Rebane's Ruminations
July 2011
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Cut, Cap & Balance Lite just passed the House 218 to 210 with no Dems voting for it, and 22 Repubs opposing it.  The tea party backed Repubs came and took the heat to the end, they would not vote for an increase in the debt ceiling.  Why?  Because our continuing to borrow with no plan to pay back is what will pull the country down, and even CCB Lite won’t fix that.  That is what will cause our credit rating to be downgraded, not the piddly crap going on in Washington this weekend.

So now we have the ongoing Beltway game that’s over the heads of most Americans –

- The President bloviates (nothing scorable),
- The House Legislates,
- The Senate Kills Bills.

Academic political scientists are telling us that there is less overlap between the Dems and Repubs than there has been since the 1890s (the beginning of the American progressive movement).  However, one thing we can all celebrate in this epochal national debate on how we citizens want to relate to government is that these bills focus on the real ideological differences between our political parties.  There is no pork appended to any of these bills CCB and CCB Lite.  Therefore there is no back room deal making and back slapping as votes are traded ONLY for the purpose of insuring re-election.

As Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid goes into the weekend to pass his smoke-and-mirrors cuts alternative, for the first time in 30 years the issues on the national fisc and governance are singular, clear, and complete.  No cuts?  Yeah, you heard the way he added savings to his spending cuts column from the presumed halt of the mid-east campaigns.  Well, the Repubs can come back with a ‘I’ll see ya and raise ya’, and claim that we could have had NASA launch a $30T program to put a man on the Sun in this decade.  And since we’re not going to do that, we’re going to cut $30T from future budgets.  Put those cuts in our column please.

[update] Without debate, the Senate killed it.  BTW, H/T to RR reader who sent the following –

Conservative star Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) ripped Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for the fantasy savings in his budget plan.

“Let’s pass a bill to cover the moon with yogurt that will cost $5 trillion today. and then let’s pass a bill the next day to cancel that bill. We could save $5 trillion.”

Great minds and all that.  I guess my little fantasy was not that far off the heavy thinking going on in Washington during these hours.

[30jul2011 update]  I'm happy to report that our congressman Tom McClintock was one of the 22 Repubs voting NO on CCB Lite.  These one shots to reduce spending by a skosh over ten years along with no provision for stopping the national debt going up forever are a joke.  Such legislation will give our creditors no greater comfort, and therefore not affect our credit rating one way or the other.  'Give us more money so we can pay our interest on what we already owe you, and forget about getting back the  principal.' is what passes for fiscal policy in Greece.

930AM – Just received this document (Download S_627 Extended version_29jul11) from Congressman Tom McClintock that analyzes CCB Lite, gives the rationale for the congressman's no vote, and outlines a future course of action.

Posted in , ,

54 responses to “CCB Lite passes – 218 to 210 (updated 30jul2011)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Thanks for the discussion. We should be the ones in Washington calling the shots.
    The simple fact about health care is that as more and more people lose their health coverage due to layoffs, rising expenses and denial of coverage the numbers dependent of public assistance increase and that is the most expensive and inefficient health care option that is paid for by public funds. We have certain standards of kindness and compassion that is part of our civic character that won’t deny basic health services to the needy. The problem is because health care insurance is not an option to the working or non working poor responsibility falls into the lap of the taxpayers who fork up the costs.
    An example of the inefficiency of the current system was made clear to me when my friend suffered a serious heart attack. was taken by ambulance, given emergency care and treated for the drect cause of the attack but denied further treatment to prevent another attack that they told him was coming. So instead of taking care of the problem once and for all they sent him home. Two weeks later he had another attack as predicted so they went through the whole routine again this time fixing the rest of the problem. The whole procedure cost $400,000 paid for by somebody or thing. If they would have fist him all at once it would have been half that. That’s an example of how bad things are currently.
    the fact is we are the only nation in the developed world that has no national health program right now. We’ll see what Obama care turns out to be but you want to get rid of that with no immediate plan for the working poor.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar

    PaulE, I know that experience made a very deep impression on you, and I do not justify it. But I can explain it as a normal outcome when a mindless, feedback-absent bureaucracy (government or big corp) is made to deliver such social services. I have heard similar stories from friends who have had long expriences with the Canadian, British, and German systems. None of it is pretty.
    I don’t claim to have solved/discovered the best healthcare system yet, but I am sure that turning it over to a yet bigger bureaucracy will deliver the same old same old with cost going through the roof and services in the basement. Let’s continue looking.

    Like

  3. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I never heard of anyone in those countries that went bankrupt and lost their home because of health problems.

    Like

  4. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    State homestead laws can easily fix that problem!
    http://www.alperlaw.com/constitutional_protection.html

    Like

Leave a comment