Rebane's Ruminations
July 2013
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

A fundamental tenet on RR has been that as government grows in size and scope, it also grows in becoming intrinsically evil through the conduct of its mega-monied politicians and recourse proof bureaucrats.  Here are some current observations that bolster that argument.


CharitiesCooptedCharities have become fiefs of big government
.  How?  First, they take the money from those who would give more to charities, then they invite the charities to beg for the same funds.  But first the charities have to satisfy certain government agendas, and not the requirements of the people who would freely give.  Almost every charity of any size now expects to receive a sizeable portion of its funding from the state after submitting appropriate proposals and bona fides attesting to their politically correct disbursal of funds received.  In the 18jul13 WSJ James Pierson makes the case that “Much of the not-for-profit sector has become a junior partner in administering the welfare state.” (more here)  And that’s the point of it all, is it not?  – all benefices will henceforth flow from government to which all homage and glory belong.

Eritrea and the United States are unique in that they shamefully share what here is called the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).  This piece of obamunism became law in 2010, and as most of this grandiose socialist’s other ideas, it has turned into a monster.  First, it has made living abroad for Americans an expensive accounting hell, and then it piles on by creating bad will between countries that asymmetrically enforce FATCA-type policies on their expatriates.  Professor Colleen Gaffy (Pepperdine University) demonstrates that “the core injustice in America’s tax policy is that it is based on citizenship rather than residence.  You ask what could possibly be wrong to pay taxes in two nations concurrently.   The answer (here) will surprise you.  But ultimately FATCA is a sure sign that we are now acting like a descending autocracy desperately attempting to control and milk our citizens wherever they may be found.

Agenda21 marches on.  The latest involves the “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposal to declare two million acres in the Sierra Nevada Mountains as “critical habitat” for the Sierra Nevada Yellow Legged Frog and the Yosemite Toad under the Endangered Species Act.”  And the consequence will be another constraint added to the long list that already prohibits Americans the use of their public lands.  And the telling part is that these critters aren’t even being endangered by humans, but other critters.  But that don’t make no never mind when Americans need to be herded and corralled into their sustainable smart growth stack&pack future.  Congressman Tom McClintock recently summarized an excellent appeal to sanity on the floor of the House in a short speech titled ‘The Real Endangered Species: The Sierra Nevada Hard Working Family’.


And, of course, the sorry trail of socialism in America continues to be littered with destitution, bankruptcy, and dependency.  Breaking news yesterday was that Detroit has filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy – the biggest municipality in the country to do so.  And the horrifics of Obamacare are sweeping the land as the Pelosi Principle continues to reveal the contents of that monstrosity.  Unions large and small, all dedicated disciples of the messiah, are now screaming bloody murder and are demanding to be protected from the law’s job killing, wallet busting mandates.  (Latest from Teamsters’ Hoffa is that Obamacare is a “perverse” law that is creating “perverse scenarios”, as was reported on RR since day one.)  The remaining supporters of the nationalizing healthcare law will be able to hold their next convention in something we used to call a phone booth.

[update]  Obama gag orders Benghazi survivors.  Did you hear that the WH has ordered all Benghazi survivors to sign non-disclosure agreements?  According to Congressman Frank Wolf (R-VA) that is the apparent reason why Congress can’t get any of these people to come and tell the real story at a public hearing.  I recall the continuing drone of local liberals here telling one and all that Benghazi was a non-event of no enduring consequence.  Now why doesn’t Obama want the story to get out?

The only prominent benefit of Obamacare is from some of the levity that it has generated in the Saturday night shows and emails.  Here’s a typical offering –

Top Ten Indicators That Your Employer Has Changed To The
Obamacare Health Care Plan.
(10) Your annual breast exam is done at Hooters.
(9) Directions to your doctor’s office include “Take a left when you enter
the trailer park.”
(8) The tongue depressors taste faintly of Fudgesicles.
(7) The proctologist in the plan is “Gus” from Roto-Rooter.
(6) The only item listed under Preventative Care Coverage is “an apple a
day.”
(5) Your primary care physician is wearing the pants you gave to Goodwill last
month.
(4) “The patient is responsible for 200% of out-of-network charges,”
is not a typographical error.
(3) The only expense covered 100% is…”Embalming.”
(2) Your Prozac comes in different colors with little M’s on them.
(1) You ask for Viagra and they give you one of their tongue depressors and
duct tape.

Posted in , , , ,

134 responses to “Ruminations – 19jul13 (updated++)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar

    Also, isn’t the farm subsidies his family enjoys a prime example of “transfer payments” except in this time it’s from the taxpayer to the wealthy. Corporate welfare for sure.
    You neved did share with me any public statements from LaMalfa that expressed his opposition to what enhances his family fortune.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 240pm++ – I have no idea what kind of “slack” you believe is involved here in separating the farm bill into its correct components. I was taught that covering up sleaze required slack, not bringing truth to bear on the subject. And I am sorry that you feel that way about “safe assumptions” of your hypotheticals, I certainly hope those don’t form the bulwark of your beliefs.
    Of course farm subsidies are transfer payments; who here has claimed otherwise? And here are Lamalfa’s public statements on the farm bill.
    http://www.redding.com/news/2013/may/12/doug-lamalfa-farm-bill-must-end-direct-payments/

    Like

  3. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, you really are a simple creature, aren’t you?
    I’m going to guess LaMalfa farms still pays much more in taxes than it gets for rice price supports. Any bets? And I’m also going to guess that he’ll vote with his party the vast majority of the time, and that the other party has no interest in killing off a New Deal deal, either.

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Funny how a lifelong democrat like George Miller, a fellow who I believe has never held a real job and who inherited the safe seat from his papa, actually has the audacity to criticize anyone like Doug LaMalfa. PaulE, you need better critics links.

    Like

  5. Paul Emery Avatar

    Todd on Miller
    Oh, so he’s a career politician like McClintock who represents part of Nevada County and doesn’t even live here.

    Like

  6. stevenfrisch Avatar
    stevenfrisch

    Who gives a darn if Doug LaMalfa pays more in taxes than he receives in subsides? Is that the standard? That each taxpayer should get back what they pay? Talk about a completely derivative statement…it has no bearing on the conversation.

    Like

  7. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE, McClintock represents me just fine as I am sure the uber liberal Miller does his folks.

    Like

  8. Paul Emery Avatar

    But Todd you must admit he’s a career politician and carpetbagger. Your team jumped all over Hillary for running for Senate in New York but at least she actually lived there (eventually).

    Like

  9. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 742pm – FYI, congressional districts in northern California often cover more than one county. Congressman McClintock does live and has lived in the districts he has represented. Unfortunately he cannot live concurrently in every county that such districts encompass.

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar

    He did not live in the district from which he was elected when first elected. He lived in So Cal and was soon to be unemployed so he went to the want ads and found an opening up here for his professional politician skills. He still lived outside the district after elected and couldn’t vote for himself. He was a Resident of Thousand Oaks at the time.

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 617am – Is he all straightened out now? For all the warts you highlight, I consider Tom McClintock to be one of the finest members of Congress, one who gives constant hope that politics is not uniformly rotten.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    PaulE, you forget one major thing in your quest to discredit Tom. He is our guy, we are in control of the seat he holds because he reflects our opinions. You had a woman (I think), many years ago who lived in Colorado and ran for Wally Herger’s seat. You undoubtedly supported that person. So actually under the federal law you don’t have to reside in the district you represent. Garamendi did the same thing as Tom did in the beginning. You support him right?

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar

    “Who gives a darn if Doug LaMalfa pays more in taxes than he receives in subsides? Is that the standard? That each taxpayer should get back what they pay? Talk about a completely derivative statement…it has no bearing on the conversation.” -Frisch
    I didn’t write “more”, implying an evenness, that it’s OK as long as they pay out more than they receive. I wrote “much more”, and probably could have written “much, much more” and remained accurate. It’s just one of the money streams created by the Feds who, once started fiddling, can’t stop, and it’s fundamentally dishonest to whine about one out of context.
    Frisch, I look forward to SBC’s championing the dismantling of the New Deal price support and marketing order mechanisms. Will you be reaching out to LaMalfa as a possible partner in this endeavor?

    Like

  14. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I think SBC should refuse to take any grant money or other sources of funding from the taxpayers. I find Frisch’s position on taxpayers money totally hypocritical. He should self examine his position and simply shut up when it comes to “non-profit” issues. I think PaulE would or should support my position on SBC. But I bet he won’t.

    Like

  15. Gregory Avatar

    Todd (8:59) you don’t have to go that far back to find a Dem schlepping their carpetbag into Nevada County. Clint Curtis (D-Mars), a delusional conspiracy theorist (deemed to be representing extraterrestrials by a lefty free rag in his native Florida) in the area to get a JD at a local mill, ran against McClintock a couple years back. Ben E. (D-Uranus) was the only 3rd party candidate on the ballot and still couldn’t outpoll the seriously flawed Democrat on the ballot.
    Ben apparently did mistake his showing as a top 3rd party performer as something other than an anomaly caused by the presence of the most seriously flawed major party candidate of any November ballot I’ve ever been handed.

    Like

  16. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Gregory, I had forgotten about that fellow and now I remember. He even wiped out BenE in the votes and the local Dem Central Committee supported the nut from Florida. Thanks. I would suggest PaulE never wrote anything against the nut from Florida as he does against McClintock or Doug LaMalfa.

    Like

  17. Gregory Avatar

    Let me apologize to Ben for an egregious error; that 10:39 should have read, “Ben Emery (G-Uranus)”.

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar

    Clint Curtis? Who cares. I didn’t voter for him. All I’m reflecting on is the support from most blatters on this blog for McClintock, the carpetbagger and professional politician and and corporate welfare taker Doug LaMalfa and what hypocrisy that represents.

    Like

  19. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    PaulE, just pointing out your blatant hypocrisy. BTW, what is a “blatter”?

    Like

  20. Paul Emery Avatar

    What does it sound like Todd? Be creative.
    You voted for these Guys Todd. I didn’t vote for Curtis. Big difference.

    Like

  21. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, can you point to any rice grower in the country who rejects the Agriculture subsidy?
    Your finding of hypocrisy here seems to be akin to your support of private school vouchers as long as the school adopts pricing policies that assure they will shortly go bankrupt.

    Like

  22. Paul Emery Avatar

    Wow Gregory, what a leap of topics! You must be referring to my support of vouchers to private school as long as they support the total tuition. Yes I believe that. Private schools don’t have to accept vouchers, it’s their choice.
    This is my opinion. Where do you find the
    definition: a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not
    So if you’re opposed to government giveaways or welfare and you support someone who is on the take, that’s hypocritical. If you are opposed to professional politicians and support McClintock, that’s hypocrisy. Does that make any sense?

    Like

  23. Paul Emery Avatar

    clarification:
    definition of hypocrisy: a feigning to be what one is not or to believe what one does not

    Like

  24. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 107pm – Apparently perfect is the enemy of good, so given the resumes of almost all politicians today, what should the voters’ policy be in supporting a politician?

    Like

  25. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    Good question. Perhaps it should be the other way around. For example don’t pretend to be opposed to career politicians and then go ga ga over one just because he supports your views. Also don’t pretend to be opposed to government handouts and then support subsidies to wealthy families and oppose food stamps and “transfer payments” to the poor and medical assistance to the uninsured. It just makes you look silly.

    Like

  26. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 209pm – I take that to mean that you have no better answer. And your conclusion that I oppose all kinds of transfer payments kind of terminates this discussion.

    Like

  27. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    PaulE, what is a blatter? The reason I call you a hypocrite is because I just don’t remember you writing or espousing the number of words you use to diss republicans when it comes to other candidates like Curtis during the campaign. You absence of words and analysis of anyone other than a republican makes ou irrelevant in the discussion of politics and journalism.
    I use your lack of criticism of Ben Emery and his ridiculous positions on most issues as a example here on a daily basis. You only engage in a negative way the right, never the left. You are a poster child for why the press gets a “used car salesman” number in importance. If you want respect for your trade I would suggest a lot more critique of the lefty candidates of the democrats or others you say you never vote for.

    Like

  28. Paul Emery Avatar

    I didn’t diss McClintock. My critique is for his supporters that claim to want citizen politicians rather than professional politicians, which he is the poster boy for. I rather appreciate some of his Libertarian positions especially his opposition to the feds grinding down on medical marijuana distributors and cultivation in states that permit it. I do find him to be a man of convictions many of which are unpopular with the Republican base. He makes himself available to the press and talks with those with opposing views. I personally have no opposition to professional politicians. It’s your side that has raised a fuss about them.
    LaMalfa is a pedestrian Republican. Very average and predictable
    More on McClintock:
    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/09/bipartisan-amendment-seeks-to-halt-obamas-medical-marijuana-raids/
    “A forthcoming amendment to H.R. 5326, a key appropriations bill currently being debated in Congress, will give the House of Representatives an opportunity to rebuke the Obama administration’s rapid fire raids on voter-approved medical marijuana facilities in the states that allow doctors to recommend the drug.
    Three California Republicans and one New York Democrat, Reps. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Sam Farr (D-CA) and Tom McClintock (R-CA), plan to introduce the amendment this evening, according to action alerts circulated Wednesday by the nation’s largest drug reform advocacy groups. “

    Like

  29. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Once again PaulE fails to answer our questions. So, since I tried to get his side of this and he refuses to answer, then I must be correct in my observations. Your non answers are as good a gold. Thanks.

    Like

  30. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Oh and the above post by you actually proves my point beyond a resolvable dobt.
    What about old George Miller there PaulE. I bet he is your pal since he is for MJ.

    Like

  31. Paul Emery Avatar

    Proves your point about what? McClintock is not for Marijuana. He’s just opposed to the Federal hammer used on states that have legalized it for medical and recreational use. People like you who blab away about big government are silent when confronted with the Feds rooting through our gardens. Hypocritical? Sure

    Like

  32. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Typical dodge.

    Like

  33. Paul Emery Avatar

    Once again what point did you prove Todd ?

    Like

  34. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, look at it this way: you think LaMalfa Farms should operate at a disadvantage by being the only rice producer not to take the money shoved in their direction, and you think private schools shouldn’t charge more than what the government is willing to put into a voucher, which has always been way below what conventional public schools get.
    Even the Yuba River Charter School, easily the worst performer in Nevada County with an Academic Performance Index of 2 (2nd decile, 10-19%) compared to California schools as a whole and an 1st decile API compared to their 100 most similar schools despite having more college educated parents than any other school in the area (as far I I’ve found, not yet a complete survey).
    In fact, despite being the absolute bottom of their list of 100 most similar schools for academic performance, the Yuba River Charter is looking forward to about $10 million to build their own school suited to Waldorf/Steiner “education”. They were even trying to make an end run around an environmental impact report.
    That voucher you think should be enough for a private school insures they could never admit more than a handful of voucher students. Hell, even YRCS has, I’ve been told, essentially required family involvement in their endless fundraisers as they can’t operate on the funds the state gives them.
    Your denigration of the LaMalfa family for operating like every other rice farm is also akin to the feces tossed towards Ayn Rand for taking Social Security when she became eligible. Yes, she was loudly against the system, but as she was forced to contribute she had every right to demand the benefits they ostensibly funded.
    Same thing with the LaMalfas, who are not beholden to the Emerys of the world and do not have to operate at a competitive disadvantage in their market because a LaMalfa was elected to Congress.

    Like

  35. Paul Emery Avatar

    Gregory
    I thought you were for “free markets”? How come this doesn’t apply to the LaMalfa’s enterprise?

    Like

  36. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Paul,
    It is all about the perception of the role of government.
    If you think government is bad and corrupt you would be a damn fool not to take advantage of “free” money if you qualify whether it is needed or not.
    Vs.
    Government programs are there to help those in need and we better only use them when we actual need the help. If I take the help when it is not needed it might mean somebody else doesn’t get it. I don’t want to be that person who needs the help but cannot get it if and when my time comes. It is looked upon as a hand up not a hand out.

    Like

  37. Paul Emery Avatar

    Ben
    I think it’s safe to call the LaMalfa’s a welfare family. They’ve been hooked on government subsidies for years with no end in sight. They should be the last ones to complain about a granny state. They get the big bucks though. Food stamp subsidy is not good enough for them. They need millions to feed their hunger.

    Like

  38. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Paul,
    From the little I know about LaMalfa and his rice business you are correct. As I said it is about perception of the role of government.
    I worked for a guy roofing for a major county in CA and my boss used to talk about how inefficient government was while at the same time over charging hours, tearing off and replacing roofs that didn’t need it, spending hours every day sitting at restaurants while on the clock. I challenged him on his participation in the very inefficiency he always complained about. He said (paraphrasing) that is just the way it is done. My reply was basically, the way it is done is the way we choose to do it. He disagreed. I quit that job, sold my truck, sold my tools, and moved to Hawaii.
    There is more to it than that but you get the idea.
    Just as a side note on that job I and a coworker were sent home on the first day because we weren’t clean shaved and he was going to run a good Christian crew. I joked and asked him if he would have sent Jesus the carpenter home for having a scraggly beard. He didn’t think it was funny.

    Like

  39. stevenfrisch Avatar
    stevenfrisch

    Posted by: Gregory | 23 July 2013 at 09:09 AM
    Actually Gregory, we have supported gradual reductions in price supports, and changes in the crop insurance programs. If Congressman LaMalfa approached us about supporting that position we would jump at the chance. Instead he is going to continue to be one of the largest recipients of ‘welfare’ in the House of Representatives while cutting food aid to poor people, and Once again you prop up a false premise to support your delusional claims.
    probably going to church on Sunday and professing to Christian values.
    Posted by: Todd Juvinall | 23 July 2013 at 09:21 AM
    And of course Todd is delusional as well; under my leadership SBC has reduced the percentage of our budget coming from public sources by more than 50%, to less than 15% of our total budget. If I had my way we would be totally free of any government grant funding in the future, but alas, as a private sector entity we find there are services we can provide more efficiently than government does. In short, I would rather my organization earn its money so we don’t have to answer to anyone but ourselves. Of course I don’t expect Todd to understand that since he is functionally illiterate.
    By the way George, you do realize that under your voting test Todd would not be able to vote, right?

    Like

  40. Gregory Avatar

    “Actually Gregory, we have supported gradual reductions in price supports, and changes in the crop insurance programs. If Congressman LaMalfa approached us about supporting that position we would jump at the chance.”
    Talking about Delusions! You think LaMalfa or McClintock should come to your doorstop, hat in hand? Why don’t you get off your own fat 501c3 arse and approach LaMalfa with an offer to help him, rather than the other way around? Prove you’re trying to work with Congresscritters representing the Sierra Nevada.

    Like

  41. Paul Emery Avatar

    Why should he(LaMalfa) come forward. He’s the one sucking the government tit. Welfare for millionaires is what he enjoys.

    Like

  42. stevenfrisch Avatar
    stevenfrisch

    Golly Greg, you really don’t know shit do you? Have another gin and tonic and collect unemployment, or SSI or whatever it is you do.

    Like

  43. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Posted by: stevenfrisch | 24 July 2013 at 07:28 AM
    Steve Frisch, you are truly a double talker. SBC’s 2011 990’s shows 800K in public money (you have your bureaucratic think-speak on that one). Now you can say that that is made of of grants, loans or individual contributions (as you do) or you could finally for once be honest. If a person gives money to your SBC and takes a tax write-off, is that not a subsidy to them? You are too funny. I think you are a bit slow on the uptake.
    Also for PaulE, if (and I don’t know if you have ever owned a home) you own a home and take the deduction on the interest against your taxes, (or a kid, or a home business) then you are a subsided American. LaMalfa’s family has a 1800 acre rice farm that hires hundreds of your favorite people, the low income farm workers. They have families and little chillin. You like little chillin right? Anyway, he is a successful farmer, feeds thousands of people and many would starve without his rice yet somehow you try a strawman on the subsidy issue. I would say get your own house in order before you cast stones.

    Like

  44. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Here is the link to a story I did on the double-speak of Form 990 as filed in 2009 by SBC. You will see what a crock SteveF if stirring about his income.
    http://sierradragonsbreathe.blogspot.com/2011/12/sbcs-2009-990-filed-with-ags-office.html

    Like

  45. Gregory Avatar

    “I thought you were for “free markets”? How come this doesn’t apply to the LaMalfa’s enterprise?”
    -Paul
    Paul, this tact of yours is an old schoolyard bit of illogic. The LaMalfa family business operates like everyone else in that line of business. They don’t have to be purer than Caesar’s wife in order to be in that line of business and be a Congressman, and, to go back to another point, a freshman congressman isn’t in a position to lead on anything.

    Like

  46. Gregory Avatar

    “Golly Greg, you really don’t know shit do you? Have another gin and tonic and collect unemployment, or SSI or whatever it is you do.”
    Golly Steve, I don’t know you; does that fit your first question? And to your command, no, I don’t collect any government checks. Sorry. Send me some of yours if it would make you feel better.

    Like

  47. Paul Emery Avatar

    Todd
    You’re getting goofy on me again. What does a tax deferral have to do with millionaires receiving millions government subsidies for a business that cannot compete in the marketplace? I guess I’m entitled to government bucks to subsidize my concert promotion business or you should get money for your failed real estate ventures that led to foreclosures.
    Gregory
    So it’s not a conflict of interest to cast a vote for subsidies to your family business. What do you consider a legitimate conflict that should recuse the vote of a Congressman?

    Like

  48. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    As usual no answers from PaulE.

    Like

  49. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, be rational (and I mean that in a literal sense): Just what is the percentage of the entire agriculture bill does the LaMalfa Farms rice subsidy represent?
    LaMalfa didn’t put it in; indeed, it’s been there for four score years. What you are, in effect, saying is that no farmer of commodity crops should be allowed to cast a vote in Congress unless it’s a vote you like.
    Just wondering… have you been as huffy on DiFi’s past conflicts of interest?

    Like

  50. Paul Emery Avatar

    I don’t think it’s appropriate for an elected public official to vote on a bill that directly subsidizes their family business. What’s wrong with that? Who cares what percentage it represents. This should apply to DiFi as well. It should be voluntary and part of the record. For exqample LaMalfa could say “Fellow Congressmen since my family will receive $600,000 (?) in direct subsidies if this bill passes I choose to abstain from voting on this measure. “

    Like

Leave a comment