Rebane's Ruminations
March 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Republicans have their undies in a bundle about how to go forward on demanding spending cuts to reduce our astronomical deficits, and ultimately getting to a balanced budget.  As you no doubt have read here, there and every other place, nickel and diming the cuts along the current process of continuing resolutions will not solve any existential fiscal problem the country has.  Fred Barnes, executive editor of the Weekly Standard, argues in today’s 28mar11 WSJ (here) that nickel and diming is just the ticket for the Repubs to sweep the 2012 elections, and then take the big cleaver to the entitlements, which is required to make a dent in our insane socialist spending spree and intrusive government growth.

ChippingAway Barnes’ argument hangs on the notion that if the government ‘shuts down’ during the Repub control of the House, while the unrepentant Dems successfully beat back meaningful cuts, then the Dems will sweep the elections.  And tiny cuts is the only process that the Dems will accept.  The way forward is to chip away at the budget, getting a couple of bil spending cuts here and another couple of bil a few weeks later (nearby figure filched from the WSJ article).  Barnes summarizes his argument by exhorting the Repubs to avoid “sacrificing spending cuts you can get on the altar of those you can’t.”

A closer read of Fred’s piece reveals a pretty big omission in the arguments that he so neatly stacks up for us.  I think the Dems are happier than Brer Rabbit (‘Ooooh, don’t throw me in that briar patch!  No, no, no!!’) with this bit by piece approach that the current House leadership seems to celebrate (see also my related post on Congressman McClintock).  Now I don’t claim to be the smartest liberal tactician on the block, but here’s what I see the Dems message next year after the series of these niggardly spending cuts have been negotiated and put in place.

The Dems will simply tell the simpletons out there that ‘It is we who fought tooth and nail for you, and prevented the Repubs from gutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and … (wait for it) the necessary spending for our men and women in the military who keep our nation secure.  We are on the side of Main Street and jobs, not the fat cats who don’t need these entitlements for their retirement and care.  And when you put us back in control of government, it is we progressives who will bring back social justice, and tax the bejeezus out of the rich which will solve all our money problems.  Happy times will be here again.’  This song has made it to the top of the charts before, and given a chance – as Barnes suggests and the Repubs are doing – it will be there again before November 2012.  Count on it.

Posted in ,

8 responses to “Bungling the Budget”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    George,
    You are right on! Hollywood is already writing the Dems political ads and will be soon be focus group testing them and doing the necessary rewrites. We will soon be seeing a parade of Republican cut damaged teachers, firemen, policemen and the disable marching across our TV screens, and blasting from our AM radio, with promises by the Democrats they will fix thinks by taxing the rich and making them well again.

    Like

  2. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I think the Repubs are in trouble on this one. There are too many pet programs that they want to cut with strong advocates such as Amtrack, Public Radio, Planned Parenthood etc. A better plan for a balanced budget would have been a straight % cut of all departments-no sacred cows including military, security, entitlements , environmental programs and everything else. Instead they opted to eliminate programs that they don’t favor and leave others that they do. I expect a big rebound for the Dems on this especially combined with the assault on public workers unions which creates insecurity in millions of families . I say let all government programs cut the same. That would get support without hundreds of skirmishes. The Dems are licking their chops on this one. It’s a classic case of overreaching ala Clintin in 92.

    Like

  3. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    I’m not so sure, progress is progress and making cuts that can be won over trying for too much without the Seante and Whitehouse may be the mistake.

    Like

  4. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Don’t get me wrong boys – 10 or 20B is not what I’m talking about – get to 60 to 100B. Then then when we have the Senate the rubber hits the road, cause even 100 is chump change, roll back the last couple years – the new Gov workers didn’t work for the Gov 2 yrs ago so what if they don’t again.

    Like

  5. Bob Hobert Avatar
    Bob Hobert

    Paul, your proposal presumes that all federal spending programs are equally legitimate and effective. I’d rather have a Congress with the moxie to shed the wasteful ones that have not produced, not merely reduce them the same percentage amount as the vital ones. But then you may be thinking we don’t have a Congress with that much integrity. I’d have to agree.

    Like

  6. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Bob I hear you with all the talk about 20 agencies having the same type programs doing the same thing. I understand Pauls point too and it would be a good start as all could cut 10%+ without anybody even noticing – actually we don’t notice anything they do do LOL – pun intended

    Like

  7. Bob Hobert Avatar
    Bob Hobert

    Dixon – good point. Perhaps we should cut across the board until we do notice.

    Like

  8. John Galt Avatar

    The republicans in Congress should be more focused on saving the Country for future generations, than saving their job for the next two years.

    Like

Leave a comment