Rebane's Ruminations
March 2010
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Readers familiar with my screeds were informed almost two years ago of the unfunded liabilities game played across our formerly golden state.   One aspect of the game was how Calpers – the world’s largest state employees’ retirement fund manager – was projecting its future income from the retirement monies it invests.  The yokels at that organization were telling equally gullible local officials all over the landscape that they would earn a handsome 7.75% net on their investments, and the locals should plan their retirement contributions based on this performance.

I and several other lonely voices on the sidelines tried our best to get out the message that Calpers was smoking funny stuff.  Local jurisdictions already underwater in their unfunded liabilities should plan on much higher remittances if they were not going to stiff their retirees when it came time to write the checks.  Ridicule from those who knew better was our lot.

But now comes the hot flash, and you guessed it.  The 1mar10 WSJ reports (here) that


Calpers is considering reducing the projected rate of return used by the giant pension fund to make investment decisions. A cut could force cash-strapped governments in California to pay millions more each year to cover their employee pension obligations.

Since 2003, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System has assumed that the value of its stocks, bonds and other holdings would increase by 7.75% a year. But the likelihood of an extended period of modest economic growth world-wide is fueling doubts inside Calpers that the pension fund can continue aiming so high.

Pressure to lower the target has been building for months. “You’ll be lucky to get 6% on your portfolios, maybe 5%,” BlackRock Inc. Chairman and Chief Executive Laurence Fink told Calpers board members last July.

Madoff The astute retail investor of late 2008 could have easily explained the matter to Calpers.  Most certainly some of us tried to explain the matter to our local jurisdictions.  The feedback from them was ‘Calpers is our investment expert, they tell us what to set aside and pay for our retirement obligations, and that’s that.’   As with the resetting of known millions of adjustable rate mortgages, projecting the coming economic disaster cum “muddle through economy” was not a matter of rocket science to anybody paying attention, except maybe governments at all levels.

Lest someone thinks that there is still a soft landing in the offing for all this, fugetaboudit.   For the local jurisdictions the alternatives are still 1) hope for a rapid destruction of the dollar, or 2) get real familiar with Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code – aka The Vallejo Plan.  Better yet, do #2 while praying for #1.

This Calpers’ caper could become the biggest Madoff scheme in history.  (Sorry Mr. Ponzi, you were outclassed, but take heart because ol’ Bernie may not hold his title for long either.)

[update]  H/T to RR reader in SoCal.

OrganizedCrime

Posted in , , ,

5 responses to “Calpers, Capers? – what the L is the difference? (updated)”

  1. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    Calpers… what a train wreck!

    Like

  2. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    When Bernie was asked by the FBI where he devised his plan he replied,”CalPERS, Social Security and Medicare- sir.”

    Like

  3. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    CLASS WAR: PUBLIC SERVANTS BECAME OUR MASTERS
    Check this out: http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=18907
    and
    http://reason.com/archives/2010/01/12/class-war/
    “government workers fare better than private-sector workers in almost every area — pay, benefits, time off, and job security:
    According to a 2007 analysis of data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Asbury Park Press, the average federal worker made $59,864 in 2005, compared with the average salary of $40,505 in the private sector.
    Across comparable jobs, the federal government paid higher salaries than the private sector three times out of four, the paper found.
    The Obama administration has extended the hiring binge started by President Bush:
    The executive branch employment (excluding the Postal Service and the Defense Department) slated to grow by 2 percent in 2010 — and more than 15 percent if you count temporary Census workers.
    The average federal salary (including benefits) is set to grow from $72,800 in 2008 to $75,419 in 2010, CBS reported. “

    Like

  4. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    You guys may not remember this guy Nick Lessy, not sure on the last name spelling – he was commodities trader for Barclays I think or one of the 100 yr old banks in the UK – he was in asia. We in the Investment banking industry came up with a little saying – ” The Nick lessy Slope of Hope” he apparently made some big bets – the trades started going south and fraudlently then kept buying more and more in the hope the slope and pricing would turn around – the end result was the entire collapse of the bank itself and it then it had to be mergered with another.
    they must be banking on some excellent stock picks to get that number, they sure aren’t going to get it the bond market – and if they buy Bonds now @ 4% and rates move up they killed on them as well – so sounds like they must be taking some extra risk. Fidelity Magellen is flat to down over the last 4 to 5 yrs so I guess their smart or lying alot.

    Like

  5. Dave C Avatar
    Dave C

    According the WSJ, Calpers is also in the slum lord business along with some shady ploys to get existing tenants to move out in order to raise the rent on the next tenants. Dump and pump.
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703503804575083602715591636.html

    Like

Leave a comment