Rebane's Ruminations
July 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Comment streams below my posts about other topics often develop threads about Second Amendment rights and, yes, gun control.  This has been a hot thread the last few days in the comments under ‘Obama is a Self-Declared Marxist’.  No doubt the recent murderous rampage in Aurora, Colorado has piqued the national interest in the topic.

In the blogosphere, where straight talk and unabashed opinions abound, the Left has again manned the ramparts of the state as the only legitimate seat of power, control, and violence.  Its adherents dust off the age-old arguments that even precede progressivism in their provenance – the elite and their henchmen should be the only possessors of instruments of deadly force.  Anyone from the lower castes having such possession is immediately suspect of planning mayhem or sedition.

In America the Left has adopted a flanking strategy on the Second Amendment, having tried and failed with a frontal assault as being too obvious.  Perusing their nostrums for “preventing mass murders in the movies”, we read of all kinds of next baby steps toward disarming the American public.  That the Colorado killer had amassed a few thousand rounds of ammo now immediately directs these sharp intellects toward slowing down the legal purchase of ammunition.  It will not be surprising if the Left will introduce legislation making the ownership of more than so many rounds to be illegal.  Never mind that not even a deranged mass murderer can use more than a miniscule fraction of such a stockpile for the most meticulously planned dastardly deed.

But such stores of ammunition among the public do present a clear and present danger to a tyrannical state.  And therein lies the missed point of all the gun control discussions circling the notions of ‘what does he need a large capacity magazine for duck hunting, for target practice, for self protection, … ?’ or ‘… only drug cartels and other criminals require assault rifles for their dirty work, not law abiding citizens.’


UnarmedCitizens

None of our collectivist comrades seem to grasp that not only did the Founders specifically prescribe the Republic to have an armed citizenry, but also that the citizenry should be armed broadly and powerfully enough to muster itself against a government turned rogue.  In my deliberations on the matter I have introduced the concept of ‘par force’ as the short label that most succinctly captures the meaning and intent of the Second Amendment which has been the endowed birthright of every American since the Revolution.  After all, it was only the availability of par force in the hands of the colonial British subjects that allowed them to throw off the growing tyranny of England, at the time their presumed legitimate government.

We don’t talk about that aspect of American exceptionalism any more.  We cite the ‘civilized behavior’ of disarmed countries around the world, while turning a blind eye to rogue governments that murder their unarmed citizens by the millions.  Oh yes, we give lame lip service to citizens who do arm themselves and fight for self-determination from the tyrannies that have ruled them for generations.  However, our lips are often so flaccid that even lip service is too little too late, or not at all.

Today with the announcements of new technology based weaponry arriving almost daily, the concept of par force becomes more vital than ever.  What is beyond my ken is the childlike belief of progressives everywhere that this time when we take away the effective means from citizens to resist their government, that governments will suddenly perform a multi-millennial metamorphosis, and become the benign and beneficial handmaidens of a grateful humanity.

Here I would like to reprise my long-held ideas about an armed citizenry that first appeared in these pages four years ago in ‘Par Force – An Uncommon View of the Second Amendment’.

[Addendum]  A correspondent sent me a copy of a 28jul12 piece – ‘CALL TO ARMS – SECOND AMENDMENT AND THE U.N. ARMS TREATY’ – by KrisAnne Hall that expands on the historical and legal aspects of an armed American citizenry.  You can download a pdf of it here Download CALL TO ARMS KrisAnne Hall.

Posted in , , , , ,

65 responses to “Circling the Barn on Gun Control (Addended)”

  1. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1001am – McVey did not represent a widespread national need when he blew up the Oklahoma City federal building, and for that he paid the ultimate price. Ben-Gurion’s 1946 explosion did, and for that he became the father of his country.
    “…, where does it stop?” Not to worry – it hasn’t started yet. (More in my next post.)

    Like

  2. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, the Colorado shooter didn’t have any military weapons. Research it and I think you’ll find no American has gone into combat with a semi-automatic version of the M-16.
    The Grass Valley Police Department has the real thing, or at least had as of a decade ago. M-16’s. Machine guns. Feeling safer?

    Like

  3. Paul Emery Avatar

    Todd
    I have never been opposed to qualified individuals owning guns for recreation and self defense. I believe they need to be licensed annually and trained to insure as much as possible public safety. I don’t know enough about guns to recommend a threshold of legality as to size, caliber, etc . Certainly the arsenal available for James Eagan Holmes should not be legal because it far exceeds reasonable self defense and sporting needs. That’s why I’ve been asking questions from my fellow blogsters about what is a reasonable threshold. What’s you’ve view on that Todd?

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar

    OK Gregory. It was a semiautomatic variation of the military’s M-16 rifle . But while we’re on the subject should automatic rifles be available to the general public and under what, if any, regulations?

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, as far as I can tell the ‘arsenal’ Holmes amassed was not at all remarkable for folks active in the shooting sports. There may be hundreds of homes in Nevada County that exceed that stockpile.
    What was remarkable is his apparent mental illness. No amount of gun owner control will make up for a deranged individual intent on inflicting harm, especially when the individual is exceedingly intelligent.

    Like

  6. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, more to the point, Holmes had the civilian variant of the M-16 rifle.
    Since the ’30’s, to legally own an automatic weapon in the US, one needed to:
    1) live in a state that allows it
    2) be investigated by the FBI and pass what amounts to a Secret clearance security check.
    3) purchase a tax stamp from the Feds
    The tax stamps were frozen in number during the Clinton administration but, since there were no criminal uses to speak of before that time it is unclear if limiting the number of legally possessed automatic weapons has done anything to increase public safety.
    That’s been the primary law for the past 75 years and seems OK. Do you disagree? I’ve never fired one nor have I wanted one, but anyone who wants the experience can go to any number of big cities in Nevada (just one of the states where they are legal), go to a tourist firing range and put down a few bucks to be Rambo for a few minutes. Some even have souvenir t-shirts you can make Holy and wear back home. Very popular among Canadian and Japanese tourists.

    Like

  7. Paul Emery Avatar

    Thanks Gregory for your thoughtful response

    Like

  8. Gregory Avatar

    Paul, you’re welcome.
    Of course, that’s only the rule for the rabble. Even in California, iirc it’s been common for active duty police officers to be allowed to buy assault rifles (the real thing) and assault weapons (not the real thing but still illegal in California) and keep them into retirement. A year ago the California AG argued the law banning such things applied after retirement and the continued possession violated the letter of California law as currently written, but it’s unclear whether he’s still of the same mind since being sworn in as Governor.

    Like

  9. TomKenworth Avatar

    Looks like this one will need yet another addendum,and why don’t they call it a code, “Moron” instead of code “Maroon?”
    Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:44pm EDT
    (Reuters) – Multiple people, including law enforcement officers, were shot on Monday when a gunman opened fire near Texas A&M University, police in College Station, Texas, said.
    “We have multiple people who have been shot,” police spokeswoman Rhonda Seaton told CNN, adding that law enforcement officers were among those.
    Police had the shooting suspect in custody, according to the university’s website. The extent of victims’ injuries was not immediately clear.
    The university issued a “code maroon” shortly after noon, warning students and employees that an “active shooter” was in the area west of campus and asking them to stay away.
    The gunman fired shots from inside a home about two blocks from the campus, according to the university’s alert.
    “We have been told to stay put,” said Keith Randall, a Texas A&M employee who was in his office. “They just asked us to stay where we are.”
    (Reporting by Jim Forsyth; Writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Doina Chiacu)

    Like

  10. TomKenworth Avatar

    They were all wrong:

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    For the record – the gunman was a distraught resident who was being served an eviction notice by a constable. The residence happened to be near Texas A&M. Out of hundreds of millions of people, in tough times some of them run into problems that exceed the threshold of reason, and they become unstable. This is not a phenomenon encountered first in recent years.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444184704577587443964969080.html?mod=WSJ__MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsForth

    Like

  12. TomKenworth Avatar

    I couldn’t have said this better:
    By Mike Thornton:
    “This is for all of you who think that 150 people in a dark, crowded theater full of tear gas, should all be armed and opening fire.
    “Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said that nine bystanders had been “wounded or grazed” and taken to hospitals. The mayor said that some of the injured may have been hit by police bullets during the confrontation with the suspect, whom Mr. Kelly identified as Jeffrey Johnson, 58, a former clothing designer at Hazan Imports. Mr. Kelly said the two officers fired a total of 14 rounds and he believed that some of the shooting victims had been shot by the officers “based on the number of people shot and the capacity of”’ the shooter’s weapon.”
    Mind you, these cops are trained to shoot and look what (apparently) happened….”

    Like

  13. TomKenworth Avatar

    Maybe it is just me watching too much Fox 40, but it seems like brazen smash and grab burglaries are up these days, videocams be damned. I suppose that just by listening to the scanners the baddies cn figure out when LE is well occupied, and then go for it. In time armed business owners doing nightwatch, in times armed thieves returning fire, hellova way to run a society, jails overflowing.

    Like

  14. George Rebane Avatar

    TomK 1054am – MikeT’s imported logic here is a fevered as usual. No one recommends the hyperbolic scenario he uses for his argument. But having one or two legal CCWs in such an audience would cut the casualty count from a murderous rogue who otherwise would proceed systematically to kill everyone within range. In this light, the new policy of the police responding to such incidents now requires them to charge into the scene and do what’s necessary to bring down the shooter. Even if it means hitting some innocent victims, the expected death toll is minimized. The Israelis have known this for decades.

    Like

Leave a comment