Rebane's Ruminations
May 2013
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Actually, that should have been ‘… our out-of-depth Community Organizer’; but where to begin?

The ongoing and growing scandals – Asleep or fiddling while Benghazi burns, Holder going after Fox News reporter, IRS going after conservative orgs, DOJ tapping into AP, … – are piling up faster than the administration spin doctors can provide material for the late evening comedy shows.  Now we have a real genuine ‘Oh shit!’ embarrassment coming in the back door of the White House on Obamacare.

The unions are going public with their opposition to the President’s premier showcase legislation that has been celebrated by liberals from Nevada County to Cape Cod.  About 20M union members are about to take a real hard look at the remaining benefits of their union membership, then prepare to head for the exits.  Union leaders are screaming at the Dems in Congress to get them exempted from Obamacare, why?  Because they’ve now seen what the rest of us knew way back when, everything Obama told them about the ‘Affordable Care Act’ was a lie, they can’t afford it.

ObamaReidPelosiSome union leaders like KM Robinson of the United Union of Roofers are saying flat out that they should rebuild that travesty from ground up, or just get rid of it.  And that’s not good for the guy who sweet talked the unions out of gazillions to fund his election campaign – twice!  Now I’m not saying that ol’ Barry intended to screw his big base of support.  Not at all, he just screwed up big time and delivered a “train wreck” for what will wind up as 18% of America’s economy.  Well, he did have a little help from a few other ditzos on the Hill like Princess Pelosi and Hapless Harry.

Obamacare is being received so badly that Kathleen Sebelius, HNIC at the Dept of HHS is out beating the bushes for private funds to pay for some propaganda to get young healthy people to buy health insurance through the federally mandated state insurance exchanges.  Lawyers are looking at that little exercise as being the equivalent of Reagan’s Iran/Contra kerfuffle.  But what’s the ACA implementing cabinet secretary to do when we now hear that 54% of Americans “disapprove” of the healthcare munificence from their federal government.  In spite of all this, the lamestream continues to send their best crickets to cover the story – or stories.  (HNIC? that’s Head Nanny in Charge, what’d you think it meant?)

Thanks to Barry’s misreading of Lord Keynes and listening to fellow nobelist Krugman, the country is up to its collective butt in debt while continuing to dig the hole ever deeper.  As I have said before, Obamacare will turn out to be the world’s most expensive and despised healthcare system ever.  But not to worry, the CO and the peace-loving Dems are going to pay for the whole thing out of our defense budget.  The speeches about America’s global retreat are already being delivered on a weekly basis.


But even that doesn’t satisfy the Occupy sector of his base.  My favorite pro-communist website truthout.com published a doozy of a screed that laid bare the Left’s real response to all this capitalism and ill-distributed wealth in the land.  William Rivers Pitt, their number one mouthpiece and editor, wrote in ‘The Beginning of the End of the Beginning’ a pretty ominous screed that ended with –

Occupy was only the beginning, but may very well have been the last manifestation of peaceful resistance against the ever-widening chasm of inequality and desolation. The noose is tightening around the necks of average people, and more become radicalized with each passing day. The wealthy would do well to take note of this, and voluntarily move to square the savage imbalance that drives billions around the world into furious despair. It does not have to be this way, and if it continues in this way, eventually the dam is going to break. When that happens, woe be unto those who believe their wealth keeps them safe and cozy. On that day, the rock will not hide them, and the dead tree will give no shelter.

Lest you think that this is a message from some remote hinterland of leftwing nuts (or is it left wingnuts, whatever), truthout.com successfully raises tens of thousands monthly to stay in business, and regularly features nationally prominent leftwing contributors like Amy Goodman and Robert Reich.  And the lamestream (along with local acolytes) continues to put out Napolitano’s copy that it is the tea partiers and our veterans that Americans need to keep an eye out for (see also RL Crabb’s cartoon).

Moving on to more progressive nonsense.  Everyone should have heard by now that our California legislature is queuing up a series of bills to stop the extraction of shale oil and gas from the state’s recently discovered Monterey Shale Formation which contains about two thirds of the country’s entire shale fuel reserves.  Why stop it?  Well the butt stupid reason given is that it will require fracking to extract the fuels, and who knows what fracking will cause if we allow it in California, probably everything from exploding water faucets to the heartbreak of psoriasis.  Not.  California has been successfully fracking its shale deposits for decades with not one incident of pollution or psoriasis.  The alternative reason, of course, is that California’s economy must be brought to its knees in order to put through the planning and control policies for managing our population, policies that would eerily fly in tight formation with Agenda 21.

ForestFireOne of those policy areas was aired yesterday afternoon in the Board of Supervisors chamber in Nevada County’s Rood Center.  The Supes were considering the forest fuels problem as we enter a particularly long and dry fire season.  We all know that our forests are overflowing with thick undergrowth and slash that is primed to burn.  And starting with the EPA, abetted by legions of eco-nuts, who know how to file ‘sue and settle’ lawsuits, our hands are tied when attempting to implement common sense solutions that will abate the fire danger, create jobs, and turn a profit for private enterprise.

Dr Tom Quinn of the USDA Forest Service and Forest Supervisor of the Tahoe National Forest gave an excellent presentation on the situation to the BoS and interested county residents.  I was alarmed to learn that California annually harvests only about one tenth of the board feet of timber that the forests in the state produce.  And we do that while importing 75% of our lumber needs from out of state.  Federal and state policies have shut down hundreds of lumber mills and destroyed thousands of jobs along with countless communities, leaving behind economic and ecological destitution.

In the meantime power plants in Europe are being mandated to convert from fossil fuels to burning wood pellets resulting in more net carbon being pumped into the atmosphere because of the accounting methods used by their local eco-nuts.  This is germane because Europe doesn’t have enough wood to burn for electricity, and therefore will have to import it from – wait for it – South Carolina and other southeastern states.

Meanwhile here in California – we are too far from Europe to economically supply its needs – our eco-nuts and their Sacramento political counterparts are figuring out how to stop the remainder of California’s meager timber harvests.  (I also had a chance to talk with Dr Quinn after his presentation ended.)  And they’re doing it with great success, making it virtually impossible to supply our own timber needs or adopt new technologies to make economically viable bio-fuels out of trees and undergrowth that ONLY contribute to the fire danger to all of us who live in these forests.

To put a ribbon on the whole thing, today the Forest Service is considering shutting down a huge hunk of the Tahoe National Forest for the sole purpose of protecting some supposedly endangered yellow-clawed, stipe-bellied, cross-eyed, pigeon-toed frog.  Isn’t Obamastan wonderful?

[30may13 update]  H/T to reader.

HolderInvestigates

Posted in , , , ,

116 responses to “Travails of our Community Organizer (updated 30may13)”

  1. MikeL Avatar
    MikeL

    I personally like my endangered frog chared before I eat it. The 9th circuit court of jesters recently put a kibosh on the Eco A wholes sue and settle nonsense. The 9th circuit actually got it right this time as the sue and settle agreements violated NEPA and FLMPA requirements that the public be consulted.
    What really needs to change is the mis-named Equal Access to Justice Act’s provision that the government pays lawyer fees to the Eco-A-Wholes when they sue.

    Like

  2. Ryan Mount Avatar

    “On that day, the rock will not hide them, and the dead tree will give no shelter.”
    What are they gonna do? Throw their Foxconn-made iPhones at their enemies? Which, come to think of it, might be a viable warfare tactic because undoubtedly they’re insured for at least two replacements.
    Suggestion: before attacking the man with your iPhone, remove it from its Otterbox.

    Like

  3. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    The answer to our health care system woes. If everyone wants to reduce spending health care is an easy place to do it since we spend around 17% of our economy on health care in the US. When we have a for profit health care system we then have a system that profits off of denying care.
    http://www.pnhp.org/

    Like

  4. Ryan Mount Avatar

    We’re living in profoundly good times. Each year better than the last.
    In the past 80 years, as an example, our food spending have plummeted from ~30% of our budget, down to under 10%*. We’re living [a lot] longer. Healthcare, BTW is not more expensive but has seemed to stay the same. Sadly, we’re spending less on booze. Probably cause our Hilter youth kids will turn us in. Anyhow…
    http://www.visualeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/VE-100-YEARS-R6.png
    Yet, everyone is miserable. No one is happy. You can fly in a steel tube at 600mph at 30K ft. And people complain about the food (or lack of it) and being cramped. You’re sitting in a chair, in the sky.
    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8m5d0_everything-is-amazing-and-nobody-i_fun
    *If one is “growing” and living the fast, cash-only life at the Briar Patch, disregard this entirely. You’re paying $80 to fill your re-usable bag of kale and wait 20 minutes for your mediocre burrito. But then again, you’re not paying income taxes. But for the rest of us, it’s very true.

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar

    RyanM 104pm – Good observations and data Ryan.

    Like

  6. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Oh Ryan,
    Usually we agree on so much but your post misses the mark entirely. Life for most Americans is just fine but what is fueling the unhappiness is everything you mentioned is superficial in meaning on the big scale of things.
    Our food bills at home are less but more goes into subsidizing petro agriculture and more to do we are spending much more guaranteeing our GM food prices are kept artificially low. We are doing this by making the cost indirect and routed through our government. $10 – $20 is the average cost of a gallon of gas in the US when all external costs, that are picked up by you and me are factored in. The food we eat is fertilized, pest controlled, planted, harvested, brought to distributor, and then brought to market on that heavily subsidized commodity of oil. This is only one aspect of a very complex system.
    Organic food on the other hand is what growing food in America actually costs without the direct subsides that “conventional” farming/ agriculture receives. Now you have to factor in the yuppie factor of the cost of retail but it still is much cheaper if we actually paid the true cost of food.

    Like

  7. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    As usual, I go back and edit a portion which then creates havoc with clarity.
    The first sentence in the second paragraph should read.
    “Our food bills at home are less but more goes into subsidizing petro agriculture. The low costs in our individual budgets has more to do with the level of subsides (direct/ indirect) guaranteeing our GM food prices are kept artificially low.”

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 148pm – I’m not sure that I (or anybody?) follow your accounting. You seem to say that all that extra indirect cost to us comes through higher taxes which we don’t properly assign to the categories like food (which Ryan’s 104pm cited). Could you just pick one expense category, like food, and show how all those indirect costs impinge on it. BTW, from the government’s budget you should subtract out defense and all the entitlements; then show us from where our tax dollars go to add to the indirect cost.
    It should be an illuminating exercise that someone should have already done, so you could just give us a link or cut and paste.

    Like

  9. Ryan Mount Avatar

    I am 100% aware of why our food bills are low: the economy of scale brought on by, well, large productions enabled by relatively cheap energy and fertilizers. It’s how we’re feeding billions of people. I suppose you might say that prices are artificially low. And that would be partially true. But I’ll give you the stage to share the petro-food story, aka “How come we have tomatoes in December, Daddy?” shtick.” Somebody should. GM foods are a separate topic mostly because they don’t explain our successes over the past 100 years, and are a somewhat recent development.
    And as for the food subsidizing, which I suppose is a good (well, better) use of tax money than nuclear weapons , the government picks winner and losers and then the winners flood the market with cheap processed crap. Then they start burning it as energy, because that’s more profitable(again due to the government) and people start to go hungry. All this provided by our government.
    Anyhow, it’s extraordinary expensive to grow one’s own food. (it’s costing me $4/tomato this year at my house, not counting my labor) Or even to buy locally, which was my observation about the privileged few tax dodgers that can afford to shop at the Briar Patch and then lecture the rest of us poor slobs about what we eat. Dickheads.
    However, I think year over year, things are dramatically improving, which is my main point. Not just here, but everywhere. Why are we living longer? Why does it only take 5 hours to fly from LA to New York? They can replace your heart. Poverty is down worldwide. Hosts are leaving ABC TV’s the View! And Jeff Pelline has not been able to shame the Union into shutting down.
    It’s just not that bad. In fact, it’s fabulous. I’d go as far to say that we’re wasting our bounty on people who don’t deserve it, as per Louis CK’s observation above.

    Like

  10. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    The politicians and political hacks are busy sticking their fingers in the dyke before the dam goes a’ busting. Dems and Republican elected political type are working behind the scenes frantically trying to get themselves exempt from Obama-Caring. Problem is nobody wants to go first and look like a hypocrite nor take the heat. No doubt the exemption will end up as amendment to some bill with the author unknown.
    All is grand in my neck of the woods. I am so grateful that I picked up this short sale before the Obama-Care tax kicks in on all real estate transactions.
    I am especially grateful for WalMart, our nation’s largest retail food supplier. Without WalMart, poor folk would not have enough money to eat. Watching one’s pennies is a prudent and wise thing to do. Mandatory in today’s climate.
    Yep, there be some in Ivory Towers that say run up to the Patch and buy some local stuff. What, 2 bucks for a tomato? Or is it 5 bucks? Might as well be a million clams. People in Ivory Towers telling po folk to buy at organic stores is like telling a homeless person to just go buy a house. Problem solved, not! Sure, eating a small $90.00 bag of organic weeds might reduce our health care expenses, but will there be enough money left over to put Chinese shoes on our kids’ feet? Thank your lucky stars that we have outlets like WalMart that do help the po folk in deeds and actions, not just flowery words.
    From the rumor mill: A Sierra Nevada county is looking at ways to tax the water from one’s well. Before we all get riled up, it is just an innocent idea being floated by the Ivory Tower rock turners. They be turning over every rock looking for some money. With that money they will be able to hire some more rock turners. Life is grand. I am most grateful today.

    Like

  11. TheMikeyMcD Avatar
    TheMikeyMcD

    I agree with Ryan, life is great and few are happy. I can’t pull myself away from the advances provided to us (by capitalism). I love the idea of simplifying to a ‘Little House on the Prairie” lifestyle… but I would miss netflix, air conditioning, deoderant, allergy medication….
    What is wrong with health care is that it is not a for profit market.
    Obama is making Watergate look like a high school musical. There are many veterans that fought (died, wounded, psychologically damaged) to protect Americans from the evils being done by this administration. Rotten to the core.

    Like

  12. TheMikeyMcD Avatar
    TheMikeyMcD

    Health Care: every time I hear someone say “single payer health system” I know who that single payer will be……. me.
    We need to free the health care market, not shackle, micro-manage and bureaucractize it.
    Collectivism is slavery.

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar

    “but I would miss netflix, air conditioning, deoderant, allergy medication….”
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan, answering the question “what time period do you wish you were from” responded with something like “anytime after the invention of novocaine”.

    Like

  14. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    Mikey wrote: “Obama is making Watergate look like a high school musical.”
    Completely and totally off the mark, Mikey. What you don’t realize is that a president of the USA in the 21st century in completely unable to commit some of the crimes of which Nixon was guilty. There are too many firewalls in place–which were created by subsequent administrations–as a direct result of Nixon’s disastrous presidency, that will prevent those types of crimes in the White House from ever happening again.
    That being said, it is now easy for the Executive Branch to convince the Legislative Branch to dry up and blow away, which has nothing to do with an individual president’s rotten-ness and everything to do with a constitutional system that is flawed and is now allowing one branch to trump the others.
    Regarding PPACA, here’s some Krugman meat to go with your salad: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/27/opinion/krugman-the-obamacare-shock.html?src=me&ref=general&_r=1&

    Like

  15. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Mr Anderson: “What you don’t realize is that a president of the USA in the 21st century in completely unable to commit some of the crimes of which Nixon was guilty. There are too many firewalls in place–which were created by subsequent administrations–as a direct result of Nixon’s disastrous presidency, that will prevent those types of crimes in the White House from ever happening again.”
    Mr. Anderson. me thinks those firewalls put in place are ineffictive and basically ain’t worth the paper they are written on as long as Congress fails to do its oversight duties per our Constitution.
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/05/30/why-five-laws-decline-are-behind-irs-benghazi-scandals/?intcmp=trending

    Like

  16. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    Bill, your excellent link to the Fox News story proves my point: the Executive Branch, regardless of party, is hugely FUBAR, and needs to be reformed. As does the rest of the American federal gov’t, to a large degree.
    The Executive Branch as it is currently designed and constructed could very easily nurture a Hitler/Stalin character in the 21st century (not Obama, he’s too black), and the US Constitution needs to be fixed so that the Legislative and Judicial branches are better able to check and balance this kind of serious and world-changing hypothetical situation.
    The firewalls I am citing, Bill, are only there to keep the current Dear Leader in Washington D.C. from laying conspiracies down on tape, for example.
    All conspiracies in the 21st century are anonymous, which means they are not actually conspiracies, by definition (-;

    Like

  17. fish Avatar
    fish

    Thanks to Barry’s misreading of Lord Keynes and listening to fellow nobelist Krugman, the country is up to its collective butt in debt while continuing to dig the hole ever deeper.
    We all do know that while Sugar Coated Barry O’s Nobel was completely unearned, it was at least granted by the Nobel Foundation. The poorly named Nobel prize in Economics is given by a central bank (Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel)…I know…..I know……hard to believe a central bank would honor economists who shamelessly endorse the tenets of central banking.

    Like

  18. Gregory Avatar

    MA, the only reform needed in Washington is to limit the regulation of interstate commerce to the regulation of actual interstate commerce. The commerce clause being stretched beyond any reasonable limit, and it is the justification for most of mess.
    No, regulating the shotgun sitting unused in a judge’s closet because it might have been made in a different state (an actual claim by one US attorney to a Court of Appeals judge when asked) isn’t the same as regulating interstate business transactions.

    Like

  19. George Rebane Avatar

    Krugman, beyond being a dubious economist and nobelist of the Yasser Arafat faction (another similarly adorned member is, of course, Obama), he has now become a super-shill for the administration. His assessments of Obamacare, especially the factual citations, are so far beyond the left field fence they are in the next county (e.g. citations of the ‘surprisingly low cost’ of California’s healthcare premiums). And not missing a beat, all hitches existent and yet to come are the fault of Republican “sabotage”. It all doesn’t speak well for his adoring audience.

    Like

  20. Russ Steele Avatar

    Forbes — Rate Shock: In California, Obamacare To Increase Individual Health Insurance Premiums By 64-146%
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2013/05/30/rate-shock-in-california-obamacare-to-increase-individual-insurance-premiums-by-64-146/
    Obamacare to double individual-market premiums
    If you’re a 25 year old male non-smoker, buying insurance for yourself, the cheapest plan on Obamacare’s exchanges is the catastrophic plan, which costs an average of $184 a month. (By “average,” I mean the median monthly premium across California’s 19 insurance rating regions.)
    The next cheapest plan, the “bronze” comprehensive plan, costs $205 a month. But in 2013, on eHealthInsurance.com (NASDAQ:EHTH), the median cost of the five cheapest plans was only $92.
    In other words, for the typical 25-year-old male non-smoking Californian, Obamacare will drive premiums up by between 100 and 123 percent.
    Under Obamacare, only people under the age of 30 can participate in the slightly cheaper catastrophic plan. So if you’re 40, your cheapest option is the bronze plan. In California, the median price of a bronze plan for a 40-year-old male non-smoker will be $261.
    But on eHealthInsurance, the median cost of the five cheapest plans was $121. That is, Obamacare will increase individual-market premiums by an average of 116 percent.
    For both 25-year-olds and 40-year-olds, then, Californians under Obamacare who buy insurance for themselves will see their insurance premiums double.

    I wonder if California’s will soon have some voters remorse?

    Like

  21. fish Avatar
    fish

    I wonder if California’s will soon have some voters remorse?
    Look at what California voters keep sending to both Washington and Sacramento and ask that question again.

    Like

  22. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    The Great Divide in 3 words:
    Americans versus Washington

    Like

  23. Paul Emery Avatar

    Russ 09:03 AM
    Everything you say is fine if you can buy insurance. Many cannot buy insurance at any price because it’s essentially not for sale if you have pre existing conditions or are above a certain age. I don’t know what insurance you have but if you’re above 55 it’s virtually impossible to buy even though it’s advertised as available because virtyally everyone has a pre existing condition that being you’re above 55.

    Like

  24. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    This s for those who have asked what country does the things I suggest.
    10. Mexico

    Life satisfaction score: 7.3
    Self-reported good health: 66% (14th lowest)
    Employees working long hours: 28.6% (3rd highest)
    Disposable income: $12,732 (3rd lowest)
    Life expectancy: 74.2 years
    Mexico received a high life satisfaction score despite receiving low scores in a number of categories that make up the OECD’s Better Life Index. No nation rated worse than Mexico in safety — the nation’s murder rate of 23.7 murders per 100,000 residents in 2011 was the highest of any OECD nation and more than 10 times the OECD average that year. Additionally, 13.1% of residents had been assaulted or mugged in 2012, also the highest of any nation considered. Mexico also ranked as one of the worst nations for both work-life balance and income. The nation had one of the lowest averages for household disposable income in the OECD, at just $12,732 as of 2010. This is less than a third of the average disposable income in the United States. However, none of these factors have prevented Mexicans from being satisfied with their lives.
    9. Finland
    Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 7th highest)
    Self-reported good health: 69% (18th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 3.9% (8th lowest)
    Disposable income: $25,739 (13th highest)
    Life expectancy: 80.6 years
    People in Finland spent an average of 19.6 years getting an education, more than any other country in the OECD. Based on students’ average scores in reading, mathematics and science, Finland was considered to have the most accomplished students. The government, relative to the nation’s size, is one of the largest spenders in the developed world, providing a significant social welfare system. In 2012, the government’s total spending was equal to nearly 56% of GDP. Finland’s employment rate of 69% in 2011, although lower than quite a few other countries, was higher than the 66% average rate across all OECD countries. People in Finland worked just 1,684 hours annually, compared to 1,776 hours in all OECD countries. Just under 4% of all employees worked very long hours, compared to about 9% in all OECD countries.
    8. Canada
    Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 7th highest)
    Self-reported good health: 88% (3rd highest)
    Employees working long hours: 3.9% (9th lowest)
    Disposable income: $28,194 (9th highest)
    Life expectancy: 81 years
    Canada was rated among the top nations for residents good health. In 2011, 88% of residents surveyed reported they were in good health, higher than all countries except for the United States and New Zealand. Canada also had one of the higher average household disposable incomes among nations considered, at more than $28,000. This was well above the OECD average of $23,047. Canada was rated as one of the best nations in the OECD for housing — although there are some concerns in the country that a real estate bubble is forming.
    7. Austria
    Life satisfaction score: 7.4 (tied for 7th highest)
    Self-reported good health: 69% (18th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 8.8% (14th highest)
    Disposable income: $28,852 (6th highest)
    Life expectancy: 81.1 years
    Last year, just 4.7% of all workers in Austria were unemployed, less than any other nation in the eurozone, where the 2012 unemployment rate was 12.3%. As many as 72% of Austrians between the ages of 15 and 64 were employed in 2011, among the top 10 of all countries and better than the 66% average rate for OECD countries. Austria was in the top third of all countries in terms of both household financial net worth, at $47,458, and personal earnings for full-time employees, at $43,688. In addition, 96% of all residents indicated that the water quality was satisfactory, higher than all but two other countries and significantly better than the 87% who indicated that across all OECD countries. Austria also has high levels of civic participation — the voter turnout rate was 82% in 2008, the ninth highest among countries considered.
    6. Netherlands
    Life satisfaction score: 7.5 (tied for 5th highest)
    Self-reported good health: 76% (11th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 0.7% (2nd lowest)
    Disposable income: $25,493 (14th highest)
    Life expectancy: 81.3 years
    The Netherlands was rated as one of the best countries for jobs by the OECD. In 2011, 73% of the population between 15 and 64 years old was employed, one of the highest proportions of all nation’s measured. Further, only roughly 1.5% of workers had been unemployed for more than one year as of 2011, less than half the OECD average of 3.1%. Also potentially contributing to residents’ happiness is the fact that 94% of residents asked said they had a support network they could count on for help if they were in trouble. This was one of the highest figures among countries measured.
    [More from 24/7 Wall St.: The Countries with the Highest Unemployment]
    5. Denmark
    Life satisfaction score: 7.5 (tied for 5th highest)
    Self-reported good health: 70% (17th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 2.0% (4th lowest)
    Disposable income: $24,682 (15th highest)
    Life expectancy: 79.9 years (12th lowest)
    Employees in Denmark had an average full-time gross pay of $45,802, higher than all but four other countries in the OECD. The average worker in Denmark put in just 1,522 hours annually, much lower than the OECD average of 1,776 hours. Air quality and water quality was considerably better in Denmark, compared to many other countries. Some 94% of residents indicated satisfaction with the water quality, the seventh highest of all countries and better than the 84% indicated across the OECD. The government of Denmark spends considerably to ensure the general well-being of its residents. Last year, government spending totaled 59.5% of GDP, the most of any OECD nation.
    4. Sweden
    Life satisfaction score: 7.6 (tied for 3rd highest)
    Self-reported good health: 80% (8th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 1.2% (3rd lowest)
    Disposable income: $26,242 (12th highest)
    Life expectancy: 81.9 years
    According to the OECD, Sweden ranks as the top country among all nations measured in terms of protecting its environment. Swedes enjoy some of the highest quality air of any nation — as of 2009, there were just 10 micrograms of small particulate matter per cubic meter in the county’s most populous areas. Its water quality in 2012 also ranked among the highest for all countries. The nation’s residents also are among the healthiest of any nations measured. Nearly 80% of those surveyed in 2011 stated they were in good health, well above the 69% average for the OECD. Although Sweden received moderate ratings for income and jobs, it was one of Europe’s best nations for income equality, with one of the lowest Gini index scores of any country.
    3. Iceland
    Life satisfaction score: 7.6 (tied for 3rd highest)
    Self-reported good health: 77% (9th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 13.5% (8th highest)
    Disposable income: $21,201 (16th lowest)
    Life expectancy: 82.4 years
    Iceland residents have the strongest support networks of all countries — 98% of residents indicated they could count on friends or relatives if they needed help. Iceland residents tend to be in good health as well, with the country’s life expectancy and self-reported health both among the top 10 of all countries. The employment rate for those between the ages of 15 and 64 was 79%, tied with Switzerland for the highest among all countries. Where Iceland did not do as well relative to other countries was income and wealth — average disposable household income of $21,201 and average household net financial wealth of $31,182 were both lower than OECD averages. But after accounting for taxes and transfer payments, income in Iceland was more evenly distributed among residents than in other nation in the OECD.
    2. Norway
    Life satisfaction score: 7.7
    Self-reported good health: 73% (14th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 2.8% (6th lowest)
    Disposable income: $31,459 (3rd highest)
    Life expectancy: 81.4 years
    Norway’s employment rate for those between ages 15 and 64 was 75%, tied with the Netherlands for the third highest rate among all countries. The gross pay of full-time employees neared $44,000, the ninth highest of all OECD countries. The average household income was $31,459, higher than every country except for the United States and Luxembourg. People in Norway tend to work significantly less than those in other countries — the average worker only put in 1,426 hours of work, compared to 1,776 in all OECD countries. Less than 3% of the country’s employees worked very long hours, lower than all but five other countries. In 2012, just 3.3% of all workers were unemployed, well less than all but one other nation examined by the OECD, South Korea. As many as 96% of the country’s residents were satisfied with the water quality, tied for third highest in the OECD. Norway also ranked among the 10 best countries in terms of air quality.
    1. Switzerland
    Life satisfaction score: 7.8
    Self-reported good health: 81% (7th highest)
    Employees working long hours: 5.9% (17th lowest)
    Disposable income: $30,060 (4th highest)
    Life expectancy: 82.8 years
    In no other country did residents have a better sense of well-being than in Switzerland. People in the country tend to be better off financially than residents of most other countries. In 2010, the average household’s disposable income was $30,060, higher than all but three other countries. Meanwhile, the average household financial net worth in Switzerland was more than $99,000, higher than any other country except for the United States. As many as 79% of the country’s residents were employed in 2011, tied for the highest employment rate in the OECD. People in the country work just 1,632 hours annually, compared to the OECD average of 1,776. Very few residents were unemployed in 2012, when the unemployment rate was just 4.4%, lower than all but three other nations studied.

    Like

  25. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 652am – Thank you for that compendium.
    It’s interesting to look at your sample. Except for Mexico, they are all small, white, culturally homogeneous (their cultural problems come completely from their minor but growing mulit-kulti factions), European, and not responsible for their own security or keeping the world civilized.
    As homogenous social orders become smaller, it is ever easier to organize under collectivist principles where altruistic behavior becomes less of a strain. The family is the natural bookend of such a social order. For example, in the family the overwhelming part of income (analogue of GDP) is spent by the ‘government’ for collective pursuits and benefits.
    That is one reason why social scientists tell us that the ideal size of sovereign nation-states never exceeds 5M by much, and the ideal size of communities is below 50K. When nations get bigger and culturally inhomogeneous, then peace and order must be maintained by a strong central government. And as we all know, there are enormous costs to such forms of governance – loss of freedoms and widespread poverty being the ones that readily come to mind.
    Self-determination is not easily practiced wholesale.

    Like

  26. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, even under Obamacare, you can’t buy “insurance”. What you will be forced to buy is all the prepaid health care that the Obama administration thinks you should buy, not an insuring against an unexpected major expenditure.
    In general, those of us who don’t overuse healthcare services subsidize those who do when we buy any insurance beyond catastrophic coverage, and Obamacare is WAY BEYOND catastrophic coverage.

    Like

  27. George Rebane Avatar

    The sludge on Obamacare just continues to pour in. Here’s a heads up for all those celebrants of the feds running national healthcare – rationing has already begun on pre-existing conditions, and predicted out of pocket costs are going through the ceiling since everything, as usual, was underestimated to calm the sheeple. Here’s what the GAO is now reporting (don’t look to the lamestream).
    The Pre-existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) is overseen by the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight (CCIIO), which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services, which is headed by Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. …
    Further, the CCIIO “instituted benefit changes for the federally run PCIP that shifted more costs onto enrollees starting in January 2013,” reported the GAO. “For example, it increased enrollees’ out of pocket maximum for in-network services from $4,000 to $6,250 and for out-of-network services from $7,000 to $10,000.”
    The report concluded, “Finally, due to growing concerns about the rate of PCIP spending, in February 2013, CCIIO suspended PCIP enrollment to ensure the appropriated funding would be sufficient to cover claims for current enrollees through the end of the program.”

    More here – http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gao-hhs-already-rationing-enrollment-obamacare-s-pre-existing-condition-plan
    In case you missed it in my post – “As I have said before, Obamacare will turn out to be the world’s most expensive and despised healthcare system ever.”

    Like

  28. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    The 18% of the GDP that our current “system” is already the most expensive so I don’t see it getting much worse. I don’t support it because as you know I believe in single payer, but it may be better than what we have or the Republican “let’s tweek what we have a little bit and see what happens” so called alternative.

    Like

  29. Paul Emery Avatar

    04:36 PM re-write
    Our current “system” is already the most expensive in the world at 18% of the GDP so I don’t see it getting much worse. I don’t support Obamacare because, as you know, I believe in single payer, but it may be better than what we have or the Republican “let’s tweek what we have a little bit and see what happens” so called alternative.
    Here’s more info about our current health care costs.
    “Hospitals, drug companies, device makers, physicians and other providers can benefit by charging inflated prices, favoring the most costly treatment options and curbing competition that could give patients more, and cheaper, choices. And almost every interaction can be an opportunity to send multiple, often opaque bills with long lists of charges: $100 for the ice pack applied for 10 minutes after a physical therapy session, or $30,000 for the artificial joint implanted in surgery. ”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/02/health/colonoscopies-explain-why-us-leads-the-world-in-health-expenditures.html?hp&_r=0

    Like

  30. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Gotta love it. Special hunting socks are now considered a “medical device” and subject to the ObamaCaring tax. If you don’t believe me, just hit the Cabellos in Reno. Hand warmers are next. Good thing thrift stores still sell medical devices such as wheelchairs and crutches. I don’t mind using dead people’s “medical devices”, but I resent paying an indirect tax for getting around on a busted knee.. Looks like ObamaCaring wants an arm and a leg and the wheelchair to go with the kitchen sink.

    Like

  31. Paul Emery Avatar

    Latest polls show strong support for Obamacare with overwhelming combined support for Obamacare and a more “liberal” solution of 59-35%. That poll would include people like me who prefer single payer.
    http://www.pollingreport.com/

    Like

  32. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 436+pm – Current healthcare is about 16%. Early Obamacare estimates take it up to 18%. By 2015, I’ll wager that it will be 20% and counting.
    I’m not aware of any “tweeking” Repub healthcare plans. All of them entail a massive overhaul with inter-state competitive insurance policies, multiple levels of healthcare practitioners, revised tax codes and tort laws for medical litigation, etc.
    I would be very suspicious of that poll. Obamacare has been uniformly disliked by Americans for a couple of years now with all kinds of polling organizations taking part. Last week’s 54% against swinging to 59% in favor in less than a week would represent a very big swing just as all the bad news on Obamacare is hitting the media. Not very likely.

    Like

  33. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    George wrote: “Obamacare has been uniformly disliked by Americans for a couple of years now…”
    uni·formly adv. – always the same, as in character or degree; unvarying.
    Allow me to revise your statement so that it is factually correct: Obamacare has been uniformly disliked by conservative Americans for a couple of years now…
    There, now it makes some logical sense. Sorry, 54% is not a mandate. My guess is that once PPACA kicks in, and the 30 million currently using the ER as their primary care facility are brought into the system in a more cost-efficient way (which, BTW, is the main reason our local hospital is totally on-board with the legislation), the polling numbers will reverse.
    I predict that by the summer of 2014, over 60% of ALL Americans (not just conservatarians) will have a positive opinion of the PPACA.
    In the meantime, let me use a baseball analogy regarding the incessant mewling of the PPACA opponents. I mean seriously, trying to repeal it 38 times in the House of Representatives?!? That’s just pitiful. Look, the umpire listened to your complaints and said sorry, the ruling stands. But the whining continued, to the point where the ump finally had to throw you out of the game (National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., June 28, 2012).
    From the Baseball Official Regulations and Playing Rules: Rule 4.07 — When a Manager, Coach or Player is ejected from a game, they shall leave the field immediately and take no further part in that game. They may not sit in the stands and may not be recalled. A Manager or Coach ejected from a game must not be present at the game site for the remainder of the game.
    Opponents of PPACA have only two choices: They can either work to reform PPACA by adding “inter-state competitive insurance policies, multiple levels of healthcare practitioners, revised tax codes and tort laws for medical litigation,” or they can leave the ballpark and stop annoying everyone else in the stands.

    Like

  34. Paul Emery Avatar

    George, in that poll I combine support for Obamacare and “more liberal” options, which would include single payer. The Repubs had six years of total control of the Presidency, House and Senate and came up with nothing so I give them no credibility in coming up with a solution to a dire problem for millions of Americans. Remember, it was Romndy who last year proposed
    “Well, we do provide care for people who don’t have insurance,” Romney told interviewer Scott Pelley. “If someone has a heart attack, they don’t sit in their apartment and — and die. We pick them up in an ambulance, and take them to the hospital, and give them care. And different states have different ways of providing for that care.”
    But Romney’s position is a shift from 2010, when he told MSNBC that part of the impetus for the Massachusetts health-care law was to keep people out of the ER.
    “It doesn’t make a lot of sense for us to have millions and millions of people who have no health insurance and yet who can go to the emergency room and get entirely free care for which they have no responsibility,” he said.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2012/09/24/romney-calls-emergency-room-a-health-care-option-for-uninsured/

    Like

  35. Gregory Avatar

    ” The Repubs had six years of total control of the Presidency, House and Senate and came up with nothing so I give them no credibility in coming up with a solution to a dire problem for millions of Americans.”
    The GOP barely controlled both houses during Bush’s first six years and never had the absolute control of Obama’s first two years. Democrats killed substantive efforts on tort reform, the trial lawyers, being a major Dem power center, not wanting their excesses reined in. This not only drove up medical malpractice insurance costs, but also all medical costs since doctors were (and are) practicing defensive medicine and ordering many more tests than they would otherwise. That stampede I hear is probably horses or cattle, but we’d better rule out zebras and ibexes just to be sure.
    One Dem medical malpractice lawyer who specialized in channeling dead babies when hitting juries up for huge damages almost became Vice President.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
    Like I said, it could have been worse.

    Like

  36. Gregory Avatar

    Checking, Bush started in 2001 with a literal 50/50 in the Senate, and not much better in the House.
    Total control? And, if you think that by 9/12/2001 that anyone thought that healthcare reform was a front burner issue, you’ve been smoking some bad granola (apologies to Zapp Brannigan).

    Like

  37. Gregory Avatar

    Back to Tozer 7:34
    “The IRS scandal may have its roots in Illinois politics. Specifically, the 1996 U.S. Senate race between Democrat Congressman Dick Durbin and conservative Republican State Rep. Al Salvi… Soon after the IRS story broke, Al Salvi told Illinois Review that it was IRS official Lois Lerner who represented the FEC in the 1996 Democrat complaint against him. According to Salvi, Lerner was, without question, politically motivated, and went so far as to make him an offer: “Promise me you will never run for office again, and we’ll drop this case.”
    http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2013/05/lerner-intrigue-goes-back-to-96-durbinsalvi-us-senate-race.html
    And now she’s in charge of the IRS group running Obamacare. Gives new meaning to the IRS ‘getting out the proctoscope’ during tax audits.

    Like

  38. George Rebane Avatar

    Obamacare was lofted on a pack of lies, cobbled together in back rooms as a stepping stone to a grander socialist vision, and passed in the dead of night on a party line vote. As a result when 54% of the population dislikes it, that is not a mandate for any given new healthcare, but it is more than enough mandate to at least overhaul the garbage that is being forced down our throats now. Politicians regularly claim ‘mandates’ with pluralities a lot lower than 54%.
    And dear reader, do you notice all the crickets the liberals are invoking to answer the daily reports that everybody from Congress, through unions, to companies big and small are doing everything they can to get out of Obamacare. On that we hear the sound of silence.
    And the only ones who will ever have a positive opinion of Obamacare in full force will be those whose hands are eternally in the ‘gimme’ position. The others have been drinking too much Pelosi Punch.

    Like

  39. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    Mr. Anderson: While I have a fondness for analogies, the danger with the baseball analogy is the removal of dissent and the squashing of free speech. The rule book is different in baseball, but I always enjoy seeing a manger get the boot in baseball and totally love seeing an enforcer sent to the penalty box in hockey. Really fires up us spectators.
    Mr. Anderson, here is my analogy:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEPpwQlRu5M

    Like

  40. Paul Emery Avatar

    George 12:13 you ignored the cumulative poll numbers that I cited that show 59% either support Obamacare or prefer stronger national health care programs such as Single Payer. That’s what the polls read, strong support for a national health care system.
    Gregory 11:26 AM
    Poor Pubbers, they can’t even pass legislation when they hold all the cards. They should be renamed the Grand Old Wimps party.

    Like

  41. Gregory Avatar

    Got it, Paul 7:40. You’ll just be silly when you think you can get away with it.
    A 50/50 senate is holding all the cards? Obama/Pelosi/Reid had a 59%/41% edge in the House and 58/42 in the Senate, courtesy of the general public deciding, like Paul, that a Republican President when crap happens means it’s the Republicans’ fault. The fact that the electorate got rid of Pelosi’s majority mostly because of the Obamacare debacle for the 111th Congress is testament to the popularity of the program.
    The costs are only now just mounting. We’ll see in the upcomin’. This time next year we’ll be 5 months and counting until the election. If it’s as popular as Paul thinks, Obama will be the only time a lame duck president’s party actually gains Congressional seats. It’s more likely that the GOP will gain in the House and take over the Senate.

    Like

  42. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    The problem with Obamacare is it forces individuals to purchase a service from a private sector health insurance company. In 2010 the poll that Mr McClintock misrepresented of 53% of Americans agreed with him on was actually broken down and nearly 30% of that 53% wanted the legislation to include a public option. In other words it wasn’t strong enough. I am one of those 30%.
    Lets not fool ourselves the D’s are in bed with the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries just as much as the R’s. Baucus (D) excluded single payer advocates while allow health insurance lobbyists sit at the table. Baucus (D) also had singer payer advocates arrested.
    In CA the D’s passed single payer when they knew Arnold would veto it but when Brown took office the D’s decided to abstain 4 votes and have 2 vote “No” for the same bill that pass previously to fall by two votes. The Democratic Party likes the idea of being for singer payer but will not as a political party fight for it.
    Single Payer Falls 2 Votes Short In California Senate
    Four Democrats Sit Out Critical Vote
    https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/01/27-6

    Like

  43. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    In the US over a million people a year file for bankruptcy due to medical bills. 75% of them have health insurance. In every other developed nation on the planet that number is virtually zero.
    45,000 Americans will die in 2013 due to lack of health insurance or the equivalent of 15 September 11, 2001 happen every year because a person cannot afford health insurance in pursuit of the highest profit margins. This is the same industry that pays CEO’s tens of millions in compensation packages. When denying care makes higher profits the incentive is to not approve claims from premium paying costumers. Absolutely immoral.

    Like

  44. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    “In the US over a million people a year file for bankruptcy due to medical bills. 75% of them have health insurance. In every other developed nation on the planet that number is virtually zero.”
    Ben, I have read those stats before and the numbers do not mean one million people a year file for bankruptcy BECAUSE of medical bills.
    All debts one owes must be declared in bankruptcy, even any amount you owe to your bankruptcy attorney. All monies owed to all parties, omitting none. The stats are skewed because if you owe 400 clams to a doctor, then that is included in the stats and wrongly proclaimed as the primary reason one declared bankruptcy. Might as well say over one million people file for bankruptcy a year due to charging pizza and beer on a credit card, 75% of whom who are making car payments.

    Like

  45. Gregory Avatar

    The even bigger problem with Obamacare is it forces individuals to purchase a service designed by Obama-appointed bureaucrats from a private sector health insurance company.
    None of that ol’ “if you like your current insurance you can keep it”. You have to buy what Obama’s people decided you should have to buy. But yes, you can buy it from your old insurance company.
    It’s almost as if you could buy any car you want, except the only car that will be available for sale is a Toyota Prius with all the bells and whistles. You can buy a Ford, a Chevy or even a Kia if you want, but Ford, Chevy and Kia all have to make a Prius to sell. They can also sell Explorers and Corvettes, but if you buy one of those you have to pay the fine (now called a “tax” to be constitutional) levied on anyone who doesn’t buy a Prius as ordered.
    What a country!

    Like

  46. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Bill,
    You are correct not all of their debt was medical but the major debt came from the inability to payback their medical. This is just a guess I would thing the study/ poll would ask what is the major cause of the bankruptcy and medical would be the answer.

    Like

  47. Paul Emery Avatar

    Gregory
    The Grand Old Wimps didn’t even present a serious proposal for comprehensive Health Care Reform during the 12 years they controlled the Congress which included six years in the White House. They had the ability to show leadership and did nothing. Can’t blame this one on the Dems.

    Like

  48. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 844am – You seem to think that the only way to improve healthcare in America is through the launch of a mammoth “comprehensive” state-run healthcare system. It will come as a shock, but there are numerous other ways to improve healthcare in our land. I have mentioned several of these that include massive tax reform (needed also for other benefits), revision of tort laws, national competition for healthcare insurance, etc. These have all been tried by the GOP in various forms, but guess who doesn’t want to play any other game than socialization of healthcare on the European model?
    BTW, I notice that the predictions, made some weeks ago, of the demise of the Obama scandals (IRS, Benghazi, DoJ) were greatly exaggerated.

    Like

Leave a comment