Rebane's Ruminations
August 2011
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work, because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation. – Peter/Paul Principle (expanded version)

George Rebane

TimeMagazine110815 Time, America’s premier leftwing news magazine, is going all out to cast the conservatives and their ideas as the debt debacle devils in the recent and ongoing debate.  Its 15aug11 issue features articles on the country’s fiscal woes and ‘How the Tea Party Hijacked America’.  The latter is actually a back-handed compliment to the enormous impact that the tea party movement has had and promises to have on our politics.  Michael Crowley writes the featured piece that firmly establishes that the tea party movement is definitely not in Republican control, but instead is a major burr under its blanket.  His leading tagline and takeaway is that the tea party is a “populist movement underestimated by both parties has shown that it’s here to stay.”

This assessment goes a long way to explain away the almost hysterical flood of articles from the progressives that the tea party movement is a rapidly waning force on the country’s political landscape, and that it may self-destruct even before the 2012 election.  This line is picked up in the hinterlands’ blogosphere by the mindless followers of the lamestream.  Meanwhile the founder/leaders of the various tea party factions, like Mark Meckler of the Tea Party Patriots, are getting more and more national air time, as incredulous hosts of TV commentary programs embarrass themselves trying to entice out some slip-of-the-tongue that might connect the tea parties to social issues or the Republican party (see also the comment streams on RR).  Crowley goes on –

In January, Senate majority leader Harry Reid predicted that the Tea Party would soon “disappear.” Now, having pushed Reid’s party into a deal few people would have thought possible a few months ago–trillions in spending cuts, possibly with no new taxes–the Tea Party is more convinced than ever that its facts and its tactics are the right ones. And its influence is hardly waning–something Reid is the first to admit. The Tea Party’s sway in Congress, Reid lamented as the Senate approved the debt deal on Aug. 2, “has been very, very disconcerting … it stopped us from arriving at a conclusion much earlier.”

Barack Obama has long promised a post-partisan environment in the capital. But he never imagined that a minority of Americans would come to play such an outsize role in the public conversation. Polls may show that Americans overwhelmingly want more compromise in Washington, but the Tea Party’s leaders–and the roughly 25% of Americans who consider themselves Tea Party supporters–are primed for more confrontation. The debt fight, believe it or not, is probably just the beginning.

What continues unexamined is the basis for the tea parties being labeled as “rightwing” or “far right” organizations. As confirmed on these pages, those descriptors are supposed to be true just because the left repeats them with increasing frequency, while themselves claiming to be “in the middle”. Crowley’s article sheds no light here.


In the same issue Rana Foroohar in ‘The Wealth Gap Widens’ laments about the widening distribution of wealth and observes that the debt deal “has exacerbated the real problem underlying our woes; the fact that most people not only feel but actually are much worse off than they were three years ago.”  She also correctly points out that during time of want, the richer and smarter are able to better retain their wealth than their less fortunate counterparts – in short, material and educational inequalities increase.  But she fails to connect the dots that this widening continues as long as the economy is down, and the economy stays down as long as government continues Keynesian spending, taxing, and regulatory policies.

Finally, the message that is totally absent from Time is that continued borrowing, along with its ever-growing debt service costs, is the real reason that the US is following the European model down the sinkhole.  And it is the real reason why our credit ratings will continue to be downgraded.  The media, including Time and Fox News, did nothing to enlighten the public on the issues when they kept referring to the ‘default catastrophe’ in every other sentence of their reporting during the recent debt deal debate.  It was the rare bird who dared peep that there was no way that America would default on its current debt service.  Now, after it is apparent that the deal did nothing to salve our fiscal wounds, even Barney Frank (of ‘Fannie and Freddie are healthy’ fame) has come out to tell all that default was never in the cards.

All this said and done, do you notice that there still is not a solution to our economic tailspin to be had from within the Beltway?  We can’t spend our way out, and we can’t tax our way out, and we can’t generate wealth out of growing stacks of regulations (witness EPA’s new ozone regulations).  The socialist sickness is firmly over the land, and it can only be removed by a miracle next November, one that will again unleash the entrepreneurs and businesses to employ people and create new wealth.

Exit question:  Until then, who will be the first to import the notion of ‘austerity’ from across the pond and introduce it into the national lexicon?

[8aug2011 update]  In response to S&P’s downgrade and the world markets’ bloodbath, today President Obama and his progressive minions put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the Tea Party movement.  The Tea Parties are comprised of 20-25% of US voters, and 40% of Americans say they “support” the principles of the movement.  The Tea Parties are made up of hundreds (thousands?) of independent small groups marbled into communities throughout the land.  The Tea Parties have no unified leadership or central control body that marshals and directs their attitudes and voting behavior.  The Tea Partiers are the office or factory worker here, the retired person there, and the lady who runs the hair salon or auto repair shop on the corner – its hard to conceive of a more spontaneous or grass roots movement in American history.

And the Tea Parties have been telling the nation for the last three years exactly how it is headed in the wrong direction and what would happen if the government didn’t change its economic policies.  It was the same people’s voice that also sent new members to Congress who promised Tea Party voters that they would stay true to its principles.

And what was told has now come to be – but after everything that has happened, our growing debt is still totally out of control, and to this day we have NO PLAN TO REPAY OR EVEN REDUCE IT.   Our credit ratings are finally beginning to catch up with and reflect long-established truths.  And, yes Mr President, we Tea Party Americans from every nook and cranny of this exceptional nation take full credit for making every effort to turn our ship of state from the disastrous course to which you are holding it fast.

Posted in , ,

116 responses to “Time at the Tea Party (updated 8aug2011)”

  1. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    And in turn, Scott, I give a hat tip to your imagination, as you post almost everything you can dream up.

    Like

  2. Brad Croul Avatar
    Brad Croul

    If “Time Magazine” is a premier left wing mag, what are the premier right wing mags? I often find “Time” in the waiting rooms of businesses.
    Isn’t the labeling (and implied dismissive invalidation) of all news sources that do not print articles favorable to your point of view just another way of “shooting the messenger”?

    Like

  3. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    Brad, I think you meant to say “If “Time Magazine” is a premier left wing RAG”…
    Magazines are from before my time, I am but a young lad. Try the following for objective news:
    http://www.zerohedge.com/about
    http://biggovernment.com/
    http://www.cato.org/

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC re 1015am: Not at all. Identifying the ideological bent of any media channel does not “shoot the messenger”, but only puts an assessed label on it that summarizes how that channel interprets what it reports. Mikey’s recommendations for alternative media channels are counter-examples of other more conservative/libertarian (e.g. Cato) ideological colorings.
    It is always remarkable how only the left takes exception to being labeled with broadly accepted ‘progressive’, ‘liberal’, ‘socialist’, ‘collectivist’, … when they evince such sentiments. The right does not consider being called a ‘conservative’ or ‘libertarian’ a pejorative. Why is that?

    Like

  5. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    Charlie and David Koch pay for Cato, don’t know about the other two. Rt Wing Institute for bigger and better profits and damn the workers, if they cost us anything more than the food they eat.

    Like

  6. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    “The right does not consider being called a ‘conservative’ or ‘libertarian’ a pejorative. Why is that?”
    Why George, the answer is so obvious. The left does not utter those words with all the non verbal negative garbage that the right does with the word “liberal.” The left is nowhere near as ill mannered and nasty as the right. The right has, through sheer force of repetition of their negative views about liberals, turned the term into a pejorative. You can called me liberal or progressive, but I am not a classic communist by any means. Of course, the right has “educated” a huge motley crew of illiterate Bible thumping, gun toting souls, into folks who believe that anyone who isn’t in their particular brand of church is suspect, and anyone not within what they believe is the greater Christian sphere, must surely be a communist.

    Like

  7. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    OOGA BOOGA Keach. Those Koch brothers scare the crap out of you and the liberals.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    DougK – it seems that you’ve sidestepped two recent points here – 1) a serious discussion of the asymmetrical pejoratives as perceived by the right and left. As an example I cite your verbage in 1152am – the right gets accused of “non verbal negative garbage”, upon which are piled such characterizations as “huge motley crew of illiterate Bible thumping, gun toting souls,…”. Hard to take the next steps in that discussion which again terminates with the left’s, ‘Yes, but we know what you’re really thinking.’ This has also been a persistent theme on these pages.
    And 2), the workers who are the ‘real creators of wealth’ and are grudgingly paid anything more than the cost of “the food they eat.” Under governance like ours (and other developed countries), why don’t the workers just quit and establish a collective to compete with the heartless greedy capitalist that underpays them? I have raised this point before, to no avail.

    Like

  9. Brad Croul Avatar
    Brad Croul

    George,
    Does “Time” state in the masthead somewhere they are, “the premier left wing news source”?
    I agree with Keachie. Your regular posters have posted so many derogatory terms, such as “libholes”, “lefty trash”, etc. that any time you mention a news source as “Communist”, “Socialist”, or “left wing” it now implies (to me) that you think the validity of the publication is in question, or that the organization should be scorned as they are not of the same political persuasion as yourself. Do you refer to Cato.org as a “premier right wing” organization when you reference it in an article?
    By what standard are you labeling national magazines as to their political persuasion? Has “Time” been rated by some rating agency as leftwing?
    From Wiki,
    “Time is the world’s largest weekly news magazine, and has a domestic audience of 20 million and a global audience of 25 million”.

    Like

  10. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    George, you are correct. The left can’t hack the name they call themselves because the mass of people now recognize their moniker as lefty. So, like most monikers they create and which become a pejorative, they rename. Time was once a great magazine but in the 90’s it became a mouthpiece for the left. Same with Newsweek. They were mainstream versions of the NATION mag-rag. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nation . Anyway, the left are simply childish babes who cry a river when we stand up to them. They are nonsensical and on the run. Besides these lovelies trash all of us including you with the vilest slights on the FUE’s blog and others.

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    BradC, surely you jest. I know of no “rating agency” that labels Time, NYT, Wash Post, LA Times, Newsweek,MSNBC … as left wing, nor National Review, Weekly Standard, Reason, American Thinker,Fox News … as right wing. Their informed audiences make those assessments. I count myself among them. Also, please don’t confuse the circulation of a news medium with its ideological bent, they are semantically orthogonal (q.v.).
    As to the pejoratives directed at the left which you cite, I can think of only one RR commenter who is still so disposed. We can only hope that time will calm him. However, the counter-pejoratives of equal and surpassing venom on these pages continue from multiple sources on the left.
    The greatest of these insults have been levied against me as a veteran and naturalized citizen, in which, for example, I have been labeled “un-American” and invited to return to my country of birth.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    I took my mother to her cataract surgeon this week and while waiting picked up the latest issue of Time. It was so thin and the fonts so small I think it could be effectively used as TP. I read a few of the articles and I must say, it reinforced my reasons to cancel it back in the 90’s. It may be read by 25 million unfortunate souls around the world but the mantra is on the wane.

    Like

  13. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    “Under governance like ours (and other developed countries), why don’t the workers just quit and establish a collective to compete with the heartless greedy capitalist that underpays them? I have raised this point before, to no avail. ”
    Because the workers as individuals are paid very little, they accumulate very little, and then those that do get some cash together, and some ideas of how to make a product or service which does indeed appeal to people, such that a profit is made, switch sides and become capitalists, and just like the rest of them, go into full greed mode.
    Full greed mode is probably essential for a startup, but after you pass $10,000,000 in net profit, certainly not.

    Like

  14. Douglas Keachie Avatar

    George, I most emphatically agree that all citizens should return to the planet of their birth…
    PS, thanks for your service.

    Like

  15. Bonnie M Avatar
    Bonnie M

    Lots of phony blather about the political left and right. They’re the same thing. Both support big government, excessive regulation and control of all resources to support it. Middle of the road people support less government, our Bill of Rights…of, by and for the people, not big government. Freedom. People in labor unions are already living under a dictator, and are afraid to say or do anything that might offend those in charge. Pretty hard to get your hand out of the cookie jar unless you let go of the cookie. The basics on how to trap an animal.

    Like

  16. George Rebane Avatar

    I wonder what there is about those masses of altruistic workers who want to share the wealth of their company’s owners. As DougK points out, the bastards turn on you the moment they find themselves starting and owning their own company. Perhaps those counter-revolutionary cads who “switch sides” can be, I don’t know, summarily shot like they were in days of yore. Maybe that way we can work through all the phoney-baloneys who, masquerading as workers, are deep down inside really filthy greedy capitalists. If we get rid of all that surface scum, we’ll get down to the real workers, those who can start a company and will not be driven by profits. I can see the happy dancing now.

    Like

Leave a comment