know what stagnation means.  Our nation’s intellectual capital is measurably deteriorating, not stagnating, and you can see how excited he gets when he soberly rolls out a mealy-mouthed assessment that all this is “at odds with our aspiration …”  No kidding!

Instead, the alarm bells should have been ringing nationwide for some time now, exhorting us to try all kinds of different approaches to educating our kids.  Instead, the union led teachers continue to oppose charter schools, parochial schools, home schooling, vouchers, parental choice, industrial strength curricula, vocational course education, … .  The only solutions offered from these agenda driven sclerotic bureaucrats are demands for more money, more regulatory and administrative burden,  less homework, politically correct learning environments, …, their list of ineffective and harmful nostrums is endless.

In spite of all this, ‘educational experts’ want us to temper our interpretation of these results by taking into consideration the diversity of America’s cultures, socio-economic conditions, and racial composition.  I don’t know where they want us to go with this admonition except perhaps in circles, because the obvious interpretations and resultant remedies are not acceptable to progressives or the liberal mind.  Meanwhile, America’s fundamental transformation continues as our leftwing politicians raise the banners of class warfare, and seek ever greater wealth transfer programs to pay their constituents more for knowing and doing less.

Posted in , , , ,

58 responses to “US Students ‘Slip’ in Global Tests”

  1. Gregory Avatar

    fish and friends, here’s a fresh steaming heaping mostly of what I have been ranting:
    [E.D. Hirsch’s] Cultural Literacy became a surprise bestseller because many other parents were also asking questions about who was responsible for the lack of academic substance in their children’s schools. Hirsch addressed these concerns near the beginning of the book: “The unacceptable failure of our schools has occurred not because our teachers are inept but chiefly because they are compelled to teach a fragmented curriculum based on faulty education theories.” This didn’t happen by chance or because of professional incompetence, according to Hirsch. Rather it was intended, quite deliberately, by the schools of education. It wasn’t that professors of education favored the wrong curriculum, but that they stood for no curriculum at all. Citing romantic theories of child development going back to Rousseau, the progressives argued that, with just a little assistance from teachers, children would figure it out as they went along. That’s because students were capable of “constructing their own knowledge.”
    “Redemption of E.D.Hirsch” by Sol Stein
    http://www.city-journal.org/2013/eon1206ss.html
    I say mostly because in the last three decades, there’s been a palpable slip in teacher quality.

    Like

  2. Joe Koyote Avatar
    Joe Koyote

    George –11:12 “are we then to understand that it is the preponderantly conservative households that produce the underachieving students?” NO. What I am saying is that the constant flow of negativity and complaints by the right about education and teachers could be a factor in all students caring less about an education.. except those who come from households where the parents reinforce education regardless of political affiliation. Kids aren’t stupid.. Why should they care about school if no one else seems to?

    Like

  3. Ryan Mount Avatar

    I reject completely the idea that WL sprang from Chomsky
    That’s kinda my point as well. Chomsky used empirical methods to demonstrate that language (note: not reading and writing, per se) is generative/transformational in a context of well or not well formed grammars. However it’s a long way from Chomsky to Phonics. And I agree with Whole Language detractors that its practice leads to poor language arts performance.
    My bigger point is ideologues leave their brains at the classroom door, to paraphrase a popular secular notion about Christians.
    Personal Anecdote: I had a mix of both Phonics and Whole Language methods growing up in the East Bay Area. But then again, my parents were school activists who marshaled* me out of more than one New Math/Whole Language elementary classroom in the 70s and 80s. I learned more from their activism than I did in the classrooms in terms of “how to learn” effectively, which turns out to be a very important (and lacking) modern skill. I remember what is was like to re-discover the joys of long division. And the pain of whatever flavor of the month the Math lesson entailed.
    I think it is unwise to wholesale reject any methods. It is more important to be critical and approach each technique conservatively and more importantly, appropriately. “Appropriateness,” ironically, is a tenet of Whole Language and congruent with Chomsky’s well-formedness, and also rarely enforced.
    * My parents were founders of the “Academics Plus” School in Pleasant Hill. This was a charter school(we didn’t call it that because there was no such name) that focused on Fundamentals in the belly of the East Bay education non-sense. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_Middle_School_%28Pleasant_Hill,_California%29

    Like

  4. Russ Steele Avatar

    I am not sure what the reading methods were when I was in the 3rd grade forward but it was not phonics. It was about recognizing the word, guessing the meaning, then adjusting the meaning as the other words were added to the sentence. The end result is that I am a very poor speller and proof reader, but a very fast reader. My mind observes the first few letters of a word and guess the rest. Sometimes the guess is wrong and the spelling error becomes reality, as readers of my post are very aware. On the other hand, my well educated English Major wife had phonics throughout her schooling and she uses phonics to spell out most any word. When our two oldest daughters were in Nebraska Elementary Schools they taught phonics, and they benefited from this training. Ellen continued the phonics lesson when #3 was in Nevada City Schools. All are good spellers. When #4 went to Nevada City Schools she was trained in phonics at home. even before Kindergarden she had taught herself to read, with the help of early phonics prompting by her mother and older sisters. Phonics all the way!

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar

    ” What I am saying is that the constant flow of negativity and complaints by the right about education and teachers could be a factor in all students caring less about an education”
    Koyote, you’re grasping at straws. The flow of complaints is because there is much that needs fixing, and it is systemic.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    JoeK 1236pm – Making that connection is more than a bit of a stretch. As you say, kids aren’t dumb, and they do realize that adults who grouse about today’s education are not in any way disparaging the utility of education – those are totally independent concepts. Quite the opposite, most kids not only understand the benefits of education, but also understand when they have a classroom teacher who doesn’t know his subject. And they do worry about that.
    It’s the Left that believes that students can’t tell when they’re sitting in front of a piss poor teacher, and that at least is one reason why they have continued to stick so many of them into classrooms and then keep them there.

    Like

  7. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Education means exactly what? Familiar story from across the Pond (from the Lefty point of view).
    http://rt.com/op-edge/cameron-education-changes-consent-853/

    Like

Leave a comment