Rebane's Ruminations
November 2008
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Clown Today the professional journalist is in a sorry state of his own making.  Polls show that the public holds the journalist in very low esteem indeed, somewhere down there with lawyers and politicians.  Perhaps it’s time to start a new department that highlights one or two of the abundance of follies they foist on us daily in the name of being society’s self-appointed ferrets and trumpets of truth and light.

Tonight on NBC’s evening news a typical stupid joke was pulled on the viewers when the anchor Lester Holt stated with a straight face that Obama had come up with a new plan to salve the economy.  This was announced at the beginning of the broadcast as a bullet point to get you to stay and watch, and again as the intro to the segment about “Obama’s plan”, how he was going to “put millions back to work”.  The apparent intention of this MSM outlet was to continue the hype about our new president-elect and that he’s got things well in hand even before he puts that hand on the Good Book.  Well, it turned out to be a non-item.  Obama has no plan whatsoever about how to put millions back to work.  But we were told instead that he wants to put millions back to work, and that he’s instructed his economic team to try and figure out a way to put millions back to work. 

And that is how it was left when the segment ended.  Either these clowns are just butt stupid and don’t know the difference between a plan and the fervent desire to have one, or they were continuing to practice puffery and intending to fool the folks.  In this case I gave them the benefit of the doubt, and assumed that the journalists (news editor, anchor, and segment lead) were all just comically ignorant.  But I bet 99% of the viewers now believe that Obama is a clever guy who has already figured out how to put millions back to work.  In the end, this is unfair to the president-elect who already has a lot of balls in the air, and the premature raising of expectations will help no one outside the beltway.

(The astute reader knows that there are about 150 million in the American workforce which today is about 6.5% unemployed.  A developed country counts ‘full employment’ effectively occurring when the “natural unemployment rate” drops below about 4.5%.  That means that Obama is seeking to return around three million workers to jobs by taking money from the Peters to pay the Pauls.  As economists have told us for decades, this means that the Peters cannot spend that money to create the really needed jobs, and we must all trust that this time around the government knows how better to deploy the workforce than does private industry.  In any case, as FDR demonstrated seventy years ago, there will be no net jobs created through any such policy.)

NRA [23nov08 update]

  ABC News announced tonight that President-elect Obama will seek to “restore” 2.5 million jobs.  While that’s close enough to my predicted 3 million jobs, I will stick with the higher number because things will get worse before they get better and Obama will up his target.  What we should keep in mind during all this is that these “restored” jobs will be advertized falsely as net new jobs.  Instead, whatever number actually created will be jobs displaced from the private sector by the government using both fiat money and fiat tributes to make people do work they deem to be most important.  The previous program that did this under FDR was called the National Recovery Administration which extended the Great Depression so that a world war was required to set things right – a high price to pay for meddling in the markets.  Stand by for another spate of Fireside Chats.

[24nov08 update] More recent research (here) has been announced on how FDR’s policies extended the Great Depression and how Obamanomics may be preparing to take around that barn again.

Posted in ,

7 responses to “Journalist Jokers (24nov08 update)”

  1. Russ Steele Avatar

    We could still be toiling away in FDRs CCC projects if WW II had not pulled us out of the depression. Building planes, ships and tanks created an economic base for the post war boom.
    While all those infrastructure projects sound interesting, it will take years for the money to flow into the economy, given all the government regulations that slow down development projects. All those EIRs, public meetings, lawsuits, and political thugs that have to be paid off. Unless these obstacles are removed by executive order.
    One solution is to start with projects that are ready to go, with the planning done, like our local Dorsey Drive project that could be ready to go to construction in about six month. I wonder how many other communities have been working on infrastructure projects for 20 years that are about ready to go to construction. We may get a Dorsey Drive in my lifetime yet, and we will have all the Peters in other communities to thank for our new highway overpass.

    Like

  2. Jeff Pelline Avatar
    Jeff Pelline

    Journalists practice what they preach, including the “four-way test” of Rotary. How about you, George?

    Like

  3. Wade Avatar
    Wade

    So:
    Heavy taxes, government command / control of economy, and spending on roads, bridges, dams = DISASTER.
    Heavy taxes, government command / control of economy, and spending on planes, ships, tanks = MIRACLE.
    I… don’t think I get it except as part of the current revisionism regarding the Depression and the New Deal. The stumbles FDR’s policies took around ’37 were the result of cutting back government spending too quickly in a misguided attempt to control the deficit. That’s what the War (and Keynes) did more than anything else — obliterate that particular concern (which got us a deficit of 140% of GDP by war’s end).

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar

    The “current revisionism regarding the Depression and the New Deal” started in the 1950s.

    Like

  5. Wade Avatar
    Wade

    Fair enough. It seems there is a particularly fervent uptick these days, no? In between heraing about the failure of the New Deal and how Obama won by championing center-right, Reaganesque, policies (wasn’t he a Communist just a few weeks ago?), my head is spinning.
    However, that leaves my “question” unanswered. The revisionists all seem to agree that the war (big, centralized, tax-and-deficit-fueled government spending) turned the economy around while the New Deal itself (big, centralized, tax-and-deficit-fueled government spending) was horrible. Can anyone reconcile this for me? I truly don’t understand it as a coherent point of view…

    Like

  6. George Rebane Avatar

    Wade, good question. Please see ‘Ruminations – 5dec2008’.

    Like

Leave a comment