Rebane's Ruminations
March 2013
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

ObamaChange4America is being harmed beyond measure by its government.  It is no longer death by a thousand cuts – we have advanced to the slash and burn level of self destruction.  The Competitive Enterprise Institute in cooperation with the Weidenbaum Center has compiled these astounding stats from the feds’ own data.  Under the Obama administration –

–    $1.752T is the FY2012 cost of regulatory compliance inflicted on the country’s private sector.  This is more than one tenth of the country’s entire GDP.
–    In FY2012 Obama issued another $216B in regulatory costs.  This was actually an election year pullback which will be remedied in the remainder of his second term.
–    In FY2013 the feds will spend $59B in regulatory enforcement.
–    Regulatory agencies employ 283,600 people in full time staff positions.

And according to the WH Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (the outfit run by Cass Sunstein), during the Great Recession (aka Depression2) –

–    Obama’s administration issued five times more regulations during his first three years than Bush2 in his eight years.
–    The cost per regulation for Obama has been 3.5X the cost under President Clinton.

And this is only a small part of the whole trail of tears onto which Washington has marched the country.  It is hard to accept that this self-administered pain and suffering during a time of economic hardship is being inflicted by a pro-America government vs a regime with another agenda.  Perhaps we err as we hopefully continue to view it as iatrogenics.



[update] The Washington Post reported a WH leak about Obama’s 2013-14 operating strategy, and it does not involve making progress on any of the fiscal or regulatory issues.

“The goal is to flip the Republican-held House back to Democratic
control, allowing Obama to push forward with a progressive agenda on gun
control, immigration, climate change and the economy during his final
two years in office, according to congressional Democrats, strategists
and others familiar with Obama’s thinking,”

The current MO of Obamunism (q.v.) is to ropadope the electorate into believing that Obama is sincere about solutions to things like deficits, debt limits, immigration reform, etc.  Instead the leak reveals that the administration’s strategy is to propose and counter with ‘solutions’ known to be unacceptable to Republicans from the gitgo, and instead spend their main energy demogauging about Republicans as the gridlock party.  The idea is to have the voters be so disgusted with the Republicans by 2014 as to bring both houses of Congress back into the Democrat fold.  With the then Pelosi2 regime in the House, Obama will use the remaining two years of his administration to push through a socialist agenda that promises to be the progressives’ dream on everything from the environment to gun control.  Stand by for ram.

[7mar13 update]  Back to gun control which may be the most serious iatrogenic initiative governments are again pursuing after Sandy Hook.  And I may be totally naive in ascribing the initiative to iatrogenics, for it may have nothing to do with unintended consequences given the other preparations now taking place.

Readers familiar with my take on guns and gun control, that are here a matter of record, recall that I have proclaimed for years that governments are the greatest killers of people in the world.  I have cited RJ Rummel’s research in Death by Government numerous times.  The book is dated in the sense that it does not include the horrendous toll wreaked by Red China during its Cultural Revolution.  That democide alone took over 100M lives.  Democide is the word for government killing its own civilians by policies other than suffering war casualties.  I received the link to this compelling video – ‘Gun Control Works’ – that highlights the democides of the 20th century.

 

Posted in , , ,

90 responses to “Government Iatrogenics (updated 7mar13)”

  1. earlcrabb Avatar

    I watched the Krugman/Scarborough debate on Charlie Rose last night. It was gratifying to see someone tell the omnipotent Krugman that yes, debt does matter. It’s an argument that my progressive friends can’t seem to grasp.

    Like

  2. Ryan Mount Avatar

    It was an interesting discussion, however Joe vs. the NYT wooly bearded potato seemed ill-matched.
    But here’s what I got out of it:
    – The year of long-term debt reckoning is 2025. That’s 12 years from now. 12
    – Progressives only care about budget deficits insofar as they are useful in defeating tax cuts.
    – When it comes time to unleash government spending, Progressive deficits can be largely ignored.
    – Conservatives often take the opposite stance

    Like

  3. Fuzz Avatar
    Fuzz

    George, I have a request.  I read your posts, but often I feel like saying, “Lets cut to the chase; if you were elected President and 80% of Congress were Rebane Conservatarians, what would you do in your: a) first 100 days, and b) first 4 years.  (I’m assuming our court system would comply.)  This is your chance to “fix it before it’s too late.”  Some considerations that come to mind are:
    Government – (Bureaucracy, departments, Cabinet positions, etc.)
    Commerce – (including type and scope of regulation)
    Money – (fiscal and monetary policy, etc.)
    Education – (government involvement)
    Natural Resources – (Parks, BLM, USFS, management and ownership)
    Health Care – (Medicare, Medicaid, Medical, etc.)
    Social Security – (the program as well as government involvement in support for the poor, homeless, uninsured, unemployed, etc.)
    Defense 
    National infrastructure
    Civil Rights
    Gun control
    …..and anything else you want to address

    Like

  4. Russ Steele Avatar

    Last time the Dow was over 14,000 was July 2007, and George Bush was President. That was then, here is some insight into what has changed:
    Dow Jones Industrial Average: Then 14164.5; Now 14164.5
    Regular Gas Price: Then $2.75; Now $3.73
    GDP Growth: Then +2.5%; Now +1.6%
    Americans Unemployed (in Labor Force): Then 6.7 million; Now 13.2 million
    Americans On Food Stamps: Then 26.9 million; Now 47.69 million
    Size of Fed’s Balance Sheet: Then $0.89 trillion; Now $3.01 trillion
    US Debt as a Percentage of GDP: Then ~38%; Now 74.2%
    US Deficit (LTM): Then $97 billion; Now $975.6 billion
    Total US Debt Outstanding: Then $9.008 trillion; Now $16.43 trillion
    US Household Debt: Then $13.5 trillion; Now 12.87 trillion
    Labor Force Participation Rate: Then 65.8%; Now 63.6%
    Consumer Confidence: Then 99.5; Now 69.6
    S&P Rating of the US: Then AAA; Now AA+
    VIX: Then 17.5%; Now 14%
    10 Year Treasury Yield: Then 4.64%; Now 1.89%
    EURUSD: Then 1.4145; Now 1.3050
    Gold: Then $748; Now $1583
    NYSE Average LTM Volume (per day): Then 1.3 billion shares; Now 545 million shares
    Just thought you should know. Could it be that many of these change are the result of increased regulations?
    More here: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-05/last-time-dow-was-here

    Like

  5. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Zero Hedge or: How I learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Fiscal Collapse. Apologies to Stanley Kubrick.
    Man I love that site. Anyhow Russ, you left out the best and snarkiest part:
    “…that ‘we all know it’s going to end badly, but in the meantime we can make some money’ – ZH translation: ‘just make sure to sell ahead of everyone else.’”
    Ah, the Casino continues to lure it’s victims in. Everyone has been warned. If your (that’s the collective ‘your’) mutual fund takes a crap, we (the collective ‘we’) can’t afford, nor do we have the stomach, for more bailouts.
    I would think Mr. McDaniel should agree with that sentiment. Watch ‘dem bonds for action.

    Like

  6. Joe Koyote Avatar
    Joe Koyote

    If regulation is such an evil culprit, how is it that the Dow is at record highs? How can the stock market be at record levels when the economy is in the tank for the 86% of Americans who own no stock? This makes no sense unless trickle down economics is a complete farce. The makers have the money but they won’t invest in the American people “claiming” regulation is the culprit when the culprit is really greed or some ulterior motive like destroying the government for personal gain. I call that treason. The constant drumbeat of false blame is getting old. The republican party in general and the tea baggers in particular are so out of step with the rest of America as to be laughable. Counting Bill Clinton, the republicans/corporatists were in the White House from 1980 through 2008 non-stop. We are now seeing the results, record corporate earnings while the rest of the country founders. Without new gerrymandered House districts purchased through pouring tons of money into state assembly campaigns that gave the right wing 73 additional seats after the 2010 census, the repubs would be a footnote in history like the Whigs. The only problem is that they have all the money and no new ideas to get us out of this mess of their own creation. Solution.. just blame the other guys and grab all you can on the way out the door. I am surprised no silverware turned up missing when GWB left the Whitehouse.

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    Fuzz 842am – Thank you for your interest. I’ve never been bashful in giving readers my ‘solutions’ in the years that RR has been on the air. Just last January I included this list which launched a very long comment stream.
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2013/01/this-presidents-second-term.html
    And here’s more
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2009/05/republicans-need-a-new-strategy.html
    And see also the posts in the ‘Great Divide’ category for my take on advancing to a more ideal form of our Republic, for example
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2011/05/an-eerie-feeling-re-great-divide.html
    And from way back when,
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2007/12/i-am-not-a-jour.html#more
    re JoeK 1002 – As RR has observed since the bubble burst, everyone in the market thinks that they can get out before the music stops playing. However, that will be a black swan event that will see millions of investors with their tits tightly caught in the wringer. Watashi wa is still keeping and eye on the price of gold and interest rates. I have provided readers a simple formula for calculating the probability of default during an upcoming time interval.
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2011/11/investors-playing-the-odds.html

    Like

  8. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    In the past, a few Leftys said that the business exodus from CA. had not much to with laws and regs. passed by the state overlords.
    It seems some other LIB states will find how that really works out.
    Beretta will pack up and leave for better pastures if the gun laws pass in the state they call home.
    The same will happen with Magpul ( maker of those evil high capacity magazines) and take 600 jobs with them. With any luck every employee will move with them.
    This is government gone wild. They think they can pass any law they like without consequence. Well,, the are finding out differently.
    Kind of reminiscent of IMM. We had the opportunity to bring good, high paying jobs here, but LIBS were happier just to run them off.So now G.V. is crying hunger.
    Sorry G.V.,,, you did this to yourself. And now that Ca. has Brown and a majority in both state houses, things will only get worse for us.
    YUP,, touchy freely laws have their drawbacks. But you never figure that out till the damage is done.( even when warned of the impending damage that will come.)

    Like

  9. Bill Tozer Avatar
    Bill Tozer

    Mr. Koyote: The Dow and the entire stock market is emotion based forward looking and usually not rooted in reality. Basically, its betting on a horse race and more often than not has little correlation to Main St. at the moment. The nearly unsolvable problems in Europe, the crushing debt, the deficits, the looming costs of Obamacare and its effect on unemployment, the global economic slow down are simply overlooked. These problems did not go away. They did no go slowly into the still deep night. My personal opinion is the investors just got impatient with sitting on the sidelines and figure its time to catch a rally. Read this, if you will, to answer your question about the rally.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/dow-punches-time-high-us-143119493.html
    Now, the other day on the radio I heard the Republicans might play ball with the White House (raise more taxes) and forget about any more immediate cuts in expenditures solely based on Obama hinting that he will deal with the long term problems facing our debt. That long term solution that needs to be addressed is entitlement reform. STOP THE PRESSES!!!!!!!
    I shouted at the radio “Stop, don’t fall for it” in a boisterous manner. How dumb does he think we are?? He will gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today. How many times will he promise one thing out of the right side of his mouth and do the opposite out of the left side. If you think for one second that Obama is seriously contemplating long term entitlement reform in exchange for raising the debt ceiling now, then you are dumber than a bucket of rocks and stupider than a fence post. He will just kick the can down the road to get more of the people’s money now and spend more now until we are all running to the Great White Father in Washington with our beggar’s tin cup in hand.
    No pain, no gain. Even the smartest people in the room have been fooled by charm and a bouncy buxom blonde passing by.

    Like

  10. Russ Steele Avatar

    Sequester has got to hurt as we said it would, according to Obama. Details in the Washington Times:
    The Obama administration denied an appeal for flexibility in lessening the sequester’s effects, with an email this week appearing to show officials in Washington that because they already had promised the cuts would be devastating, they now have to follow through on that.
    In the email sent Monday by Charles Brown, an official with the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service office in Raleigh, N.C., Mr. Brown asked “if there was any latitude” in how to spread the sequester cuts across the region to lessen the impacts on fish inspections.
    He said he was discouraged by officials in Washington, who gave him this reply: “We have gone on record with a notification to Congress and whoever else that ‘APHIS would eliminate assistance to producers in 24 states in managing wildlife damage to the aquaculture industry, unless they provide funding to cover the costs.’ So it is our opinion that however you manage that reduction, you need to make sure you are not contradicting what we said the impact would be.”
    “This email confirms what many Americans have suspected: The Obama administration is doing everything they can to make sure their worst predictions come true and to maximize the pain of the Sequester cuts for political gain,” said Rep. Tim Griffin, Arkansas Republican.

    Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/mar/5/email-tells-feds-make-sequester-painful-promised/#ixzz2Mhfffa6Y

    Like

  11. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    Time to declare a national holiday!!!!! Chavez is DEAD!!!!!
    “O” will need to find a new mentor. ( That little twerp from N.Korea?)

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar

    RE Update
    No doubt the Dems will pull this off due to the pathetic opposition offered by the Pubbers. Anyone who votes for either “Party” should have their drivers license seized for delusional thinking. These people are dangerous on the highway because of declining mental capacity.

    Like

  13. Gerry Fedor Avatar
    Gerry Fedor

    Walt, maybe Dennis Rodman can give our President some pointers on Basketball as he seemed to have played a game and got drunk with “that little twerp from North Korea”…..
    It just amazes me that we give credence to the worlds little twerps!
    Personally I would have liked it if Mr. Rodman would have pulled his underpants over his head, and paddled him!

    Like

  14. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    I didn’t even want to “go there” Gerry,, What a crock of…. well you know…
    So we had ” Hanoi Jane”,, so how does “DMZ Dennis” sound? But feel free to find a more
    appropriate handle.
    I wonder if Dennis loaned that teenage dictator one of his signature wedding dress drag outfits.
    Any word on the fate of the losing team after the game they watched? ( back to the rice patties under armed guards?)

    Like

  15. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Barack Obama administration is NOT, let me repeat IS NOT progressive in any sense. I am embarrassed and apologize for voting for him despite Obama being my 9th choice in 2008 for President of the United States of America. I knew better but the other candidates didn’t give much of a choice. Between Obama vs McCain he was better and McKinney was a former Democrat running in Green clothing. Nader was taking Republican money and Bob Barr was a complete hypocrite of his career as a Republican and the witch hunt after Bill Clinton.
    For all that read Rebane’s blog please ignore the reasons why he proposes the Obama administration is bad for America. The reasons are pointless and are perpetuating a corporate controlled America. There are plenty of reasons the Obama administration is bad for America.
    The Obama administration outright war on whistleblowers, talking on both sides of his mouth on every issue, pro-banking, pro-big business, pro war, pro authoritarianism, pro violating civil liberties, and giving hope for a change in the establishment when all he does is perpetuate the continuation of powers that be.

    Like

  16. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Barack Obama administration is NOT, let me repeat IS NOT progressive in any sense.
    You got that right, brother. And I’m not being snarky, for once. But it’s a popular trope to put him in that camp. I suppose it makes it easier to demonize him. I have no idea what the motivation is.
    Let’s put it another way, if he is a Progressive or Socialist or whatever, he’s a very bad one. Like horrible.

    Like

  17. Paul Emery Avatar

    Yes indeed Ben. Obama represents the ruling class very well. There has to be some reason the Republicans are so pathetic when it comes to national elections and the only thing I can think of is that the powers that be do not not want a bunch of foamers running things thinking they can actually change the power structure that runs this country. Seeing Jeb Bush jump off a cliff so early in the game is evidence enough that they have no real desire to win and that the real players are behind the Dems

    Like

  18. George Rebane Avatar

    re BenE’s 807pm – It seems that this comment starts out with another typical red herring. There is no proposal here that Obama actually is the progressive he professes to be. And we all know that there are legions (millions?) of progressives out there who definitely see him as one of their own.
    I have long held him to have a special agenda for America that puts him into a league of his own. For that I labeled his ideology as Obamunism (see Glossary) and described it in my 15sep12 Union column –
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2012/09/the-advent-of-obamunism.html

    Like

  19. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George,
    I will state this again on a key point of your post, regulations. It is big business that pushes regulations more than any other to stomp out medium and small business competition. Only the bigs can afford to comply with the regulations being put forward by the corporate owned big two political parties.
    As for the progressive comment.
    “The Washington Post reported a WH leak about Obama’s 2013-14 operating strategy, and it does not involve making progress on any of the fiscal or regulatory issues.
    “The goal is to flip the Republican-held House back to Democratic control, allowing Obama to push forward with a progressive agenda on gun control, immigration, climate change and the economy during his final two years in office, according to congressional Democrats, strategists and others familiar with Obama’s thinking,”

    Like

  20. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 907pm – Ben, sometimes I think you are hopeless, other times I’m certain of it – this one is of the latter case. Your quote is from the Washington Post, a liberal (progressive) newspaper whose editors very definitely think Obama is a progressive.
    Yes, if you would ever read RR carefully, you’d know that I have for years promoted the idea that big corporations and big government are in cahoots – recall Rebane’s Rule of Capitalism. And regulations to inhibit competition (cost of entry) are their main work product. Big corporations cannot survive without government guns, bet on it. Here’s just one sample of the rule.
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2011/01/states-busy-strapping-on-bankruptcy-kneepads.html?cid=6a00e54f86f2ad88330147e1d9e784970b#comment-6a00e54f86f2ad88330147e1d9e784970b
    (And try not to read each post as if it were the sum and substance of my thinking. This is a growing body of commentary over the years containing thousands of articles appended with tens of thousands of expanding comments. The posted commentaries are topical, and no single one captures all aspects of a notion discussed nor my beliefs on the subject. Capice? That’s why God invented the TypePad and Google search functions.)

    Like

  21. Paul Emery Avatar

    “Your quote is from the Washington Post”
    So George you are going after the messenger not the message. Hmm I thought we’ve been down that road already.

    Like

  22. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 941pm – Help me out here Paul, where am I going after anyone? I’m trying to disabuse BenE of misattributing me as the one labeling Obama a progressive. Do all you Brethren of the Left have problems reading?

    Like

  23. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    All this is getting downright depressing. So, here is a sweet little upbeat tune from our own KVMR’s Marc the Money dude
    I cannot stress enough you must prepare for what will be the result of severely flawed economic policies coming from central banks everywhere. They have all lost their sense and now print paper to solve non-paper problems. Colored pieces of paper don’t solve anything. If they did, our problems would be long gone but they are almost as bad as they have ever been. Couple that with a new found realization by people everywhere that hard work will be punished through higher taxes, that wealth is bad and is to be redistributed to those “unfortunates”, that to achieve success is to be scorned, and that anything bad that happens to you is somebody’s else’s fault, and you have the recipe for an unmitigated disaster of epic proportions. Society loses its incentive to work, governments grow so large as to consume everything the economy produces, and the people of that economy now sit and wait for government checks. Those remaining producers, those still working, are taxed to death until they themselves go on the public dole.
    The only ones getting wealthy are the ones at the money spigots: Washington and its cronies, big lobbying corporations, the military industries which gobble trillions and the banking industry who make money on all of it.
    America is falling as foretold by many. Democracy destroys itself because world improvers start improving, the rich are vilified, the middle class is taxed, the lazy get paid to sit home, more labor unions (which exist now just to feed themselves), more perks and pensions, ever-bigger government and criminal-like lobbyist demand continues until the rock is finally bled dry.
    No more blood is to be squeezed. As it was once said, the trouble with Socialism is you eventually run out of other people’s money.
    Protect yourself, they are coming after your privacy, your wealth, your guns, your gold, even your decency. It is happening America. You are witnessing the fall of Rome. No, we won’t burn to the ground, but America will end up like Britain, a shadow of greatness, once the nation that was the envy of all, now reduced to a blip on world map.
    The emerging behemoths like China will be the next in line to inherit the mantle.
    In the mean time, look for more government intrusion, higher taxes to “redistribute” your wealth to others in the name of “fairness” and more of you “pay your fair share’ of which that “share” is determined by someone else.

    Like

  24. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George,
    Here is the problem you and I face. You think your opinion is something we all should take in and remember where I think it is just an opinion of an ideologue. Sometimes you make good points but most times the core opinion could have been lifted from Townhall website.
    My comment was based on a product inserted into your opinion piece. I personally don’t think it was something that needed to be addressed. I think there are plenty of legitimate reasons to oppose the Obama administration but you continue to make very weak and ideological arguments. Obama has increased military spending, made cuts to spending, put medicare and SS on the table, abandoned labor, expanded fossil fuel exploration within US borders, bombs muslim nations, deported and imprisoned more immigrants than any other president, expanded Patriot and FISA Acts, aggressively going after Bradley Manning, and most likely will approve the Keystone Pipeline. My guess if a Republican president was doing these things you would support it.

    Like

  25. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    A follow up comment.
    George,
    Despite my disagreement with your opinions in many case I really do appreciate that you make them in the way you do. Your opinions are shaped by decades of experience and study. I think if we really get into the core values we want for our nation we probably would agree on much more than we disagree. The problem lies is how we achieve the core values and this is where you and I will continue to disagree.

    Like

  26. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 739am – Fair enough Ben. But as long as you are on RR and debating me, you must needs take in the body of my opinion, as you would debating anyone else with a ‘published corpus’. Ideologically I’m pretty much an open book, but you must read it in order for us to make what progress we can.

    Like

  27. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George,
    Your opinions are all over the map and you can point to one comment or another to match your opinion de jour. I take your opinions in totality because they definitely shape a specific ideology. You’ll claim you believe in individual liberty on one comment and then another comment claim you support might makes right because it is based in reality. Individual liberty only exists in reality because those of us who refuse to except might makes right. Do you really think those who control power and wealth would ever willingly recognize individual liberty? Not in a million years and I don’t care what side of the political spectrum we are coming. As you correctly point out some of the most brutal modern governments/ nations of individual liberties have been Communist in name. I would argue that in practice they are not following the theory but when giving a small number of people the controls of power it will eventually turn into tyrannical. That is why I am a proponent of democracy despite all of its warts. It is ugly and slow but allows the most people to be in on the decision making, which is the closest form of government to self determination we have come up with to date.

    Like

  28. Paul Emery Avatar

    George when you wrote ” Your quote is from the Washington Post, a liberal (progressive) newspaper whose editors very definitely think Obama is a progressive” you did so with the intent of countering B Emery’s argument by negating his source.

    Like

  29. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Billy T,
    Do you realize that the private sector unionize work for is at 6%. So what part of the blame do you give the other 94% of private sector?

    Like

  30. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    Paul,
    My source to that WP article was RR post Government Iatrogenics. As usual I had to look up the definition of Iatrogenics to figure out George’s point. It means unintended consequences or problems caused by the prescribed treatment.
    I believe what George is saying that Obama and the D’s are creating political theatre to make the R’s look bad so they then could implement their socialist progressive agenda. Is that correct George?
    Here is the thing both parties live in the theatric mode and governing is a byproduct of the manufactured drama. The problem actual lies in the fact that our society and culture is shaped by the legislation that is passed. Legislation that is a byproduct or iatrogenic of political theatre is the worst form of government because it just stacks more and more onto bad policies. We have decades of band aids solutions on core issues that cause much our ailments. This is how we have tax code that is over 70,000 pages long.

    Like

  31. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 919am &ff – Ben, you are again treading on thin ice by accusing me of some pretty sleazy conduct in these discussions with “Your opinions are all over the map and you can point to one comment or another to match your opinion de jour.” You should either point out my inconsistencies or take your leave from RR.
    My free use of ‘iatrogenics’ was predicated on the notion that readers would all be familiar with that term from my very recent post on Taleb’s ‘Antifragility’. I think regular readers are used to my lifelong apprenticeship to Buckley’s and Churchill’s use of and love affair with the English language. A trapping of age perhaps.

    Like

  32. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George,
    I gave you a perfect example. One cannot be a proponent of individual liberty and agree with the philosophy of “might makes right” because it is based in reality as stated when we were talking about Mexico dropping bombs on US homes from drones in the name of the war on drugs. So which side are you on? Do you believe in individual liberty or do you believe in “might makes right”? You can’t have it both ways. I accept the realities of the world but fight back against those I disagree with like the bullsh!# concept of “Might Makes Right”. My saying goes “Might Makes Tyranny and Despotism”.
    I don’t have time to go through your shifting ideas but even this post you shifted. You constantly use terms interchangeably such as collectivists, progressives, liberals, and socialists. In this post you insert a WP piece that is there to seemingly prove your point in which the article points out the progressive agenda of the Obama administration. I take offense to the label of progressive being attached to Obama and say so. You then shift and say you aren’t calling Obama a progressive. Lets revisit your closing paragraph. I will paste in its entirety so taking out of context isn’t an excuse. Just because you refer to Obamunism in your opening sentence doesn’t mean you separate it from progressives or socialist. Your final statement once again brings Obama to a socialist agenda with progressive ideals.
    So I repeat from my 05 March 2013 at 08:07 PM comment that started our back and forth.
    “Barack Obama administration is NOT, let me repeat IS NOT progressive in any sense.”
    “The current MO of Obamunism (q.v.) is to ropadope the electorate into believing that Obama is sincere about solutions to things like deficits, debt limits, immigration reform, etc. Instead the leak reveals that the administration’s strategy is to propose and counter with ‘solutions’ known to be unacceptable to Republicans from the gitgo, and instead spend their main energy demogauging about Republicans as the gridlock party. The idea is to have the voters be so disgusted with the Republicans by 2014 as to bring both houses of Congress back into the Democrat fold. With the then Pelosi2 regime in the House, Obama will use the remaining two years of his administration to push through a socialist agenda that promises to be the progressives’ dream on everything from the environment to gun control. Stand by for ram.”

    Like

  33. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 1108am – Please cite my “might makes right”.
    Also, you are confused by the taxonomy of ideologies and the fact that Obama’s administration can project a progressive agenda (an agenda embraced by progressives) while not having to be a progressive himself (that’s why I have defined and given him the label of Obamunist to make that distinction). Were you wider read, you would know that I use the labels – collectivists, progressives, liberals, socialists, communist, marxist, bolshevik, … – appropriately and follow fairly closely the conventions of right leaning political scientists, economists, and commentators.
    Finally, I do maintain that Obama has hidden his ideology as much as he has hidden his past. One plausible reason for this is that neither can stand the light of day in today’s America (but then there’s always tomorrow). If all this is too confusing, then leave it alone.

    Like

  34. Gregory Avatar

    Speaking of hidden motives…
    “”I don’t believe people should be able to own guns,” Obama told Lott one day at the University of Chicago Law School.
    Lott explains that he first met Obama shortly after completing his research on concealed handgun laws and crime.
    “He did not come across as a moderate who wanted to bring people together,” Lott writes.
    After he introduced himself to Obama, Lott suggested that they have lunch one day to discuss their views on guns. According to Lott, Obama “grimaced and turned away.” That was the way many conversations with Obama ended, Lott says.”
    Ben, while often wrong, George is remarkably consistent, not “all over the map”. He only seems that way to you because you’re not understanding what he writes, in much the same was as the apocryphal three blind men didn’t understand the elephant. Your first paragraph at 11:08 is pure straw man, and I doubt you even knew that when you wrote it.

    Like

  35. Paul Emery Avatar

    Gregory
    “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns,” Obama told Lott one day at the University of Chicago Law School.”
    Link please

    Like

  36. Ryan Mount Avatar

    The 5th Amendment is being discussed defended on the US Senate floor right now.
    This is extraordinary.
    http://www.c-span.org/Live-Video/C-SPAN2/

    Like

  37. TheMikeyMcD Avatar
    TheMikeyMcD

    Ryan, I have been glued to this (@RandPaul filibuster) all day.
    Anyone else think it is crazy that any senator on either side of aisle is fighting Rand Paul on this?! Why won’t Obama simply say “we won’t allow for the killing of non-combative Americans without due process.” Harry Reid hit a new low today (for him that is saying something).
    All Rand wants is a promise that non-combative Americans won’t be killed by government without due process.

    Like

  38. George Rebane Avatar

    re Mikey 158pm – I think this debate/filibuster puts a finger on what Obama really wants to do with his FEMA Corps and 2,700 MRAPs etc to be deployed across the land. Let’s see how the lamestream vs other media pick up on this.

    Like

  39. Gregory Avatar

    Can’t google, Paul?
    Here’s one, with links to audio of Lott being specific about it last year:
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/06/obama-anti-gun-quote-resurfaces-i-dont-believe-people-should-be-able-to-own-guns/

    Like

  40. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    George,
    No problem on the usage of left leaning descriptions. You can use the terms I can disagree.
    Here is the exchange on the subject “Might Makes Right”
    BenE 158pm – Among nations ‘might makes right’ is still an operative rule. Mexican UAVs would never make it across the border, they would be shot down over Mexico. Would that the Taliban or Pakistanis or Iranian ragheads could do the same, they would. Next question. 05 February 2013 at 02:37 PM
    George,
    So lets get back to my example of Mexico. I understand your response as being the truth. What I am also reading is that if Mexico had the ability/ power to send in drones they would be justified in doing so because they have enough might to back it up, am I reading your position correctly?
    Posted by: Ben Emery | 06 February 2013 at 08:01 AM
    BenE 801pm – You are correctly reading my interpretation of what Mexico would most likely do. And our options then would be to file grievances with the UN,The Hague,…, or correct the situation, or pound sand. That is a reality that will remain as long as there exist sovereign nation states.
    Two dicta dominate here: 1) All power grows out the barrel of a gun. (Mao) 2) The pen is mightier than a sword only to the extent that it can motivate the sword. (Rebane)

    Like

  41. Ben Emery Avatar
    Ben Emery

    So George, which is it individual liberty or might makes right?

    Like

  42. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE 247pm – How did you conclude from my description of how I believe the world operates (existential interpretation), and how I believe it should operate (prescriptive interpretation)? (BTW, thanks for digging this out.)

    Like

  43. Paul Emery Avatar

    Thanks Gregory
    It’s good protocol to provide links to statements.
    So this is what I found
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2013/03/government-iatrogenics.html
    ” Economist and author John Lott Jr. makes a shocking claim in his new book, “At the Brink.” According to Lott, President Barack Obama once told him that he doesn’t believe Americans should have the right to own guns. The stunning statement was purportedly uttered during a conversation the two had at the University of Chicago Law School in the 1990s.”
    So I take it that Rebane contributors can go back in time nearly 20 years or so to search for any quote that might uphold an opinion about a candidate or elected official. This was a candid verbal recollection that Lott brought up years later based on a private conversation. I remember being blasted on this blog when I used Romney quotes from the 90’s in my expostulation about Romney being the “Flipper”.
    George, I believe you responded that it was OK to change your opinion. That we change through time. Are you willing to give Obama that same latitude?

    Like

  44. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 406pm – Of course Paul. But please don’t take the aphorism in only its first part. The “latitude” that I give is based on the ‘flipper’ making a reasonable case for his flip. Recall that Keynes said, ‘When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?’ With regard to guns – crime and gun violence has been on a marked downtrend during the last two decades. That should make Obama be even more for widespread legal possession of guns than he was way back when. I await his use of the available latitude.

    Like

  45. Paul Emery Avatar

    Gregory, George
    CAn you show me any recent quotes, especially campaign of policy statements from Obama that states Americans don’t have the right to own guns ?

    Like

  46. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    What expanded “widespread legal possession of guns” do you advocate ?

    Like

  47. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 450pm &ff – I have never made that claim about Obama, nor do I have a handy reference to back such a claim. Nevertheless, I do firmly believe that the pursuit of Obamunism does require that the population be disarmed so that only the state and criminals remain in possession of ready means of deadly force which must be denied to the large population of law abiding citizens lest they effectively resist the fundamental change which certain elites have in mind for the country.
    Re “widespread legal possession of guns” – I advocate the right of every adult American citizen, absent of any record of psychiatric or criminal debilitations, to be able to carry par force firearms with them at any time, concealed or unconcealed. That means into schools, police stations, hospitals, government facilities, churches, etc. Today’s laws covering the use and misuse of firearms such as in brandishing, etc are sufficient to prescribe the proper conduct with weapons, and should be enforced to the letter of such laws.

    Like

  48. Paul Emery Avatar

    How do you determine the absence of “psychiatric or criminal debilitation’s” without universal background checks?
    Also would you include airplanes in the scope of legal places to carry guns concealed or unconcealed?

    Like

  49. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 649pm – Have no idea on how it could be accomplished without universal background checks. I believe our hopes for hiding our backgrounds is pretty much gone already – I know mine has been gone at least since I was battalion S-2 of a nuclear artillery battalion in Europe.
    And very definitely I would include airplanes as a legal place for as many legal guns as possible.
    You see, I believe we are civilized not through the number of constraints forced on our behavior, but by behaving freely in a civilized manner when we have other alternatives at our disposal. It is the proper execution of free will by a free person that makes him civilized, and therefore creates a civilized society in which the Bastiat Triangle of rights is foundational and maintained from the grass roots level. Tyranny has no chance in such an environment. But alas, it does not come risk free, only at the lowest risk of wholesale pain to a society that embodies liberty and opportunity to the largest numbers (technically Pareto optimal).

    Like

  50. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    Good GOD Paul,, can you get any pickeyer? I can point out a few right here
    that would fit into that “questionable” category. I will refrain from name dropping.
    You do know there is at least one town that made it mandatory to own a weapon, and know how to use it? Now I hear another is going to do the same thing.
    So. Riddle me this. If someone is good enough to be allowed to carry a gun on the streets (permit),, why is he magically less responsible in the air?
    GO FILIBUSTER!
    SO,,, Does “O” have the right to play DICTATOR?
    Just dropping a bomb on someone is a great way to keep your personal enemies quiet. Nope,,, don’t let them get in front of any camera to talk.
    ” He was droned for reasons of national security. That’s all we can say.”
    I can actually see Jay the Carney telling that at a press briefing.

    Like

Leave a comment