Rebane's Ruminations
June 2010
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Earlier in the day I heard of the great Nevada County voting machine debacle – apparently they don’t register the paper ballots because all of them were printed with identical registration numbers and no one checked the ballots or the scanning system with the ballots before voting started.  Who knows, there may even be more stuff that is discovered afterward.  I wasn’t going to post on this dust-up until the dust had settled.

Well, I’ve been getting emails from my partisan correspondents regarding this little incident since it directly involves the incumbent Clerk-Recorder Greg Diaz who is standing for election for this non-partisan office against challenger Barry Pruett.  Pruett’s campaign has focused on the dual issues of the incumbent’s overall competence and character.

For a number of reasons, Mr Diaz has attracted a following mostly from the left, and Mr Pruett from the right.  Several strong community voices from the left castigated those on the right about making the race partisan.  Those on the right advised the left to get over it because in reality, once the tilt of the candidates becomes known, there is no non-partisan voting, no matter what it says on the ballot – never is, never was.

Anyway, from one unverified source I understand that, due to this foul-up, there will be an attorney from the state’s elections office sent here to monitor the manual count of the ballots.  That should mollify those who might think that it was a planned goof designed to stop Pruett.  I don’t belong to that school of conspiracy and prefer to accept the simpler of the explanations.

In any event, an example of the concern about the ‘scanner error’ is voiced by Bill Neuharth, chairman of the Nevada County Republican Party.  Haven’t yet heard any complaints from the left, I guess for them everything is hunky-dory.  Neuharth just issued this statement –
 
"The integrity of the election process is in jeopardy here in Nevada County.  Due to an unprecedented printing error the ballots being cast in the precincts are unreadable by the E-Scan machines, and therefore the votes can't be tallied in the precincts."
 
"Consequently, the trust of the Nevada County voters has been violated by the Nevada County Clerk Recorders office."
 
"I am urging the California Secretary of State to send independent observers to oversee the ballot counting process this evening when the polls close. There should also be a complete and thorough investigation to determine what lapses of oversight occurred to allow the printing of faulty ballots.”

Posted in , ,

23 responses to “Experience Counts”

  1. Russ Avatar

    George,
    The papertiger commenting at NC Media Watch wants to know how is it that the two scanners in the election office are working and the field units are not working? Damn good question. This will force all the ballot counting to the Elections office. Is this how is did it in San Francisco?
    How were the office machines fixed? Re-programed? If the office scanners were reprogramed to solve the problem, what other code was added to the program? One for Pruett, two for Diaz, one for Pruett, etc. How is any re-programing certified? By whom? When?

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Well, the answer is an easy one but not necessarily satisfying. The scanners in the field are set up not to allow an easy modification of their operating code – all for legitimate and valid reasons. The two in the elections office have ‘system administrator’ versions of the software, which do support on site fixes – again for obvious reasons. But now comes the problem of verifying that these latter two systems don’t get monkeyed with before they are used for the back-up vote count.
    Whoever is to certify the back-up vote count should take an image of the software in the two systems, and have Diaz sign an affidavit attesting to their authenticity. In other words generate evidence that can be used in court.

    Like

  3. Bob Hobert Avatar
    Bob Hobert

    I am reminded of the 2008 election in Minnesota where some seriously boring non-funny fellow lost the US Senate election, then ‘won’ it months later after ballots were ‘recounted’ and/or discounted, and the margin of victory was mysteriously found among ballots ‘discovered’ in the back seat of a precinct worker’s car after the polls closed. Those late/recounted ballots, defying all known odds, went overwhelmingly for the funny guy. No one is laughing now, as the comedian currently sits in Congress as a US Senator. Can Nevada County escape that kind of farce tonight?

    Like

  4. Michael P. Anderson Avatar
    Michael P. Anderson

    George,
    As your favorite progressive hickenlooper, I consider this mistake to be a very big deal, and I look forward to finding out exactly what happened here. The integrity of the voting process is sacrosanct.
    We will just have to wait to find out what happened. But definitely not hunky-dory.
    Michael A.

    Like

  5. Nuff said Avatar
    Nuff said

    The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

    Like

  6. Mikey McD Avatar

    If only this news was available yesterday… how ironic would it be if the acting clerk/recorder muffed this election and retained his/her own seat?

    Like

  7. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    May I suggest that the already started defense of Mr Diaz’s little faux pas will be the best local entertainment available for the coming week or so, regardless of who is to be the next Clerk-Recorder.

    Like

  8. Michael P. Anderson Avatar
    Michael P. Anderson

    Yeah, even though Pruett appears to have lost by a big margin, the electorate has indeed been handed this gift of entertainment, which might also shine some insightful light onto the machinations of the Clerk-Recorder job in Nevada County. All to the good in my book.
    BTW, I’m not a big fan of this office being directly elected, I think an appointment by the BOS is more appropriate when the goal is professionalism and non-partisanship. I’m usually a direct-democracy kinda guy, but when it comes to counting votes I like some oversight over the unwashed masses with purple thumbs.
    Yes, I know, you don’t believe that such a thing as non-partisanship exists. But we’ll have to agree to disagree on this one: there are certain professional standards to which some people are able to hold themselves, regardless of personal beliefs, and we need those professionals to perform certain tasks in gov’t. Those offices are rightly designated non-partisan, because the holders of those offices have personal ideologies that cannot have any bearing on the professional performance of their duties.

    Like

  9. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Michael, agreed that certain offices need to be non-partisan, but that was not my point. Non-partisan offices have never, to my knowledge of history, been filled in a non-partisan manner by a partisan electorate. Partisanship enters in – that’s the real world.
    Because I’m not uniformly a “direct-democracy kinda guy”, I agree with you that some of these offices, especially those not having their own purse strings, should be appointed by higher elected officials and serve at their pleasure. It’s easier then to throw the bums out wholesale.

    Like

  10. D. King Avatar
    D. King

    It’s easy enough to check the ballots.
    They should each have finger prints
    that match no other ballot prints (the
    voters print). If they don’t, do a DMV
    print check on the others.

    Like

  11. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    Attorney Jack Duran has unseated Placer County District 1 Supervisor F.C. “Rocky” Rockholm.
    With all percents reporting, Democrat Duran, left, gained 58 percent of the vote to Rockholm’s 42 percent.
    Duran’s victory is a major win for Democratic operatives in Placer County, many of whom backed Charlie Brown in his narrow loss to Republican Tom McClintock in the 4th Congressional District race in 2008. Placer County is one of the most heavily Republican counties in the state.
    In the county auditor- controller’s race, Katherine Martinis bested Roseville accountant Casey Tanner 62 percent to 38 percent, respectively.

    Like

  12. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    Looks like it’s Supervisor Terry Lamphier for four years!
    Looks like Barry Pruett and the Tea Party have been sent packing.
    Looks like Place County made a turn to the left.

    Like

  13. Beetlejuice Avatar
    Beetlejuice

    I have heard and read Terry Lamphier’s ramblings for years, thus, I discounted him as being unintelligent, radically socialist, and void of reasoning skills needed to keep a puppy alive. I think many among us would have contributed to Spencers campaign (and not assumed a landslide) if we thought Terry had a shot in hell.

    Like

  14. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    This was a smooth a professionally handled election – that Pruiett guy could never do it this well – snark
    In November will the entire state be waiting for Nevada Cty returns until 3 AM – prolly

    Like

  15. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    You bet Dixon… and Florida has such a fine histry of how they handle elections!

    Like

  16. RL Crabb Avatar

    Pruett’s campaign suffered from the candidate being a lawyer who was tied to a lawsuit against the county. Face it, everybody hates lawyers until you need one.
    As for Terry’s upset victory…well, even Daffy Duck can win an election when the opposition doesn’t mount a defense.

    Like

  17. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Bob, that’s about as plausible of an explanation as I have seen.

    Like

  18. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    Lamphier and his folks worked hard and Spencer and his folks did little. It’s about effort and Spencer showed none… no surprise!

    Like

  19. Nuff said Avatar
    Nuff said

    This community let Barry Pruett known loudly and clearly that it is sick and tired of negative slash-and-burn campaigning. But rather than run on his own strengths, he chose to simply follow the old playbook of attacking the strength of your opponent. (We’ll see how long the lawsuit continues now). His blowout loss (69-31%) was even more lopsided than it would have been due to the very tone of his campaign. (That’s how you introduce yourself to public service?) Clearly his political approach was resoundingly rejected by this community — including the “vote-safe” initiative (62-38%), despite being given a name no one can argue against. So maybe next time, and I have no doubt there will be a next time, he’ll try to show voters the positive changes he wants to bring to the community, rather than the polarizing politics he brought this time. Until then, want some cheese with that whine?

    Like

  20. Sarah Avatar
    Sarah

    I contend that a third candidate would have won the Clerk/recorder race. The current clerk/recorder is obviously unable to perform his job and politicized the office, Pruett was painted with “slash-and-burn campaigning” to his political detriment and being a lawyer does not help… a third choice would have won.

    Like

  21. Nuff said Avatar
    Nuff said

    At what point, and you better have an example, did Greg Diaz “politicize the office” in his campaign? Pruett painted himself. From the outset when he took the stage at the Tea Party candidate forum he went after Diaz, trying to dredge up the woes of the former clerk/recorder and tie them to the current one. Instead of speaking to his own skills and experiences, Pruett went negative. And SEVENTY percent of Nevada County voters told him “No thank you.”

    Like

  22. Sarah Avatar
    Sarah

    I recall a letter to the editor written as Clerk/Recorder where Diaz kissed his own bottom, then there was Diaz’s “anti-Tea Party fear mongering letter”, his partnering with Peeline’s blog to smear Pruett, Diaz’s website which designed around smearing Pruett and covering up Diaz’s past…. just to name a few. I agree that voters said “No thank you” to Pruett; I am contending that a third choice could/would have won.
    (I did note that you did not defend “The current clerk/recorder is obviously unable to perform his job”)

    Like

  23. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    No one needed to “smear” Barry Pruett, he did a great job of doing that himself.
    Pruett was sent packing and a large part of the anti Pruett vote was by a large number of Republicans in Nevada County.

    Like

Leave a comment