Rebane's Ruminations
June 2011
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

The ‘birther’ pot continues to boil.  In ‘The Birth Certificate from Hell’ I reviewed the response to the White House posting of President Obama’s long form birth certificate.  The pdf image of the certificate, available from the WH website, indicated clearly that it had been ‘photoshopped’.  For more recent developments, please read Russ Steele’s 06jun11_0650 comment on that post.

JobLossesSinceWW2 

RR readers know that I am of the Austrian persuasion (Mises and Hayek) when it comes to economic theory and government policy.  Mises’ famous advice to governments seeking to repair recessions – “Do nothing, sooner!” – was first borne out in the Great Depression.  In the recessions since, the dictum has garnered additional support.  This is nowhere illustrated better than the above graphic from calculateriskblog.com (H/T to RR reader).  Here we see the extension of recessions as the feds have started to ‘help’ out.  And, of course, the poster child of them all is the current Great Recession that is on its way to becoming Great Depression Two

Bush2’s TARP started things off (red line) by slowing down unemployment at the predictable and predicted (also here on RR) cost of a deeper and more extended unemployment later which President Obama cooked into this economic cow pie with his bailouts, corporate meddlings, increased regulations, and trillions of stimulus dollars that have left the socialists yapping their perennial ‘It would have been worse had we not done what we did.’  Were Mises and Hayek still alive, I venture that their next piece of advice to us would be, ‘Stand by for ram!’  (More on this at NCMW here.)

MathSciScores2009 Last night I was at Bear River High School presenting some scholarships from SESF (TechTest) and the Nevada City Rotary Club on their annual awards night.  And last week SESF presented the major tranche of TechTest2011 merit scholarships to Nevada Union High School seniors.  These scholarships continue to support young people headed for technology careers.  The daily news reminds us again that we are in dire straits as nation when it comes to supplying wealth creating workers.  Thanks to the new politically correct curricula promoted by leftwing teachers’ unions, we have been turning out dumber students in mostly ‘meathead majors’.  Industry is again beseeching our school systems to turn out workers with skills needed in the American workplaces (see ‘Industry Puts Heat on Schools to Teach Skills Employers Need’ in the 6jun11 WSJ), and progressive organizations like the NAACP continue to throw their weight against the kids who are most disadvantaged (here).  The nearby graphic illustrates the competitive slide of US students compared to students in other OECD countries.

The shortage of qualified people in the manufacturing and service sectors is especially acute even in the days of 9+% unemployment.  The greatest “service sector” job shortage is in engineers which, of course, relates to our inability to attract and educate people in the STEM subjects (STEM? Science, technology, engineering, mathematics).  It would behoove all of us with a voice and a vote to become familiar with this problem which has been assiduously ignored and/or downplayed by the progressives in places where it counts – the nation’s classrooms.  For more details on jobs and the strategies leading companies are using to get workers, please see the special reports in ‘The War for Tech Talent 2011’.

Posted in , , ,

21 responses to “Ruminations – 7jun2011”

  1. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    Science, technology, engineering, mathematics… this is where education, parents and students need to focus and focus on fast. We are being left behind.

    Like

  2. Russ Steele Avatar

    Steve E,
    The numbers speak from them selves, we are behind and our schools are not prepared to close the gap. More and more students entering collage are unable to pass the entrance exams and must take remedial courses just to get in to collage. SESF has a tech mentoring program to help our local students, but we need tech mentoring programs across the state and the nation if we are ever to catch up.
    For partents that really care about their children’s education form Charter Schools, allowing parents and teachers to create quality schools that can focus on the STEM.
    However, when a charter school is formed, the teachers are allowed to determine if they want to pay union bribes to work at the charter school. In California, 85% of the teachers vote NO on paying bribes to unions.
    Is it any wonder the unions are afraid of charter schools and are trying to kill them in the Legislature.
    “Among the bills that charter schools are watching closely is AB 401 by Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, which would place a cap on the number of allowable charters in California and won passage to the Senate earlier this month – a similar bill by the author got this far last year before failing in committee.
    Other pending bills in the lower house would create new rights and benefits for classified employees that work for charter schools and require charter conversions to be approved by 50 percent of classified staff in addition to half the teachers.”
    Unions do not care about education; they care about bribes, money and owning government. Our children STEM skills are the last item on the agenda.
    WE need to get the Union out of our schools and get back to creating an educated work force that can compete in the global market place. That is not going to happen until the the people of this nation rise up and make it happen. The TPP 40 year plan has some to the right elements, but there is a lot more to be done. One step at a time.

    Like

  3. wmartin Avatar
    wmartin

    “More and more students entering collage are unable to pass the entrance exams”…
    This, I believe.
    I wonder to what extent K-12 has declined in quality due to a need to make all students equal. I’ll bet there’s a ton of money being spent on various forms of special ed that didn’t used to be and this is drawn from a general fund. It’s hard to escape those zero sum games.
    It’s also hard to escape the fact that there’s a couple of billion Indians and Chinese out there, they have quite a few decent schools, and they will work for less. I can’t say that there’s anything so superior in either US DNA or work ethic that you can overcome vastly lower labor rates.
    But really, do you improve the situation in this country by pushing on the rope? By putting more people through technical training? or do you improve the situation by pulling on the rope and giving people some reason to have technical careers.
    At this point in time, it’s got to look a lot more attractive for an 18 year old to become a fireman (a profession whose practitioners are guaranteed to become wealthy in their early 50’s), a lawyer, part of one of our bubbles like real estate, or the boss of the Sierra Business Council. Technical occupations are subject to rampant ageism and declining wages through the years.
    Perhaps a civil engineer can pull it off, but most engineering and science gigs have increasingly bad track records at providing lifetime employment.

    Like

  4. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    I agree with Russ’s statement about the basic issue/condition… “The numbers speak from them selves, we are behind and our schools are not prepared to close the gap”.

    Like

  5. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    STEM is nearly pure bullsh*t eduspeak.
    As a physicist/electrical engineer who has successfully launched their kid into DEEP STEM, let me say K-12 doesn’t need “STEM”, it needs to provide the solid math (meaning algebra, geometry, algebra II, trig and calculus) and science (meaning solid chemistry and physics). Post secondary can do the rest just fine.

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    GregG, please tell us more. I understand STEM to be nothing other than an acronym for the kinds of technical courses that our kids need. And these courses would consist of the “solid math and science” that you speak of. Is this not correct? What other less useful curriculum does STEM imply in educational circles?

    Like

  7. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    It’s COLLEGE, and “von Mises’.
    It would be nice for the Sierra Business Council to be run by someone schooled in science. It would be even nicer if it was run by someone schooled in the sciences and actually a council of businesses in the Sierra.

    Like

  8. George Rebane Avatar

    GregG, not sure what you meant by “COLLEGE”.
    (Apologies for leaving off Ludwig’s titular ‘von’. To be correct I would also have to augment Friedrich’s appellation since he was equally von Hayek. I’ve started leaving off the extra baggage with the assumption that RR readers know about whom I write.)

    Like

  9. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    College, not ‘collage’.
    Kids in K-12 who want to study science, technology, engineering or mathematics need the same old algebra, trig, calculus, chemistry and physics that has been there for the past X decades. When you hear a K-12 BSer talking about STEM, they’re bullsitting you.
    “We do STEM” means they’re pretending a watered down curriculum that might lead to a Nursing degree is good enuf. Sorry, but if you can’t hit your freshman year in college ready to play the same chemistry, physics and calculus (single and multivariable) that chem, physics, engineering and math majors need to play hardball, you’ve not been prepared for real STEM.

    Like

  10. George Rebane Avatar

    Greg, “‘collage’” ???
    Re STEM: I was not aware that STEM is also a K-12 BS term for watered down courses. The kids I work with in the TechTest merit scholarship program appear to have received a decent STEM curriculum (they could be stronger in math). Take a look at the tests on sesfoundation.org.
    There is also a use for a two-tiered STEM curriculum. The more broader curriculum would seek to produce numerate graduates for non-technology careers. But I don’t see any of that happening.

    Like

  11. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    I remember speaking with a science teacher (physics, iirc) from Bear River HS ten years ago, outside an ‘outcome based education’ dog and pony show that the county ed super, Terry McAteer, was hosting.
    He was defending his trig and calculus free 9th grade level physics by noting BRHS wouldn’t be able to fill a classroom with seniors ready to tackle the more math intensive traditional 12 grade physics curriculum. He also related that most of his students could not figure out and simplify 1/[-0.2] without a calculator.
    Can’t do real STEM if you haven’t mastered algebra, which you can’t master if you don’t understand fractions.

    Like

  12. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Tech marketing folks are easily distracted by BSO’s… bright shiny objects. Often the wishlist of the last customer they’ve talked to. If only we had the new BSO, we’d have some sales.
    STEM is the current BSO in the ed biz.
    BTW have you kept track of the elementary schools of the techtest takers?

    Like

  13. George Rebane Avatar

    Can’t disagree with your observations GregG.
    Tracking “… elementary schools of the techtest takes?” Short answer is NO. What dots are you connecting here?

    Like

  14. Ben Emery Avatar

    Education based in comprehension instead of memorization (teaching to the test) will be the way students strengthen their ability to critically think. To minimize failure and maximize passing scores in larger and more intellectually diverse classrooms becomes the key to teaching. Teaching at the levels of the lower level students to maximize test results and in the mean time disillusioning more capable students along with teachers who have higher goals. As we continue to either cut funding to our schools (reducing amount of teachers) or administrations continue to focus on putting their wants before the students this trend will continue. We need more teachers who are secure in their jobs along with getting teacher to student ratios down.
    Just some food for thought
    Funds from Nevada County going to fund our occupation of Afghanistan in 2011 budget
    http://costofwar.com/en/tradeoffs/state/CA/county/nevada-county/program/13/tradeoff/3/

    Like

  15. Ben Emery Avatar

    Sorry I should of read though it before posting.
    “To minimize failure and maximize passing scores” is referring to teaching to the test not comprehension.

    Like

  16. Mikey McD Avatar

    Ben, the facts are that education spending is still on the rise (DESPITE DECLINING ENROLLMENT).
    Propaganda: “As we continue to either cut funding to our schools”
    CA: 2003 Education spending = $46 Billion
    CA: 2009 Education Spending = $54 Billion

    Like

  17. Mikey McD Avatar

    Greg, have your read “Outliers” (Malcolm Gladwell)? The portion on education (specifically math) was interesting if you can read through his ‘it takes a village’ bias.

    Like

  18. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Ben Emery, I have to say you are a compass pointing south when it comes to education. There never was much rote (mindless memorization without a context of understanding) in traditional mathematics education, and the Whole Math/Fuzzy Math/NCTM Math attempts at getting rid of any memorization were disastrous.
    MMcD, no I’ve not read Gladwell but googling, it appears I agree with him in one place, that excelling in math and science takes more than talent and drive: the student also needs as much nurturing as the struggling students at the other end. Unfortunately, many schools (especially including the GVSD) have (or at least had) the attitude the smart kids will do OK no matter what. Unfortunately, they don’t.
    George, I would be surprised if you didn’t have some elementary schools overrepresented, and others underrepresented. GVSD and Pleasant Valley, would be my guesses for underrepresentation, Chicago Park, Pleasant Ridge and Mount St. Marys for overrepresentation.

    Like

  19. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Let me quote the NCTM President of the mid 90’s, Jack Price:

    What we have now is nostalgia math. It is the mathematics that we have always had, that is good for the most part for the relatively high socio-economic anglo male, and that we have a great deal of research that has been done showing that women, for example, and minority groups do not learn the same way. They have the capability, certainly, of learning, but they don’t, the teaching strategies that you use with them are different from those that we have been able to use in the past when young people, we weren’t expected to graduate a lot of people, and most of those who did graduate and go on to college were the anglo males.

    Linda Brown, then Principal of Hennessey and Ass’t Supe of the GVSD, when rejecting with horror my suggestion of accepting free books from Saxon Publishers (the books they turned to after Mathland was proven a dismal failure), Ms. Brown exclaimed following the [so-called] NCTM Standards was the #1 priority. Saxon was just “drill and kill”, the whole math denigration of practice and a modicum of memorization, like addition and multiplication facts and standard algorithms like long division.
    Funny, but women and even men of color in India, Japan an China have done pretty will with that bad old White Male Math. And white kids in Grass Valley failed miserably with the NTCMish monstrosities inflicted upon them. The kids taking the first TechTest in 2007 were the first ones that had Mathland as 1st graders in the GVSD. I think there will be another couple years before the last of the Mathlanded in the 1st are worked out of the system.

    Like

  20. George Rebane Avatar

    Greg, I don’t doubt your assessments of the source grade schools for success on TechTest. And since you are much closer to the STEM atrocities in the current/recent school curricula, is there some hope that we will have a return to teaching methods that work as we go forward? Or are we trying out some new theories of education in these critical areas?

    Like

  21. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    I’m afraid education in the US is a nearly lost cause, and the best description of the problems that I know of is in the book “The Schools We Need (and why we can’t have them)” by E.D.Hirsch.
    http://www.amazon.com/Schools-We-Need-Dont-Have/dp/0385495242/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_4
    The colleges of education are deeply set into the constructivist models of learning theory and are more interested in turning out teachers who salute the unverifiable ‘multiple intelligences’ theories of Howard Gardner, forcing a ‘child centered curriculum’ rather than a knowledge centered curriculum that was the traditional focus.
    Another look at math ed is Liping Ma’s piece, “Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States”
    http://www.amazon.com/Knowing-Teaching-Elementary-Mathematics-Understanding/dp/0805829091
    Just as it’s hard to fight city hall, it’s hard to fight the Federal Dept of Education, all the state D of E’s, and the teacher’s unions. Hard fought reforms like the California content standards in math and science are chipped away until they make way for more of the watered down junk.
    A couple of crudely constructed sites you might find of interest to browse are
    http://www.mathematicallycorrect.com and http://nychold.org/
    The grandaddy parents group was HonestOpenLogicalDebate HOLD in Palo Alto, the first parental group that came together after NCTM math was first rolled out in the schools there, with computation scores taking a quick dive. HOLD was mostly superceded by MC and later, after California had mostly found some real math religion, NYC HOLD formed as NYC started repeating the fad.

    Like

Leave a comment