George Rebane

ARCHIVES
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
OUR LINKS
YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog
16 responses to “Love that ‘Pivot to Jobs’”
-
George does your chart include the 500K+ the County received for the new transit center in Grass Valley? Can you please check on that as the County has received the money.
LikeLike
-
Steve,
Was the new transit center submitted as a stimulus project by the County/City, or as part of the Transportation Commission stimulus Package. if part of the NCTC Package, Dan Landon the executive director can answer your question. When I was on the Commission is was part of the transit systems budget as a separate line item.LikeLike
-
George, I was at the joint meeting last night and the County transoportation folks said it was ARRA funds and that they have the money in hand.
The design and engineering work for the project is being done by locals, last name Baker, from Nevada City.
Last night included the effort to have locals do the construction too.
Might need to check your information and data source as this project is 500K+ and is ARRA funded… per the County.LikeLike
-
Good questions. My Friday ARRA chart is taken from the data that the county publishes on its ‘MyNevadaCounty.com’ home page. If you click on the red printing above the numbers, it takes you to the accounting breakdown of how the three dollar amounts are derived. I was told by Rick Haffey’s office that this data is kept current. But all of that doesn’t mean that the county’s bureaucracy has no ‘right hand, left hand’ problem.
LikeLike
-
Hope if they are going with local labor they are paying prevailing wage.
LikeLike
-
There are a couple different ARRA funding totals for Nevada County, it depends who you ask. California Recovery Task Force’s “unofficial” Nevada County total is here:
http://www.cpec.ca.gov/RecoveryData/County.asp?County=Nevada&Sort=Name
The California Stimulus Map is here:
http://www.recovery.ca.gov/HTML/RecoveryImpact/map.shtmlLikeLike
-
Thanks for those links Kasey. I’m not sure what to do with the so-called ‘budget’ amounts called out at the first link since they are so heavily qualified (received, approved, applied for???). But it does give a good overall scope of ARRA monies coming/considered for Nevada County jurisdictions. The folks at the Rood Center should know what the status of total ARRA monies are for the county. Do you know where equivalent numbers for GV, Nevada City, and Truckee might be available?
LikeLike
-
You’re welcome George. It is indeed a difficult Act to follow.
GV, NC, and Truckee numbers from that same California Recovery Task Force source could be gathered by visiting that second link in my previous post. There are a couple ways to query this map. One way is to try using the search box to search for the city of interest.
Another method you may want to try is by clicking on Nevada County’s “pie” (currently with 70 projects). That would take you to a list of all projects counted as “Nevada County” projects. On your right would then be a list of all the individual projects. To determine which geography the project applies to (if possible, some cover multiple geographies) you’d have to make some judgment calls by clicking on each project and use the recipient and project information.LikeLike
-
That may turn out to be a trail of tears. For the present I’ll continue to believe that county CFO Joe Cristoffel is posting the correct numbers on the county’s website. The purpose of the graph is to present a picture of the rate that ARRA monies are actually distributed to a jurisdiction with which we all are familiar. If you discover a more reliable source that presents the three totals for the four Nevada County jurisdictions, please share them. And thanks again Kasey.
LikeLike
-
I don;t know what is going on with the info sources George uses because they don;t seem to be very accurate. Here’s info about another local ARRA funded project:
A half-million dollar street construction project could gain approval at Tuesday’s Grass Valley City Council meeting.
The council is set to see a proposal to raise the intersection at Race and South Auburn streets with the stated goal of increasing the visibility of pedestrians and slowing vehicle speeds on South Auburn. The project would be financed by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds and cost about $530,000, according to a city staff report.
If approved, a contract for the work is expected to be awarded in April with construction to take place later this Spring, the report said. The construction is expected to take about a month.LikeLike
-
One more time. I use the home page of the Nevada County website where the ‘applied for’, ‘approved’, and ‘received’ ARRA amounts are summarized. If the municipal jurisdictions provided equal summaries of their ARRA funds, I’d be glad to start plotting a grand total for those categories. It seems that only the county is willing to publish their data in such a format.
LikeLike
-
What about private sector ARRA work? or work done on a regional basis like the State Energy Program? or training and youth development opportunities coming from the Governors Green Job Corps initiative? or regional Workforce Investment Board programs? or state highway programs not let by the county governments through their processes? or federal services provided by federal agencies and not done as a pass through?
Seems like you are just reporting the county data, allowing it to imply that we are being underserved by the federal government, then not taking any responsibility for collecting data from other sources. If you know other ARRA funding is being distributed through other sources why not start out by saying “Hey, I know there is a lot more than thais, it sure would be great to get an accurate count here”.
I know why—because it would not fit your agenda to convince people that the federal government is screwing us. You want people to think the government is screwing them.
Ant-government propaganda again!LikeLike
-
Over 1 year later and only 1/3 of the funds have been paid out (http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/home.aspx). “Good enough for government work.”
If this administration wanted to offer hope/change they could return the remaining (unused) $500 billion back to taxpayers!LikeLike
-
SteveF, you nailed me again, there’s just no getting around you. One does wonder, however, why Nevada County is doing the same thing.
LikeLike
-
KQED has this report on ARRA funding. How much is Nevada County’s ARRA in the Weatherization Assistance Program? From KQED:
Touted as a “shovel-ready” project that would create jobs immediately by leveraging existing infrastructure, the Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program has so far fallen far short of its goals. The program received almost $5 billion under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) to improve the energy efficiency of nearly 590,000 residences of low-income citizens — more than a tenfold increase over the $450 million approved in FY 2009.
But a Special Report released last month from the Inspector General of the Office of Audit Services at the DOE found that as of December, just $368 million (8%) of the $4.73 billion allocation had been spent, and 5% of the nearly 600,000 units nationwide slated for weatherization with funding from the Recovery Act were actually completed.
That includes completion of just 12 of 43,400 planned units in California, which has been allotted more than $185.8 million in Recovery Act funding for its Weatherization Assistance Program.
Read the rest here.LikeLike
RR FUNDAMENTALS
RECENT POSTS
- Father forgive them for they know not …
- Democrats Ascendant
- Scattershots – 4jan26 (updated 8jan26)
- Sandbox – 4jan26
- Venezuela on path to freedom and prosperity
RECENT COMMENTS
CATEGORIES
- Agenda 21 (490)
- All Things Trump (32)
- Books & Media (34)
- Budget (2)
- California (385)
- Comment Sandbox (488)
- Critical Thinking & Numeracy (1,312)
- Culture Comments (750)
- Current Affairs (1,858)
- Film (7)
- Food and Drink (9)
- Games (5)
- General (215)
- Glossary & Semantics (25)
- Great Divide (208)
- Growth (1)
- Happenings (679)
- Investing (43)
- Music (2)
- My Story (62)
- Nevada County (733)
- Our Country (2,430)
- Our World (629)
- Rebane Doctrine (130)
- Religion (38)
- sandbox (2)
- Science (33)
- Science Snippets (165)
- Singularity Signposts (144)
- Sports (3)
- The Liberal Mind (644)
- The Rear View (74)
- Travel (8)
- Trump (3)
- Uncategorized (45)
- We the iSheeple (620)
- Web/Tech (176)


Leave a comment