Rebane's Ruminations
December 2012
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 21 December 2012.]

You’ve all heard enough about the Newtown killings, and, no doubt, you will hear a lot more.  I decided to give you a break on the topic, and take one myself since the debate about the response to that tragedy has been hot and heavy on the web and on my blog.  In any case, today’s diatribe has obvious connections, should anyone want to tie things together.

I want to explore the notion that 2013 will be the year of the progressive pandemic.  In various forms this topic is being explored around the world after Americans gave a second term to their openly socialist president, and the country seems hell bent on a course of fiscal disaster that will remove the United States as a world hegemon.

In ‘2013: The Year America Dies?’ British journalist Paul Joseph Watson asks, “Will 2013 be remembered by future historians as the year that the United States of America, to all intents and purposes, died as a Republic and was finally seized by authoritarian globalists who have already openly usurped governments all across Europe?”

There are a lot of indicators baked into that question which answer it in the affirmative.   I’ll go through a few of them so you can form your own opinion as to how much they support Watson’s and my outlook.  It is easy to see that Europe is already in the bag for globalism, with leaders of major banks and investment houses in the EU countries all moving governments and economies in a direction to make the world safe for international finance.


The US is long past the point where it can make a credible case for repaying its debts and unfunded entitlement obligations, let alone stopping the trillion dollar annual deficits in federal spending that continue to balloon this debt.  The progressives’ control of government, corporations, and academe will guarantee that there will be no change in the plan to spend and tax ourselves to renewed prosperity.  That promise is keeping America mollified and hopeful as we quietly shut down our Republic.

Global strategist and former Jimmy Carter national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski recently delivered a cautionary lament in a speech to fellow globalists.  According to Watson, Brzezinski warned fellow elitists that a worldwide “resistance” movement to “external control” driven by “populist activism” is threatening to derail the move towards a new world order.

Our federal government has already taken extraordinary measures to detect, contain, and eliminate such populist activism, no matter where it may raise its stubborn head.  The new and improved National Defense Authorization Act lays out the details of how government will squash all resistance.  Related documents like the new Army field manual FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations gives specific instruction for the detainment and re-education of dissidents.

To abet this pandemic, accelerating technology has quietly made privacy a thing of the past.  The ability for the state to capture, record, analyze, and store our whereabouts, actions, and utterances 24/7 is rapidly becoming complete with the aid of cell phones already in our pockets, microphones and cameras in the streets and public transport vehicles, and drones overhead.  Your smart home will be smart enough to tell the feds everything they want to know about you.

Fostered by the Newtown massacre of innocents, President Obama promised that “under the radar” gun control initiatives will get a full airing in 2013.  No armed population has ever been compliant to their betters in government, and therefore America must be disarmed for all intents and purposes, even if it takes UN mandates and troops to complete the job.

In the meantime, the same broad path to what now appears as unadorned communism is called for by economist Nancy Folbre writing (here) in the New York Times.  Her message to America is that “All Americans willing and able to work have a right to paid employment. If the private sector can’t generate sufficient jobs, the public sector should provide them.”  You heard it correctly, full employment in America is a right, just like it was in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.  Our government now promises to tax and shrink the private sector to any extent required to guarantee that right.

Ben Franklin warned us that “Passion governs.  And she never governs wisely.”

My name is Rebane, and I expand on this and related themes on georgerebane.com where the linked transcript of this commentary is posted, and where such issues are debated extensively.  However these views are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[23dec12 update]  A reader pointed me to a recent interview with polymath George Gilder.  The interview was comprehensive in the sense that it covered a lot of the topics RR concerns itself with.  I was again pleasantly made aware that Gilder and I share wordviews about the US and what's happening around the world.  The differences between us are minor, and I will point them out should any reader care to raise a specific tenet or idea in a comment.  (This will, of course, come as a complete surprise to our lightly read leftwingers who continue characterize my views here as the lonely howls of a conservative lost in a rightwing wilderness.)  The interview was conducted by The Daily Bell in conjunction with Gilder's forthcoming book Knowledge and Power.  It is definitely worth a read.

Posted in , , ,

75 responses to “2013, the year of the Progressive Pandemic (updated 23dec12)”

  1. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    And I will say it one more time, which is it about pontificating know-it-alls that they just cannot say the simple words, “I have new information that shows that I was incorrect”?

    Like

  2. Russ Steele Avatar

    DK@12:54
    If the vice-principals are the internal cops, then send them to training and then arm them. They can be the external cop as well. The taxpayers get a two for the price of one.

    Like

  3. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    George, how dare you challenge the “smartest” man on planet earth. What a hoot. The guy’s eyes have to be brown.
    Back in the 90’s I and many across America concerned with the money and influence the SBC type scams were practicing came to a head with the FORD Foundation. The common blokes were buying their F-150’s to go to work and do the things the middle class folks were doing and the profits of FORD were pouring into their “non-profit”. Then the Board of the non-profit (apparently a bunch of lefty do-gooders) would “redistribute” the money to NGO’s whose soul purpose was to undermine capitalism, property rights and spread socialist crap. Well we all started sending them letters saying “what the hell” are you doing? C omitting suicide? They got the message only after a threatened boycott of their F-150’s. (they are probably back to their crap though)
    They were recycling the profits, getting tax write-offs, taking the money and giving it to a bunch of leftwing scammers who hated FORD. And this was my first real forays into understanding the dangers the SBC’s create for free enterprise, taxes and the bastardization of the true intent of non profits.

    Like

  4. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    Steele, 7:36 am, first intelligent thing you’ve written about schools, but please keep in mind, the vice principles cannot wander the halls armed, or you will get both dead and wounded VEEP’s and students. You will have to have hardened safes for night time storage on campus, and then transfer to BioMetric instant open inside the Main Office lockups.
    Todd, you’ve found your soul purpose! I thought it was perfectly legally and therefore perfectly OK for corps to transfer cash wherever they wanted, superpac and superfoundations. What, you don’t like their choices? Too bad, this is the system you are encouraging.

    Like

  5. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    still waking up, “principals”

    Like

  6. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Jesus Todd this just shows what a dimwit you are. Don’t you know that there is absolutely no on-going financial connection between the Ford Motor Company and the Ford Foundation? The Ford Foundation was created with a gift of non voting stock from the estates of Henry and Edsel Ford. The Foundation and the Motor Company operate completely independently.
    This is like boycotting FORD to get a completely unrelated business to do something. It is insane.

    Like

  7. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    I would also set up cameofluged daytime biometric safe boxex at the afr ends of the campus, guns placed in them before students arrive, and removed at the end of the day, once most students are gone. Special cart to carry the guns to and from the remote safe-boxes. That speeds up the response time, by placing a weapon where a wandering VEEP, common mode for them, can get to it in a hurry. Bullet semi proof vests for all veeps, and school paid insurance policies for them too.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    SteveF 416am – (wow, you’re up early on a Sunday)
    Did I miss your response to my 308pm that countered your 15% of GDP claim?

    As a general comment I want to remind us all that it is profits (in excess of costs) that allows an economy to grow through investment in new infrastructure, plant, equipment, research, … , and, yes, even fund government through taxes on such profits. And government, though the only channel for funding certain of these activities, is demonstrably the most inefficient and profit killing method of benefiting the common weal through its spending programs. Its operation in areas better handled by for-profit enterprises always diminishes the possible benefit to the economy – there is no net gain when compared with private enterprise.

    Like

  9. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    So George still lists no benefit of improved productivity on the part of employees based on their lives being upgraded by the services of non profits? Must really hate to have to hire anyone to do anything, as you hold labor in such low esteem, and apparently contributing nothing to the GDP. Upgrade a machine, cool! Upgrade a human, I guess no such thing exists in George’s world. As for me, I always thought that’s what education and healthcare and better housing were all about.

    Like

  10. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    George, did I not clearly post the source of my !5% of the economy in response to your 308 pm (it was you who defined the economy as GDP)? Of course, some portion of the funds that go to charitable and nonprofit organizations comes from government, although as you yourself noted most come from private sources. Some portion of revenue to for profit businesses also come from government, as you clearly know since you worked in a government dependent business (defense then education) most of your life. Those private sources CHOOSE to distribute their funding through nonprofit organizations. That is just as much a contribution to GDP as if they bought a ton of steel.
    You are dissembling and being completely disingenuous here.
    You asked me to post sources and I did. They proved your figures incorrect (and I must note you are selectively deciding what to respond to here, for example you never answered my question about whether or not government should play some role in telling the private sector where to put its money, like donating it or distributing it through contracts for services to no profits).
    Your position that non-profit activity is diminutive is just that, an opinion. My statement that nonprofits contribute 15% of GDP is a FACT, based on real data.

    Like

  11. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    SteveF, you are calling me a dimwit? What a hoot. While you were running a restaurant in Truckee I was involved with thousands of Americans in the FORD issue. But hey, you are the Wiki master here, the cut and paste king, so you must be right. All those people involved were no match for your superior intelligence.

    Like

  12. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hey Todd, it just goes to show you that thousands of people led by dimwits can all be wrong. There is no connection between FORD MOTOR COMPANY and the FORD Foundation. FORD Foundation is a private, stand alone, endowed entity, with zero operational relationship to the motor company. So you may try to critique me for knowing more than you, but the simple truth is I just know more than you do. I can’t help it if you are an idiot.

    Like

  13. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    Hey Todd, I think James Carville is talking about you here:
    “When I hear people talking about the troubled state of today’s Republican Party, it calls to mind something Lester Maddox said one time back when he was governor of Georgia. He said the problem with Georgia prisons was ‘the quality of the inmates.’ The problem with the Republican Party is the quality of the people who vote in their primaries and caucuses. Everybody says they need a better candidate, or they need a better message but — in my opinion — the Republicans have an inmate problem.”

    Like

  14. George Rebane Avatar

    SteveF 840am – From your own source 32% of one non-profit sector’s revenues came from the government (which you repeatedly choose to ignore), and the other sector’s government contributions were omitted (which you also ignore). Already your 15% is wrong, and now we are debating how much of the 15% is being double counted in GDP. There is no fact to your fact until you reconcile my observations.

    Like

  15. Gregory Avatar

    George, The Urban Institute puts the number closer to 5.4%:
    “In 2010, nonprofits contributed products and services that added $779 billion to the nation’s gross domestic product; 5.4 percent of GDP.”
    http://www.urban.org/nonprofits/index.cfm

    Like

  16. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    George, you still do not understand…it is not double counted in GDP….GDP is a measure of goods and services produced…it does not matter where the $$ came from, they could come from Mars…..GDP does not measure where money comes from it measures what money is spent….You don’t get to just redefine a standard economic terms for your own purposes….(oh, but I guess you think you do since you provided a Dr. Seuss ‘glossary’ for posters)
    But, lets pretend for one second that we define it your way; even if 32% came from government, and you choose to discount that, the other 68% came from the private sector…and you failed to add together expenditures from non-profits and charitable organizations…which added together are 22% of GDP…if you were to reduce that by the 32% that ‘came from government’ you would still have 15% of the GDP.
    What is even more disturbing to me is that you just can’t say it can you? You can’t say, “based on the commonly used definition of GDP, public charities and nonprofit organizations comprise 15% of US GDP.” Instead you insist on dissembling, changing definitions, providing opinion, and denying the naked truth that you are WRONG. I thought you were a bigger man than that Mr. Rebane.
    But I agree, we are getting nowhere, because you are full of beans and refuse to acknowledge the most commonly used and standard definition of a word rather than admit fault. How sad.

    Like

  17. Gregory Avatar

    “George, I did not rely on any figures from the report other than the total revenue and expenses of nonprofits and charities.” Frisch
    And yet I was ridiculed by Frisch for suggesting he was just totaling the percentage of GDP (a dollar denominated measure of value) that non profits spent; by adding revenue and expenses together, it does appear that he double counted, since expenses are covered by revenue.
    Using Frisch’s 15%, assuming he actually had good reason for that, and using The Urban Institute’s ~5%, it would appear that the average non-profit takes $300K of capital and turns it into $100K of goods and services; that might well be the case.

    Like

  18. L Avatar
    L

    So, if the Fed printed $16 trillion and gave it to non-profits, instructing them to pay off the national debt, would that double the GDP? Just askin’… L

    Like

  19. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Math, simple math. GDP has a definition. You may not like that definition, but it is the definition.

    Like

  20. George Rebane Avatar

    L 1124pm – Actually, the Fed cannot ‘print and give’ money to anyone, but needs to go through some fairly complex open market transactions in buying/selling debt instruments (e.g. Treasurys) with the US Treasury and the banks for which it holds reserves.
    http://www.federalreserveeducation.org/about-the-fed/structure-and-functions/monetary-policy/

    Like

  21. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    MichaelA here is a link that reflects what most people think you are all about. Frisch too.
    http://thechive.com/2010/11/18/i-can-count-to-potato-22-photos/
    What a hoot.

    Like

  22. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    You stay classy, George…..

    Like

  23. Gregory Avatar

    “Math, simple math. GDP has a definition. You may not like that definition, but it is the definition.” -Frisch
    And just how did our resident 6 figure income non-profit executive apply the simple math to get a figure three times the size The Urban League came up with for GDP contributions by non-profits?

    Like

  24. Gregory Avatar

    Kitties, Christmas trees, a bouncy tune, what more could one want for a Progressive Pandemic on Christmas Eve?
    http://www.rathergood.com/content/christmas/communist_christmas.swf

    Like

Leave a comment