Rebane's Ruminations
September 2009
S M T W T F S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

– The collateral damage from Obamacare.
– Where is Obama’s plan for healthcare?
– Michelle demonstrates low carbon, organic shopping.

When you see Obamacare costs going up in lockstep with your taxes, you start looking at your neighbors a little differently.  The fat guy is no longer just a fat guy waddling down the sidewalk.  You know he’s going to have big time medical problems that he could avoid without all those extra pounds, and you know that you will be paying for the extra burden he will put on our socialized healthcare system.  And you think ‘There oughta be a law against people getting fat like that, ‘cause it costs all of us extra.’  Well as usual, California has got you covered in that kind of thinking, and is actively looking at ways it can prohibit the consumption of sugared soft drinks in the Golden State.  Few people are aware of the collateral damage to our freedoms that all shared cost social programs do.  (At this point some liberal readers immediately conclude again that Rebane is against all government programs, and smugly point out the interstate highways system and local fire department.)  Ol’ pappy taught most of us Golden Rule #2, ‘Them that’s got the gold, makes the rules.’  And if part of that gold for Obamacare comes from us, we’ll have a tendency to start making more rules for our neighbors and back politicians who will help us do it.  And many people think that this is good.

Speaking of Obamacare, few people have noticed that there is no healthcare bill from the White House.  As Obama goes around the country talking about “my healthcare bill” and “my plan”, it’s the Democrats in Congress who are now wondering what in hell is he talking about.  Actually, this tactic has served the First Fibber well as he makes his rounds pumping socialized medicine.  But with five  MichelleShops (yes, five) healthcare bills still running around loose in Congress, Dems like Max Baucus (gang of six fame) are now starting to wish that the President would either defecate or relinquish the receptacle.  It seems that even the dufus division in Washington has noticed that there is a big difference between grand objectives from the podium and a plan to achieve them.  But down in the hinterlands where we live, this little distinction goes completely unnoticed – ‘My plan is to make sure every community has sustainable solar power.’ – and the sheeple marvel at such wisdom while shouting down anyone who points out that the emperor has no clothes.

Michelle’s little rustic outing is all over the media today.  This morning a reader emailed me the link to Washington Post’s (gasp!) story ‘Hi-Ho, the Derry-O’ of the fiasco.   Shutting down a good part of downtown Washington so that her First Nibs could get some “certified organic Tuscan kale” is quite a glimpse into our collective future.  It’s definitely worth a read.  Oh, and in that bucolic down-home scene, do you notice the two organic shoppers in black? 

Posted in , ,

10 responses to “Ruminations – 18sep2009”

  1. Mikey McD Avatar
    Mikey McD

    Do you think congress will get at least 24 hours to read a 2000 page bill before they need to vote? Will the public get a chance to review the bill?
    The federal government is in debt due to enormous debts associated with social programs (SS and Medicare)… All the government needs is a mechanism whereby they could control (read decrease) life expectancy… enter nationalized medicine.

    Like

  2. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    After all this publicity on the ‘vote before/instead of read’ routine, they may get the time to read it. But then the question becomes, ‘Will they read it?’ and ‘Do they understand it?’

    Like

  3. DaveC Avatar
    DaveC

    I read this morning where Kucinich wants health care company profits to pay for the public option of Obamacare.

    Like

  4. Wade Avatar
    Wade

    The socialized roads have made the government-subsidized act of driving dangerous and expensive, akin to driving in eastern Germany in 1945, a time and place which, not so coincidentally, featured a highly anti-American mix of Nazis and Communists in close proximity. Speaking of which, the fact that Nancy Pelosi forces us at gunpoint to buy car insurance means that Brezhnev has won the Cold War without firing a shot. Next King George will try to dictate a particular side of the road that everybody “has to” drive on, eroding even more of our freedoms while forcing everyone into their collectivist box. At gunpoint. If they start collecting personal information from drivers in some sort of sinister-sounding computer database, we’ll know Glenn Beck was right about, well, everything.
    By the way, is “shutting down” part of a city or town for a photo-op bad no matter who does it? Or is it just bad when Democrats do it? Is having Secret Service protection bad too? For Democratic first families? Is it arrogant? Inauthentic?
    In the city center where I live, they close down several roads every Saturday and Sunday for the farmers’ market. There are usually no armored limousines present to symbolize tyranny and illegitimate privilege, but then again, no one around here is married the Tsar of All the Acorns.

    Like

  5. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Don’t any of these guys know how cash flows through an economy? Kucinich is one of the legion of double dummies in Washington’s Dufus Division who can’t figure out that the consumer of such health care companies will wind up paying the fare while winding up with fewer services. Can we tattoo on their foreheads ‘Taxing something gives you less of it.’?

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Welcome back Wade!

    Like

  7. Steve Enos Avatar
    Steve Enos

    “fact that Nancy Pelosi forces us at gunpoint to buy car insurance”. What the heck?
    If you want to drive in CA the state law requires auto insurance and for good reason. If you want to drive you are at risk and you put others at risk. Wrecks do happen and requiring auto insurance is a good thing. Far to many un-insured drives have wrecks that cost the rest of us responsible drivers a lot of money.

    Like

  8. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Very informative Steve, thanks for coming

    Like

  9. Dixon Cruickshank Avatar
    Dixon Cruickshank

    Washington Post article was great George
    PS – I don’t even know what that stuff is

    Like

  10. Mikey McD Avatar

    Wade, I think I detect a bit of sarcasm. I think 99% of folks agree that a society needs to adhere to laws and that such a society needs an enforcer (govt?). Each member shall pay equal to the enforcer and each shall adhere to the same laws. The problem comes when the enforcer gets an itch for philanthropy and social planning. It is comical that liberals point to the roads system or water system (or any public utility) an example of how socialism works. Most of such entities are self-sustaining through fees and those that don’t are such a small piece of the federal budget expense pie chart they fall into the “Misc” category.
    BUT, social security and medicare (the 2 programs that mirror nationalized healthcare’s socialist agenda) are conveniently left out of the discussion; and they are 2 of the largest pieces of the pie chart… AND BOTH ARE BANKRUPT AND CORRUPT.
    I agree with this: http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/Bastiat_Triangle_Alliance.pdf

    Like

Leave a comment