Rebane's Ruminations
February 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Three European leaders recently concluded very publicly that unassimilated multiculturalism in their countries was not only a failure, but a dangerous failure (here).  In America that is not yet received wisdom as we are again reminded of the ongoing saga of Major Nidal Malik ‘Allahu Akbar!’ Hasan – the Ft Hood Islamic terrorist who killed 13 and wounded 32 more.

This massacre was perpetrated by an institutionalized political correctness in our Department of Defense that wears multicultural blinders causing it to ignore the most blatant and obvious evidence of hatred against western civilization in general and America in particular.  Now all branches of the military have analyzed and reported on the Ft Hood massacre.  And given what has happened in the interval here and all around the world, none of the reports mention radical Islam as a causative or contributive factor to Hasan’s atrocity.  (more here)

I take this to be the latest harbinger of our relentless slide as a nation.  As a child, student, and defender of western civilization, I feel very alone when I see my government invite continued assaults from all quarters on American culture, values, and mores.  We go on spewing the ‘all cultures are equal’ pabulum while no longer defending our birthrights.  And that for us in the end will be deadly.

[18feb2011 update]  Thinking it as an intellectual given, I almost didn’t expect pushback on the thesis of this post.  Nevertheless, there it was in the comment thread, and most of it stayed on topic.  Historically multiple cultures living under a single political government have kept the peace primarily through separation and the government’s brutal force of arms.  Countries and empires divided into ethnic provinces and into smaller regions into “quarters” that had no political and social contact with each other, and tolerated a commercial contact of necessities.  Not exactly what we view as the American ideal.

When assimilation occurred, it did so over generations and usually at the cost of one culture assimilating its weaker counterpart.  In short multiculturalism per se did not survive.

Throughout history forced multiculturalism has abruptly ended with the downfall of the enforcing government, after which the (usually violent) separation of cultures has been the immediate aftermath.  Modern examples abound with the British Raj leaving India, the implosion of the USSR, the fall of Yugoslavia, and most recently Sadam Hussein’s Iraq.

Such politically incorrect history has not been taught to our young by the left dominated public schools.  Instead the mental midgets who mentor our classrooms have pushed the worship of a particularly dysfunctional form of “diversity” and “inclusion” which is Marxist in its modern inception, and seeks to prepare its acolytes for global citizenship.

The question now posed is, ‘Given that multiculturalism is a deadly affectation in America, what do we do about it?’  The implication is that we want to ‘do’ something that will keep America whole within its modern boundaries.  Let me start by saying that such solutions may no longer exist.  Jefferson’s “A nation ignorant and free …” echoes across the centuries; we may have become too ignorant to save ourselves as the historical sovereign nation-state founded in 1776.

But were we to attempt to save the country, the natural starting place would be to robustly re-establish our national totems (flags, statuary, pledge of allegiance, music, …) in all public places and all public occasions.  Most certainly our children’s history books would have to be rewritten again – books that, say, would once again give more column inches to George Washington than to Cesar Chavez.  Civics classes that focused on American exceptionalism and political unity rather than inclusionary diversity (whatever the hell that is) would re-enter the curriculum.  And most of all we need to re-establish the three most important things that are common to a culture – language, language, language.  Speak what you will at home, but in public and the workplace be fully communicative in English.

[21feb2011 update]  The news on the disastrous failure of multiculturalism in Europe just keeps pouring in.  It's almost as if for years people were afraid to open their mouths, and now that national leaders have taken their fingers out of the dike, the flood of reality is washing over the continent with a splash or two getting noticed on this side of the Pond.  Russ Steele sent me this link 'Europe's Mulitculturalism Leading to Civil War?' on Islamic 'no-go zone' that have arisen in countries like France, Germany, and Great Britain.  "France has some 751 "No Go" zones. The French government has labeled these areas 'sensitive urban zones' that are dangerous for whites and non-Muslims to enter."

Posted in , ,

62 responses to “Multiculturalism is a Deadly Affectation (updated 21feb2011)”

  1. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    I should ask for more detail because I share the apocalyptic
    scenario you describe so let’s just leave it at that for now.
    It seems to me that economic globalization and ownership of patents, copyrights and media outlets by international corporations pretty much wraps it up as far individual nations having any real control over their destiny, except for regional matters. That to me is global government. How do you propose we distribute knowledge and control within this reality?

    Like

  2. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Major typo I meant to say
    I should ask for more detail because I don’t share the apocalyptic scenario you describe so let’s just leave it at that for now.

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    Paul, it’s interesting that you label my implied scenario “apocalyptic”, implying(?) that if the historical talents and commercial dominance of the US are equalized or normalized relative to other economies, then that is our apocalypse. My thought instead is that we will go through an enormous readjustment that may mean a noticeable (significant?) reduction in our QoL. There may or not be blood in the gutters when that happens. The readjustment will happen, and we can skip the plausible ‘how it will happen’ for now as you suggest.
    As far as distribution of knowledge and control in the afteremath, my suggestion or ideal in these pages has been the evolution of sovereign nation states into confederacies consisting of large numbers of relatively small (under a million) semi-autonomous provinces following more or less the Swiss model.
    Each such jurisdiction would be culturally very homogeneous and would adopt its own political and economoic model. Movement, trade, and tourism among these cantons or provinces would be free, and societally ten thousand flowers would be encouraged to bloom and compete as models for QoL for all to see.
    Discouraged (how?) would be the cancerous settlements of foreign cultures in the sense that it is happening today. In short, multiculturalism would be inhibited, and that would necessarily impinge on personal liberties as it already did before we all started blindly celebrating diversity. I hope this gives enough of a bare skeleton of my preferred brave new world.

    Like

  4. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Would you consider Chinatown in San Francisco a “cancerous settlement” ?
    “apocalyptic”,
    You stated WWIII as a possible outcome of protectionist economic policies proposed by the Dems. That’s why I used the reference.
    “Semi-autonomous provinces following more or less the Swiss model”
    I think we need to return to local government in whatever form might work.
    Not a bad idea especially if it incorporated geographic and environmental boundaries as guidelines, but it will never happen. The Civil War sealed the deal for federal control over States. That’s why I thought the message of prop 19 was worth supporting.

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar

    SF Chinatown, cancerous settlement? not on your life. We recall that in the 19th century the Chinese were ushered and kept in their ghettos by the US. They wanted to assimilate in the worst way, and many/most did, even at the turn of the last century by buying land and becoming farmers and inland merchants. China never had a culture embodying a national policy or religion that taught worldwide settlements. (The movie ‘Flower Drum Song’ comes to mind.) Not sure how you drew that connection to Islam.
    Historically protectionist policies have been the seeds of conflict between nations. One of the reliable chestnuts of diplomacy has always been ‘When goods stop crossing borders, armies will.’ For example, our trade inhibitions against Japan in the 1930s fomented Pearl Harbor. We will continue very good relations with China as long as they lend us money and we buy their stuff – and if that ever stops, watch out.

    Like

  6. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    I’m confused about your message on this.
    This was your definition of assimilation as expressed earlier in this post
    “To assimilate as an immigrant into a new culture means to learn, accept, and exhibit the trappings and behaviors of that culture. And to do this at a minimum while in the public round of that culture.
    The desired endpoint of such assimilation is to draw to oneself no extraordinary attention as being someone strange or foreign to the adopted culture. An assimilated immigrant need never forsake his native culture, but merely practice it privately or when asked to share it in or during an appropriate multicultural event.”
    So why wouldn’t the Chinese as demonstrated by their public expression in Chinatown be part of your concern. Are you saying that intact ethnic communities such as this are actually OK?

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    There is no concern about Chinatown’s (or any other towns) in America because they are not exclusive enclaves of global movements based on a single culture, religion, or nationality that has a stated goal of world domination. In fact, these unique ethno-centric enclaves are designed specifically to draw in non-Chinese visitors and cater to them.
    I apologize if my “China never had a culture embodying a national policy or religion that taught worldwide settlements.” didn’t say it well enough for you to understand.
    What “public expression” of the American Chinese is a concern that draws a parallel with the Muslims?

    Like

  8. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    George
    Even a brief look at San Francisco political history will show the political clout of the organized Chinese community to fund and effect local and State politics. Also, the Chinese had such settlements worldwide in virtually every country so I don’t embrace your clarification. Many Chinese in Chinatown speak little or no English, have their own publications and economic institutions. For years they sent money home to help their families. I have no problem with this and embrace the cultural diversity that the Chinese and other cultures bring to our nation. So according to you it’s OK to express your ethnic culture as part of a tourist exhibition but it’s obvious Chinatown and the Chinese institutions in San Francisco are much more than that.
    So, for purposes of clarity, your concerns seem to be primarily Muslim communities who, according to you, have a stated goal of world domination. Are their any other cultures you put into that category or can we leave it at that? It seems to me that Latinos are interested primarily in having a decent place to live and do not embrace worldwide domination.

    Like

  9. George Rebane Avatar

    Political clout in SF does not spell the desire for world domination. We don’t remove Old Glory from classrooms in order not to impune Chinese sensitivities, but we do that and more so that we don’t accidentally enrage a local Muslim for whom your death is the only thing that will assuage Allah and bless his earthly sword.
    “…Muslim communities who, according to you, have a stated goal of world domination.” No Paul, not according to me, but according to the declarations of multiple Islamic activists groups and the broad sentiments of the Arab street as continue to be confirmed by reputable polling institutions such as Pew Research. It is only the progressive politicians and their pocketed lamestream media who seem to be totally blind to what the rest of the world knows and accepts. Have I erred in not counting your membership in that group?
    The only Latino problems we have are the corrupt governments which anchor their economies to eternal misery. And, of course, the Reconquista declarations of Mexican activist organizations in the US. I know of no global goals that Latinos have. Our problems rise mainly from history and proximity.

    Like

  10. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    Well now that you’ve narrowed the scope of the dangers of diversity we can move on to something else. Are you aware of our local history when we tried to ship the Chinese back to China after they outlived their usefulness building the railroads? The White Labor Club in Truckee tried their best to eliminate Chinese communities by boycotts and burning them out. There is a book “The Chinese Must Go” by Nevada City Historian Wallace Hagaman. Here’s more about this Golden Moment in Capitalism from the era that you seem to take nostalgic admiration of.
    http://www.sierrasun.com/article/20041128/LIFE/111280007

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    Paul, I am indeed aware of the attempts to ship Chinese workers back to their homeland. But I do think you have your “Golden Moment of Capitalism” more than a bit confused. No capitalist – then or now – has ever wanted to get rid of cheap labor. It is the socialists and their labor organizations (aka unions) that have sought to limit open markets in labor. They have used every means possible including murder, rape, pillage, fire, and even (as in this case) racism to protect their favored workers.
    Perhaps clearing up this misconception of what motivates free market capitalists may reduce the difference in our worldviews.

    Like

  12. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    Paul I am coming in a little late on this but I think I get your jist. Yes it was terrible to treat the Chinese and other Asian people’s as they were treated. My personal experience is in our area the Chinese assimilated into the dominant culture and ran some stores and did real estate. I went to school with a few and I had a crush on one beautiful girl.
    I do understand why FDR, a democrat, placed 120,000 Japanese in concentration camps but I personally 70 years later, am sorry for it. The times were different. What I see is this regarding the Chinese. They assimilated into the dominant culture and do not preach the death of the infidel. I have yet to see a Chinese American strap a bomb around himself and yell whatever the Islamists yell before murdering men women and children.

    Like

Leave a comment