Rebane's Ruminations
November 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

[This article on Agenda 21, emphasizing its history in the US, was sent to me by Judi Caler, co-founder of Reclaiming our American Rights (ROAR!).  It was also published in the Nov 2011 edition of the CABPRO News.  gjr]

Judi Caler

Several months ago, a young Executive Director of a community nonprofit volunteered to help a Grass Valley citizens group approach our local elected officials in order to affect public policy on an important issue. Having been a lobbyist and political activist in the past, I didn’t think I would learn anything new. I was wrong.

Peoples’ lives are being hijacked, compliments of the United Nations and their Agenda 21 (AKA Sustainable Development); our young people, products of our public “educational” system, don’t understand how representative government was intended to work by the founders of our country. They have been indoctrinated to accept without question what is imposed upon them, and also to help impose that doctrine upon others.

Agenda 21 is the 1992 United Nations plan for the global elite to control every facet of our lives—what we have, what we do, where we live, where we go, what we eat, etc. President George H.W. Bush signed Agenda 21 for the United States along with the leaders of 178 other nations. It was deliberately designed as a non-binding “soft law” document, not a treaty, so as to avoid the Senate confirmation process.

President Clinton followed up by creating the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) by Executive Order in 1993 for the purpose of implementing Agenda 21 in the United States. He thus laid the foundation to restructure our political process to conform to a one world government.

To further carry out Agenda 21, President Obama, by Executive Order in June 2011 established the White House Rural Council to exercise control over rural America in education, food supply, land use, water use, recreation, property, energy, and the lives of 16% of the U.S. population.

The PCSD produced “Toward A Sustainable America” in 1999. Among its 16 “We Believe” statements is Number 8:

“We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions; more rapid change; and more sensible use of human, natural and financial resources in achieving our goals.”

In other words, the constitution was getting in the way of their plans. The “old” political process involved private citizens lobbying their local elected officials to adopt policy; vigorous open debate on both sides; and an eventual public vote by elected officials. Sustainable Development couldn’t take hold across America if this process were allowed to continue. And so the “consensus” or “visioning” process was born.

The consensus process bypasses local government officials, and cumbersome argument and debate; early participants are handpicked and friendly. Through stakeholder meetings, the public is given the impression that a broad spectrum of the community’s citizenry is engaged.

A typical stakeholder meeting is run by a highly trained, highly paid facilitator. His or her job is to drive a consensus sympathetic to the desired outcome of the project and marginalize any opposition. Stakeholders are persons or groups with no legal interest in the property in question, such as environmental nonprofits, dictating the use of that property to the owner. Shills are sometimes hired to join in the “consensus.”

The new process is most often accompanied by a government grant that local elected officials rarely reject, especially if the local community has been told that the grant is awarded to help usher in “sustainability.” Organizations such as the American Planning Association are provided funding to produce plans and procedures that are ready-made for local governing bodies to approve.

Only after the plan is essentially developed is the governing body called upon to give it the force of law by a formal vote. If the governing bodies do not vote as expected, the threat of a lawsuit is not uncommon. Once the new decision-making process has been established, it can be used to develop policy in all areas embraced by sustainable development, i.e. economics, social justice, education and the environment.

There can be no accountability to the people when public policy is developed by government-funded advocacy groups, administrators or bureaucrats. Individual freedom is lost as property rights are eroded. Local authority is thus removed from elected officials, and control moves up to the regional or state level or higher. Top-down government management of local communities is achieved.

To find Agenda 21 operating in your community, watch for the buzzwords (partial list): sustainable, social justice, smart growth, public/private partnership, common good, collaborative, vision/visioning, affordable, livable, walkable, consensus, stakeholder, International, regional, endangered species…

Reclaiming Our American Rights (ROAR!) is a Nevada County citizens group fighting Agenda 21. We have available a new slide show presentation entitled “What Is Sustainable Development?” It is intended as an introduction to Agenda 21, a subject we need to understand if our freedoms are to survive. To join ROAR or to arrange a showing for your group, big or small, please contact us at unagenda21@hotmail.com.

Judi Caler lives in Nevada City. She founded AnimalSave and co-founded ROAR!

Posted in , ,

102 responses to “Local Government—An Oxymoron?!”

  1. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hey, its NH2020 all over again! Isn’t it quaint that no matter how much things change they always somehow seem to remain the same?

    Like

  2. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    “Individual freedom is lost as property rights are eroded.” I don’t like people messing with my rights. The Constitution and Bill of Rights are about rights. A true democracy is ruled by the majority, but we live in a Republic. In a Republic the rights of the individual are protected from the majority. The rights of private property include the freedom to exclude those from one’s property as inherent in the right of association. And to the Republic for which it stands….

    Like

  3. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Bill, that is spot on why America is different. We placed property rights on a protected position because without its protection no other right means anything. When the USSR went belly up, one of the first things Yeltsin did was invite a cadre of people in the “real property” business over to Russia to train them in all the aspects of land ownership. The Rooskies even put a more protective set of articles and wording in their new Constitution regarding property rights.
    NH2020 was an important fight here in little Nevada County. The left tried to remove private property rights and they were defeated. People saw them for what they were trying to do, take another bite out of my property rights and transfer it to government. But the left never sleeps and they have now put in place many new mandates on my home and my land. Even the trees on your property are now the governments since you must ask them for permission to remove one.

    Like

  4. Brad Croul Avatar
    Brad Croul

    Ms. Caler needs to work on her mission statement if she wants to remain credible. So, let me get this straight; the words, affordable, livable, walkable, consensus, stakeholder, International, regional”, are “danger” words. Can we assume, then, that Ms. Caler is pro-freeway, sprawl, suburban, congestion, and, she is anti-sidewalk and bike lane and doesn’t care how much things cost? Are international and regional both dangerous? What does that leave – national “uber alles”? How does this square with states rights? What is the opposite of stakeholder – pawn?

    Like

  5. Russ Steele Avatar

    The Agenda 21 movement is like the cedar tree in my yard next to the fence which is surrounding my property, it marks the boundary of the property and protects my property like the Constitution protects property rights. Each year the cedar tree adds more and more cells year after year, and every slowly it will eventually push the fence down, exposing my property to intruders. That is unless I take down the cedar tree before it destroys the fence. The Agenda 21 movement continues to add cells, every so slowly.
    The SBC Leadership Training Program teaches community activists how to organizes collaborative meetings, manage the content and control the outcomes. I am a graduate of the Training program. In other words, how to train attendees to become a sustainability facilitator in their own communities across the Sierra.
    We have many graduates of the SBC Leadership Training right here in Western Nevada County, and they are often the organizers of all the feel good meetings on collaboration, sustainability, visioning, smart growth, etc, that we are invited to attend, all for the good of the community.
    SBC was invited to manage the NH2020 process and we saw how they controlled and managed the out comes of the NH2020 public meetings according to a predetermined agenda. The whole process was being playing out here right before our eyes. Some of us recognized what was happening and challenges the process and then the out comes. Now we must not drop our guard, as the cells are still here, still growing and attempting to topple our property rights.

    Like

  6. bill tozer Avatar
    bill tozer

    The Sustainable Develop crowd shoots off buzz words at detractors such as ant-bike paths, anti-sidewalk, pro sprawl to obscure the issue. The Sierra Clubbers want every new development to be in tight clusters with open space. Sounds good until you attend a meeting in one of their homes which they proudly show the attendees their beautiful acreage, gardens, pastures, and wooded areas surrounding their redwood decked home in the country. Do as I say, not as I do. More on topic, the current OWS in lower Manhattan is a perfect example how government interference makes property rights, free speech, and the right to assemble issue collide in glaring fashion. Brookfield Office Properties wanted to build a high rise in NYC. The local gov’t said to build your highrise so you must buy a piece of property and turn it into a PRIVATE park that you maintain and operate and you must keep it open to the public 24/7. Never mind that the local parks in NYC have a 11pm curfew that allow people to pass thru later than 11 but not stop and is maintained by the city. Thus we have Zuccotti Park, a privately owned and maintained park that must be open to the public 24/7. The private property rights of Brookfield were trampled upon. Sure, they allowed this to happen to get their highrise. Their rights to exclude people from their property was also trampled upon. The OWSers chant free speech and they have the right to be there. True. But be careful what you wish for. Because it is open to the public 24/7, the OWSers cannot kick ANYONE out of tent city or bar me, you, or a group NAZI Skinhead Racists from staying there either. As OWS forms security squads and debates the issue of kicking trouble makers out of tent city, they are trampling on the very rights of others that they themselves esteem so highly. See ya at Zuccotti Park, its open to everyone!!

    Like

  7. Russ Steele Avatar

    This report is from Global Research
    On Sunday, October 23, a meeting was held at 60 Wall Street. Six leaders discussed what to do with the half-million dollars that had been donated to their organization, since, in their estimation, the organization was incapable of making sound financial decisions. The proposed solution was not to spend the money educating their co-workers or stimulating more active participation by improving the organization’s structures and tactics. Instead, those present discussed how they could commandeer the $500,000 for their new, more exclusive organization No, this was not the meeting of any traditional influence on Wall Street. These were six of the leaders of Occupy Wall Street (OWS).

    My emphasis added: Animal Farm?

    Like

  8. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    As soon as I read this SBC came to mind – obviously Mr Frisch didn’t disappoint with the first rebuttal.
    I have been in meetings like that and as soon as the real basic agenda is broched – that is not part of the agenda.
    Mr Croul have you guys not been trying to a interchange built for many years ??? I guess you disagree with that.

    Like

  9. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Brad Croul | 06 November 2011 at 07:47 AM
    “…she is anti-sidewalk…”
    This is a disturbing trend in our society!

    Like

  10. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Hey did I mention that I am anti-sink? I really think that indoor plumbing has led to the serial softening of American men leading to the decline of our nation and the rise of world communism.

    Like

  11. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    So, Steve, does the SBC leadership training include a steaming dollop of Delphi?
    My old links to Delphi manipulation techniques and how to counter them are broken, this looks similar:
    http://www.vlrc.org/articles/110.html

    Like

  12. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    BTW it was either Caler or someone with a similar worldview (and CABPRO relationship) who was telling a local Libertarian group how the UN was trying to do something like replace the dollar or disarm Americans. It was awhile ago, when the local LP was run by a true Keeper Of Odd Knowledge. The current guys are rational human beings new to politics.
    The Delphi facilitation is real and undemocratic, but I think the Agenda 21 rants are just the right wing analogue of the Thorntons of the world seeing the Kochs as evil puppetmasters manipulating the people against their own best interests.

    Like

  13. George Rebane Avatar

    GregG, it looks like you’re working on a point here about connecting dots on Agenda 21 being a misguided and, perhaps, delusional (in its analogue to Thornton) effort. Will you be putting some meat on such bones?

    Like

  14. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    “Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc.”
    Frisch is trying to do this right now in this thread. It’s also the modus operandi of the FUE, Jeff Pelline.

    Like

  15. Mike Thornton Avatar

    I’ve got an idea,Gerorge.
    Why don’t you guys ask TJ, how many UN, One World Government “conference calls” came into the Rood Center, while he was on the BOS!
    You guys are freakin crazy!

    Like

  16. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    George, it’s all too easy to look at two cars going in the same direction and imagine they are both coming from the same place and going to the same destination.
    Keep your eye on your own destination, including the health of the Constitution’s earliest amendments, and where the Frischs or Thorntons of the world are coming from and headed towards are all but immaterial.

    Like

  17. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Who wants clean air? Who wants clean water? Who likes puppies and kittens?
    Who likes CANDY?
    Don’t you want the government to give you these things?
    You lefties are an embarrassment to the stupid.

    Like

  18. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Greg Goodknight | 06 November 2011 at 12:15 PM
    “Facilitators are trained to recognize potential opponents and how to make such people appear aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc.”
    Frisch is trying to do this right now in this thread. It’s also the modus operandi of the FUE, Jeff Pelline.
    …and they plant useful idiots in the crowd.
    Here is an example:
    http://www.youtube.com/user/cvminutemen#p/u/8/UsBiXNvp9ec

    Like

  19. Russ Steele Avatar

    D.King,
    Please warn me to put down my coffee before writing another one of these insights:
    You lefties are an embarrassment to the stupid.
    When I read that I almost spit coffee on the keyboard.

    Like

  20. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Sorry Russ.

    Like

  21. Mike Thornton Avatar

    It doesn’t take a lot of “training” to see that wingnuts pivot from conspiracy to conspiracy to conspiracy. The fact is that even if every once and awhile you might actually stumble upon a decent policy or idea, when you live in la-la land (as most of you appear to do) it makes is really hard to take anything you say seriously.
    And I notice none of you are denouncing the “terrorists”. You’re (once again) making excuses for them…..

    Like

  22. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Do you mean the Waffle House Four gang.
    These guys?
    Four Senior Citizens Plotted Killing Spree At A Waffle House
    motherjones

    Like

  23. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    DK and others,
    The “don’t you want government to give you these things” isn’t far off from the message of Sowell’s “Conflict of Visions”. Yes, the left tends to think if there’s a problem, like poor people are homeless, it needs to be solved and if the right people are in the right government jobs making the right decisions, the country will be a better place. So credit standards were loosened to allow just about anyone to buy a home, everybody started getting rich, and the country seemed a better place until the bottom fell out.
    The left tends to think if you’re against their solving the problems with OPM, it’s because you want people to suffer, while the right tends to think what the left wants to do will, in the end, make things even worse.
    I remember Duck’s Breath Theater’s Merle Kessler (in his Ian Shoals persona) on the McNeil-Lehrer Report rapidly talking (as usual) with a reference to ‘Democrats working hard to decide how to spend Republican money’.
    I gotta go.

    Like

  24. RL Crabb Avatar

    The sword cuts both ways. Where are your property rights when a developer comes in, buys off the government to change the zoning of your neighborhood with a promise of jobs and leaves you with a degraded environment, potholed roads, and a big ugly industrial building that cuts off all the sunlight to your garden? Oh yeah, it’s for the “good of the community”. Been there, and been done unto.
    I’ll agree that the enviro crowd is overzealous when it comes to property rights, but the almighty dollar isn’t any better. As with most things, it’s a matter of balance.

    Like

  25. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Ah…Mike…It just goes to show you that when you give a moron oxygen you get an oxymoron.

    Like

  26. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    It’s true: I was secretly trained in the Delphi Technique by the federal government in a method designed by the Defense Department in the Cold War to convince rural residents to adopt a internationalist agenda designed to shift the nation to communism.

    Like

  27. Mike Thornton Avatar

    Wow, Steve, you’ve been trained as a “00-Delphi” and now that you’ve been to China, you’re the “Manchurian” Communist, all at the same time!

    Like

  28. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Frisch, you are doing a fine job of dodging the issue and staying on your long term talking point of folks here being “aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc”.
    While I never went to any of the NH2020 meetings the SBC ‘facilitated’, all the accounts in print and the listservs of the time were classic Delphi.
    George, the more you and CABPRO align with ‘Agenda 21’ rants, the more you give ammunition to the Frischs and Thorntons of the world. There’s no upside for you in it. Anyone given to think ill of SBC because of imagined Agenda 21 links is already on your side.

    Like

  29. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Good training, huh?

    Like

  30. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Not really, Steve. It’s just you being you. You’ll eventually give up when it’s clear the provocations aren’t working, and run off in a huff making some blanket statement about the stupidity of everyone who doesn’t agree with you.
    “SBC leadership training” didn’t do the job for NH2020, did it?
    I can’t wait to see the latest IRS filings by the SBC. Does anyone have an online link? Maybe their CEO will oblige us with links here.

    Like

  31. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    RL, you generally don’t have a property right regarding the aesthetics of your neighbor’s property, but you do have something of a right to the sunlight hitting your garden. A half decent lawyer should have been able to tie them up in knots for you.

    Like

  32. Mike Thornton Avatar

    Greg:
    Do you really think that it takes some kind of secret agent “00 Delphi” training to make you guys look: “aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc”. ?
    Here’s a pretty simple suggestion. Instead of worrying about Steve making you look:”aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc”., stop BEING; “aggressive, foolish, extremist, etc”.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Like

  33. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Not everyone can be as calm and level headed as you are Mike.

    Like

  34. George Rebane Avatar

    Agenda 21 is what it is, and Judi Caler has done a workmanlike job in summarizing its main points. Agenda 21 is not an effluent from some isolated and fevered brains, but a formally established framework for worldwide public policy signed by heads of state and now being instantiated bit by piece at many levels of government in the US and other countries. Conducive to the sentiments and sensibilities of the UN, this body issued Agenda 21 to implement the progressive view of a smart and beneficial future for mankind on earth. As a visible and unifying banner delineating objectives, means, and methods, it needs no international conspiracy to bring its prescriptions into being.

    Like

  35. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    There’s nothing secret or even sinister about the Delphi technique, Thornton. It’s been out in the open for years.
    An effective way of handling a meeting where the organizers really want it to go their way. Nothing more, nothing less. However, it is easily countered if their opposition keeps their cool and are prepared. An incompetent facilitator can be end run just by politely ignoring them and discussing the issues with the other attendees in accordance with the usual norms of civil behavior.
    No one here is more aggressive, foolish or extreme than you, Thornton.

    Like

  36. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    I love how we can create a conspiracy out of just simply running a meeting well by giving it the name “Delphi” and making sound like something out of The Omega Man. Give common sense a name and it becomes a Machiavellian tactic!
    Does it take a rocket scientist to figure out that having a clear agenda for a meeting, staying on the points intended, allowing for wide ranging contributions from participants, getting smaller groups of people to provide input so they can focus on specific issues and cover more ground, maintaining a schedule, and recording the results so old ground is not covered every time people meet, is good business? That advise could be found in any business advice book by Steven Covey, Peter Drucker, Jim Collins or Patrick Lencioni.
    But call it Delphi and it is an international conspiracy.
    You guys are friggin’ crackpots, pure and simple.

    Like

  37. Mike Thornton Avatar

    They are “crackpots”, Steve.
    Pretty soon they’ll get back to the “Elders of Zion” or some other recycled and tired conspiracy theory.
    I wonder if Robert’s (Rules) can show us his birth certificate so Russ can run it through the Youtube, hallucination machine, looking for secret threads of Kenyanism?

    Like

  38. Judi Caler Avatar
    Judi Caler

    No, Brad, I’m not pro-freeway, sprawl, suburban, congestion; and anti-sidewalk and bike lane! The point is that words are being redefined by globalists, and we need a new dictionary to understand common words that have been co-opted and used against us, so that we can be on the same page. This bright audience must have noticed the semantic war which has been raging for decades?! WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH (1984). “Affordable housing” means subsidized housing; “visioning” is the process of attaining a consensus; “consensus” is a phony agreement to a predetermined outcome that stifles dissent; “stakeholder” is a person or group with no legal interest in property dictating its use TO the owner; “the common good” means the individual has no rights; “sustainable development” is a template to de-industrialize America; “sustainable” means whatever the government wants it to mean, i.e. government-approved; “social justice” or “equity” is the opposite of equal justice under the law and means redistribution of wealth (from the middle class to the elite); “smart growth” is high density stack and pack housing, mass transit and land use control.
    If you use the new phony meanings and accuse me of having the opposite opinion, you would be correct. Instead you use the real meanings and accuse me of believing the opposite. Not true, and this is the purpose of co-opting words. I never accused the global elite of being stupid—just their useful idiots.
    Don’t believe me. Start reading their words—it isn’t a hidden secret anymore. “Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress. This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21 (Local Agenda 21). So, we call our processes something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management or smart growth.” –J. Gary Lawrence, an advisor to the US President’s Council on Sustainable Development, “The Future of Local Agenda 21 in the New Millennium,” 1998.
    Thank you for the great link to globalresearch and OWS, Russ. You can see the “consensus” process with its trained facilitators predictably taking over OWS, just as the same folks have taken over our constitutional form of government. Bringing the Dephi process into this argument is right on.
    Perhaps it would help for you guys to see the actual Agenda 21 document which, as George points out, is real. It may be a conspiracy; it is certainly not a theory. Have at it; busy yourselves with all 40 chapters off their own website, signed by almost every head of state in 1992. These are the people who think they know what is best for the rest of us in their own words: http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/

    Like

  39. RL Crabb Avatar

    It should be remembered that the ‘Gang of Four’ was elected to a majority because the sitting supervisors weren’t listening to their constituents concerns. Once in charge, they embarked on the path to NH2020, which proved to be more intrusive than what residents were willing to swallow. Through the following election cycles, three of the four were defeated, but only by a narrow margin.
    For the last eight years, the supes have maintained a roughly right/center agenda, and while both sides like to bitch about it, it’s provided some stability to local government. Is it the intent of the hardcore right to go back to the bad ol’ days? Good luck. I’ll say it again…balance.

    Like

  40. Mike Thornton Avatar

    Judi:
    Can you tell me where the local Agenda 21 concentration camps are located at?
    I mean, the Black Helicopters need somewhere to land, don’t they?

    Like

  41. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Mike Thornton | 06 November 2011 at 03:05 PM
    “They are “crackpots”, Steve.”
    Stop trying to marginalize me. You’re hurting me feelings. 🙂
    The Delphi Technique
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rjoI7-esOw

    Like

  42. Mike Thornton Avatar

    King, I’m not “marginalizing” you…..
    I’m just trying to find out where the “camps” are.
    I’m sure there will be a need for illegal alien labor.
    Oh, shucks, I got it confused with Area 51…

    Like

  43. Judi Caler Avatar
    Judi Caler

    Mike, why don’t you try googling your own words instead of marginalizing any thinking person with what passes for humor on the left? I just tried it with “local Agenda 21 concentration camps are located at?” off your question at 3:18 PM, and came up with 1,179,158 hits. Maybe that will keep you busy for a while. You can write a report for the rest of us.

    Like

  44. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    What the SBC links to is a packaging of Delphi called Open Space. Compare this to the Delphi piece I linked to above:
    “Open Space works best when the work to be done is complex, the people and ideas involved are diverse, the passion for resolution (and potential for conflict) are high, and the time to get it done was yesterday … a simple, powerful way to get people and organizations moving — when and where it’s needed most.
    And, while Open Space is known for its apparent lack of structure and welcoming of surprises, it turns out that the Open Space meeting or organization is actually very structured — but that structure is so perfectly fit to the people and the work at hand, that it goes unnoticed in its proper role of supporting (not blocking) best work. In fact, the stories and workplans woven in Open Space are generally more complex, more robust, more durable — and can move a great deal faster than expert- or management-driven designs.”
    http://www.openspaceworld.org/cgi/wiki.cgi?AboutOpenSpace
    This is indistinguishable from “Delphi”.
    If Frisch thinks the SBC way is different, please, give examples.

    Like

  45. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Be calm!
    Just wait, I’m sure your mind will sync back up with reality.

    Like

  46. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Oh, and Mike, I’m glad you’re seeking our help. I’m very proud of you!

    Like

  47. George Rebane Avatar

    Bravo Judi!!
    BTW, if memory serves from my defense systems days, Delphi is a group decision making methodology developed by/for the systems command of the USAF. It was also used extensively by the Pentagon’s halo of defense contractors during the 1970s. I don’t know where it went from there after the early 1980s when I ‘went commercial’, but as I was completing my last contracts with the government, I heard that various consultants were selling Delphi to corporations as a group decision support system.

    Like

Leave a comment