Rebane's Ruminations
October 2011
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the transcript of my regular KVMR commentary broadcast on 21 October 2011.  Here I have provided some links to expand the recorded material, and added a recent Ramirez who always summarizes succinctly.]

The Occupy Wall Street crowd has taken its template from the street critics of Europe’s socialist countries, and its marching orders from a Team Obama that needs to soften up the country for next year’s re-election.  Some media mavens on the left are deliriously happy to report that now they also have their ‘tea party’ movement, but the attempts to compare the two don’t stand up to scrutiny – at least so far.

The ‘occupy’ name has been well chosen, for to occupy means to take possession and control of a space, place, or organization.  Occupiers are foreign to the normal or indigenous population of a place, and seek to replace the pre-occupation order of their target space, place or organization.  The people on the streets today most certainly admit that, although what they want to replace it with is still not nailed down.

Enough of these demonstrations have gone on to allow some early polling to take place.  Bill Schoen, former Bill Clinton pollster, reports “research (showing) clearly that the movement doesn’t represent unemployed America and is not ideologically diverse. Rather, it comprises an unrepresentative segment of the electorate that believes in radical redistribution of wealth, civil disobedience and, in some instances, violence.”  Moreover, he finds that “the protesters have a distinct ideology and are bound by a deep commitment to radical left-wing policies”, and that “the vast majority of them are employed.” (more here)

Obama.lemmings


Most of this is certainly evident from the posted videos of the Occupy demonstrations in New York, Los Angeles, Berkeley, and other large urban areas.  From such locations there have been gathered photos showing rather pathetic looking young people holding up hand-printed summaries of the dire straits in which they find themselves.  A common theme in those complaints is a deep disappointment that the education for which they borrowed so much is worthless as far as landing a job.  These kids are of the generation that our educational system has taught to ‘follow your heart’ in picking an area of study, and then expect that when you graduate, someone will see value in what you know.  After all, isn’t having a fulfilling job with a just living wage one of our inalienable rights?

These kinds of directionless people with little knowledge and fewer skills make up the dissatisfied masses that are ripe for the picking of leftwing ideologues.  For that they have attracted support and cheerleading from unions like the SEIU and the UAW, from radical left politicals like the American Socialist Party and the American Communist Party, and even the American Nazi Party wants to elbow in there and see who they can attract from the clueless.  Their banners and signs say it all.

Some deep thinkers have even tried to compare the Occupy folks with the tea party movement.  There they could not be farther off course for the two social phenomena are literally 180 apart along every dimension you care to examine.  But basically, one wants a revolution leading to a new order, and the other wants to preserve the aspects of governance and economic thought that have made this nation great.  (Tea Party Patriots Mark Meckler’s rebuttal here)

To see how our local Occupiers stack up with Bill Schoen’s findings, I went to last Wednesday’s Nevada City occupation.  The demonstration was attended by about 150 folks who, from their spoken sentiments and hand-painted signs, were definitely persuaded by leftwing ideas.  They were a peaceful and friendly lot without much direction, busy drawing up last minute signs about corporations being bad, and all of them led by a lone horn player.  No one was angry on that balmy fall afternoon, it was an affair that would get everyone home in time for dinner.

But I see these Obama demonstrations having legs that could easily take them into 2012 and become a major factor in next year’s election.  The demonstrators will definitely be swayed by the riots in Europe, and as they become more organized, the occupiers will have no one to support but President Obama and the Democrats.  And our polarization will then become stronger for it.

My name is Rebane, and I also expand on these and other themes in my Union columns, and on georgerebane.com where this transcript appears with appropriate links to reference materials.  These opinions are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

Posted in , , , ,

76 responses to “Who are the Occupiers?”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    Is the OWS just Like the Tea Party? I have posted a video comparision at Is It 2012 in Nevada County Yet. You decide if they two can be compared.

    Like

  2. Russ Steele Avatar

    Oops, should read “if the two”

    Like

  3. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    Russ and George,
    My kid’s soccer coach was at the Nevada City protest on Wednesday. He’s a paramedic. He didn’t take a crap on a police car. He didn’t even bang a drum.
    The OWS protest is about preserving the middle class in America. The various tea party groups are also trying to do this. These groups may have different ways of getting out their message, but they are going after the same thing: stop the relentless assaults on the US Constitution that are concentrating power with the Republican and Democratic Party oligarchs.
    I think OWS and the Tea Party Patriots should seek common ground. Their messages resonate for me.
    Michael A.

    Like

  4. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    No, No Michael, you just don’t get it. The OWS supporters are all a bunch of unwashed, pot smoking, hippy commies that hate America.
    As George says they are… “pathetic looking young people”… “directionless people with little knowledge and fewer skills”… they are “clueless”… “led by a lone horn player”… “My name is Rebane”.
    How sad, how very, very sad.

    Like

  5. Jed Avatar
    Jed

    What draws me to the OWS movement?
    The idea of a locally sustained economy backed by local self governance without influence from large corporations from outside our area, this is what the 99% want. There are a lot of other issues being brought up that some of the 99% support and some do not, but we all know there’s no chance of any of our issues being addressed if the levers of government are controlled by multi-national corporations who do not possess the morals of people and whose sole purpose is bent on making vast amounts of wealth for a few at the expense of many.
    Democrat I am not, both parties are beholden to huge corporations that have taken control of our country shaping it into the head of a globally repressive corporate empire that cares nothing for local self autonomy within our country or around the world.
    You should be part of the movement, come fight for your local community, that’s my goal, strengthening my local community with the aim of sustainability, so we can weather the storms that a global market can bring.
    You’ve fallen for the same name calling trick that attacked the Tea Party. As you wished people would stop listening to mischaracterizations of the Tea Party and instead engage in dialogue with you, don’t just listen to what some “Clinton pollster” says, instead come out and talk to a few of us, after all, you are part of the 99% and you’ll be shocked at how much you have in common with your neighbors.

    Like

  6. stevenfrisch Avatar
    stevenfrisch

    Wow, good luck Jed. For many who post here this is not about “coming out to talk to a few of us”. or “how much you have in common”, or even wanting to create a society where there is widespread democracy and economic self-detrmination.
    The concept that the global financial system should be open, transparent, democratic, and fair; that it should serve the needs of a broader range of people, and act as a positive engine of economic prosperity the way ethically driven capitalism should, is completely alien.
    This is about a small group of tea party people who have been duped by global corporate interests to participate in and organize a national movement designed to protect the interests of concentrated capital and the power that it brings, that acts in a predatory way, that unethically insists on an unfair share of a dwindling piece of the earths resources, and does so under the guise of freedom and American values.
    I am drawn to your message, because I am a capitalist, and I believe that capitalism can work better than any other system yet devised, but it must be reformed, must serve a broader need, must act in a way that is socially and economically and environmentally just. I am not frightened by the OWS movement, because the alternative is continued concentration of power in the hands of an irresponsible elite, and eventually social, political and economic collapse.

    Like

  7. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    George, you may be amused by the fact that, assuming I have no problem with connectivity, your site is allowed in China, as is Mr. Steele’s, but Mr. Pelline’s appears to be blocked. I am experiencing similar connectivity problems with Google e-mail accounts, Facebook, and You Tube, which appear to offend the Chinese system.
    In my humble opinion, the answer to social and economic dislocation is more democracy– blow down walls and breathe the free air–not filtering technology.

    Like

  8. Russ Steele Avatar

    Steven,
    Is it Pelline’s blog or his web site for Sierra FoodWineArt that is blocked, or both? Can you see the County Tourism Web Site from China now, or it also blocked? The County tourism web site is gonevadacounty.com

    Like

  9. Mikey McD Avatar

    M Anderson, this is the first time I have heard anyone partial to or associated with the OWS mob use that goal- “stop the relentless assaults on the US Constitution that are concentrating power with the Republican and Democratic Party oligarchs.”
    Every video, op/ed, news story I have reviewed shows the mobs disdain for corporations, a desire for more ‘social justice’ (via force) all via pissing on the constitution and giving even more power to a federal government (donkeys and elephants). Hypocrisy, ignorance or stupidity… take your pick.
    Interesting that corporations lobbyists are evil and labor union lobbyists are ‘good.’

    Like

  10. Mikey McD Avatar

    Does the OWS mob understand that the ability of ‘evil’ corporations to buy influence is correlated to the power of the government for sale?
    Limit the power of government and you will limit the power of the ‘evil’ corporations.

    Like

  11. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Russ, gonevadacounty comes up, and Sierra FoodWineArt does as well. Just in the last hour SFR began coming up. I think it must have something to do with the filtering technology, since my connectivity otherwise has been excellent.
    Google docs, Facebook and You Tube is till blocked.
    The whole what is blocked and how does one work around it thing is fascinating.

    Like

  12. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    By the way Russ, you must not have seen the comments I have awaiting moderation on the Nevada County 2012 web site? Are they not coming through?

    Like

  13. George Rebane Avatar

    SteveF – what is your current location? Itinerary?

    Like

  14. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    “This is about a small group of tea party people who have been duped by global corporate interests to participate in and organize a national movement designed to protect the interests of concentrated capital and the power that it brings, that acts in a predatory way, that unethically insists on an unfair share of a dwindling piece of the earths resources, and does so under the guise of freedom and American values.
    I am drawn to your message, because I am a capitalist, and I believe that capitalism can work better than any other system yet devised, but it must be reformed, must serve a broader need, must act in a way that is socially and economically and environmentally just.” — Steven Frisch
    In other words, we need to destroy Capitalism in order to save it.
    I’m more worried about duped OWS participants who think the would-be bosses wishing to rule in their names would be any better.

    Like

  15. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    With a hundred thousand or so pages of IRS can do and can’t do, I would say the capitalist system is fairly well regulated. Then add the million or so laws at all levels of government (including others like NID and a local fire district, reclamation district or even a mosquito district) and I think we have enough rules. The issue is enforcement. So over time our little corner of the world, America, has ratcheted down through all these rules and regulations the very reason we were created. Sure we need rules to get along and maintain order, that is the basic tenet of ant just society, but when the government starts forbidding coconut oil on my popcorn at the theater, I think we have gone to far.
    Some of the worst abusers of our system are grant seeking non profits like the one who made coconut oil an issue. There are many non profits created to do injury to the system and they need to be removed and defunded. America is eating its young.

    Like

  16. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    “No, No Michael, you just don’t get it. The OWS supporters are all a bunch of unwashed, pot smoking, hippy commies that hate America.”
    That’s a little over the top Steve.
    http://tinyurl.com/43l7qb7
    Well, maybe not.

    Like

  17. Russ Steele Avatar

    Sorry Steve,
    I overlooked your posts waiting moderation, sorry for the delay. I will reviews and respond when I get more time.

    Like

  18. Ben Emery Avatar

    I will repost something from our local paper that is pretty clear at what the 99% are pissed about;
    I am the 99%
    Ben Emery
    Nevada City
    “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” — Mahatma Gandhi
    On Sept. 17, a rally against the unaccountable reckless behavior of Wall Street and the financial sector began in New York City. A single location with a few hundred people mushroomed into a few thousand people and now includes cities and towns across the nation with tens of thousands people in solidarity. I am one of the 99 percent for whom the Occupy movements are speaking.
    What is the source of this unrest? The destructive rot of corruption in our government and political system that has infected the entire body politic is the source. Special interests control our two major political parties and their leaderships. Our representatives are no longer capable of working for the public good in the presence of this rot.
    To address all the policy changes required, we first need to excise this infection from our system. The following two extracting procedures are a must before we can move forward. Public financing of campaigns and amending the U.S. Constitution to establish that money is not speech, and that human beings, not corporations, are individuals entitled to constitutional rights.”
    I sent this in quite awhile ago and it just got published. RR is behind the curve a bit, you guys are still in the “then they laugh at you” mode. The overzealous crack down from those who are controlled by the power that be are becoming more draconian. The establishment has obviously moved onto fighting them.
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/oct/19/naomi-wolf-arrest-occupy-wall-street?newsfeed=true

    Like

  19. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE – I believe that you totally misunderstand my assessment of the Occupy movement (perhaps through the progressive penchant for ignoring my words and substituting ‘I know what he’s really thingking’). I have never ignored the Occupy movement, nor do I intend to as the weeks roll by. And the last thing I would do is to try to discount such a movement by laughing at it. BTW, for you and others of similar interpretive skills, describing and/or recounting the attributes of some thing is NOT the same as denigrating it through laughter.
    I cannot speak for the other commenters on these pages, but I do stand by my RR posts.

    Like

  20. Ben Emery Avatar

    George,
    I was addressing all the comments on the thread up until this point.
    You expressed your opinion the other night so I just went to the comments. I thanked you twice the other night for not being hyperbolic about the event in Nevada City. The communism comment was a bit but as I wrote Paul, baby steps. Getting people on the left to stop making huge accusations is just as hard.
    I think we aren’t all the far apart on many key issues. Despite what most believe to be true the majority of Americans are in agreement on many many major issues. As I have said here many times the power that be need to keep the masses divided otherwise we unite and focus on power elites. This is why I am an outspoken opponent of the two parties. It is easy to corrupt and divide two groups but get four or five into the mix and it becomes much more difficult.
    Here is one of the ten key values of the GP that most conservatives agree with;
    Decentralization of power either in the form of government or corporate is the key to bringing our forefathers vision to fruition.
    Decentralization
    * How can we reduce power and responsibility to individuals, institutions, communities and regions?
    * How can we encourage the flourishing of regionally-based culture, rather than a dominant mono-culture?
    * How can we have a decentralized, democratic society with our political, economic and social institutions locating power on the smallest scale (closest to home) that is efficient and practical?
    * How can we redesign our institutions so that fewer decisions and less regulation over money are granted as one moves from the community to the national level?
    * How can we reconcile the need for community and regional self-determination with the need for appropriate centralized regulation in certain matters?

    Like

  21. George Rebane Avatar

    BenE – your 1215am definitely makes you welcome in the tea party (but we won’t tell anyone). The ideas on the decentralization of power, control, knowledge, … are ideas that conservetarians like me have been promoting for decades. All the while we have had a difficult time understanding how the ‘radical rightwing’ appellations apply to us. Are there some specifics where you see RR being in the far right; these would be interesting for all readers if we focus on them.

    Like

  22. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Here is a shameless link to my post on the differences between the TPP and OWS.
    http://sierradragonsbreathe.blogspot.com/2011/10/ows-is-misguided-and-antithesis-of.html
    I too would like BenE to do a top ten list of what he considers our rightwing extremism. I always considered myself a simple conservative. But, since the Greens are to the left of the democrats, I would make the observation they are not to close to the conservatives.

    Like

  23. Mikey McD Avatar

    For me it comes down to choosing between more government (force) or less government (force). How does solution x, y, z affect my personal liberty.
    Corporation contributions don’t even make a dent… and why do labor unions get a pass?

    Like

  24. stevenfrisch Avatar
    stevenfrisch

    Of course I did not say, “we need to destroy capitalism in order to save it”. That was an over the top description of my statement. I have said here on many occasions that capitalism is the best system yet devised to allocate resources. I said we need reform. And I am on record here as agreeing that some of the reform we need very well may mean reducing or eliminating a good deal of those “hundred thousand pages” of rules that Todd references; but then of course in the very same paragraph he goes on to attack a basic tenet of American democracy, free speech and free association. I wonder how one “removes” people who freely associate?
    George, I am in Beijing for the next week.
    Russ, thanks for the reply.

    Like

  25. Mikey McD Avatar

    “What is true, just, and beautiful is not determined by popular vote. The masses everywhere are ignorant, short-sighted, motivated by envy, and easy to fool. Democratic politicians must appeal to these masses in order to be elected. Whoever is the best demagogue will win. Almost by necessity, then, democracy will lead to the perversion of truth, justice and beauty.”
    — Hans-Hermann Hoppe

    Like

  26. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Once again SteveF appears unable to read with comprehension. Reading what I said about rent seeking non profits as some sort of attack on free speech and association is simply fallacious. The taxpayers fund these organizations and when they lobby the politicians they are breaking the law. They then need to be sanctioned. I simply learned that from SteveF in his political trysts with Prop23.

    Like

  27. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Todd, you’re once again, factually incorrect. Lobbying, as defined under the law, by non-profits is not illegal. The legal threshold for 501c3 organizations, in order to maintain thier status, is approximately less than 20% of their budget. Lobbying with government funded grants is generally illegal, but not with privately raised funds.
    The ability of non-profit organizations, which are defined in the tax code, to speak out on public issues is protected free speech and free association under the constitution. The ability of non-profit organizations to educate the public about public issues, and to support specific solutions to problems, is protected free speech. Just because you don’t agree with the speech is no reason to characterize them as intended to do harm and call for them to be “removed”.
    The ones who should be removed are non-profits who break the law–I wholeheartedly agree with that. Or organizations that dupe the public by claiming to be non- profits when they are not, that is illegal behavior. In short, the organization you founded, CABPRO, engaged in illegal behavior when it falsely claimed non-profit status. They are the ones who should be prosecuted.

    Like

  28. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    McD, would that be the same Hoppe whose free speech rights were defended by the ACLU, an organization I support, for his controversial academic views on the economics of homosexuality?

    Like

  29. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    No Steve once again you know nothing about which you speak. You were the chief lobbyist for the defeat pf prop 23 and we have yet to see the amounts you claimed for political lobbying which is against the law. You were breaking the law as far as many people could determine. Why would you do that? You still have not published the documents necessary to allow the public to see the total dollars which had to be substantial since you were constantly on the stump back then.
    CABPRO has never broken any laws and unlike you and SBC has never sucked from the hind teat of mother government. By the way, who is paying for your overseas junket? Please list all the taxpayer funds you are utilizing so we can observe the transparency you claim you want from all others. A simple list of all expenditures via email to this site will suffice.

    Like

  30. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Todd, all of my required 990 reports are filed with the appropriate agencies. And you are dead wrong about the law on supporting or opposing specific legislation.
    It is against the law for a for profit business to claim it is a nonprofit. You and I could go around and around on this issue, but smart readers will just look it up and decide for themselves.
    As far as my trip is concerned, it was partially funded by the US State Department, and you can rest assured that it will show up in my 2011 990 form., as is legally required.
    You simply don’t know what you are talking about. Your emotions are getting the better of your ability to do good research.

    Like

  31. Ben Emery Avatar

    George,
    I agree with the tea party on many things but disagree with many of their solutions as well, so I don’t join.
    No where on this thread have I used the term radical, right-wing, or extremists. I try not to use explosive terms to generalize an entire population.
    Since we have an agreement on decentralization maybe we can can come to an understanding, not necessarily an agreement, on our positions against consolidated power be it government or corporate?

    Like

  32. Ben Emery Avatar

    Todd,
    “But, since the Greens are to the left of the democrats, I would make the observation they are not to close to the conservatives.”
    Today’s “conservatives” would consider the policies of Reagan, Nixon, and Eisenhower left of the current democratic party. So being left of the current democratic party isn’t that hard to do. The greens and libertarians agree on many many things outside of social issues. That is why I chose the green party in the 90’s over the libertarians, that is why I am described by many as a libertarian leaning green.
    At a forum last year I sat next to a communist (extreme left) and the distance between the two of us on the policies we agreed on were night and day.
    An Example
    I think a state controlled health care for all insurance policy was the way to go. Increase the pool, more healthy participants increasing intake of premiums at the same time only having a fraction of the increase in claims. This would lower the cost for everybody at the same time getting everybody insured. Essentially at the moment the government is on the hook for the most costly segment of our society the elderly, chronically sick, and the poor assuring maximum profits for private industry.
    The communist thought a nationalized VA system was the only answer. Government owned hospitals, government trained/ owned staff, government owned equipment, ect…
    Huuuge difference.

    Like

  33. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    I don’t see the difference BenE in what you or the communist are advocating.
    SteveF, sorry to have to correct you again but you were breaking the law if you were politicking against a political issue and not reporting it. Your 990’s are missing, where did you hide them? CABPRO was always a legal for profit under the law and never took a dime of government money for anything. SBC is a arm of big government and many call the kinds of non-profits like SBC simply money laundering machines for democrats. Is SBC a money laundering scheme?

    Like

  34. Steve Frisch Avatar
    Steve Frisch

    Sorry Todd, 100% up to date and fully filed, you are just too stupid to know where to look. By the way George, according to your definition I think Todd just lied.

    Like

  35. Ben Emery Avatar

    Todd,
    That was my last statement of my comment but then I took it off to let you make it.
    Here was the statement that didn’t make it on the comment
    “I don’t expect you to see the difference due to the fact that anything left of your ideology is equivalent to communism in your opinion”
    One is complete ownership of the health care system and one is a insurance program.
    The real problem lies that you have no idea what you are talking about when using the terms communism, socialism, and extreme left wing. As I said before Reagan, Nixon, and Eisenhower would be extreme left wing for today’s “conservative/ republican”

    Like

  36. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    “[C]apitalism can work better than any other system yet devised, but it must be reformed, must serve a broader need, must act in a way that is socially and economically and environmentally just.”
    Sorry, Frisch, but that is a “must be destroyed in order to save it” sort of statement. There’s already something like 70,000 pages in the Federal tax codes ostensibly put there to do just that, along with volumes of regulations regulating anything and everything that might possibly relate to interstate commerce.
    Now we need, according to you, additional reforms to make sure a private enterprise serves “a broader need”, and meets some nebulous standard of being socially, economically and environmentally “just”.
    “He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.” A future Jefferson could be writing that about a Frisch the Fifth.
    Economic justice is harder than it looks:
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/they_want_lice_of_the_occu_pie_9xKCxcI4aectFYkafMb8UJ

    Like

  37. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    “Today’s “conservatives” would consider the policies of Reagan, Nixon, and Eisenhower left of the current democratic party. So being left of the current democratic party isn’t that hard to do.”
    First, Nixon was never a “conservative”, so it is wrong to portray him as one. Anti-communist isn’t “conservative” and Nixon’s was probably mostly borne of opportunism.
    Besides that, I’d love to hear what Eisenhower and Reagan did that was “left of the current Democratic party”.

    Like

  38. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    Thanks for the link Greg. Love the Headline.
    “They want $lice of the occu-pie”

    Like

  39. Ben Emery Avatar

    Greg,
    Your link is stuck in between laugh and fight.
    Eisenhower supported his 91% top marginal income tax rate, supported labor unions, and told his brother that those who tried to eliminate Social Security were ignorant and stupid. The modern day democratic party are split on a one half of one percent tax increase on the wealthiest Americans whose effective federal income tax rate is 17%, abandoned labor unions, and have put Social Security on the table for negotiating. There is much more, such as the federal interstate highway system. Total cost of federal government was $1.14 trillion, adjusted for inflation it would be in the ball park of a $9 to $10 trillion dollar program. Obama/ democrats got a $700 billion stimulus with nearly $350 billion of that were tax cuts and no buy American provision due to the republicans opposition to the idea.

    Like

  40. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Tod
    Can you explain the money Democrats money laundering operation you accuse SBC of being part of. I’d like to know more about how it works.

    Like

  41. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Ben, reality check. No one paid a 91% tax rate. In those days, even department store credit card interest charges weree deductible (and should be today). Plus, his legislature was largely Democrat.
    Beautiful misdirection, btw. You tar Eisenhower for the high marginal tax rate of his day that was not of his making, and then misstate current effective tax rates.
    Quotes, please. And state for the record what the Social Security payroll tax rate was in the mid 50’s, compared to the combined SS and Medicare taxes, including employer paid portion and expected state and federal income taxes paid by middle class workers on the Social Security payroll deductions they don’t get to see.

    Like

  42. Mikey McD Avatar

    Greg, did ‘we’ have crv tax, property tax, gas tax, cigarette tax, utility tax, communication tax, cell tower tax, sales tax, fishing license tax, well owners tax, septic tank tax, ETC when Eisenhower ruled? LOL.

    Like

  43. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Wow I go to church, get back and fire up the computer and there we are, the same liberal mantra I left earlier today but still the same.
    Friesch and SBC are utilizing taxpayers money and grants which foster jobs for the left (AB32 and Prop23 political work). Obama is the latest grantor of favors. What happens is the grant and/or rent seekers such as say, ACORN, would get tax money then do the bidding of the democrat machine. Most non-profits are like ACORN are almost exclusively peopled by the leftwing. They are then encouraged to assist their mentors with volunteer time and/or monetary donations. It is a well documented scam and it has been maintained lately in the billions of stimuli money sent to prop up and pay the teachers unions and others. You should google it PaulE (of course you have haven’t you?).
    SBC is one of those non profits that do “studies” and hold “meetings” almost exclusively. I would guess since Freisch won’t reveal the makeup of the employees (after calling conservatives racists) that along with a monochrome set of employees they are probably of one political party. Sort of like the media and the professors of our colleges.
    BenE says of me, “The real problem lies that you have no idea what you are talking about when using the terms communism, socialism, and extreme left wing.”
    So if I don’t BenE, why don’t you tell us all your definition of those terms and who fills them in your view?

    Like

  44. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Todd
    Under your defination wouldn’t you also consider defense contractors such as Haliburton who profit from wars started by former CEO’s (re Cheney) to also be practitioners of “money laundering’ (your definition)

    Like

  45. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Halliburton is a private contractor. I am speaking of non-profits. If Halliburton was run by Cheney and was getting money through contracts and then donating a portion back to Cheney, I would say that would be illegal. Oh, that;’s right, it is already. The non-profits mre the latest liberal ploy for money laundering. Creative though.

    Like

  46. George Rebane Avatar

    MichaelA 1211am – I’m sorry to have missed this, “The OWS protest is about preserving the middle class in America.” I am simply aghast at this conclusion given the composition, behavior, messages from, and the supporting organizations of the OWS movement. If so, it is the middle class of a nether world neither I nor mine would ever want to join. The evidence of two parallel universes keeps pouring in. How can we continue to cobble together a single nation comprised of such two different and distant cohorts who have to live cheek-by-jowl? The easy answer from each to the other is ‘You just need to give up your principles.’

    Like

  47. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Todd
    Here’s a chronology Cheney and Haliburton
    1,Cheney was chairman and CEO of Halliburton Company from 1995 to 2000 and received stock options from Halliburton.Cheney retired from the company during the 2000 U.S. presidential election campaign with a severance package worth $36 million.
    2. As of 2004, he had received $398,548 in deferred compensation from Halliburton while Vice President.
    3. Cheney was a major champion for the Iraq war that awarded Haliburton a $7 billion contract for which only Halliburton was allowed to bid.
    4. Also in 2004 the Pentagon reported that Halliburton would repay the government for overcharges estimated at $27.4 million for meals served to American troops at five military bases in Iraq and Kuwait.
    I can go on and on. All this while Cheney received “deferred” compensation from Haliburton essentially while still on the payroll while engineering make work wars for for major financial supporters of Republican including guess who? Bush Cheney.

    Like

  48. Ben Emery Avatar

    My original sign for the Occupy Wall St/ San Francisco was a dart board with 20 different federal issues for each section. It is different for every person, for me it is about removing special interest money out of our political parties/ campaigns and the bulls eye was amending the US Constitution to state that corporations are not human beings and money does not equal free speech.
    http://movetoamend.org/
    The other 18 can be different but here were the ones on my board. Military Industrial Complex, Monopolies, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Tax Code, WTO, Free Trade, Federal Reserve, War on Drugs, Patriot Act, FISA Act, TSA, Homeland Security, For Profit Health Care, Medicare part D, Glass Steagall, CFMA 2000, Lobbyists
    All these issues have one thing in common, lots of money and lobbyists buying up our so called representatives.

    Like

  49. Ben Emery Avatar

    Mickey,
    Almost every tax you listed were state and local taxes, not federal.
    Property Taxes are state taxes that were in place when Eisenhower was elected president.
    Most excise taxes were put in place in the late 17th and the 18th centuries, cigarettes were one of those taxes.
    Gas Tax- Hoover
    Doubling FICA Taxes- Reagan
    Eliminating interests deductions from taxes- Reagan
    Reagan drastically reduced taxes on the wealthiest while drastically increasing them on everybody else.
    Here is some of the tax hikes of Reagan by republican Alan Simpson
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KInQbzHqQ-g&feature=player_embedded

    Like

  50. Ben Emery Avatar

    Greg,
    I will address your points a different time, I don’t have the time or energy to deal with this stuff tonight.

    Like

Leave a comment