Rebane's Ruminations
November 2008
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

Mike McDaniel

In all the election hoopla surrounding the socialists push for our "new hope" my focus was on the first question on the Massachusetts ballot.  "Question 1" as it was described on ads and radio waves would have abolished the MA state income tax (full disclosure; I contributed financially to the cause).

The proposition failed by a slim margin.  The opponents of the prop were anyone that derives their income from taxpayers.  Perhaps the most vocal were the teacher employee unions.  They spent over $7,000,000 fighting question 1.  It would appear that teachers don't think they would be employable elsewhere… and more importantly that the MA government would not make cuts elsewhere to the budget in order to fund education.
 
The forces behind "Question 1" have found several silver linings from the campaign quoted from Michael Cloud:

• "The $7,268,816 we forced the Teachers Unions to spend to keep the state income tax is $7,268,816 they could NOT spend elsewhere to raise property taxes and other taxes."
• This year, the Massachusetts state legislature and Governor postponed
government spending increases, announced spending cuts – and did NOT
increase taxes. Our Ballot Initiative and our campaign for it are a key
reason why.
• Hundreds and hundreds of advertisements by the Teachers Unions
claimed:“YES on Question 1 = Raising Property Taxes.” These ads aroused and reinforced opposition to raising property taxes. The Teachers Unions campaign against our tax cut just might stop their 2009 campaigns for property tax increases."

For some time now I have made a hobby of "following" tax payer funded defined benefit pensions plans here in California.  On election day a major voice (yell) was heard on the public employee pension issue.  Taxpayers in Orange County voted overwhelmingly to relieve the Board of Supervisors from making future pension plan pay raises (HERE). In the future all pension plan pay increases will be voted on by the taxpayers.

The taxpayers of Orange County have paved the way for taxpayer funded pension plan reform in other communities.   It is apparent that present and past leaders across this great nation need voter help in being stewards of tax revenues.  It is refreshing to have leaders in Orange County design a solution which taxpayers overwhelmingly supported to start solving the unfunded liability crisis.   Does your community have any such leaders?

[gjr – Mike McDaniel is a financial professional in Nevada County and contributes to this blog from time to time.]

Posted in ,

4 responses to “Election Reflections”

  1. Mike McDaniel Avatar
    Mike McDaniel

    George, Pat Butler of KNCO news reports that the Nevada City City Council voted unanimously (with Sally Harris abstaining) to support Universal Health Care in California. I look at the atrocious state of government programs (social security, welfare, education…) and wonder what the socialist’s faith in government is built upon. Insane.

    Like

  2. Mike McDaniel Avatar
    Mike McDaniel

    What does a protest in Nevada City look like?
    BID has sent 25 businesses to collections to get their tax. Genius.
    Approximately 50% of the business owners in Nevada City oppose a miscellaneous tax collected annually to fund a Business Improvement District (BID). Though proponents of the BID acknowledge a correlation between the tax and vacancies downtown they have pushed to tax business owners for yet another year. The BID which is designed to help attract shoppers to downtown Nevada City (which was once the job of local Chamber of Commerce) has made no impact on foot traffic. Apparently you can’t tax yourself into prosperity.

    Like

  3. Dagny Taggert Avatar
    Dagny Taggert

    Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the
    establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY during the Carter Administration?
    Anybody? Anything? No?
    Didn’t think so.
    Bottom line . . we’ve spent several hundred billion dollars in support of
    an agency the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember.
    Ready? It was very simple, and at the time everybody thought it very
    appropriate.
    The Department of Energy was instituted 8-04-1977 TO LESSEN OUR DEPENDENCE
    ON FOREIGN OIL. HEY, PRETTY EFFICIENT, HUH?
    AND NOW IT’S 2008, 31 YEARS LATER, AND THE BUDGET FOR THIS NECESSARY
    DEPARTMENT IS AT $24.2 BILLION A YEAR, THEY HAVE 16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES,
    AND APPROXIMATELY 100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES AND LOOK AT THE JOB THEY HAVE
    DONE!
    THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY ‘WHAT WAS I THINKING?’
    Ah yes, good ole bureaucracy. And now we are going to turn the Banking AND
    HEALTH CARE systems over to them and the Social Security Admin. will
    administer some of it also?

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    The socialist dream is the ever egalitarian society where all are equally poor in a ruinous economy. Government management of sectors like housing, education, health, retirement, finance, … will guarantee it. 52% of the voters have so decreed.

    Like

Leave a comment