Rebane's Ruminations
May 2012
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

Government at its best is a necessary evil, and at its worst, an intolerant one. – Thomas Paine

George Rebane

The contradictory, self-defeating, and citizen oppressing behavior by government at all levels just added two more battle ribbons of stupidity to their banners.

The first is the latest outrage by the feds who deem marijuana consumption illegal across the country in contravention to 17 states which have pronounced it legal.  California is one of the 17, and Nevada County is currently in a white heat debate over its recently passed ordinance prescribing the cultivation of marijuana.

The ordinance is quite draconian, with sufficient measures of all hues in it that 99.44% of the county’s growers can be busted at any time at the discretion of local authorities.  And, of course, they can be arrested and indicted by federal authorities regardless of what California and our county permits.  Our local supes assure us to not worry about the ordinance; that unless you’re really really bad, no one will enforce it.  No such guarantees can be given about the feds.

Marijuana_Illegal
Our congressman Tom McClintock joined with two other House members to introduce a bill that would remove funding for federal marijuana raids.  The bill failed miserably (262-163) with most Dems in favor, and only one in eight Repubs willing to back states’ rights (H/T to reader, more here).  Go figger, but don’t take too long, the problem is not that hard.  As I have long noted, the two cohorts in our society that would have the most to lose if marijuana progressed toward legalization are the drug traffickers and the drug enforcement authorities.  The trade is a cash cow for both, and neither wants the cops and crooks game to go unfunded and, God forbid, stop.  (History buffs will recall that for the same reasons the repeal of prohibition was equally opposed by the police and organized crime.)

Here in California our Governor Moonbeam made the easily predicted announcement today that none of the state’s past tax/fee increases, regulatory additions, green industries, …, none have produced the projected revenues needed to balance California’s so-called budget.  In fact, revenues have plunged enough to increase the recently announced $9B deficit to its current level of $16B.  Enough people have bailed and continue to banzai out of here to make a bad situation worse.

But the pullet pucky politicians in Sacramento are not done.  They have put their cross hairs on those wealth producers still here, and have decided that another round of tax increases is required to finally fix things.  Not having the character or courage to pass such an increase themselves, they have again thrown the measure into the referendum mill, hoping that we would be dumb enough to pass the increase this November.  One of the big lies, reported here before, is that some of the money will go to maintaining classroom services for our kids’ education.  Actually, the new tax money will go to shore up the egregious under funding of teachers’ union pension funds.  The kids will see no benefit.

Anybody willing to do a little wager on the amount of revenue shortfall the new tax increase will create if it passes?

So, dear reader, here is more conclusive proof that the fix-all remedy for government is simply to starve the beast while revising its legal code, abolishing rogue agencies, rewriting its tax code in toto, and returning rights to the states as exquisitely prescribed by our Founders.

Posted in , , ,

72 responses to “Dufus Government – why we need to starve it”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar

    Big question George. It’s probably human nature to want a government (King, Queen, Puntah, Shah whatever) that is warm and cuddly to your personal needs and to act as a big stick for enforcement . Thus some of the same people who opposed NH 2020 as being an assault on their property rights will gladly call in the choppers against those who grow plants on their land they don’t approve of. I have also had to deal with smokers of pot at music events that feel they have the right to light up anywhere anytime claiming “no smoking” doesn’t apply to their indulgence.
    Freedom and liberty require tolerance of behavior you don’t necessarily agree with and temperance of our own behavior that affects others. The intrigue of MJ cultivation and marketing is purely the result of an archaic and obsolete law that under any reasonable evaluation should be repealed. It is also an unjust law because it cannot be effectively and fairly enforced and leaves it up the police to be judge and jury in deciding who to arrest. \
    Ultimately it boils down to allowing the government to inspect our gardens for inappropriate foliage and gassing up helicopters to take photos of our backyards to make sure we are growing permissible petunias and tomatoes and not illegal scrubs.

    Like

  2. Michael Anderson Avatar

    “The first American patriot that shoots down one of these drones that comes too close to his children in his backyard will be an American hero.”
    Judge Andrew Napolitano
    http://rt.com/usa/news/judge-napolitano-drone-government-430/
    Fun times in the 21 century!

    Like

  3. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Need to be careful what you shoot it down with. A water rocket would be hard to aim, but impossible to prove that it was deliberate. A rock might hurt someone. Helium barrage balloons? Fly a large kite, you have just as much right to the air space. Use a mirror to reflect light at the camera lens. WTF Morgan (Jay Leno)
    Do you mean the libertarians here don’t like pot?

    Like

  4. Michael Anderson Avatar

    Keach, I was thinking of something more along the lines of a Barrett M107 or a Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL).

    Like

  5. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    A low to medium powered laser would probably destroy the sensor, but there is a lot of law on the books against blinding pilots, and by extension, I would assume they’d quickly include even a remote pilot. Water balloons and surgical tubing slingshots would be just dandy! An array could be built. Whack-a-drone! If you can grab the wreckage and spirit it off, dump it in the Yuba, it would be hard to prove in court that it didn’t just malfunction.
    “They sent a drone, into the air,
    It fell to earth, they know not where.”
    Boys and their toys….it’s cops and robbers all over again, what a hoot!

    Like

  6. Gregory Avatar

    So many targets, so little time…
    Paul 8:14 afaik I’m the only self proclaimed Libertarian type at RR, and I’ve not been posting on this thread until now so “I’m seeing … some self proclaimed Libertarian types on this blog running too [sic] hide under mama governments [sic] skirt if someone is growing a stinky plant next door” is false on its face. I could not care less about what my neighbors are growing, as long as they and their customers don’t drive faster than 12 mph on the neighborhood road. In general, the left has a hard time dealing with political beliefs that are more Pro Choice, on everything, than they are and both Paul and Keach are guilty as charged.
    “No bong hits for you!” — The Pot Nazi
    Shooting down one of those microdrones just takes a shotgun with target or birdshot loads, so no need to risk the confiscation of very expensive, difficult to acquire and probably felonious to possess (if only because it’s not nice to receive stolen property) military equipment. The piloting of such things is done the same way as any model helicopter… the one with the controls is looking up from the ground. Illuminating it with a laser would do nothing.
    It is amazing how the usual suspect is so devoid of rationality.

    Like

  7. Gregory Avatar

    Prohibition ended when the prohibitionist persecutors couldn’t reliably seat 12 jurors without at least one that, in the end, would not vote guilty.
    Try to get Gary Dusseljee to move back to Nirvana Silly and educate the meeses showing up for jury duty:
    http://www.meetup.com/LibertariansAbroadBangkok/members/12268891/
    I would not bet against GD owning a bong in Bangkok.

    Like

  8. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Amazing how the usual suspect is so devoid of the range of types of drones available. He may also do the experiment with his camera and see what a direct blast from a medium grade laser will do to it. Maybe nothing, but most likely the imperfections of the lens would send the beam to most of the receptors, and some would get the full impact. If nothing else, it would drive the auto exposure all over the map trying to keep up, and possibly play havoc with the auto focus as well.
    Discharging a firearm at night, or on parcels less than fire acres, at least used to be illegal. I wonder if someone’s house is within range of the neighborhood road, for water balloons? Such fun! And here is probably your most likely “Whack-a-drone.”
    http://www.frattoys.com/water-balloon-launcher/basic-water-ballon-cannon.html

    Like

  9. Gregory Avatar

    Keach, show me an RPV, civilian or not, that’s flown by reference to a real time camera image. Cue final Jeopardy! theme, cut a check to the Merv Griffin estate.

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar

    It looks like McClintock is on the popular side on this issue. Around 75% in a recently released poll want the feds to back off Medipot states.
    http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/05/17/americans-support-ending-federal-crackdown-on-medical-marijuana
    Gregory
    Actually you weren’t necessarily one of the NIMBY Libertarians I was referring to but you’re lack of concern for Federal intervention of states rights in this issue is well documented so why not.

    Like

  11. Todd Juvinall Avatar

    It looks like some people on the left actually do have situational ethics. It all depends on whose “ox” is being gored. But if you smoke dope, any pot, oops, I mean port in the storm will work if it is even supported by the devil. What a hoot!

    Like

  12. Gregory Avatar

    “you’re [sic] lack of concern for Federal intervention of states rights in this issue is well documented so why not.”
    I can’t imagine how that hallucination was inspired; Paul, I think you’re just making that up. If it is well documented, it won’t be hard for you to find.

    Like

  13. Gregory Avatar

    “you weren’t necessarily one of the NIMBY Libertarians I was referring to”
    I’m blissfully unaware of any other Libertarians, NIMBY or otherwise, frequenting this blog. Who are you talking about?

    Like

  14. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    So I guess those guys north of Vegas just “envision” the landscape in Afghanistan? The other affects on the camera itself for taking the pictures of the pot still stand.
    We have a new STEM program out on the Ridge. Everybody is building these things:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLOCww5jPbE

    Like

  15. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Too late to be making comments. The other effects of a laser on the auto exposure and focus still stand, for the pot evidence camera, even with a guy on the ground, who would be exposing himself to risk. What if they are meth heads growing pot for their drug of choice? BTW, pole, rc helicopter (high end) and kite cameras occasionally use remote wireless video:
    Here’s just one example in which the pilot uses video glasses and remains on the ground:
    http://www.draganfly.com/uav-helicopter/draganflyer-x6/

    Like

  16. Gregory Avatar

    “Here’s just one example in which the pilot uses video glasses and remains on the ground:”
    My statement stands; it is not being flown by the monitor view from the glasses, and the operator looks in the direction of the drone at all times, the reason the vid monitor is built into the glasses in the first place: because they need to be looking at it, not at a screen somewhere else.
    The video can die and it will still be perfectly controllable.
    Sorry Keach, you lose.

    Like

  17. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Sorry Greg, if you fly the plane over a hill to take advantage of the safety of the hill, and you video conks and you have no line of site to the craft, you lose the craft, unless you can instinctively fly it in a climb up to where you can see it again.
    “UAV Tactical Use
    The Draganflyer X6 helicopter is a revolutionary reconnaissance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV); it can be transported in a lightweight softshell pack with a military grade backpack while always being ready for flight in minutes. Fly it over hills to get a safe view of what is on the other side. Draganflyer X6 Military Applications”
    Would you like to play another round?
    BTW, they have wireless video cams in toy trains that give you a trackside and level view there as well. Tempus Fugit

    Like

  18. Gregory Avatar

    Keach, GPS driven RPV’s like the Draganflyer are also not flown by reference to the video. You lose again. Your problem seems to be a basic misunderstanding of what is needed to control any aircraft.
    The toy train videocam developed by Lionel, and Neil Young, was prototyped in the office I vacated at the Litton Building we (USR) moved to Crown Point Circle

    Like

  19. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Let’s see if I’ve got this right:
    First you said the pilot had to see the plane in the air at all times, hence the glasses.
    Now you say it is gps driven. If you send it over the hill via GPS, what do you use to point the camera,again blind luck? There is a huge hemisphere of possible camera positionings, that changes as the craft moves. You just rolled craps, again, and BTW, this is not the only craft I referenced.
    You not only have to control the aircraft, Greg, you have to come back with usable footage, which is best obtained by being able to see not only where the craft is going, but also what is visible to the camera that takes the images. These may or may not be two different onboard systems.

    Like

  20. Gregory Avatar

    “Let’s see if I’ve got this right”
    Nope. You’re confusing multiple very different vehicles and different issues. The simple devices did not have onboard autopilots with gps, which was the case for the last one, produced for the military. The first one was a simple craft, and the goggles were not virtual reality devices, they merely allowed the guy with the controls to be looking at the craft (like any RC flyer) while being able to also see the video.
    “There is a huge hemisphere of possible camera positionings, that changes as the craft moves.” Yes, and you’ve just stumbled over the problem without noticing. You can’t fly an aircraft by reference to a camera that can be pointed anywhere, you need more information than it can give. Piloting is a different function than gathering surveillance video; none of these were being piloted by reference to the camera. Nor could they.
    “These may or may not be two different onboard systems”
    They are two different systems. More than two.
    I’ve an airplane with an autopilot that gets its roll stabilization (problem one) from a canted gyroscope (turn coordinator), heading info (problem 2) from either GPS, a directional gyro or a nav signal, VOR or LOC, and also has altitude hold and glide slope coupling (problem 3). I also have about 120 hours of logged flying by reference to instruments. It ain’t as easy as it looks. Ask JFK Jr.
    Problem 4 is pointing a camera. There’s a reason you hire Gordo to fly the plane while you point and click.

    Like

  21. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    In my original post, I never said I was limited to “simple devices.” Nor did I state that exact examples could be found in the two links. My internal point of departure was the drones that fly over Afghanistan, ect, and are flown from folks who work at Nellis Air Force base in Nevada:
    “The Predator and Reaper pilots do their debriefings and classroom work at Nellis with weapons school students specializing in other aircraft. They fly the drones from nearby Creech Air Force Base, the control station used to fly drones in Afghanistan and Iraq.”
    ~ http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/07/nation/na-topgun-drone7 ~
    In lower end, sophistication-wise, craft, you could, but not very efficiently, both gather surveillance imaging and guide the craft once it was up in the air from a camera that was mounted in the nose of the craft which could be fixed at a 30 degree downward angle, with respect to the line of flight. Better would be to have the same camera capable of tilting from say minus 45 degrees to plus 15. So the two functions (of piloting (at least once up in the air and before landing) the craft and shooting images) could be combined into one camera.
    BTW, I helped dear brother (back in the late 1960’s) install WWII surplus gyro horizons into his and his friends’ sailplanes, and no it is not as simple as one might like. For fun, you might enjoy checking out Kite Aerial Photography, and the complex rigs that are used accomplish the feats. The all time classic, however is the San Francisco Waterfront, as captured from a string of kites
    “One of Lawrence’s world renowned photographs is of the ruins of San Francisco, California after the 1906 earthquake. It is a 160-degree panorama from a kite taken 2000 feet (600 m) in the air above the San Francisco Bay that showed the entire city on a single 17-by-48-inch contact print made from a single piece of film. Each print sold for $125 and Lawrence made at least $15,000 in sales from this one photograph. The camera used in this photograph weighed 49 pounds (22 kg) and used a celluloid-film plate. [3]
    In 2006, Juneau-based photographer Ronald Klein built a working replica of Lawrence’s camera and used it to rephotograph San Francisco from about the same location (but from a helicopter, not a kite), 100 years after the earthquake. The rephotograph was actually taken by Mark Walsh, George R. Lawrence’s great grandson, who rode in the helicopter, held the camera, and clicked the shutter.”
    ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Lawrence_%28photographer%29 ~

    Like

Leave a comment