Rebane's Ruminations
April 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary which was broadcast on 27 April 2012.  I have annotated it with notes and links as appropriate.]

One of the nation’s premier demographers Democrat Joel Kotkin was recently interviewed by the WSJ on his study of ‘The Great California Exodus’, that has been vehemently denied by the state’s progressive pundits and local leftists.  Kotkin reviewed the grand history of the golden state and its downward spiral that is now entering its third decade.  This demographer has been busy for a number of years studying and publishing on our economic and demographic decline.  (for more google ‘joel kotkin, california exodus’)

Among the more recent developments is that the great exodus which started with corporations – no one wants to expand in California – grew to include the well-to-do, and now includes middle class workers who are priced out its real estate markets, and taxed out of their income and ability to save.  Kotkin points out that California ranks at or near the bottom on every important comparison of the states ranging from ‘ease of doing business’ through cost of living to individual liberties.   Along with states like Illinois and New Jersey, we have become the poster child of how not to govern a state.

Where California used to invite the founding of innovative companies such as those which gave us Silicon Valley, today the main product of California, according to Kotkin, is red tape.  He goes on to explain that “part of California's dysfunction … stems from state and local government restrictions on development.”

That “local government” part hits home here in Nevada County.  Our county’s population has been stagnant for the last decade.  Both businesses and developers have been taking a pass on the county for some years now claiming that it is just too hard to get anything done in these foothills.  The leftwing activists, of course, celebrate this as an achievement in their eternal quest for a sustainable stasis.  And our local municipal and county governments have long had a bi-partisan effort to support these prohibitions and delays.  The cynical part of all this is the expressed denial by our electeds as they give lip service to promote yet another business development workshop or public meeting.


But the latest corroboration of Joel Kotkin’s documented downfall is what our Governor is now setting us up for.  The state is broke and has unfunded liabilities that total way north of a half a trillion dollars (that’s trillion like with twelve zeros).  The road to our insolvency is paved with public employee pension agreements that are both underfunded and already taking wrenching bites out of local government budgets, putting more cities and counties on the brink of Chapter 9 bankruptcy.  This situation is so well known internationally that it is even familiar to the man on the street in Athens, while at the same time being denied by every progressive worth his salt in California.

So what is Moonbeam doing?  He promoting a new tax hike – yes, our plan is to tax ourselves back to prosperity – a tax hike that we are told will go to help our underfunded schools.  But as newspapers like the Wall Street Journal report, “The dirty little secret is that the new revenues are needed to backfill the insolvent teachers pension fund.”, which means that the tax hike is a fraud.  This was made clear to the board of CalSTRS, the California State Teachers Retirement System, a sister pension fund manager to the catastrophically underfunded CalPERS which manages pension funds for other public employees at all levels of government in California.

According to an actuarial report, none of the new tax hike monies will go to education in the sense that we citizens understand and expect.  The anticipated $3-5B annually will go to shore up the large deficits in the teachers’ pension funds and health benefits so that the teachers won’t have to increase their contributions from existing salaries to an already lavish retirement program.  Today a teacher can retire at age 60 and receive $54,000 a year for life.

The big lie foisted by Democrats in Sacramento is that the tax hike will benefit education and education-related services.  In reality it will do none of that, and accomplish only the postponement of “critical pension reforms that might otherwise take place”.  And that may be the plan from the party that owes so much to the public service employee unions.

Please consider this exit question – how long will California’s liberal voter majority continue to elect representatives who have nothing to show for their accomplishments over the last decades except a looming bankruptcy and ‘The Great California Exodus’?

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on these and other themes in my Union columns, and on georgerebane.com where this transcript appears.  These opinions are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

[28apr12 update]  Today Russ Steele posted ‘Prop 23 update …' on NC2012, a sister piece to the above, and lit off a lively debate between Mr Steven Frisch, head of the Sierra Business Council and a leading progressive voice in the region.  Mr Frisch, whose comments also appear in these pages, is a strong proponent of AB32, California’s gonzo green blast into the gut now ravaging the state’s economy, and promising to soon kick into high gear under the implementation programs and tender mercies of CARB.  It’s a lively debate in which Mr Frisch sees nothing but happy dancing in the streets for Californians once AB32 really gets rolling, and seems totally blind to the catastrophe that drives the California exodus.  The phalanx of opposition has left him completely unfazed.

However, the fine back-and-forth arguments presented there are somewhat moot and overshadowed by the facts grounded by available data – people and businesses are leaving California, and that’s that.  And it isn’t only the rich leaving the state.  Kotkin has shown that in the last 20 years, a NET of 4 million middle class Californians have departed for greener pastures as the exodus grows.

Posted in , , ,

59 responses to “Sacramento vs California (updated 28apr12)”

  1. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    It will be a lot of kids growing up with a Clockwork Orange attitude towards life. As a matter of principle I would not take on teaching as a scab. And frankly, at this point in my life I have no desire to spend a full year in a classroom with today’s students, parents, administrators, and voters, and I suspect most other retirees would feel the same. Good luck with a teacher and their unions bashing society, it will make such a great world for your grandchildren.
    Just finished a conversation with an old high school friend on FB, She’s in Utah, and the school district (no unions) just abolished her pension altogether, with a small lump sum payment. The goal of school districts is to pay as little as possible and get as much as possible, just like any corporation. The goal of teachers’ unions is to avoid teachers getting beat up in this voter installed and controlled blender.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    DougK 1010am – I am a longtime proponent of meritocracy in teaching. Public K-12 systems eschew that attribute, or at least make it low on the list of desiderata for teaching. That’s why vouchers and tax credits for education are better solutions. The well run public K-12 systems will then do much better when they have to compete for students.

    Like

  3. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    I too believe in a meritocracy for teachers, but you cannot evaluate teachers just on test scores. As a teacher of over 30 years experience, I have written up a system that allows for fair evaluations, and improvements.
    http://farstars.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-evaluating-teachers-in-fair-and.html

    Like

  4. Gregory Avatar

    The goal of teachers unions is to maximize pay and benefits, and ensure no dues paying teacher gets fired without a fight. School boards try to do more than pay lip service to rewarding good teachers and removing bad ones, but it isn’t easy.
    It certainly is both possible and fair to use student test-based value-added analysis for teacher evaluations. Leave it to Keachie to design a teacher evaluation system that relies only on teachers; what is important is how much students learn, not whether a teacher can impress other teachers while on stage.
    “I am beset with a brain that comes up with outside-the-box observations, and ideas about improving things…” -Keachie
    Indeed. Outside the box is good, if it’s a small box constraining good practice. If inside the box is reality and outside is fantasy… not so good. Keach, you’ve the wrong box to be outside of.

    Like

  5. Gregory Avatar

    “As a matter of principle I would not take on teaching as a scab.” – Keachie
    I think that shows Keachie puts Union membership above teaching, as if there was any doubt.

    Like

  6. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    No Greg it means I put quality teaching in a quality environment, above simply getting a paycheck, like engineers who will not design equipment for human or animal torture.

    Like

  7. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    “School boards try to do more than pay lip service to rewarding good teachers and removing bad ones, but it isn’t easy.”
    Of course it is easy. You just make sure your charter school teachers can get higher salaries than your regular school teachers, and preferably a higher salary that the principal at their school, and that no superintendent makes more than double the top teacher’s salary. Piece of cake! but alack and alas, they just don’t do it, despite all the handwringing over rewarding teachers, which is all just so much Bushwah.
    There is plenty of room in my system for test scores, and parent and student input. Easy enough to make part of: “would have the results of the initial judging reviewed by 3 professional judges, teachers already rated excellent, on leave for a year of judging, who rate the teacher in 10 to 20 areas, on numerical scales.”

    Like

  8. Gregory Avatar

    Sorry, Keach, but you’re even more incoherent than usual. Word association football. In the last century, teacher’s unions in California have presided over a tanking of quality, putting union members in charge of teacher evaluations would make things even worse. As in Lake Woebegone, all teachers would be above average unless they were, shall we say, “scabs”.
    Then there’s the statistic that 94% of teacher’s union political donations have gone to Democrats, which points out where all those dues go. The state going bankrupt would just about destroy the politicians they have invested in so diligently over the years.
    There is no role in your “system” for the adult supervision that is in place. Just ask Principals and Superintendents about your idea and they’ll laugh all the way to the next board meeting.

    Like

  9. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Do you want teacher evaluation, or school site politics? I’ve seen the beast from the inside, and that’s why I set it up the way I did.
    You want to take one of your imaginary super teachers and put them in a real school, and here is what would happen. Little Johnny McNasty and his parents would get totally upset as your super teacher righteously flunks the little twit, and then the begin pounding the table, in the principal’s office, and at the school board meetings. This will happen repeatedly, and the teacher will be identified as a “problem,” not by the Union at first, just the principal and school board. Eventually the latter two will start to lean on the union, and eventually the wheels will roll to get the teacher to leave.
    Case in point. A student at a nearby school flunks everything but music during the fall semester, but wants to play in the spring. The parents lean on the music teacher, the principal, and the school board. The teacher now feel his job is threatened, and gives the student a chance to make up some work, and raises his grade. The upshot of it all is that the student takes a shot at a coach on an away game, and soon a major fight breaks out, and the entire team is suspended for the season.
    Neither the teachers nor the unions are in control, and your shining knight teachers will hit the same walls the rest of us do. BTW, the story is true, and happened just this year, and got extensive news coverage. That’s how the schools roll today, and it is not the fault of the teachers or their unions. It is the fault of principals and school boards caving into parents of highly dysfunctional students.
    You know so little about the insides of public schools that you should disqualify yourself immediately from taking any more such silly stands.

    Like

Leave a comment