Rebane's Ruminations
September 2011
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

This crap we’ve been hearing about a handful of solar tech companies, led by Solyndra, going bankrupt is small potatoes and the tip of the iceberg, the remainder of which Team Obama and the Dems hope that never sees the light of day.  For all intents and purposes, there are no successful and sustainable green tech companies that have gotten the long green from the feds.

GreenKoolAid Last night we heard that the administration is touting that they have created 3,545 new green jobs from an expenditure of $38,600,000,000 (yep, that’s over 38 billion dollars).  That computes to spending $10,880,000 per job.  As I’ve pointed out, when other people’s money runs out, so will the jobs and the companies that are providing them.  Now that is some serious crony socialism that the nation’s progressives hope the common folk never understand.

In the meantime we keep hearing of the newest tax’n spend posterchild lamenting that he’s not paying enough tax, and telling us all that the feds should raise taxes on those who invest and create new jobs.  The country’s response can be heard echoing daily across this great land, ‘Write a f@%king check Warren!!’

[20sep2011 update]  Tonight we heard that Congress is starting hearings on Solyndra, having subpoenaed members of that bankrupt company’s executive team to testify this Friday.  They, of course, will all be taking the Fifth.  And after a ridiculously harrowing day on the Hill, they’ll probably gather to take another fifth.  Congress will get nothing out of these people, and they will even get less when they subpoena Administration types to answer questions as to why the half billion was lent to a company that even the guy running the corner newspaper stand knew was gonna go belly up.  The government folks will all use ‘executive privilege’ to zip their lips.

But not to worry, it will all come out.  And the later they start singing, the worse it will be for the White House.  In the meantime, we taxpayers do have something to worry about – namely that there are billions more that must be quickly spent on other green tech companies just waiting out there with their little beaks open and ready for their stimulus hit.  Given the spate of bankruptcies, sanity would dictate that further such giveaways should be halted until we find out what in tarnation is going on at the Dept of Energy (a question that’s been hanging for the last thirty years).  But sanity turned up MIA years ago inside the Beltway.  The Senate is determined to sprinkle those additional billions on temporary green jobs, come hell or high water – nothing will stop those Dems playing to their far left base now that these people are ready to toss Obama under the bus.

Now don’t put away your funny bone yet, there’s another joke from the yokels.  It turns out that the 1,000+ Solyndra ex-employees can receive government paid retraining while drawing unemployment according to Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT).  This is kind of weird in itself, and doubly so when you consider that these former employees were already trained up in how to work a clean energy, green tech, environmentally supportive, ya-da ya-da company.  Hasn’t everyone – from President Obama, through California’s Moonbeam, down to Mary Nichols of CARB (remember AB32, it’s still here), and even the considerable chorus of local lefties – been telling everyone and their mother that green/clean tech is where all the new jobs are coming from?  So why do they need retraining on our nickel?

Posted in , ,

61 responses to “The Real Green Jobs Scandal (updated 20sep2011)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Scott
    This was from Bush’s own guy
    “Lawrence B. Lindsey, Mr. Bush’s first chief economics adviser, said there was little impetus to raise alarms about the proliferation of easy credit that was helping Mr. Bush meet housing goals.
    “No one wanted to stop that bubble,” Mr. Lindsey said. “It would have conflicted with the president’s own policies.”
    And Cheney
    “If we hadn’t done what we did with TARP, I think we’d have been in big, big trouble, much worse than we are.”
    Hardly hero’s in this story

    Like

  2. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    I don’t need to interview Lowell Robinson, as I own a commercial moving van, the largest Uhaul rents, vintage 1973, that I bought when we moved up here. Were I using this vehicle for commercial purposes, instead of a one time move and tool shed, I would be paying $2100/year for the license, and, like everyone else, gasoline taxes.
    Now if you want to see a group that uses public resources to earn money, you may wish to check out your lawyers as a class. Other than minor court fees for filing, and either personal or corporate taxes, they pay ZIP for their exclusive right to represent others in court. They passed the laws that give only themselves that right, and, while they use the courts every bit as much as truckers use the roads, they pay no taxes to make the courts run smoothly and efficiently, because as a class it is not in their interest to have them run smoothly and efficiently. By being able to drag things out forever, they make tons of extra cash. I think that any time a lawyer files a paper in court, 10% of the settlement, in or out of court, should go to upgrade the courts.
    They of course scream that they would pass it on, but the public will only pay just so much, so it will wind up coming out of their hides, at least most of it. You can thank a lawyer in the Bay Area who hurt our family for this posting.

    Like

  3. Douglas Keachie Avatar
    Douglas Keachie

    George, I did a bit of contract work for them, researching infrared cameras, some years back, and was hoping you’d know more about what they were up to these days. Without really checking, I was assuming sort of an informal hitech Chamber of Commerce might be in existence up here, and that with your interest in getting funding for your high school science and math scholarship efforts, you would be plugged in with gold plated connections. I in no way meant to insult your character or work, while doing a light hearted probe for information.

    Like

  4. Russell Steele Avatar
    Russell Steele

    The U.S. government’s $535 million bet on solar-energy darling Solyndra, Inc. was big. But LA Observed has learned that the feds have bet an even bigger pile of taxpayer chips on another green energy project in California – that would be BrightSource Energy, Inc.’s Ivanpah solar power farm in the Mojave Desert. That bet: $1.6 billion.
    The US Department of Treasury’s Federal Financing Bank – the same bank that’s on the hook in the Solyndra meltdown – has agreed to loan $1.6 billion to Oakland-based Brightsource.
    The bigger question is how many more of these are there?  For whatever reason the White House and the Administration has refused to give the public a full accounting of how they spent our money. 
    Could this be Obama’s Enron Moment?

    Like

  5. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    PaulE will blame Bush. LOL.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    DougK 1233am – No insult taken, thanks for the concern. My only point in the reply was that there seems to be less there to sonofusion and IDI than meets the eye. It seems like they’re trying to survive by plowing other fields now. Will report when I find out more.
    But your point is well made on enlisting more tech industry sponsors for TechTest. We are working on that. Even checks from private individuals wanting to support tech-bound local young people will be appreciated. (The foregoing was an unabashed hint.)

    Like

  7. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    Paul, you are side stepping the points I’ve raised. There was criminal activity in a major way that has cost the tax payers 10s of billions and the Dems supported it and the Rs tried to stop it. As I noted, once the gravy train was rolling, all sorts of people got on board. Bush wasn’t the one that started pushing the banks to make idiot loans, but if he had tried to let the banks go back to mortgage lending with the normal prudent requirements, the left would have exploded with screams of racism and the usual class war rants that he was trying to keep the poor locked out of home ownership. BTW – I note that you now are a fan of Dick Cheney. When did this start? Or do you only selectively give credence to folks when it suits your view?

    Like

  8. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Scott, he won’t answer your questions because he can’t. (this is called hit and run) I recall Bush was under attack by gthe left and they were calling it racist if he wouldn’t stop trying to fix Gannie and Freddie. And yes, the left will wrap their arms around their opposite number on a issue they agree with.

    Like

  9. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Why couldn’t the R’s stop it? For six years they controlled both the Presidency and the Congress. The fact is they didn’t want to. Blame the Dems?
    And Bush pumping money into Fannie and Freddie doesn’t sound like reform to me
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/washington/14fannieweb.html
    “The plan calls on Congress to give the government the authority over the next two years to buy an unspecified amount of stock in the two companies. Over the same period of time, it would permit the companies to have greater access to the Treasury, by expanding the credit line that each company has from the Treasury. Each company now has a $2.25 billion credit line, set nearly 40 years ago by Congress. At the time, Fannie had only about $15 billion in outstanding debt. It now has total debt of about $800 billion, while Freddie has about $740 billion.
    Today the two companies also hold or guarantee mortgages valued at more than $5 trillion.
    As part of the plan, the administration will also call on Congress to raise the national debt limit, people briefed on the plan said. And it will ask Congress to give the Federal Reserve a role in setting the rules for how big a capital cushion each company must hold. Giving the Fed a consulting role in the companies’ oversight is seen as yet another way to reassure nervous markets.”
    I profoundly dislike Cheney. I quoted him to illustrate the Bush support for TARP which was a total sell out to bail out the crooks that orchestrated the crash. Also it was a source I thought you’d be comfortable with. Yes, it was intentional and yes, they were relying on Bush and th Congress to bail them out.

    Like

  10. Bonnie M Avatar
    Bonnie M

    Thanks for your article George. I find it humorous that the bankrupt Solyndra’s executive team will all be taking the Fifth. I’ve noticed that those who think the Constitution isn’t worth the paper it’s written on, are the first to use it to protect themselves when they get into trouble.

    Like

  11. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Paul – Scott is correct in his points SFYL, I was in the mortgage business and he is correct on all points, move on to something else that ones a loser.
    BTW – I have now been regulated out of the mortgage business along with hundreds of thousands of other Mortgage Brokers by the Dodd/Frank Act – mortgage brokers can not exist anymore all to the mega banks – which I knew would come with “the crisis” – good business move on the their part though, eliminating any competition.

    Like

Leave a comment