Rebane's Ruminations
January 2013
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[Cautionary note to innumerate readers, this post will require some facility in basic arithmetic and an attention span.]

BudgetCrisisEl Lider Fearless has issued his latest executive demand – no more congressional limits on accruing national debt.  “We are not a deadbeat nation,” Mr. Obama said. “And the consequences of us (sic) not paying our bills…would be disastrous.”  The dirty little secret that his constituents can’t grasp is that Obama’s fundamental transformation is taking us directly into that very same disaster, big time.  His offer to “accept responsibility for raising the debt limit if Congress voted to give him the authority” is meaningless pabulum.  What possible ‘responsibility’ could he accept in the matter of running up more debt, after having already added over $5T with impunity, and then being re-elected by his ‘stash’ shouting supporters.

We will first dispose of the notion of defaulting on our debt service payments under the current debt limit of approximately $16.4T.  Then looking at the White House 2013 federal budget put out by its OMB, we see that projected total federal outlays are about $3.8T, with projected total tax receipts coming in at about $2.9T.  This leaves a deficit of $900B which must be borrowed.   When some other wiggle items are added to the amount to be borrowed, the real deficit rises to $1.2T and the national debt will then increase to about $17.5T.  (See Table S-15 in the Summary Tables)

To service the debt at today’s very low interest rates will cost ‘only’ $250B in 2013 (Table S-5).  (When interest rates become real again, debt service costs will approach $1T; more later.)  I hope readers are beginning to appreciate that the debt service-to-GDP or debt service-to-budget are the real metrics which no one wants to make available and publish.  As I’ve pointed out many times before, the ever popular debt-to-GDP is a meaningless metric in guiding both fiscal and monetary policies, and that’s why interest rates are supremely important.

So where are we with all this ‘default on our debt’ nonsense?  Our tax receipts are $2.9T and we have to pay our lenders $250B or about 8.6% of our receipts.  Therefore, there is no need to stiff our lenders unless we purposely want to create a financial crisis.  Even without raising the debt limit by one cent, we are not at risk of ruining our standing in the credit markets.


But that $250B will have to come out of our other spending plans.  Look first at Table S-5.  Our mandatory spending consists of the mandatory or legally committed ‘entitlements’ (SS, Medicare, Medicaid, … totaling $2.3T) and debt service ($250B).  For 2013 that will total almost $2.5T.  Our discretionary budget component, consisting of the military, homeland security, infrastructure, education, pork, …, and all the government departments and workers comes to $1.26T.  So you see if we shut down government completely – closed all the departments, decommissioned the military, and sent everyone home – we still couldn’t balance our federal budget.  At these spending levels, it simply cannot be balanced.

Now cue the leftwing chorus to belt out another verse of ‘Let’s raise them taxes one mo’ time’.  But even some three-digit progressives are beginning to understand that we’re on the back side of the (gasp!) Laffer Curve, and that raising tax rates will further hobble the economy and lower tax receipts.  So where are we?
1.    There will be no chance of even approaching a balanced budget, let alone debt reduction, without first reducing the $2.3T mandatory spending component.  That the $1.26T discretionary component has to be reduced, should go without saying.
2.    There is no possibility that we will default on our debt service payments.  We have the money, and the Constitution requires we pay our debts.
3.    The ONLY thing that will give hope to Americans, our creditors, and trading partners worldwide is the robust growth of our economy.  That will generate the tax revenues to sustain sensible spending programs and debt service payments.
4.    To robustly grow our economy we need to 1) totally revise our tax code, 2) totally revise our tort laws driving litigiousness, 3) massively roll back our regulatory jungle, 4) extricate government from mangling markets, and 5) remove the influence of government service employee unions.

All the rest of what we’ll be hearing from Washington in the coming weeks is self-defeating bullcrap.

Posted in , , ,

64 responses to “Debt Limit and Things Economical”

  1. George Rebane Avatar

    RyanM 300pm – From your 1250pm “For example, you can have Communism WITHOUT Statism.” I didn’t know what else to conclude since the most recent, known, draconian, and durable examples of communism have ALL been the penultimate expressions of statism in human existence. (I leave ‘ultimate’ for technical reasons, because who knows what post-Orwellian form of governance can still befall humanity.) Apologies if I didn’t catch your nuance.

    Like

  2. Ken Jones Avatar
    Ken Jones

    Walt the protest plate refers to the District’s lack of congressional representation. You have representation. You may not like the representative you have and if so you better start with McClintock and now Doug LaMalfa in our district in 2013. But I would suggest reading the entire article or listening closely so you don’t make the same error again. I hope you enjoy the next 4 years with President Obama.

    Like

  3. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    Thanks Larry…M.

    Like

  4. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    Walt, where’s the photo of the WHOLE license plate and frame, top and bottom? Could it be that the top says “NO?”

    Like

  5. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    Or could it just be that like all plates issued in the District of Columbia, that’s what it says on the bottom of the standard state plate? Nice try, no cigar.

    Like

  6. Paul Emery Avatar

    So George the future looks pretty bleak, in your view, with blood in the streets due to socialist addiction withdrawals when the country goes broke and cannot provide services. Police and the military will be in full battle gear controlling the streets. They will no doubt be aided by vigilantly militias equipped with the latest weaponry. Of course, if the police and military get too efficient they may challenge or be challenged by the militia and there is where the 2nd Amendment solution plays out. What other scenarios do you see under your vision of the future?
    Mikey
    Most of which you propose is the cut back and elimination of services and increased taxation to the lower income population. Your flat tax proposal means tax increases for the poor and reductions for the wealthy.

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 842pm – Nice theatrics. What “other scenarios” do I see? Does that little literary jiujitsu mean that I accepted your version? Who can tell? Look at the very disappointed people in Greece, Spain, and now Italy. Unless you think that we Americans are somehow more highly evolved, we’ll react pretty much like all people have when the government tit was yanked from their mouths.

    Like

  8. earlcrabb Avatar

    Hey, it’s not just doom and gloom on the right. Prepare your “inner bunker” my friends…
    http://www.wordpress.peakmoment.tv/conversations/

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar

    “Police and the military will be in full battle gear controlling the streets.”
    Paul, in the last LA riots the police just disappeared from difficult areas for days, leaving folks to fend for themselves. There just aren’t enough police and military to keep order when order falls apart over a large area.

    Like

  10. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    The South Yuba River Bridges are good choke points, although Bridgeport will be harder to defend. If you make it across, you can all regroup on the Ridge. Last Stand takes place at the 16 to One.

    Like

  11. L Avatar
    L

    SteveF, no, fascism and socialism are not the “same thing,” the first is a branch of the second, as is communism. They are the two unalike sides of the same coin. The chief difference in these two collectivist ideologies is that communism demands state ownership of the means of production while fascism ‘merely’ demands direction of the means of production. The distribution is handled approximately the same in both cases, but history suggests that fascists are much better on the production side, probably because they know they’re not capable of growing an economy, while communists (like most socialists) really, really believe they know better how to order every aspect of human existence. Flip a coin- both sides come up as a disaster for the average man. L

    Like

  12. TheMikeyMcD Avatar
    TheMikeyMcD

    Paul, I don’t follow you. We have a different definition of services and a different definition of equality. I am a proponent of CHOICE (voluntary action). Allow me the CHOICE to participate in SS/Medicare. Do you consider SS/Medicare ‘services?’ Don’t FORCE taxpayers to fund a broken college system. Yes, equality requires each individual to be treated equally (re: taxes and the benefits).
    More tax payers = more eyes on the politicians. I could change the tax/spend dynamic by changing 1 law:
    Employers should not be tax collectors; FORCE employees and employers to pay their own taxes, 2x month to the government.
    “Mikey
    Most of which you propose is the cut back and elimination of services and increased taxation to the lower income population. Your flat tax proposal means tax increases for the poor and reductions for the wealthy. “

    Like

  13. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    “Employers should not be tax collectors; FORCE employees and employers to pay their own taxes, 2x month to the government.”
    and let no government agency collect for anything owed to another gov agency, through garnishment.

    Like

  14. Paulo McManus Avatar
    Paulo McManus

    Fiscal cliff, debt limit? After these i don’t think the word economical still makes sense. Ed Butowsky i need your expert advice on this matter.

    Like

Leave a comment