Rebane's Ruminations
October 2010
S M T W T F S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

[This is President Obama’s 2oct10 weekly radio address with my commentary annotated in blue italics.  All emphases are mine.]

ObamaChange4 Over the past twenty months, we’ve been fighting not just to create more jobs today, but to rebuild our economy on a stronger foundation.  Our future as a nation depends on making sure that the jobs and industries of the 21st century take root here in America.  And there is perhaps no industry with more potential to create jobs now – and growth in the coming years – than clean energy.

With alarm we have watched the kind of “stronger foundation” that you and yours have started fashioning for our country – it is not an American foundation, but one that today is uniquely yours.  Jobs and new industries have always taken root in America.  In fact they have sprung from the fertile soil of America’s creativity, liberty, and firm knowledge that the most generous of rewards are retained by those who successfully manage their entrepreneurial risk in free markets.  There are many other sectors than ‘clean energy’ for which generous investments and their attendant jobs are waiting.  These include water, sanitation, agriculture, bio-technology, robotics, machine intelligence, transportation, and healthcare.  All of these, and clean energy in its time, will bear more fruit and quicker when government lifts its heavy tax and regulatory burdens and promises a known, open, and stable playing field.

For decades, we’ve talked about the importance of ending our dependence on foreign oil and pursuing new kinds of energy, like wind and solar power.  But for just as long, progress had been prevented at every turn by the special interests and their allies in Washington.

The “special interests” have been those in behalf of the American citizens and the industry that has supplied them for decades with the world’s most abundant and cheapest energy to power our homes, farms, and industries.  Our growth, quality of life, and security have all been dependent on the success of such special interests.  Long may they wave.

So, year after year, our dependence on foreign oil grew.  Families have been held hostage to spikes in gas prices.  Good manufacturing jobs have gone overseas.  And we’ve seen companies produce new energy technologies and high-skilled jobs not in America, but in countries like China, India and Germany.

Jobs have not left America because of our dependence on foreign oil.  Jobs have gone and continue to go overseas because the American worker has been dumbed down by two generations of union dominated state education monopolies in which multi-culturalism and puerile self-esteem have replaced the curricula of science, math, and history.  In the workplace – public and private – every sector that has fallen under the grip of unions has suffered and seen its  productivity shrivel.  Overseas, formerly autocratic governments are loosening their grip and allowing hundreds of millions of workers to leave farms for new factories that out produce ours and are raising the quality of life for billions of people.  All the while our socialists demagogue workers’ rights to produce less, in greater comfort, for more pay.  We are reaping what we have sown, and the trade wars now in the planning stages will bring home to all the fantasyland future you are architecting for us Mr President.


It was essential – for our economy, our security, and our planet – that we finally tackle this challenge.  That is why, since we took office, my administration has made an historic commitment to promote clean energy technology.  This will mean hundreds of thousands of new American jobs by 2012.  Jobs for contractors to install energy-saving windows and insulation.  Jobs for factory workers to build high-tech vehicle batteries, electric cars, and hybrid trucks.  Jobs for engineers and construction crews to create wind farms and solar plants that are going to double the renewable energy we can generate in this country.  These are jobs building the future.

None of these jobs mandated by the bayonet will build the future that we Americans want for ourselves and our children.  As long as cheaper energy is available from existing sources, all such ‘clean energy’ jobs are subsidized make-work, and they will not be fiscally sustainable, nor will they sustain our quality of life.  We need to embark immediately on a totally new program of public and private education that begins with cleaning house of the deadwood ‘teachers’ who don’t teach, but survive only through their special interest unions that have ground down our ability to compete in the new technologies outlined above.

For example, I want share with you one new development, made possible by the clean energy incentives we have launched.  This month, in the Mojave Desert, a company called BrightSource plans to break ground on a revolutionary new type of solar power plant.  It’s going to put about a thousand people to work building a state-of-the-art facility.  And when it’s complete, it will turn sunlight into the energy that will power up to 140,000 homes – the largest such plant in the world.  Not in China.  Not in India.  But in California.

And not in California Mr President.  At full capacity BrightSource advertizes a 100MW output from its 50K heliostats during the day’s good sun angles in a desert under clear skies.  At that, this sprawling facility will not even be able to power a toaster in each of those 140K homes, let alone supply its normal household needs.  Confident that your constituency “flunks Econ 101”, you, sir, are patronizingly selling bullcrap to the country with reports like these.

With projects like this one, and others across this country, we are staking our claim to continued leadership in the new global economy.  And we’re putting Americans to work producing clean, home-grown American energy that will help lower our reliance on foreign oil and protect our planet for future generations.

With projects like this we are only driving a stake through the heart of our economy.  Projects such as BrightStone would not be feasible were it not for subsidies and the mandates to utilities to buy its power output at elevated prices.  There are a hundred ways to structure financing deals for such energy projects that let select early investors reap guaranteed profits for political display purposes.  Such projects are nothing but feel-good totems to the technically and financially inert.  They are only affordable to the extent that the government can continue to plunder the taxpayer.  Attempting to lower reliance on fossil fuels and ‘protect our planet’ with many square miles of earth’s surface mounted heliostats is a fools errand.  There are many more promising energy generation approaches to which a free market would allocate such investments.

Now there are some in Washington who want to shut them down.  In fact, in the Pledge they recently released, the Republican leadership is promising to scrap all the incentives for clean energy projects, including those currently underway – even with all the jobs and potential that they hold.

This doesn’t make sense for our economy.  It doesn’t make sense for Americans who are looking for jobs. And it doesn’t make sense for our future.  To go backwards and scrap these plans means handing the competitive edge to China and other nations.  It means that we’ll grow even more dependent on foreign oil.  And, at a time of economic hardship, it means forgoing jobs we desperately need. In fact, shutting down just this one project would cost about a thousand jobs.

Yes, and I would venture that half the country wishes godspeed to those wanting to shut down such boondoggles.  There is nothing that the BrightStones of America will do to keep us from “handing the competitive edge to China and other nations.”  In fact, they would rather that we keep slogging onward with such politicized power projects to insure the success of their own ends.

That’s what’s at stake in this debate.  We can go back to the failed energy policies that profited the oil companies but weakened our country.  We can go back to the days when promising industries got set up overseas.  Or we can go after new jobs in growing industries. And we can spur innovation and help make our economy more competitive.  We know the choice that’s right for America.  We need to do what we’ve always done – put our ingenuity and can do spirit to work to fight for a brighter future.

Mr President, with projects and propaganda like this, you and yours are forcing us into a failed energy policy that will do nothing but propel us to that final crisis which you are determined not to waste.

Thanks.

Posted in , ,

5 responses to “The President’s (Annotated) Weekly Address”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    George.
    Your comments would stand out more if they were in color, say a nice primary color.
    This is an excellent rebuttal and I will b linking to it from NC Media Watch.

    Like

  2. Russ Steele Avatar

    George,
    The CA Lutheran University Center for Economic Research and Forecasting examined The Truth About Green Jobs and California. They has this to say about green energy projects driven by environmental regulations:
    The Foreign Experience
    In this country, the focus on green jobs is of fairly recent origin, linked primarily to the election of President Obama and a solidly Democratic Congress. Yet to understand how green policies function in a real economy, one does not have to depend on imaginary projections. There have been many foreign countries – most particularly in the European Union – that have embraced this approach for many years. A close look at the results suggests that the economic promise of job creation tied to renewable energy sectors has been far less fulfilled than is commonly claimed by environmental activists and their key corporate allies.
    Investment in a “green revolution” already has become a centerpiece of the current British Labour Government’s plan to revitalize the country’s economy. In this, the UK will be following a path of massive subsidization of the renewable sector to rebuild its damaged economy in a “digital, low-carbon, high technology age.”
    But there is growing evidence that the current pattern of subsidization is unsustainable. Germany, for example, has spent over 1.2 billion Euros on solar roofs… which now generate 0.4 percent of the country’s electricity. The cost of green jobs is also very high. In Denmark, subsidies per job reach upwards of $150,000 a year; in Germany, the cost has been estimated as high as $250,000.
    The Spanish Experience
    Given the much higher costs of renewable energy, the report estimates that each green megawatt installed destroys 5.28 jobs on average elsewhere in the economy: 8.99 by photovoltaics, 4.27 by wind energy, 5.05 by mini-hydro. The report has been hotly contested for being short-sighted and not counting both the environmental and long-term economic advantages of Spain’s strong green energy policies.
    Yet there is more widespread criticism of Spain’s program. Many of the solar plants, for example, were of low quality and are likely never to be efficient. Given these problems and Spain’s critical economic condition, in September 2009 the government abruptly changed course, cutting payments and capping solar construction.
    The Danish Experience
    There is widespread concern among Danish firms, particularly in manufacturing, that their competitive position will be weakened by these new taxes. The biggest impact, they believe, will be on those firms that must compete internationally. Ironically, this affects the environmental sector. Danish companies have specialized in being energy efficient; energy efficiency has become a competitive advantage for Danish companies, helping to offset high Danish labor costs and generally weak Danish productivity trends. “But this position of strength will be destroyed if these companies [have imposed upon them] new special Danish energy taxes.”

    Like

  3. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    George, this had to be a radio address because he could not do it with a straight face (if it was televised we would have seen that he was so full of $h!t that his eyes were brown)! Shall we enter into another debate of ‘is he stupid or evil?’

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Russ – thanks for the details. As readers know, I’ve been reporting on the non-sustainability of the EU clean energy projects and jobs. These and other reports just continue putting meat on the bones. But, of course, the lying bastards in the lamestream media will not let any of this out to their audiences.
    Mikey – I do believe that the debate is over; President Obama is not stupid. Our republic was built to weather a stupid president now and then. I’m not sure its construction is robust enough to handle the other kind.

    Like

  5. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    George, let’s hope that those charged with explaining history to future generations agree with your sentiment (I had to put up with Woodrow Wilson and/or FDR = god).

    Like

Leave a comment