Rebane's Ruminations
January 2013
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Never confuse effort with achievement.

Inauguration2013The country is in shambles, and it’s time to think of historical legacies.  Fortunately, as Barack Obama formally starts his second term, the President can salve both through implementing the same set of policies.

Over the last four years these pages have detailed the mistakes of this administration which have accelerated the country on the path to fiscal ruin, domestic polarization, and international ineffectiveness (even The Economist and The Heritage Foundation agree on these).  And though he regained the presidency, most Americans still believe that the country is headed in the wrong direction.  What should the President do to assure his place in history as a leader who, after recovering from first-term missteps, was able to turn the country around and regain America’s promise in the 21st century?

According to my lights he should do as much of the following as possible –

1.    Launch a massive deregulation of America and American life that includes the consolidation and/or elimination of federal departments such as Energy, Education, EPA, Commerce, … .
2.    Develop a new tax code that is simple, as flat as possible, and eliminates the convolutions of federal favoritism, behavior modifications, and inhibitions to re-enter the workforce.
3.    Reduce federal taxes to historical 18% levels of GDP, and balance the federal budget.
4.    Recognize Singularity’s advent and the new labor markets that it will mandate, including the generation of wealth by fewer people using ever more productive technology.
5.    Revamp public education to benefit America’s youth instead of those who run the ‘public teaching industry’.
6.    Eliminate all public service unions in governments and public education.
7.    Eliminate corporate and agricultural welfare (not needed under new tax code).
8.    Restructure Obamacare from the unintended and poorly conceived burden that it will now be, to newly formed open, state run markets that invite more competition at the levels and practice of healthcare providers, insurance, and pharma.  This includes a revision of the tort laws that promote litigiousness.
9.    Restructure entitlements so that their funding is converted to benefit from more private sector investment than untenable taxes which inhibit economic growth.
10.    Become a net energy exporter by developing America’s abundant energy resources, especially gas.
11.    Engage with our international trading partners – China, EU, South America, Russia, … – to the maximum extent possible to assure that only goods, not armies, cross the world’s borders.
12.    Declare a climate change holiday to reevaluate the entire proposition of AGW and its alternative, global cooling on the basis of science and not international politics.
13.    Acknowledge the existence of Islamic terror and its demonstrated anti-western objectives, and work toward a quick two state solution with Israel and Palestine.  This includes promoting strategically located Gaza to become the world’s most productive and prosperous free port – i.e. get the Palestinians into commerce big time, and invite the Israelis to join them with the long term leasing of adjacent real estate needed for expansion – it is only through business and commercial growth that a sustainable peace will be achieved in the near and mid-east.
14.    Revamp our military to project power with air, naval, and space systems that use ground troops in sparing and short engagements.  Use the goal of normalizing Iran and parity with China in the Pacific as the design standard for a new force structure.
15.    Encourage private sector space enterprises, and give NASA a new inspiring objective that invites international co-operation to achieve man’s next great step on its way to the stars.
16.    Honor American citizenship by securing our borders and legitimizing our resident illegal aliens onto acceptable paths to residency, repatriation, or citizenship.
17.    Re-establish the constitutional intent of states’ rights, and encourage states to resume their role as competitive laboratories of liberty and prosperity.

[Addendum]  After some reflection I want to add some ruminations on President Obama’s second inaugural speech.  To me it was an extremely ideological speech – an impression corroborated tonight by talking heads of both persuasions – that underlined what I have been interpreting about this man’s belief system since his 2008 stump speeches.  The liberal Washington Post opined that it was “a speech that challenges the other side”, but was primarily targeted to his base.  He no longer needs to pander to us all.

His parade contained no acknowledgement of our European legacy – no units with costumed Pilgrims, no Revolutionary War patriots, no nod to the entrepreneurs of our industrial revolution, no recognition of our great westward movement that formed what today is America, no nod to the faith that saw our forebears through unimaginable difficulties.  Instead he was entertained by a bunch of hoaky Indians dancing in Hollywood-like costumes in an ensemble that included women to satisfy politically correct gender equality dicta.  I was surprised that no obviously gay couples were included in the spectacle; perhaps I missed them.

One of my maxims has been to “Never confuse effort with accomplishment.”  President Obama left no doubt that in his America both should be equated and equally rewarded.  And he let us know that he is proud of his ideology, which means that he will do everything that he can to implement it during the first, say, eighteen months before he becomes a certified lame duck.

Today he gave no quarter to his political opponents; he sought no reconciliation between the country’s ideological poles.  His legacy will be that of the leftmost ideologue of all American presidents.  He made it clear that he was not acknowledging the many paths up the historical mountain of America’s common future of achievement; instead he told us that he would lead us up a different mountain altogether (and there’s more to be said about that).

In the large view, he wants to be remembered as perhaps the co-equal of MLK as America’s preeminent civil rights leader.  Of one thing we can be certain, in our history his regime will be more than merely noteworthy.

Posted in , ,

119 responses to “This President’s Second Term (addended)”

  1. Walt Avatar

    WOW!! Get a load of this line from his speech.
    “Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,” he said.
    And the last time I checked, that “collective action” is call the Tea Party.
    Preserving our individual freedoms is NOT on his “to do” list. The vary opposite is closer to fact. I give you the last four years as proof.
    Hugo Chavez must be vary proud of his apprentice.

    Like

  2. TheMikeyMcD Avatar
    TheMikeyMcD

    David Burge ‏@iowahawkblog
    Like listening to cannibals say grace while they lower you into the pot. #inauguration

    Like

  3. Walt Avatar

    LOL!!! Mikey!,, Good catch. ( Uuuhhhhh,,, But OOhhh soooo true.)
    ” Someone please pass the trenderizer…”

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    After one of the most disgusting campaigns full of vile personal attacks (on Romney/Ryan), our re-elected fellow is calling for civility. If there ever was a master BSer he takes the cake. The moron party is so proud. Well, they are just too stupid to know the difference.

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar

    The personal attacks continue: “Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms. The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it.”
    There is no “overwhelming judgment of science”, only propaganda from the proponents, phony metastudies by the likes of Naomi Oreski whose only science training was as a mining geologist, oriented towards getting minerals out of the ground, not chemistry or physics, the drivers of climate. “Deny” and “denier” remain personal attacks made against anyone who hasn’t saluted the IPCC AR4 colors that were run up the flagpole.

    Like

  6. Walt Avatar

    Our beloved Leftys are a little more quiet than usual.
    Either they got a few sets of those heavily reduced in price
    inaugural ball tickets, ( By at least 50% across the board)
    Or they decided just to give us the cold shoulder treatment.
    ( Kinda Like what “O” is doing to the nation)
    Think he was wearing that “trillion dollar coin” around his neck as he
    lie… I mean sworn in?
    Ya know he wants that minted REAL BAD… How else will he get a currency with his mug shot on it? He may want to re-think that idea. If you need a coin that “says” it’s worth said amount, but is worth less than what it’s made of,, you got problems.
    And we have had that problem since we left the gold standard.

    Like

  7. Paul Emery Avatar

    So Todd the Swiftboating of Senator Kerry in 04 doesn’t qualify as ” vile personal attacks “

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    The swiftboating allegations would have been vile had they not been true. But then we again digress going down memory lane, instead of considering this president’s outlook and policies for his second term in office.

    Like

  9. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    There is a stink of hypocrisy here. I’ll remember your concerns about digressing down memory lane the next time a responder goes gooey over Ronald Reagan.
    By whose evaluation do you make that stand {the allegations were true)? Here’s the official review:
    In September 2004, Vice Admiral Ronald A. Route, the Navy inspector general, completed a review of Kerry’s combat medals, initiated at the request of Judicial Watch. In a memo to the Secretary of the Navy Gordon R. England, Route stated [15]
    “Our examination found that existing documentation regarding the Silver Star, Bronze Star and Purple Heart medals indicates the awards approval process was properly followed. In particular, the senior officers who awarded the medals were properly delegated authority to do so. In addition, we found that they correctly followed the procedures in place at the time for approving these awards.
    “Conducting any additional review regarding events that took place over 30 years ago would not be productive. The passage of time would make reconstruction of the facts and circumstances unreliable, and would not allow the information gathered to be considered in the context of the time in which the events took place.
    “Our review also considered the fact that Senator Kerry’s post-active duty activities were public and that military and civilian officials were aware of his actions at the time. For these reasons, I have determined that Senator Kerry’s awards were properly approved and will take no further action in this matter.”
    http://web.archive.org/web/20040922031819/http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040918/D855P5QG0.html

    Like

  10. George Rebane Avatar

    I have not studied Kerry’s heroics. But I have read a lot of military history and know some decorated veterans. Their common denominator has always been the accolades or peers and comrades who were there when the medals were earned.
    Again, I don’t want to divert from Obama. Please excuse my excusing myself from this fruitless sideline. Perhaps someone else will take up the thread.

    Like

  11. Russ Steele Avatar

    Paul@07:58
    While the process might have been followed, the basic input was flawed, a sliver in the finger does not deserve a Purple Heart. I would stand behind the navy swabs that were there and observed want happened rather than some Admiral in Washington who’s career was on the line, depending on his answer. There are some Viet Nam Vets that would stand behind Senator, soon to be Sec of State, they are North Viet Nam Vets. He did more for their cause, than any of the US Vets he served with. Just look at his post service testimony before Congress. How can you justify that lying crap!
    Now let’s put this distraction aside and focus to the subject of the this post. Oh, wait you do not want to discuss this post, that is the reason for your distraction. You are so transparent some time.

    Like

  12. Russ Steele Avatar

    Opps it is time to change the subject from guns and 2nd amendment and switch to climate change. Things are not going will for the “O” so it is time to change the subject. That is how all good liberals conduct an argument, when losing, change the subject! But. I digress.
    President Barack Obama is pledging to respond to what he calls “the threat of climate change.” He says that failing to do so would be a betrayal of the nation’s children, and of future generations.
    Here is a key section of O’s speech:
    “We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations. Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.”The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition; we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries ­ we must claim its promise.”That is how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure ­ our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped peaks.”
    Of course there is no global warming, only a bunch of environmental wackos pushing a issue not supported by the facts.
    Here is one view of his claims by a third party observer, James Delingpole in the UK Telegraph:
    The first sentence is a blatant untruth. Concerted global action so far to deal with the threat of climate change has resulted in: higher energy prices; more deaths from fuel poverty; more intrusive regulation; the destruction of rainforests and the squandering of agricultural land on biofuels; higher food prices; famine and food riots – as a result partly of the drive for biofuels; the entrenchment of corporatism and rent-seeking to the detriment of free markets; the ravaging of the countryside with ugly solar farms and even uglier wind turbines; the deaths of millions of birds and bats; the great recession. How any of this has in any way benefited either our children (who are going to find it far harder to find a job) or future generations is a complete mystery.
    The second sentence is a devious combination of the junk factoid and the non sequitur.
    That “overwhelming judgement of science” is a reference to the comprehensively discredited Doran survey: the one where the “97 per cent of climate scientists” turned out to consist of just 75 out of 77 climate scientists who could be bothered to reply to two silly and dubious questions.
    As for the idea that “science” ever has such a thing as an “overwhelming judgement”: this would be news to Galileo, Newton, Einstein and indeed all the great scientists of history, all of whom made their names by advancing theories which completely overturned the “overwhelming judgement” of their contemporaries.
    It’s probably true, up to a point, that “none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms”. But only if you accept that everyone lives in a region susceptible to fires, drought and powerful storms, which not everyone does.
    What Obama is presumably trying to slip into that weasel sentence is the notion that “science” is overwhelmingly of the view that raging fires, crippling drought and more powerful storms are increasing as a result of “climate change” (note incidentally how he’s careful not to say whether or not it is man-made, thus enabling him to cover all eventualities). But if this is the case, I’d dearly love to see the evidence that this is a) anthropogenic b) controllable or c)historically unprecedented. Certainly, according to this graph at Watts Up With That?, there is nothing particular weird or alarming about recent weather activity. On an index of “Extreme Weather” in the US since 1910, last year – 2012 – ranks a very modest 54th.

    If Obama was really concerned about tomorrows children, he would stop sending their future down the national debt rat hole!

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar

    Leave it to Paul to change the subject. The official Obama campaign went negative and hard even before Romney sewed up the GOP nomination. I’d have really felt bad for Romney had his campaign against his primary competition not been the same basic style.
    Perhaps someone can dig out the budget of the Swift Boaters and compare it to the budget for negative ads against Romney by the official Obama campaign.

    Like

  14. Ken Jones Avatar
    Ken Jones

    George you could not be more wrong when you claim this country of ours is in shambles. More Henny Penny crap trying to pass as factual. What is in shambles are the far right politics that have become an insult to America. Now the whine that our president was negative in the last election. Well maybe but really no more negative than any previous election. Trouble is the right lost so the only recourse is the constant whine. Nothing more funny than a far right blogger than has trouble with basic spelling calling half the country morons. Continue to be divisive while ignoring the success of President Obama and those of the United States of America. I expect that these bombastic tirades will continue because misery loves company.

    Like

  15. Paul Emery Avatar

    Oh, how foolish of me. Of course, it was George Bush, a National Guard quitter who was the real patriot.
    George, your wish list will require some champion to sweep into power. Of course it will be a Republican. Any idea who that may be?

    Like

  16. George Rebane Avatar

    KenJ 922pm – The shambles I reference is contained in a long litany of measurables published by many outlets. But if you’ve not read about it elsewhere, then I’ll be glad to be the water carrier in your news world. (BTW, what “far right blogger” with spelling problems are you referring to; I’m the only blogger here?)
    In any event, here we are with a recovery celebrated only by the diehard left, tens of millions unemployed, more tens off the working rolls, a choking debt made marginally tolerable by a temporary and artificial interest rate that will rise in spite of what the Fed will do, taxes high and going higher in an attempt to emulate a failed European model, unfunded entitlement liabilities reaching to the $100T range, a school system that doesn’t produce workers who can compete on global markets, a foreign policy that has become beyond ineffective and disrespected, … . It saddens me to continue, so I’ll stop. But that’s how you spell shambles.

    Like

  17. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 942pm – I’m aware of no Republican who will put their career on the line for that list. Maybe some will peck here and there a bit, but no more. I’m probably a lone wolf howling plaintively in the night.

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar

    George
    As far as most Americans believing this country is heading in the wrong direction, belief that Obama is doing a good job is in the low 50% compared to support for the Republican House which is currently less than 20% so it’s easy to see what most people see as the problem.
    http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm
    http://www.pollingreport.com/cong_rep.htm

    Like

  19. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Congressional approval has traditionally been low (low-ish).
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx
    Compare to this.
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/116677/presidential-approval-ratings-gallup-historical-statistics-trends.aspx#2
    Most of them hover around 50% +/- 10% or so with spikes during crisis. Bush II’s exhibit’s a rather interesting downward slope, which is misleading because he spiked so damn high after 9/11. So Bush II has the distinction of having the highest popularity and what looks to be the lowest. So fans and pundits both can pick him as their favorite.
    Anyhow these low-ish Congressional numbers, in my opinion, are an accurate representation of the electorate’s mood, which is sour, angry, and malcontent. It also is emblematic of that all-but-too American notion that “Congress is full of a bunch of bums, except to the guy I voted in. He’s OK.”
    And the relatively high-ish Presidential numbers are a symptom of our human desire for some hero to come and rescue us. And of course come in and beat up the bums in Congress.

    Like

  20. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE is in a time warp again. What a hoot. Obama is not the same as the SwiftBoat Veterans for Truth PaulE. As a “intelligent” man, you amaze me at your mental connections of different things. I would suggest you review the ads from the private men who actually served in Vietnam and have the truth about the coiffed one, Mr. Heinz.

    Like

  21. Ken Jones Avatar
    Ken Jones

    George I wasn’t referring to you when I commented on the far right blogger with spelling issues. You spell very well, however your logic is questionable.

    Like

  22. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    George, I do get a kick out of the far left commenter above who has whined about the conservatives for as long as I have read his tripe. Now his boy is in and he is now the butt kisser of Obama. What a hoot! And that is from a fellow who claims non alignment! Liars all.

    Like

  23. Brad Croul Avatar
    Brad Croul

    And a 3-D printer in every garage!

    Like

  24. George Rebane Avatar

    KenJ 642am – Good enough. I welcome criticism of my “questionable logic”, for such dialogue is the sum and stuff of RR.
    BradC 800am – That would be a renaissance and give new definition to ‘cottage industry’.

    Like

  25. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Walt | 21 January 2013 at 05:46 PM
    Walt, I think it is a function of the majority of those you call liberals here understanding that you and your friends are yesterdays news.
    Here is how this is going to work: the people who think like you do are going to gradually die out, or isolate themselves in walled communities, or alienate themselves so much from the next generation that they are no longer credible voices. They will be an anachronism of the failed past. Kind of like the Dodo!
    Regardless, the big debate is going on out there in the real world not here with 8 curmudgeons.
    By the way, to Russ and Greg; sorry, you lose! More than 70% of Americans believe climate change is a serious problem and a risk. You can play ‘question the science’ games all you want, no one believes you anymore, and the institutions that promote your medieval view of science will be buried by an activated public over the next decade. Better start hoarding coal to power those incandescent bulbs you’re sitting on.

    Like

  26. George Rebane Avatar

    SteveF 838am – you are probably right on climate change attitudes as being driven by consensus or mob science. As a cheerleader of such public policy processes, you probably take great pleasure in how public policy was influenced when almost a 100% of the people believed the world was flat, and diseases derived from the ‘night airs’.

    Like

  27. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    This current stream of posts illustrates well the major divide. Modern vs post-modern thought. George is concerned with the measurable and verifiable truths of reality and the left is only concerned with opinions and impressions – feelings, if you will. The uneducated and uninformed mobs have the power of the ballot box and that is all that the left wants. The calls for the elimination of pesky road blocks to direct democracy such as the Constitution are being heard more loudly and more often. Science and morality are to be driven by opinion polls, not verifiable facts and eternal truths. The youth of today may become tired of the rants of the old guard, but when we are gone, the youth will be the ones left paying the bills. The reality of a ruined economy will be difficult for the left to explain away then.

    Like

  28. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    I have no problem with people questioning the science George, that is the scientific method; just with them using that as a tool to stall action on an issue the vast majority of the scientific community and citizenry think is important. That is not ‘mob science’, it is just the facts. If there is an analogy between the flat earthers and bad medicine, it is almost entirely on your side of the equation. But you will never agree to that, nor will your fellow posters, so you must be ‘left behind’. Enjoy armageddon!

    Like

  29. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    There is no eternal truth.

    Like

  30. Russ Steele Avatar

    StevenF @ 8:38
    I was a long time reader of the Economist, but when they got in the global warming band wagon, I got off the Economist. How could intelligent people that I respected adopt this hoax in light of the evidence that AGW was unsupportable. Now they have had a change of mind.
    THE ECONOMIST Gives Up On Global Climate Treaties. “This is pretty much where we’ve been for some time: the global approach to reducing CO2 emissions is a dead end, and while the overall science about the climate seems well established, there are some significant fiddly bits that haven’t yet been worked out. There may be more surprises like soot in the works, some good, some bad, but in any case the details, the timing, and the consequences of climate change are less clear than the overall arc, and the case for particular policies is often significantly weaker than the overall case that climate change is under way.”

    Like

  31. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    Looks like some of the more responsible rich are finally beginning to realize that it is in their best interests to join the 99% ters. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/21/us-reutersmagazine-davos-swiss-rich-idUSBRE90K0F420130121

    Like

  32. TheMikeyMcD Avatar

    Russ, reason is winning. It was once called ‘global warming’ now they have retreated to call it ‘climate change.’
    I wonder if the “more than 70% of Americans believe climate change” are the same 70% that cannot pass a 3rd grade math exam. LOL.
    Slavery never ended. It was perfected.
    Who would have thought that golfer Phil Mickelson was an extremist!?
    http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/12487-taxes-could-cause-phil-mickelson-to-go-galt?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    Like

  33. Russ Steele Avatar

    StevenF 09:19
    You wrote: “vast majority of the scientific community” Where is your proof?
    If you are making reference to Obama speech here are some details to consider. His reference to “overwhelming judgement of science” is a reference to the comprehensively discredited Doran survey: the one where the “97 per cent of climate scientists” turned out to consist of just 75 out of 77 climate scientists who could be bothered to reply to two silly and dubious questions. This study has been ridiculed by scientist around the world as junk science. Is this your science?
    James Delingpole in the UK Telegraph: As for the idea that “science” ever has such a thing as an “overwhelming judgement”: this would be news to Galileo, Newton, Einstein and indeed all the great scientists of history, all of whom made their names by advancing theories which completely overturned the “overwhelming judgement” of their contemporaries.
    In the long run it does not matter what the lame stream press has impressed on the minds of the gullible, that global warming is happening, the facts speak for them selves, there has been no warming for 17 years and it will continue to grow colder and dryer over the next 20 years. Stay Tuned.

    Like

  34. Russ Steele Avatar

    Steven and all you warmers here is some facts that you will need to deal with:
    https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/22/its-the-enso-stupid/

    Like

  35. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Steve at 09:20 AM> There is no eternal truth.
    For Scott @ 09:18 AM…
    The Post-modern asks: What is eternal? What is truth?
    A Modernist asserts: There is no eternal truth.
    Keats, a Romantic would say…

    When old age shall this generation waste,
    Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
    Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou sayst,
    “Beauty is truth, truth beauty,” – that is all
    Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.

    Which one shall we pick? Which one does Obama pick?

    Like

  36. Walt Avatar

    Talk about “yesterdays news” Comment,,,LOL!! Us? “die out” as you put it?
    Now that’s a good one.. WE are not the ones aborting our children, like LIBS
    like to do. ( forget that LIB recessive gene) Yes Libbyism has polluted the gene pool. ( no wonder LIBS have to indoctrinate OUR children in the school system. Then they wise up once out of Libby mind control and see reality)
    But since you just HAD to change the subject to GW,, Ya’ know that little part of the Constitution you guys love to bring up? The establishment of religion?
    Sooner or later some hungry litigator will go after your little GW BS.
    Well, that’s just what LIBS are doing today. Establishing the religion of AGW.
    And with the full support of Government.
    The religion of “green” is now upon us, and the Gov. demands we bow to it, and dissavow our own. ( they are still going after the churchs as we speak)

    Like

  37. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    KJ 9:22PM, there are fewer people with jobs today than there were four years ago. That isn’t “success”.
    Frisch, enjoy the blip that the Presidential bully pulpit gives your CO2 indulgences business, but even the high priest of warming at NASA-GISS, James Hansen, has this week put his name as lead author to a paper that admits “to the standstill of global temperature in the past decade”. Others, including the climate mavens at the UEA and British Meteorological Office, note a 16 year pause. You will be eating crow, it’s just a matter of when, not if. Natural variations gave us a warming climate in the late 20th century but they have already reversed.
    CO2 is a weak warming agent but not enough to overcome oceanic variation and solar effects (both direct and indirect). The end of AGW hysteria is near.

    Like

  38. Walt Avatar

    Now to put us back on the right track. The red herring has gone rotten.
    “I think the majority of us feel strongly — even the majority of gun owners feel strongly — that we need to make some sacrifice[s] to our freedoms, if that’s the way to put it. We need to make some sacrifices to what we might want to have, in order to safeguard our children.” James Taylor…
    Sorry,,, the vary opposite is true, and it has jack squat to do with “for the children” in the Progressive eye.
    So just what other “rights” would the Lefties care to give up? Why stop at self protection?
    Why not the 1ST? Your pals down in Berkeley have already written that line.
    ” You can say anything you like, but only if WE agree with what you say.”
    ( A Berkeley collage brat on video)

    Like

  39. Gregory Avatar

    “Why do you resist us? We only with to improve the quality of life for all species.”
    -Locutus of SBC
    BTW I’m not sure how often this happens but I managed to take a peek at Mono Lake on Sunday, and it appeared to be frozen over.

    Like

  40. Ken Jones Avatar
    Ken Jones

    Greg the Dow is up 71% since President Obama took office. UE is the same % as it was when Obama was elected. In fact President Obama oversaw more job creation in just 2010 than President Bush did in his entire 8 years. I guess you consider that shambles.
    NASA, NOAA, the EPA and many other agencies agree that climate change is happening and man has an influence.
    A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?” (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn’t publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate change responded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.
    Just one of several studies. But instead go with Limbaugh on this one.

    Like

  41. Gregory Avatar

    KJ, the unemployment rate is the same because they’ve stopped counting so many long term unemployed said to have stopped looking for work, and the Dow, loaded with multinationals is heavily weighed towards foreign earnings.
    There are fewer Americans with full time equivalent jobs now than when Obama took office. Gasoline also costs about twice as much. Middle class standards of living are down.
    That isn’t success.

    Like

  42. Paul Emery Avatar

    Russ
    Currently public opinion is supporting the case that global warming is real, including nearly half of the Republicans. If this continues it will reflect in the ’14 elections. What do you think can happen that will sway public opinion to your position?
    http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/10/15/poll-half-of-republicans-believe-in-global-warming

    Like

  43. Russ Steele Avatar

    Ken@12:02PM
    You wrote “A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”
    Are you aware that only 77 of the 3146 scientist answered the silly question, and only 75 responded in the positive. Thus your silly number of 97.5%. On the other hand, 97.7% of the scientist asked thought the question too stupid to answer.

    Like

  44. Russ Steele Avatar

    Ken@12:03PM
    It appears that NASA is having some second thoughts about the Sun’s impact on the climate.
    Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate – NASA Science
    There is, however, a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny solar variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate.

    One of the participants, Greg Kopp of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado, pointed out that while the variations in luminosity over the 11-year solar cycle amount to only a tenth of a percent of the sun’s total output, such a small fraction is still important. “Even typical short term variations of 0.1% in incident irradiance exceed all other energy sources (such as natural radioactivity in Earth’s core) combined,” he says.
    Of particular importance is the sun’s extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation, which peaks during the years around solar maximum. Within the relatively narrow band of EUV wavelengths, the sun’s output varies not by a minuscule 0.1%, but by whopping factors of 10 or more. This can strongly affect the chemistry and thermal structure of the upper atmosphere.

    Indeed, Gerald Meehl of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) presented persuasive evidence that solar variability is leaving an imprint on climate, especially in the Pacific. According to the report, when researchers look at sea surface temperature data during sunspot peak years, the tropical Pacific shows a pronounced La Nina-like pattern, with a cooling of almost 1o C in the equatorial eastern Pacific. In addition, “there are signs of enhanced precipitation in the Pacific ITCZ (Inter-Tropical Convergence Zone ) and SPCZ (South Pacific Convergence Zone) as well as above-normal sea-level pressure in the mid-latitude North and South Pacific,” correlated with peaks in the sunspot cycle.
    The solar cycle signals are so strong in the Pacific, that Meehl and colleagues have begun to wonder if something in the Pacific climate system is acting to amplify them.

    Dan Lubin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography pointed out the value of looking at sun-like stars elsewhere in the Milky Way to determine the frequency of similar grand minima. “Early estimates of grand minimum frequency in solar-type stars ranged from 10% to 30%, implying the sun’s influence could be overpowering. More recent studies using data from Hipparcos (a European Space Agency astrometry satellite) and properly accounting for the metallicity of the stars, place the estimate in the range of less than 3%.” This is not a large number, but it is significant.
    Indeed, the sun could be on the threshold of a mini-Maunder event right now. Ongoing Solar Cycle 24 is the weakest in more than 50 years.

    “If the sun really is entering an unfamiliar phase of the solar cycle, then we must redouble our efforts to understand the sun-climate link,” notes Lika Guhathakurta of NASA’s Living with a Star Program, which helped fund the NRC study. “The report offers some good ideas for how to get started.”
    I would like to remind you all that we had a Little Ice Age during the last Maunder Minimum. You can follow the Next Grand Minimum http://nextgrandminimum.wordpress.com
    H/T to Tom Nelson for the NASA Report Summary.

    Like

  45. Walt Avatar

    Ken,, Gotta love your “employment report”.
    As usual,, fuzzy math is a LIBS best friend.
    Our REAL U.P. number is closer to 14.6%
    The Dow you say? Sorry Capitalists will buck the system and make a buck
    despite Liberal attempts to regulate them to their knees, and bow to their will.
    So…. How bout that “state established religion” known as AGW?

    Like

  46. Fuzz Avatar
    Fuzz

    George, considering item #1 on your list, I’m curious what your defined stance is on regulation.  I agree that we are, in total, over-regulated, but let’s take the EPA as a specific example.  By calling for it’s elimination, are you:
    a)  saying environmental regulation should be purely at the state level?
    b)  saying there shouldn’t be any environmental regulation period? 
    How would you handle the threats to environmental quality, from industry and society, which could have mild to disastrous effects?

    Like

  47. Russ Steele Avatar

    Paul@12;56PM
    I would believe also, if my only source of information was the lames stream media. The low information voter seems to be influenced by the weather outside their window. Last years was a warm winter in the US. This year it is going back to much colder. We are going back to the climate of the 1950 to the 1970s, when the lame stream press was clamoring about the coming ice age. Not sure the opinions will turn around by 2014, but as Obama shuts down the coal plants and the price of electrical energy soars, like Obama promised, then attitudes will change. I am betting on Mother Nature to demonstrate the failure of AGW. When cold and miserable, huddled in a cold house, unable to pay the fuel bill, even the low information voter is not going to believe in AGW.

    Like

  48. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    For Steve Frisch at 9:20 – That was a joke, right? Ha Ha.
    For Ryan Mount at 10:04 – I’m afraid we’re not on the same page here. Modern Western Thought started around the time of Socrates. Although he certainly wasn’t the only adherent of that way of thinking. “Socrates defined true knowledge as eternal, unchanging, and absolute compared to opinions which are temporal, changing, and relative”. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/socrates
    We are moving to an era populated by what is coming to be called Post-Modern. Or as it was called back in the 60’s – ‘The Church Of What’s Happening Now’. There have been plenty of both ways of thought (and others as well) all along, but one way dominated for centuries and it looks like another way may come to dominate in the future.

    Like

  49. Walt Avatar

    And just how many coal plants have been shuttered? OH YAA,,, Convert them to NG.. That’s all good and well, but how many years will the “permit process” and all the fun that goes with it just to put the pipes in the ground?
    How bout the one near the Grand Canyon owned ( sort of) by the Indians?
    Over a Billion bucks to bring it into compliance…( Never mind the fact that its’e one of the most “compliant” there is.

    Like

Leave a comment