George Rebane
One way to deconstruct a nation-state is to have its citizens divided into cohorts each answerable to a different set of laws. The Islamic settlements in Europe are on their way to such a legal construct. Great Britain already has a Sharia dual in its legal system to which Muslims are bound and under which their justice may be dispensed.
Islamic organizations in Australia united under AFIC (Australian Federation of Islamic Councils) are now petitioning the government to do the same. AFIC states that it “strongly supports that multiculturalism should lead to legal pluralism . . . and twin tolerations”. This is perhaps the most blatant demonstration that Islamic societies, as they spread across the world, have no intention to assimilate into their host societies. (more here and here)
On the current path of progressivism in America, we are on course to soon entertain similar appeals on our shores. Strong arguments will be made and explained to the rest of us by the left that the natural maturation of multiculturalism must needs embody a legal pluralism and multiple tolerations specific to who belongs to what group.
As argued before in these pages – societies remain cohesive to the extent that its members can reliably predict each others’ behavior. A common language and a common body of law contribute to such cohesion. Legal pluralism does not.
(H/T to RR reader.)
[18may2011 update] A reader’s email contained this strong exhortation by conservativeactionalerts.com regarding some relevant legislation – HR973 – on Sharia law now before Congress.


Leave a comment