Rebane's Ruminations
April 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

InternetToday it is very difficult to reconfigure networks because you have to deal with hardwired components like routers, switches, and servers which have been manufactured by network suppliers like Cisco and Juniper to handle the stream of data packets in their own specific ways.  Modifying a network is a nightmare of hardware reconfiguration and clumsy/limited system programming.  Today network hardware operators are a highly paid group of technicians doing such things that few people understand.

The response to this growing friction in developing new networks with expanded capabilities comes from a Silicon Valley company called Nicira.  The company is built on the technology out of the 2007 PhD dissertation of its CTO Martin Casado.  Dr Casado invented a better way to ‘program networks’ on existing or cobbled together cheaper hardware.   These new architectures will be virtual networks operating virtual servers and using virtual storage on arbitrary and/or existing hardware configurations within an enterprise or out in the internet cloud.

The big deal is that the virtual networks – their configuration and operation – are totally under software control, and that means they can be quickly reconfigured (on the fly); and with even more smarts built in, they can reconfigure themselves to improve performance, be more facile in managing data, and interfacing with all kinds of other systems on the periphery of the network.  The online Wired has a good article on all this here.  Nicira is already working with some very big outfits in implementing this next phase of network technology.

To me the excitement here is that such reprogrammable virtual networks take us a giant step closer to what I believe is the most likely candidate for the Singularity event that I have described before in these pages.  And that is when the cloud spontaneously ‘wakes up’ and becomes sentient.  Dynamic reprogramming of networks to implement new processing algorithms, new data handling techniques, and whole new computing paradigms (mimicking human brain structures?) is a required capability for this event to happen.  Virtualizing networks will hasten the day when it says, ‘I’m here.’

Posted in , ,

5 responses to “Singularity Signposts – The Coming Virtual Cloud”

  1. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    It will be interesting to see if the new system will limit it’s reconfigurations to predefined parameters, or take initiative and start out pacing the original programmers.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    ScottO 209pm – that’s a good point, and it depends what kind of self-optimization algorithms are implemented within what scope in the virtual network. I would be surprised if there will not be routines written which allow the virtual network to explore and discover/update its hardware substratum so as to expand its ‘art of the possible’.

    Like

  3. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Here at IBM, we have our Smart Cloud (I work for this division) implementations which behave very much like this, although the Cloud and it’s associated infrastructure isn’t as self-healing and configuring as Mr. Casado may wish.
    I would love a network that could do this for me. To some extent, my other platforms already do this. And why not? Why should I have to build a new house each time I move? I just just want to move in.
    IBM’s Smart Cloud offering is downright spectacular. We can throw-up a multi-site, redundant, geographically disperse (as in sites around the globe) infrastructure (DB2 Databases, Websphere app servers, and others) in a matter of a couple of hours.
    At the hardware and app-level, we already pretty much have what Mr. Casado is proposing. We just need data center remote hands (employees) to rack servers and start them up. With regards to the networks, and I’ve mentioned this in other discussion, the Cisco paradigm is a real fiscal pain point. They’re expensive and there’s a priesthood that goes along with managing their equipment. I would be quite pleased to turn them into a commodity and have a very simple and light admin layer for managing my networks.
    This ain’t Skynet, this is value for my customers.

    Like

  4. Michael Anderson Avatar

    Hi guys, pretty interesting stuff for sure. Thanks for the article, George. Dealing with the limitations of the physical and data link layers is still where I have some questions.
    I downloaded the DVNI white paper and gave it a quick read. There’s nothing specifically referencing the OSI model, but I’m assuming DVNI virtualizes at least layers 3 through 6.
    As Ryan notes, for the Internet to work we still need “data center remote hands (employees) to rack servers and start them up.” Robots could certainly manage the physical labor here, but I need to understand if/how DVNI works at layers 1 and 2.
    And of course, everything still will come to a grinding halt when the machine gets turned off accidently, or someone plugs the Ethernet cable into the wrong NIC. I think the Singularity is still a ways out (-;

    Like

  5. Ryan Mount Avatar

    Michael-
    We’re also using organic organisms (people) to monitor all this stuff too. However a lot of that is automated as well.

    Like

Leave a comment