Rebane's Ruminations
November 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

On these pages I have argued long and hard that the permissive environment in which mortgage lenders made subprime loans was carefully constructed and energetically promoted by the congressional social engineering programs of the Democratic Party augmented by a klatch of RINOs. Yesterday’s announced retirement by Rep Barney Frank (D-MA), one of the prime perpetrators of Depression2, motivated this post of the record pointed to by an RR reader.

Since the 2008 election we have heard the constant and now-famous wail from our President, echoed by Democrats in Congress, that seeks to absolve him and his cohort of any contribution to the present financial mess.

BushsFault
Actually, Mr President, it wasn’t.  The sequence of events presented below was taken from President Bush’s White House website in September 2008, and it is open for refutation by anyone who can show that the public record is in error.  (Source: NiceDeb)


For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.  Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President’s repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.

2001
April: The Administration’s FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

2002
May: The President calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in his 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
2003
January: Freddie Mac announces it has to restate financial results for the previous three years.
February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that “although investors perceive an implicit Federal guarantee of [GSE] obligations,” “the government has provided no explicit legal backing for them.”  As a consequence, unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market.  (“Systemic Risk: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Role of OFHEO,” OFHEO Report, 2/4/03).
September: Fannie Mae discloses SEC investigation and acknowledges OFHEO’s review found earnings manipulations.
September: Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact “legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises” and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.
October: Fannie Mae discloses $1.2 billion accounting error.
November: Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any “legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk.”  To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have “broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards” and “receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE.”  (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03).

2004
February: The President’s FY05 Budget againhighlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital, and called for creation of a new, world-class regulator:  “The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore…should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator.”  (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)
February: CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to “not take [the financial market’s] strength for granted.”  Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by “ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator.”  (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, “Keeping Fannie And Freddie’s House In Order,” Financial Times, 2/24/04).
June: Deputy Secretary of Treasury Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and called for reform, saying “We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system.  Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs:  Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System.”  (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04).

2005
April: Treasury Secretary John Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying “Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America… Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system.”  (Secretary John W. Snow, “Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee,” 4/13/05).

2007
July: Two Bear Stearns hedge funds invested in mortgage securities collapse.
August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying “first things first when it comes to those two institutions.  Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options.”  (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, The White House, 8/9/07).
September: RealtyTrac announces foreclosure filings up 243,000 in August – up 115 percent from the year before.
September: Single-family existing home sales decreases 7.5 percent from the previous month – the lowest level in nine years.  Median sale price of existing homes fell six percent from the year before.
December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying “These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I’ve called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs – and ensures they focus on their important housing mission.  The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start.  But the Senate has not acted.  And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon.”  (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, The White House, 12/6/07).

2008
January: Bank of America announces it will buy Countrywide.
January: Citigroup announces mortgage portfolio lost $18.1 billion in value.
February: Assistant Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, says “A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully.”  (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08).
March: Bear Stearns announces it will sell itself to JPMorgan Chase.
March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and “move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages.”  (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08).
April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and “modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by … helping people stay in their homes.”  (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08).
May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.

•    “Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans.”   (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08).
•    “[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that – and Congress is making progress on this – is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator.”  (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08).
•    “Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans.”  (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08).

June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying “we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.”  (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08).
July: Congress heeds the President’s call for action and passes reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.

Posted in , , ,

99 responses to “How We Got Here – Looking at the Bush2 Record”

  1. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    “And D. King – I never called all of you ‘crackers’, just appealing to Rebane’s affinity for pejoratives (raghead, liberals, etc.) – but I can see how a member of this e-centipede would perceive inclusion.”
    Well, at least we’re not in the energy infrastructure destroying, global warming, socialist adoring, “it’s Bush’s fault”, conga line!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Go7M9yjUyU

    Like

  2. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Guano, hmmm, yeah, you have what facts? Please enlighten us oh phony named one. What a hoot! Don’t you know a person using a phony name can’t claim slander or libel? Besides, you seem to be the angry liberal here. We all get along fine.

    Like

  3. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Paul, imagine the discussions we could have if Reality was the starting point and not the end game after wave after wave of the myths Progressives knowingly tell each other come crashing onto the rocks.
    In the ’90’s Gingrich tamed the federal budget, if for a time. For his reward he got perhaps the most relentlessly negative press of any public figure in the US. Ever. Hounded out of the Congress for what the House counse said was Income Tax law violations, and it took a couple years for the IRS to say, no, there was no violation. Gingrich was cutting close to the line, but didn’t stray over.
    I see Guano is back. Sorry guy, but your ‘facts’ don’t hold up, like your partisan spew of “Focusing on Fannie & Freddie is a C.Y.A. Karl Rove talking point for the ill-informed”. No one believes that. You’re sounding more and more like the FUE channeling Thornton. Here’s a fact… just prior to the meltdown, the GSE twins had about 91% of the mortgage backed securities market.
    http://financialservices.house.gov/UploadedFiles/052511sifma.pdf
    They’re not in the loan origination business, but their business partners, like mortgage banks, are.

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    Administrivia: I did delete the little personal mudball exchange between ToddJ and the ‘Steve Wynn’ that the latter started. But ToddJ appears to be right about Steve Wynn being a sock puppet (aka sackhead). He never did answer my 941am.

    Like

  5. Steve Wynn Avatar
    Steve Wynn

    Sorry Woodsy, I was a bit busy and (I know it’sd hard for you to believe) don’t hang on every word that you and Toddy post. I get enough humor in my day without being at your beck and call.
    If you want to use Todd Juvinall as your basis for accuracy I’m really surprised as someone with 2 degrees and being a former director I thought you were smarter than that?
    But then again, maybe I’m wrong?

    Like

  6. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Greg
    I didn’t have a bad thing to say about the Newt. The contract with America was a brilliant political move and very effective.
    Yes, Gingrich tamed and balanced the budget then watched Bush destroy it with tax cuts and unfunded wars. That was the time to pass a balanced budget amendment (2000) but the Repubs dropped the ball and waited till the Dems were in control to make it an issue after allowing the deficit to double under Bush 2. My guess is that they didn’t want to balance the budget because they would prefer to run up the national credit card so support defense contractors and international adventures . Pretty smart actually. They get what they want and don’t take responsibility or make it an issue till the Dems are in control.
    Greg, can you show me any examples where the Bush team really made a balanced budget amendment a priority?

    Like

  7. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Greg, the sock puppet SteveW is calling you Woodsy. What a hoot.

    Like

  8. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Isn’t it interesting that we place our names here and the sock puppets of our local lefty crowd are too scared to do the same. They always go personal, never addressing the post.

    Like

  9. Steve Wynn Avatar
    Steve Wynn

    Maybe you should speak with Greg Goodnight (as there is no such person) and you and your fellow puppeteers can go out and play with each other?
    Todd, you certainly are not the sharpest knife in the drawer, so let’s try to not give anyone advice as your record is not one that I would be proud of!

    Like

  10. George Rebane Avatar

    ToddJ – I think that SteveW’s 234pm was directed at me since he accused me of also being ‘Woodsy’ in his 919am “… Woodsy, aka George …”. However, I will let him clear this up, else he’s among the dear departed on this blog. In any case, since he has trouble counting – I have three degrees – that may explain why most of the stuff here may be out of his reach. (But I am intrigued about ‘Woodsy’; anyone know where this alleged sackhead posts?)

    Like

  11. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    SteveW, you are a sock puppet and have no guts to place your name here as we do. Greg is a real person since I have met him in person and he is not Woodsy (I know Woodsy personally). There are no puppeteers here except you and guano so we just laugh at you. Regarding being proud of something. Hmmm. Let me see. SteveW, sock puppet, coward, Todd Juvinall, twice elected by the people of the county. Golly, I actually exist. You are a troll and are using a very successful man’s name from Las Vegas. What a hoot.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Woodsy posts at my blog but has been away for a couple of months. I saw him at Friar Tuck’s when I was there for dinner. Woodsy doesn’t use his real name because the sock puppets like this SteveW character were trying to find him and go after his work.

    Like

  13. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Funny, you guys don’t seem to have any compunctions about coming after me at work. Don’t you think this is a bit of a double standard, Mr. Juvinall?

    Like

  14. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    You call what you do work? Amazing.

    Like

  15. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hypocrite…thy name is Todd.

    Like

  16. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    This is really getting silly. I need to call my friends and ask them to tune in.
    Back somewhat to the original topic of the this post-Bush’s performance as Pres. Can anyone answer my question as to why the Repubs didn’t pursue a balanced budget amendment in 2000 when the budget was indeed balanced and the deficit was indeed being paid down?

    Like

  17. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Any time Frisch arrives the childish behavior of a liberal is exposed.

    Like

  18. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    How about my question Todd? It’s totally relevant to the topic of this post.

    Like

  19. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 459pm – think back to 2000 when the markets crashed and the dotcom bubble burst. Everyone with a 3-digit IQ knew that 1) the balanced budget was a flash in the pan, and 2) with the country facing a recession, such an amendment would have a snow ball’s chance in hell. Nobody was willing spend political capital pushing a DOA loser.

    Like

  20. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE, I think they didn’t have the 2/3rds number.

    Like

  21. Walt Avatar
    Walt

    So we have THREE Steve’s now..Interesting…. So is this the one that dreamed up George’s multiple personalities in The Union’s thread?
    But George might pick up a few more readers out of the deal.
    This guy is new on the block, and had no clue what he’s getting into.Wasn’t it you ( Steve3) that whined about “adult talk” on George’s page, and was happy The Union had a “baby sitter” and hiding behind “Guest”?

    Like

  22. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    But the Repubs ran the show? Whys is it a good idea today and not then?

    Like

  23. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 550pm – Because today the country is on its ass economically, has had its credit rating downgraded, and will crash and burn if the can gets kicked down the road some more. There is no more slack in the system, we’re running on empty. (I know this is a view totally foreign to the Left.)

    Like

  24. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE what about 2/3rds don’t you understand?
    Walt, welcome back. The three Steve’s, sounds like a bad Amigo movie. LOL!

    Like

  25. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Paul Emery has met me. Not sure why Wynn thinks I don’t exist. Pelline has met my kid. Coito ergo sum.
    Wynn must be a figment of a deranged imagination.
    By the way, Wynn, I don’t know of any “Greg Goodnight” in town either. But I am.

    Like

  26. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    Guano @10:00am: “just appealing to Rebane’s affinity for pejoratives (raghead, liberals, etc.) Well, bat guano, you are 100% spot on. Calling anyone a liberal is indeed a pejorative. Look at all the liberal saps running away from that title and ducking under the more palatable term “progressive”. Yep, any liberal knows that being called a liberal is the kiss of death after the scandalous way liberals have behaved, and worse, they way they think. Liberal is an insulting pejorative and is the lowest name you could ever ever call someone slithering out of the primordial ooze

    Like

  27. George Rebane Avatar

    C’mon BillT, cut the marshmallows, tell us what you really think 😉

    Like

  28. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    I think it is high time we stop criticizing Steve Wynn. I, for one, actually like what he has to say: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FATx3ijm_xg&feature=related

    Like

  29. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    We should not dis Steve Wynn, we should listen to him http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdrxfFFeMbc

    Like

  30. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    Steve Wynn was a big Obama supporter and donor. Now he is watching the carnage. There is hope even for a life long Dem like Mr. Wynn. He is a true patriot. http://www.moneynews.com/StreetTalk/Wynn-Obama-dishonest-economy/2011/10/21/id/415290

    Like

  31. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    Stevie, you saved the best for last. Thank you Steve Wynn for your courage http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu-P_lK-NeU&feature=related

    Like

  32. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George, Todd
    Actually even hard core Conservatives have a hard time with the idea of a Balanced Budged Amendment. That’s probably why it’s never seriously considered and is only used as a dividing point in political garbage talk. Count on it never happening
    Norman Ornstein, of the conservative American Enterprise Institute, regards the measure as a bad idea.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-a-balanced-budget-amendment-is-too-risky/2011/07/18/gIQAn3PhMI_story.html
    “That this amendment has been endorsed by all 47 Republicans in the Senate, and that a dozen Republicans have pledged not to increase the debt limit without the amendment, are sad commentaries on our politics. But the effects should this amendment be adopted would be frightening.”
    “I am not against balanced budgets,” he wrote on the subject. “But a constitutional requirement to balance the federal budget is a virtual guarantee that we will have economic catastrophes that will make the Great Depression look like a picnic.”

    Like

  33. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE, I actually think a balanced budget amendment is unworkable. California has one and look at how creative the politicians are in working around it and still overspending. I am also against term limits becasue as we see, California’s term limits have backfired and we are worse off. At least even that old goat Willie Brown worked within the income. Anything we the people do to put the fix on the politicians will never work. The only thing that keeps the damage limited by them is to create gridlock and/or never put them in session.
    I think Steve Wynn the mogul is a great guy, thanks Bill for the links. The local Steve Wynn, the sock puppet coward, has to be a liberal. They are so nasty.

    Like

  34. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE – I agree with ToddJ that the naked balanced budget amendment is unworkable. To make a workable one requires a lot of contingencies for allowable debt. Even though I think that these could be wordsmithed, the politics required for getting such an amendment passed is beyond my ken.

    Like

  35. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George, Todd
    I also don’t believe in term limits. How long I chose to support someone in office is my business. Personally I think two terms is max for any office (sorry Nate) but it should be my choice.
    I think a balanced budget is possible if we tax ourselves to pay for last years spending. A simple across the board increase will do. That way we will never accumulate debt for more than one year. If we go over budget then we pay the next year. Is that too simple? That way we pay for wars as we fight them and we feel it in our pocketbook. The greatest way to stop wars is to pay as you go and have a draft (no one excluded} That way everyone feels the pinch.
    We would have left Iraq years ago if we paid to fight.
    So what happens to the 47 Repubs that have pledged to make no deals without a balanced budget amendment? They need an exit plan for sure.

    Like

  36. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE – I’m not so convinced about opposing term limits. The notion of citizen politicians who serve for a while and then get back to the real world is still attractive to me, although I do understand the hanky-panky with all that.
    Re the balanced budget. I think we danced that dance not too long ago. If I recall, my counter was that this year’s fed budget cannot be larger than the revenues collected last year (with, of course, all the emergency contingencies thrown in).

    Like

  37. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    That will work George but what happens when you have an unfunded war or an economic downturn that yields less tax revenue. What happens when the economy does not grow but fixed expenses either stay the same or increase. Does the capitalist model you see as the funder of the government have to rely on constant growth? We know that there are recessions as a natural cycle of business so when we have one doesn’t that lead to deficit and debt?

    Like

  38. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE – as I mentioned, “unfunded wars” and “economic downturns” would be among the emergency contingencies I mentioned. The former we would not have any more – we get in a fight, we fund the fight. In economic downturns (“natural business cycles”) we tighten our belts and spend less; the government also has to adapt as does the private sector. Keynesian papering over a recession/depression has not worked; it only makes it harder to dig out than letting the markets clear. In any event, we must always remember that the current method does not work.

    Like

  39. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Thanks for your clarity on this. Let me indulge you in this perhaps not so hypothetical question. What happens if the markets are controlled by interests, foreign of domestic that are not the best interests of our country?

    Like

  40. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Good question Paul, kind of reminds me of the hydro-electric dam being blown up.

    Like

  41. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE 1135am – What happens then is exactly what is happening now. To the extent that they can such interests do exert their influence on the markets. The solution is sunshine and transparency, not purposive control, especially by governments. The last thing you want is to destroy the working of the price mechanism of open markets, even if the price mechanism is a bit flawed already and takes a while to communicate ‘truth’. Control of markets has always been the objective of all who trade in them, whether by means honorable or devious.

    Like

  42. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Fascinating topic George. The next question I have is what do you believe is the appropriate roll of government in creating regulations and acting as a traffic cop so to speak. Obviously we need some regulations, without going into details what do you think they need to be? This I think is a huge question and very relevant today.

    Like

  43. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE – agreed. My starting point of government’s duty in markets is to enforce the general notion of ‘truth’ in all market communications, and to be the arbiter of contract conflicts. A good starting point for expanding the discussion here is this short pdf ‘The End of Market Failure’.
    http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv23n2/zerbe.pdf

    Like

  44. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Thanks George I’ll read it

    Like

  45. David Smith Avatar
    David Smith

    I find it interesting that Steve Wynn is quoted in the Union today….. Oh well, so much for not exisiting in the county.

    Like

  46. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Steve Wynn is a sock puppet and was in the Union because he/she placed it there. He was not interviewed by the Union. It is an old ploy to gain legitimacy for a sock puppet. It is also a ploy to use a real common name like David Smith. Or John Jones. I think you are one as well.

    Like

  47. Steve Wynn Avatar
    Steve Wynn

    Shhhhh Toddy, it’s time for your medications as you seem to have some real problems with reality. Maybe you should call the reporter who called me about the windstorm, and ask him, before you continue your insanity?

    Like

  48. RL Crabb Avatar

    Another sign of rabid dingbatism: paranoid delusions.

    Like

  49. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Shh, Steve Wynn the sock puppet. She didn’t call you, you submitted. It is OK, Crabb has called your malady.

    Like

Leave a comment