Rebane's Ruminations
March 2010
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

PigLipstick ‘Propaganda in the mornin’, propaganda in the evenin’, propaganda all the live-long day.’  It’s been a full time job, going on two years now, to put lipstick on this pig.  And it’s not over yet as the President prepares to depart on a cross country campaign to sell Obamacare.  This is the new law for the peehpul, their representatives had to be bribed to pass it, and now they need to be told how much they like it.  Kool-Aid now has a new flavor.  I predict these mid-term elections will be the most watched and eventful in the country’s history.

Reading NCWatch, I learned that Former Union Editor Jeff Pelline’s blog will join the new Sacramento Connect network of blogs started by the Sacramento Bee.  Jeff has been assiduously reporting and interpreting foothill news for months.  And his Sierra Foothills Report blog will now receive traffic from the Sac Bee website.  I agree that the format of Sacramento Connect is a good one for newspapers, and a great match for like-minded satellite blogs.

This new relationship should lay aside any continuing claims that Mr Pelline offers centerline and balanced reportage.  The Sac Bee is an established MSM liberal voice of California.  It has been one of the media stalwarts supporting the Democratic California legislature over the years as that body passed law after law to impede, halt, and destroy the state’s economy.  That job is pretty well done, and California will now choose to become either a federalized or dysfunctional state.  Federalized if it intends to maintain its skeletized services while surrendering control and its fisc to the Beltway.  And dysfunctional if it continues to reduce services and raise taxes as it chases balanced budgets with its shrinking revenue base.  (The Arnold has now become the nation’s epitome of the girly-man governor.)


The Sac Bee, and now its online minions, will implement the plan to bring coastal county politics to the Sierra.  Much is ballyhooed by the local left that Nevada County has already abandoned its traditional conservative values and outlook.  Looking at what’s going on in Grass Valley and Nevada City, it’s hard to dispute those claims.  And conservatives in Nevada County are the most laid back bunch of do littles I have seen.  They can still claim some traction in our ‘non-partisan’ Rood Center, but that too is shaping up to be the Sierra version of the Alamo over the next couple of elections.

Meanwhile news outlets like the Sac Bee, joined by folks like Mr Pelline, will be able to trumpet their promotion of Obama’s version of the 1930s WPA.  All that economic development funded by the good people of Ohio may now be coming our way.  All we need do is write some clever grant proposals, look destitute enough, and promise to be greener than thou.  Case in point, tonight the Green Team will again meet in Nevada City’s city hall to consolidate their good ideas for bringing in some of that Other People’s Money.

Be that as it may.  Democracy is an unstable form of governance, and a republic is marginally better when both are headed by professional politicians whose job one is Job One.  We congratulate Jeff Pelline on the advent of his new journalistic megaphone.   As one of the lone conservative voices in these mountains who is not a journalist, I will continue offering my commentary on the progress of our march toward hope and change.

 

Posted in , ,

17 responses to “Ruminations – 23mar2010”

  1. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    George, what about the “tilt” of your blog and Russ’s blog? Fair and Balanced, conservative or liberal?
    This shows the direction of newspapers that want to have a future.
    Congratulations to Jeff P. and Yubanet!

    Like

  2. Jeff Pelline Avatar
    Jeff Pelline

    George,
    Sounds like it’s been a tough week for you, and it’s only Tuesday. Here’s a thought: Instead of always labeling people and things (and insulting all involved along the way) why not do some navel gazing on your own end and ask why you are not being successful in persuading people to your way of thinking. I’d start with RL Crabb’s comment on this blog the other day, where he said “it’s like talking to a brick wall.”

    Like

  3. George Rebane Avatar

    Steve, the tilt of my blog remains open and obvious. If the ideology of successful newspapers is that of Sac Bee, I will have to take a pass. I will go down with the likes of WSJ. But your guidance is always appreciated.
    Jeff, again congratulations. And also thank you for your guidance and keeping me in mind.

    Like

  4. Scott Obermuller Avatar

    George, you should be ashamed of yourself! Jeff has pointed out that you have insulted “all involved along the way”. Every single person! And “always labeling people and things”. Always! It’s like talking to a brick wall! My questions would be to Jeff – how do you know that? Are you in the habit of talking to brick walls? Have you responded to any of George’s arguments with facts and specific rebuttals? How do you know that George has never been successful in persuading people? Hey – this is fun. Always!

    Like

  5. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    Speaking of big spending how’s this for a big spending mama?
    http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-money24-2010mar24,0,7372116.story?track=rss
    Meg is spending $249 a minute on her campaign.
    I hope all the tea party patriots will recognize what they have in E-Meg and vote libertarian!
    Lets see, the Republicans are going to nominate a pro choice, anti-gun, Barbara Boxer supporting, candidate and then go into November pretending she is a conservative.
    Heh heh heh…..

    Like

  6. Mikey McD Avatar

    California “Republicans” are flaming liberals. The last “Republican” I voted for in the governors race was Tom McClintock (2006?). The proof is in the pudding… look how messed up CA finances are = liberals with our checkbook.

    Like

  7. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    The lipstick on a pig image reminds me of the insane idea to have Palin run for VP. No wonder Obama won the election.

    Like

  8. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    Yeah but $10 says when push comes to shove George and Russ will support Meg. And they will act like she is a conservative.
    Bottom line is that Jeff Pelline, bogging in other locations about the changing and changed demographics of California, is right. Californians are less white (about 40%) thus more liberal on immigration and inclusion issues; more tolerant on gay rights and choice as younger people, who do not even care about these issues, enter the voter pool; socially moderate; and fiscally slightly right of center.
    The Republican party has not kept pace with this change and is currently in a position of suspended schizophrenia. The power and energy in the party lays in the right wing, but the voters are closer to the center. California Republicans know they cannot nominate a conservative and did not even have one running for Governor this time around. So they are nominating a Meg Whitman.
    If Democrats could learn the fiscal responsibility lesson, and support common sense budget reforms–like performance based budgeting, sunset clauses, multi-year budgets, and pay as you go–they could dominate California politics for a generation or more.

    Like

  9. Russ Avatar

    My fear is that Meg could just be another Arnold in a skirt. My vote still needs to b earned. I will vote for anyone that can demonstrate fiscal responsibility. I said demonstrate, just more words claiming they are fiscally responsible will not cut the mustard.

    Like

  10. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    I’m happy to hear that your vote needs to be earned. How does one earn it?
    Ironically Jerry Brown was one of the most fiscally responsible Governor’s in California history.
    He refused most of the trappings of his office, including mansion and limo, in favor of apartment and private car. He supported Prop 13 (which I still do not support). He balanced the state budget 6 times and managed a $5 billion surplus part of the time (about 15% of the state budget at the time which is quite impressive). He established a pay as you go philosophy to budgeting. He invested heavily in California’s infrastructure (not as great as his Dad but pretty good). He balanced the budget in the city of Oakland, and left the city in much. much better financial shape than he found it.
    He has flaws, the murder rate in oakland soared in the 90’s, he did not manage Prop 13 well, he could have rebated taxes in advance of the vote and headed off the crises.
    But as a financial manager, Brown has a good record.

    Like

  11. George Rebane Avatar

    Gentlemen (SteveE & SteveF), the progressive Dems have no need to learn any of those good behaviors in order to “dominate California politics for a generation or more.” Continuing their policy of the last few decades will be sufficient for them to retain whatever power the feds will still grant California. The only chance that the Repubs have is to become even more progressive than the Democrats. Rejoice, you characterize our electorate correctly. We are all dependent on Ohio.
    And going with the flow (as you describe it) has never been my strong suit. As my readers know – I remain a child, student, and defender of western civilization. Against its foes I continue to work, inspired by the words of Bonaro Overstreet’s ‘Stubborn Ounces’.
    You say the little efforts that I make
    will do no good; they never will prevail
    to tip the hovering scale
    where justice hangs in balance.
    I don’t think I ever thought they would.
    But I am prejudiced beyond debate
    in favor of my right to choose which side
    shall feel the stubborn ounces of my weight.

    Like

  12. Russ Avatar

    Steve,
    Sacramento is still trying to recover from Jerry Brown’s transportation policies. Adriana Gianturco killed the the 880 bypass and opted for light rail, which hardly anyone rides. The last upgrade cost 255 million dollars and increased ridership by 1,000, that slowly declined to less than 500 as riders learned that cars in congestion were still faster than taking light rail. Now years later, Sierra College Blvd and Hazel Ave are being widened to five lanes to carry the traffic between, the SR50 economic corridor and the I-80/SR65 economic corridor. The bypass would have handled that traffic flow. SR50 and I-80 expansion were blocked by those demanding more light rail the no one rides, especially those making the demands for more of it. They want some else to ride thus reducing their commute time. Now the whole public transportation systems is doing down the drain in Sacramento, and the only way to get to work will be by car, but the roads will not be able to handle the traffic. Light rail was another liberal wet dream that turned in to a nightmare, and Jerry Brown was responsible. What will be his next great failure?

    Like

  13. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    “prejudiced beyond debate”… about covers it.

    Like

  14. Steven Frisch Avatar
    Steven Frisch

    The 880 bypass background is here. I am not sure how this would have helped traffic and its redundant with I-80. As a matter of fact it is I-80 under another name.
    I could probably quote a thousand studies that show the link between the air pollution from outside the area that you hate, and freeway expansion. Public transit has on average one tenth the emissions per capita that auto travel does. But if I posted data you would respond with a study from a paid corporate shill from the Reason Foundation, the Heartland Institute, The Heritage Foundation or the Pacific Legal Foundation.
    http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-880a_ca.html

    Like

  15. George Rebane Avatar

    SteveE, you have to slow down and read the words, they’re not as big as they seem. “prejudiced beyond debate” refers to not giving up “my right to choose” which side I will debate, not rejecting debate as the means of illuminating and/or resolving issues. I will gladly help you with such matters of language, but in the longer run I don’t think it will help. It’s either your attitude or English remediation that needs an adjustment. I believe I gave a principled and comprehensible answer to your and SteveF’s points about the direction of California’s political mood.
    Bring your progressive views by all means, but cut the crap if you want to keep commenting on RR.

    Like

  16. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    SteveF you quote your emissions output as a per capita – to me that means your including everyone thats driving cars too, thereby spreading out the emissions.
    How about this – figure it out based on ridership – emissions produced per the 5 people riding on it.
    The next politican that brings up expanding rail, ask them if they have ever been on one. It works in big cities but in Fla and CA it just doesn’t work, everything is just too spread out.

    Like

  17. Russ Avatar

    Steve E,
    Look at the map you linked too, it shows 880 as loop around the city and provided a direct link to SR50. Now Sierra College Blvd is being expanded to carry the traffic that the 880 loop would have carried. The regions economic development suffered due to traffic congestions according to recents Texas Transportation Institute studies.
    Light rail could not carry any of that traffic. It only carries people, and not very well.

    Like

Leave a comment