Rebane's Ruminations
December 2012
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

As it gathers steam, the national travesty that is Obamacare is now taking big bites out of our nation’s commonweal, and the real tragedy is yet to come.  Since arriving in the dark of night three years ago, it is now morphing into the gigantic puzzle palace that all government programs eventually become.  Obamacare’s puzzle palace is the Health and Human Services Department that now displays a “special combination of rigidity and ineptitude” beyond what was predicted for a program that is supposed to launch and be running by October 2013.

States are shying away from the law’s so-called “clearinghouses” which promise new orders of red tape and government inefficiency.  HHS, that so far has issued more than 13,000 pages of useless regulations, is refusing to answer states’ questions on how they are supposed to manage their ends of Obamacare.  The 14dec12 WSJ reports – 

…  for the better part of a year states and groups like the bipartisan National Governors Association and the National Association of Medicaid Directors have been begging HHS merely for information about how they're required to make ObamaCare work in practice. There was radio silence from Washington, with time running out. Louisiana and other states even took to filing Freedom of Information Act requests, which are still pending.

It is clear that the HHS does not know what it is doing, and is desperately trying to make something up by next October that doesn’t embarrass this administration too much, while forgetting that this administration does not embarrass at all as it staggers toward socialism.

In a word, HHS is treating the states not as the partners it needs to give ObamaCare any chance of success, but as serfs.

Meanwhile, companies are responding by restructuring their workforces, laying people off and making some into part-time employees – anything to escape the latest titan of bureaucratic burdens on our nation’s economy.   And the rest of us pikers are just getting the dribs and drabs of Obamacare’s latest bad news as prescribed by the Pelosi Principle.  It is clear to me that this mess will be way bigger than any of us predicted when that lump of coal arrived in our stocking on Christmas eve three years ago.

H.L Mencken in the 1930s kept a keen and gimlet eye on the mass of bureaucracies launched by FDR’s New Deal, and wondered about the mentality that was behind the onslaught that pushed the nation deeper and deeper into depression until the administration finally threw up its hands and admitted defeat in 1939.  Of this Mencken observed that –

Here is the perfect pattern of a professional world-saver. His whole life has been devoted to the art and science of spending other people's money. He has saved millions of the down-trodden from starvation, pestilence, cannibalism, and worse—always at someone else's expense, and usually at the taxpayer's. . . .
 
Of such sort are the young wizards who now sweat to save the plain people from the degradations of capitalism, which is to say, from the degradations of working hard, saving their money, and paying their way. This is what the New Deal and its Planned Economy come to in practise—a series of furious and irrational raids upon the taxpayer, planned casually by professional do-gooders lolling in smoking cars, and executed by professional politicians bent only upon building up an irresistible machine.

[update]  Newtown, Connecticut elementary school massacre.  This is the latest in a string of such mass shootings that reflect a sign of our times.  In the previous post 'War on Words' where discussion of this tragedy was starting, I posted a comment that in part reads – "… I see much merit in the proposal to permit legal guns in schools so
that such mad shooters don't have a safe environment in which to go on a
serial killing spree. It is today's world, after all.

Rumination – how did we become a world where such mass killings are
becoming so commonplace? And the simple answer that guns are easy to
get today won't wash – today it is harder to get hands on a gun than at
any time in our history.   50 years ago, anyone could have an M-1
semi-automatic carbine or other equivalent weapon(s), and commit similar
atrocities in crowded places like malls, theaters, and schools.  But to
us then it was unthinkable, today it no longer is. What happened?"

Posted in ,

120 responses to “Ruminations – 14dec12 (updated)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar

    Texas Chainsaw 3D opens next week as a holiday treat and will likely be a big hit. Merry Christmas America

    Like

  2. Ryan Mount Avatar

    albeit under the false cover of sarcasm
    Hey now. It’s more polite to use sarcasm than to just call someone a dick. But, as if I care what you think. 😉 At least it’s not like in the Senate chambers when a Senator says something like, “What the distinguished Senator from Vermont means,” translated into real languageas , “that uncombed hippy a**hole doesn’t know what the hell he’s talking about.”
    Anyhow, back to the happy topic of school shootings…
    You know, the Bath School tragedy is never mentioned. Maybe because the guy used dynamite instead of a gun? (well, he did use a gun to detonate his truck) I suppose it’s out of sight, out of mind like drone attacks. BTW, speaking of out of sight, this happened on Friday as well:
    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/12/22-kids-slashed-in-china-elementary-school-knife-attack/
    [taps fingers] Maybe we should limit knife sales too to get ahead of this risk as well? How about cars too? ~88 people died yesterday in USA car accidents. About 16 of those approximate 88 where just sanding around on the sidewalk minding their own business.
    Maybe we should require gun owners to carry insurance? But criminals and the mentally ill won’t, because they don’t care about laws in the first place. Each for their own reasons. I’m not against ratcheting back the access to military-like weapons, I just don’t seeing doing any good other than making us feel safer and punishing people would never do such a heinous act. But go ahead. Good luck with that. Bastiat welcomes all broken windows with an ironic chuckle.

    Like

  3. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Ryan is spot on and I am in agreement with his 10:45.
    Regarding Frisch’s diatribe. He says it is sarcasm, but having read his leftwingnut tripe for a few years we all know he actually believes what he wrote. He truly is unhinged. Oh, and we actually have children.
    Greg is always good for fact checking and he keeps us properly informed so we don’t go off on a stupid nonfactual tantrum. Unless it is a personal rant of course.
    The facts are apparent here. The little children’s bodies were not even cold before the Pelline’s and Frisch’s were calling for “gun control” My suggestion to those two heathens is next time, wait until the funerals are over before putting both your feet into your big mouths.

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar

    We must admit that as a culture we are entertained by extreme violence and that is a problem.

    Like

  5. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I thought the left was always defending the gansta rappers and Hollywood PaulE. Free expression, free speech all that. The ACLU protects them too. It is really not about that stuff, you know, video games and such. It is about how the left has won the culture battle and “anything” goes. Self esteem is more important than actually being a success or a winner. No, it is about the culture ruined by the left in America.

    Like

  6. Ryan Mount Avatar

    I don’t quite understand the “if you watch it, you will do” meme.
    In other words, if you force me to watch (you’ll have to drag me into the Del Oro. Another option, threaten to force me to watch Dr. Oz, and then I’ll happily go) to watch Texas Chainsaw 3D, I am somehow more predisposed to, I dunno, hack people up?
    I don’t get it. I think the answer is this: there is an ultra small portion of our civilized population who are mentally ill and deranged beyond treatment and mainstreaming. Of that ultra small percent, another ultra small percentage of that parent group (this is like those Russian matryoshka dolls, so bear with me) are planning ultra violent events. And lastly, of that ultra small group, which is a percentage of that larger ultra small population, there is even a smaller percentage that will get a hold of weapons and use them.
    Then after that last percentage who actually does such an unthinkable and heinous act, the media will be there 24/7 to terrify us even more and to sell us Insurance and other security products. Other predictable events: Progressive will call for banning some classes of weapons and sneak in legislation that requires mandatory testicle exams, and the NRA will hold a special convention in Connecticut.
    IOW words, this:
    http://www.theonion.com/articles/tornado-violence-are-tornadic-images-in-the-media,730/

    Like

  7. earlcrabb Avatar

    Steve, sometimes sarcasm works, sometimes it falls flat. It should probably be left to trained professionals.(I’m being sarcastic.) Were you being sarcastic when you accuse overzealous gun owners of “waving the constitution like a bloody flag” or “crushing them at the polls, in congress, etc.?”
    And, of course, blaming video games, movies, and (horrors!) comic books will go back on the radar. It’s been tried before too. (Ever heard of the comics code?)
    I’m not in favor of arming everyone, at least until the zombie apocalypse, but disarming and censoring impure thoughts has never worked either. Maybe in another hundred years human beings will feel secure enough to give up their guns, but not in the world we live in today.

    Like

  8. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    I think we are drilling down to the nitty gritty. I had posted – “How about we affirm the rights and value of all human life?”
    Michael then responds -“I find yours (sic) ideas abhorrent and offensive.”
    Well, ladies and gentlemen, which of those two statements contributes more to the mass slaughter of innocent children?
    Also quite telling – ” You’re a man, Scott. You have no standing on the subject.”
    That’s awesome dude. Where does that thinking lead us? First of all, since I have no standing, I also have no responsibility, so should we get rid of paternity laws for men? Why should I have to contribute one dime for abortion or birth control? Also, since you have decided to make a declaration on the matter, I assume you must believe you do have standing, ergo – you are not a man or you are just a hypocrite. Should women be allowed to vote on any issues relating to selective service, circumcision, treatment of prostate cancer, etc? It is exactly because of what I do know about science and conception and birth that I believe that human life begins at the point of the formation of the double helix. If you believe otherwise, feel free to state your view. I happened to be joined by 10s of millions of women in my belief. So are these womens’ beliefs also “abhorrent and offensive” to you?

    Like

  9. Russ Steele Avatar

    Katy Grimes a slender blond reporter who writes at the CalWatchDog has some thoughts on Politicians Jumping on the Anti-Gun Bandwagon

    Fifteen years following the passage of Florida’s concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state. FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 52 percent during that 15-year period — thus putting the Florida rate below the national average.
    The Center for Disease Control has admitted that there is no evidence that gun control reduces crime. The CDC has long been criticized for propagating questionable studies which gun control organizations have used in defense of their cause. But after analyzing 51 studies in 2003, the CDC concluded that the “evidence was insufficient to determine the effectiveness of any of these [firearms] laws.”
    Some other gun statistics:

    * Guns are used 2.5 million times annually or 6,860 times a day. This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than they are to take lives.
    * Less than 8 percent of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.
    * 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse
    * Citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as police do every year.
    * Only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The ‘error rate’ for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five times as high.

    God help any thug who breaks into my house… and it’s not just my German Shepherd and marshmallow gun to worry about.

    Like

  10. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    re: Paul’s post at 12:19. “We must admit that as a culture we are entertained by extreme violence and that is a problem.” As a culture, yes you are correct. The question is why as a culture is this true and how much of it becomes self perpetuating? Is it the symptom of a problem that becomes part of the same issue? I know that entire books have been written on the subject, nothing much seems to change. There were mass murders long before TV and movies, so maybe it doesn’t really have much bearing.

    Like

  11. Gregory Avatar

    “It’s more polite to use sarcasm than to just call someone a dick.”
    Not really, Ryan, and with a score of dead little kids it’s incredibly misplaced, but after years of BSNBC substituting snark (snide sarcasm) for rational discourse, many of the Frischs swimming in the blogosphere can’t tell the difference.
    You see, SF is working with Universal Truths that only idiotic right wing outsiders deny, so anyone in his tribe will think that “sarcasm” witty. He has a very hard time with rational replies and if one believes in behavioral patterns, one might expect a Cartmanesque ‘Screw you guys, I’m going home’ post from him very soon.
    It’s particularly funny how he missed Russ’ poor attribution skills and so felt particular license to mock the post of 17 December 2012 at 07:37 AM as just another Russ delusion, despite its actual author, a university professor of law. No, Steve, it really was written by someone above your pay grade.
    Have you tried your snark with the actual author?

    Like

  12. Paul Emery Avatar

    This is a stunning stat.
    Scott
    Yes, it could be a symptom of a problem that contributes to the problem.
    “Number of murders seen on TV by the time an average child finishes elementary school: 8,000
    Number of violent acts seen on TV by age 18: 200,000
    Percentage of Americans who believe TV violence helps precipitate real life mayhem: 79”
    If 79% believe TV violence contributes to the problem why do they allow children free access to TV.
    http://www.csun.edu/science/health/docs/tv&health.html
    I don’t propose a remedy here. This is just an observation worth noting

    Like

  13. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    I did not miss Russ’s attribution. It was obvious. You assumed that Greg. Another example of your dissembling and distracting skills.

    Like

  14. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Do they have less exposures to death on TV in Australia? Great Britain? Canada? Sweden? Look at the top movies in those countries and you will see your fair share of shoot em’ up American movies. Or is something lost in translation?

    Like

  15. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hey, if I could just get away with calling most of you guys dicks I would!

    Like

  16. L Avatar
    L

    Steve, last time I checked, you do “get away with” calling most posters here, ‘dicks.’ In turn, you get to read them calling you an idiot, which they also get away with. What’s not to like?
    ‘Corse I’d rather be a ‘dick,’ which is just an obnoxious expression, than an idiot which is a real human condition. L

    Like

  17. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    If you read my ‘sarcastic’ post closely you will note that they are all things Russ has stated here and on his own blog quite clearly over the years. And I can’t get away with calling people dicks, but Todd can get away with bragging about the size of his unit. When I point out that there may be some connection between his love for his unit and his divorce rate those comments are assiduously expunged. The arguments being made here about holding on to guns are just the standard NRA fare. They don’t resonate with the vast majority of people as we will see over the next few months. Sandy Hook defined a tipping point in peoples consciousness about gun ownership issues and there is nothing those posting here can do about it.

    Like

  18. George Rebane Avatar

    Administrivia – I address the public’s tipping point and SteveF’s already-tipped point in the next post. In it one can compare and contrast “just the standard NRA fare” – as if that could be totally discounted on reason alone – and the fare of the nation’s SteveFs.
    http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2012/12/fire-ready-aim-panic-driven-public-policy.html

    Like

  19. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    Russ Steele | 17 December 2012 at 01:30 PM
    Statistics compiled by whom, and located where?
    Unspoken of course is the phenom of people very heavily armed shooting thems well before they’ve run out of ammo. Could it just be that killing on tv is very clean, you shoot, they fall, is very different from killing in real life? A body hit by a bullet, may go totally Zombie for a while, and the true horror of what they are doing, quickly settles in, regardless of how crazy they are? Maybe we need more realistic deaths on tv and video games? Adjust your sarcsm control as needed.
    And lock them guns up, use other devices to give yourself warn, or finger id locks, which apparently work very well.

    Like

  20. Russ Steele Avatar

    Douglas,
    Click on the link and read the original for Katy.

    Like

Leave a comment