Rebane's Ruminations
February 2011
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is the transcript of my regular commentary on KVMR-FM 89.5 that was broadcast earlier this 4feb2011 evening.]

In Nevada County Local 39 of the International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO enjoys the membership of about 555 of the current 825 employees, or about 2 out of 3 county workers.  Our county, like most across the land, is suffering from a budget shortfall caused by the current, or if you will, ‘recent’ recession.  Our elected Supervisors have sought and received wage and benefit concessions from the Sheriff’s Department and county management level staff.  This was done in the spirit of understanding the signs of the times, and the desire to keep as many people working as possible to provide the county its needed services.

However the leadership of Local 39 has informed the county that it will make no such concessions for its membership.  The most likely result of this is that the county will have to lay off some union members.  And as usual, the layoffs will most likely be based on seniority rather than merit or utility to the people whom the county serves.  In short, for the sake of keeping the benefit packages intact for the union’s leadership and senior members, the union will instead sacrifice members’ jobs.  Job security was supposedly one of the benefits that attracted them to the union in the first place.  Or was it?


The impact of unions in the American workplace has been spotty.  Most certainly in recent decades, both public and private sector unions have had a negative impact on the companies and the jurisdictions where they have taken root.  In the public sector they have driven states, cities, and counties to the edge of bankruptcy.  Their ability to do that was first recognized by President Roosevelt in the 1930s, and they have lived up to his fears since then.  During his first go-around our current Governor Jerry Brown opened California state employees to union representation.  The state is now looking at almost one half trillion dollars of unfunded government employee retirement benefits.

Not all states have opened their doors to forced-union membership.  Over the years, twenty-two states have chosen to remain ‘right-to-work’ states where workers have the right to join a union or not.  As reported (here) by the Cato Institute, these states have done much better economically than the non-right-to-work states.  Moreover, the Wall Street Journal reports that “right-to-work states outperform forced-union states in almost every measurable category of worker well-being.”

The evidence on the negative impact of unions has become common knowledge among politicians not bought and paid for by these organizations.  Today Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin – three forced-union states – are considering reversing the trend and becoming right-to-work states.  They want this so that domestic and foreign companies seeking to expand and/or relocate don’t spurn them as did Colgate when it chose not to build a factory with hundreds of new jobs in Indiana.  Colgate chose a right-to-work state instead.

Returning to the intractable public service union members who contribute to California’s fiscal blight, a couple of questions about Nevada County’s problem come to mind.  What prevents the Local 39 membership from holding a vote to recall its leadership, or insisting that a membership vote be held on the wage concession issue?  And if not that, then remembering Reagan and the air traffic controllers, we may ask what prevents our Board of Supervisors from firing all of the Local 39 members?  After that they can open all those positions for rehiring under the new reduced benefit package?

It would be good to hear from the county on these alternatives before having to make the next critical budget decision.  Perhaps just the airing of these possibilities will motivate Local 39 leadership to reconsider their entrenched position.

My name is Rebane and I also expand on these and other themes in my Union columns, on NCTV, and on georgerebane.com where this transcript appears.  These opinions are not necessarily shared by KVMR.  Thank you for listening.

Posted in , , ,

10 responses to “Local 39: Unions Eating their Young?”

  1. Jeff Peline Avatar
    Jeff Peline

    Did KVMR invite the union to provide a rebuttal to “this”?

    Like

  2. Paul Emery Avatar
    Paul Emery

    You neglect to note that the unions and the county will be going through a process of negotiation and will arrive at an agreement. This is way too early in the process to resort to such options.

    Like

  3. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Jeff its George’s commentary, why would he know that or even be involved? Maybe you should call them and ask them to allow you to do a rebuttal
    Paul, sounds like that was an answer to me, so the logical question would be to explore any options that may be available – that would allow the county to continue on that basis.
    I wanted to go be an air traffic controller when he did that btw
    Roosevelt was pretty perceptive on that one, they go on strike and cripple a city with basic services – europe is worse, I think only because we have given them everything so far.

    Like

  4. Todd Juvinall Avatar
    Todd Juvinall

    So why would Pelline put the word this in parentheses? Maybe he should be invited by Paul to give his liberal POV and maybe he would stop complaining about everything.

    Like

  5. Mike Sherman Avatar

    I worked for the county for 12 years and was not a member of the union, nor did I want to be. In ’07 or ’08, county management assisted the union in pushing through a hushed, fast vote making union dues (and membership) mandatory. Money was being sucked out of my paycheck to support an organization that does not always act in the best interest of anyone except themselves. I pushed for a new vote on mandatory union dues by gathering signatures on my own time and paid dearly for this ‘political’ activity. I find it interesting that the union shows it’s appreciation to county management by telling them to shove it. The mandatory union dues doubled the union’s income, yet they hold fast at telling all of us ‘too bad, so sad’. I told county management if the employee petition process was successful in getting a new vote, a group of us was considering an additional petition process/vote to de-certify the union all together.
    There are plenty of fine, intelligent employees willing to step up and handle labor contracts. Utilizing the AFL-CIO does not serve the needs of county management, county employees or the taxpaying citizens of Nevada County.
    There was a time when labor unions were necessary, but not today.

    Like

  6. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    “There was a time when labor unions were necessary, but not today.”
    I agree, for the most part. As a former member of IATSE/AFL-CIO and witness to some union baloney myself, AFL-CIO does seem to be a bit of an odd fit for Nevada County.
    That being said, Steve Crouch, district rep. for Local 39, asked a question during the recent imbroglio and I think it’s a good one–why not ask first for older county workers to take early retirement before layoffs?

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar

    Michael, that sounds like a step in the right direction. Every additional year they’re on the job costs the county maximum pension liability. How was that suggestion received?

    Like

  8. Greg Goodknight Avatar
    Greg Goodknight

    Peeline violates his abstinence pledge once again. Not surprising.
    Nice job with the commentary, George. To the extent Local 39 takes a hard line on feathering the nests of their senior members, they’ll be eating not only their brothers and sisters with less seniority, but also their friends and neighbors who will be faced with crumbling infrastructure and fewer services for their tax dollars.

    Like

  9. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Of course thats what the private sector does by offering early retirement packages – but here the union goes the other direction
    good post Mr Sherman – we need people like you that have been there, I don’t what its like

    Like

  10. Michael Anderson Avatar
    Michael Anderson

    “How was that suggestion received?
    I have no idea. Good question.
    I get the sense that Crouch and Haffey are talking past each other on this subject. That’s unfortunate.

    Like

Leave a comment