Rebane's Ruminations
July 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the addended transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 20 July 2012.]

CalPERSThe economy’s downward spiral goes on while the lamestream media continues to paper over the fiscal bombs that explode daily.  The latest report is about the disastrous year that Calpers just finished in June.  You recall that Calpers is the retirement fund manager for California’s public employees – it invests monies from local jurisdictions like cities and counties for their public service employee pensions.  As the country’s biggest retirement fund manager, it is also one of the worst performing.

Right now it has $223B under management.  Unfortunately this is still an estimated 55 to 80% underfunded.  That, according to a Stanford study, is the amount that California’s taxpayers will have to make up, so that the retired government employees will get the monies that their unions negotiated for them with the help of some very ignorant and cooperative politicians who were supposed to represent the taxpayers.

With a nod and a wink from Sacramento, Calpers told us not to worry a couple of years ago in the depth of the recession.  It claimed that its investments would earn 7.75% annually into the indefinite future, and that would make everything alright.  Compare that insane number with interest paid by corporate and government bonds which were less than half that rate.  The public demand for some reality in projecting future Calpers earnings caused their investment mavens to relent – they relented all the way down to using 7.5% to project future portfolio earnings.


The local jurisdictions, including our Nevada County, demurred the announcement and assured their taxpayers that Calpers’ financial experts had everything under control.  Not all, including yours truly, were fooled by that notched down insanity.  And guess what?  Calpers reported last week that its portfolio had earned a meager 1% last year instead of the projected 7.5%.  Now that’s a significant shot in the shorts.  But stupid is forever, and Calpers chief investment officer, Joe Dear, put the blame on everybody but himself, and told us that things would be much better in the future.  Anyone who has been paying attention to what’s happening in the world of finance knows that things aren’t getting better for quite a long time, and may get significantly worse in the interval.

Here’s the problem.  Let’s say that Calpers manages to get its portfolio performance up to, say, 3% for the next four years.  Furthermore, assume it has to start the projected target payouts in 15 years, payouts that Mr Dear still considers achievable.  Then for the remaining 10 years the Calpers portfolio has to earn an average of over 10% annually.   And with the gang that can’t shoot straight in charge, they will not get close to that rate as the world struggles to recover from this depression.  We recall that these are the people who lost 7.2% on their stock portfolio last year when the Dow was up 3.8%.

But let’s bring this dismal situation back home to Nevada County whose CEO Rick Haffey recently reported that, using Calpers 7.5% discount rate, the county’s unfunded pension liabilities were in excess of $119M.  The exact figure is unknown for a number of known and unknown reasons.  Using more realistic portfolio return rates, these unfunded liabilities could easily be much higher.  Add to this problem the fact that the county doesn’t know when and how much of these liabilities come due in the next ten to twenty years, and you begin to get an idea of what the county’s taxpayers are facing.

Well not quite.  So far I’ve only been talking about the Calpers retirement portfolio.  We have yet to cover the liabilities facing us when we include the pensioneers’ healthcare costs, and CalSTRS which manages teacher retirement funds for local school districts.  But since you’re already in tears, I’ll save that for another time.

Yesterday I had a chat with Rick Haffey about the Calpers 1% return.  He stated that the news had “caught their attention”, but emphasized that the county is committed to continue reducing its employee pension exposure.  He cited that even our SEIU Local 39 employees have increased their contribution from 8 to 10.5% of payroll.   Currently 16% of the county’s budget goes to retirement costs, and Haffey said that could rise up to 20% if the investment climate does not improve.  He also said that the great hope in resolving the $119M unfunded liabilities lies with Governor Jerry Brown’s pension reform program which is still in never-neverland.  In the meanwhile, by law the county must continue dealing with Calpers as its retirement portfolio manager.

But one thing is for sure, we taxpayers will not make up the liabilities that past ignorance and corruption has piled on our backs.  Someone suggested that Sacramento should pass a new law directing Calpers to return the contributed sums as appreciated to the local jurisdictions on a pro rata basis, and let them each figure out how they will settle with the retirees to whom they are obligated.

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on these and other themes in my Union columns, and on georgerebane.com where this transcript with additional materials appears.  These opinions are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[Addendum] This is the WSJ article on Calpers, ‘Calpers Misses Big on Investment Target’.

Here and here are some more grittier assessments of the hanky-panky that has come out of Calpers over the years.

And from Bloomberg BusinessWeek we read, “Moody’s, which rates debt in the $3.7 trillion municipal market, said in a July 2 report that unfunded liabilities of state and local pensions are $2 trillion, which it said was three times the total reported by governments.”

The politicians and senior county staffers responsible for most of the county’s $119M unfunded pension liabilities are long gone, and hard to indict.  The relatively calm attitude in today’s Rood Center can most plausibly be explained by the same ‘shoot and scoot’ mentality – the current crowd will be history when the fan blades get soiled.  Only the new ‘it didn’t happen on our watch’ crew and taxpayers holding the bag will still be here.

For the record – for my commentary I contacted both CEO Rick Haffey and my supervisor Nate Beason to ask their take on Calpers’ 1% and its impact on Nevada County.  Rick called me back yesterday morning and gave me an opportunity to ask my questions.  I appreciated that from a very busy county executive.  I have yet to hear from Nate.

Finally, one of the bigger retirement benefit dominoes to fall that no one pays attention to is that of the United States Postal Service.  The USPS is set to default on a $5.5B payment for its retirees healthcare unless Congress acts (more here).  The postal service has been on life support for years, and no one knows quite what to do with our original, ancient, and traditional communications network which we now call ‘snail mail’.  H/T to RR reader for connecting this dot.

Posted in , , ,

64 responses to “Calpers’ Predicted Predicament (Addended)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar

    Of course Ben , it is general knowledge that the Bush Admin pulled one over our eyes on this and that we’ll be paying the tab for years to come. It’s part of the reason Bush is exiled from the Republican Party and the officio’s run for cover whenever he leaves his ranch.
    On a bigger picture though George, I want to ask your opinion since you agree that Bush lied to the American public and Congress about the reason for war with Iraq doesn’t that certify that the war was unconstitutional because the only flimsy justification for calling it an act of war was justification under the War Powers Act and the reason presented by Bush was WMD’s, later found to be unfounded and which we agree was not the real reason for the war.
    Is intentionally lying to congress to get us into a war an impeachable action? I would think so.

    Like

  2. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    I see MichaelA answered the question I asked of BenE and I am so happy he did. MA says his ilk likes NATO and The Treaty of the Seas then BenE says he personally doesn’t like NATO now (too warmongery). Gosh, I think the left should not answer for others anymore (I detect disunity) . Then we get a screed by MA warning people they will be viewed as nutty if they opposes or even discuss Agenda21. That shows me he knows zip about it and is simply bloviating hot air.
    I recall being all by myself in my opposition (locally) to the Global Warming crap in 1997. I was called at home after I wrote an OP-D and I was called a nut for my POV. I said it was a money raising, government centric, non-proft cash cow, simply political and was bogus. Look at the results today. The world has woken up and most everyone except the true believers of AGW agree with me. So, MA just wait and watch. Your property rights are in the cross-hairs by the Agenda21 folks and you have your blinders on and ears shut.
    Poor PaulE can’t move on with his life and will probably be spitting on Bush/Cheney’s graves if he outlives them. Perhaps PaulE should write a letter to Hillary Clinton. She along with all the rest of the Congress (except Babara Lee, resident commie from Berkley) voted to go to war with Iraq. Maybe a letter to her and Obama asking them to send a bill to Iraq for war support would be in order. PaulE can send the letter and CC this blog with a scanned copy.

    Like

  3. Paul Emery Avatar

    Todd
    You apparently have no respect for he Constitution which requires an Act of War be declared by Congress before we invade a foreign country. This becomes relevant when the President Obama is referred to as the “liar in chief” and you ignore the actions of your guy, the exiled Bush Jr whose lies were responsible for the death of over 4000 US soldiers, untold numbers if Iraqi’s and trillions of dollars in debt for future generations.
    AS I see it the framers of the Constitution attempted to balance the power of the President as commander-in-chief with that of Congress, the representatives of the People by giving them the sole responsibility to declare war.
    Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution gives to the Executive Branch the command of the nation’s armed forces, while Article I, Section 8 gives to the Legislative Branch the power to decide when the United States goes to war.

    Like

  4. Michael Anderson Avatar

    Todd, I am not a “ilk.” Please make a note of it, thanks.
    I guess unlike the folks you hang out w/ Todd, a little disunity is no big thing to guys like Ben and I.
    I doubt Paul spends much time worrying about Bush II and history, that will take care of itself…but an impeachable offense is an impeachable offense, and Paul’s correct assessment is duly noted.
    The Heritage Foundation is trying to help you Todd! Perhaps you should listen. I don’t care really what you do, but I do know that all this talk about Agenda 21 weakens your position.

    Like

  5. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    PaulE, yeah that vote to use force by your party democrats gets no play from you. Why is that? Regarding the Constitution, I think you need to re-read the document since you pick and choose what you think it says.
    MichaelA, your ilk is an accurate description. You make light of something that is already in place in over 100 jurisdictions in California and is being fought in most of them by people who see its threat. But, since you seem to be a “loyalist” it may be too late for you to come to the light.
    Your dismissive of my point that PaulE should move along was so funny. Almost all of his posts are about the Bush years and the wars. Either you are dense or blind to not admit that fact.
    The Heritage Foundation must be important to you. I never read it, don’t belong to it and don’t quote it. It is simply another group of folks with a POV. For a liberal to use it is the height of dis-ingenuousness.

    Like

  6. TomKenworth Avatar

    Todd, what you forgot that Crabb deleted was our conversation at Chase Bank. You wrote it like the day before? Sharp as a 16 penny nail, square in cross section, found with metal detector.

    Like

  7. Paul Emery Avatar

    Acually Todd the House Dems voted against the resolutions 82-126. The Repubs were 215-6. The Senate Dems supported it 29-21, the Repubs were 48-1. Obama was not yet in the Senate but was not a supporter of the war. That was a major campaign issue in the Dem primary against Hillary.

    Like

  8. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    PaulE, thanks for showing the Resolution to use force, was a bi-partisan vote.

    Like

  9. Michael Anderson Avatar

    I was against the war in Afghanistan after 9-11 (certainly the manner in which it was fought), as well as the illegal 2003 war in Iraq. Both were tar babies designed by the enemy to remove our blood and treasure, which is exactly what they did.
    Did you notice I wrote “the enemy” above? Yeah, that’s because I believe wholeheartedly that the United States of America has many enemies. We just differ in how to deal with the problem.
    I don’t really care who in Congress voted for those wars. Todd is correct in stating that this massively idiotic way of starting out the 21st century was a bipartisan fu(kup.
    So here I sit very happily in Nevada City, waiting and wondering if the bipartisan insanity coming out of Washington D.C. will end the federal gov’t and send the USA down the path of USSR. It might, but it also might not. In the meantime, I have a Plan B, a Plan C, and a Plan 7.
    Stay tuned!

    Like

  10. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    Vote Romney.

    Like

  11. Paul Emery Avatar

    Michael
    I think you misunderstood Todd. He was a solid supporter of both wars and thinks they were constitutional and justified.

    Like

  12. Ben Emery Avatar

    Paul,
    Todd thinks invading sovereign nations is constitutional when republicans do it. I on the other hand spoke/ speak out against the Obama/ Bush/ Clinton/ Bush/ Reagan administrations for entering into military conflict and bombing campaigns because they don’t follow the constitution and have the debate on the floor allowing their constituents to hear the reasons why we should or should not go to war. Both party’s now make their case through marketing on political talk shows and phony claims of imminent threats.

    Like

  13. Michael Anderson Avatar

    Todd, I would very much like to discuss with you my Plan 7. Can we have a lunch? Please get back to me, thanks…M.

    Like

  14. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    You libs can rest easy. I am a war-mongering SOB and if that allows you lefties to feel better, have at it. LOL!

    Like

Leave a comment