Rebane's Ruminations
October 2008
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

ARCHIVES


OUR LINKS


YubaNet
White House Blog
Watts Up With That?
The Union
Sierra Thread
RL “Bob” Crabb
Barry Pruett Blog

George Rebane

Shill – (noun) a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.

Onion – (noun) a root vegetable that grows hidden from view, which when peeled reveals a monotonous succession of identical layer upon layer that provides no further illumination as to its contents while bringing a tear to the eye in the effort. 

Onion From time to time Ruminations is graced by the comments of that intrepid editor of our beloved Onion, yes, Jeff Pelline.  In Jeff’s most recent contributions (here and here) he again grieves at how far below his expectations we local bloggers fall – presumably led by yours truly.

Having now taken Nevada County’s flagship newspaper to new levels in journalistic integrity and reporting accuracy, his reputation in the community has become known to all – he is truly a self-made man.

So it is with some gravity that the remainder of this community’s purveyors of information and comment must consider his recent assessment of us as being in a “bush league”.  But apparently the instructional content of Jeff’s comments has achieved such a level of detail and intensity that several blogs have summarily banned him.  I understand that the man must now use several computers in order to attempt a bypass of the established barriers.  As I have said, in this community his impact is hard to avoid.

The force of his personality was further underlined by the Onion’s receipt of a last minute ‘invitation’ to sponsor next Tuesday’s election night bash at the Miners Foundry.  Not being a bush leaguer like some of the other original sponsors, it was natural to leave the Onion in a class of its own.  But this was not to be, and after some frank discussion with the Foundry’s Exec Director Gretchen Bond (oh, to have been a fly on the wall), the newspaper was added to the list of sponsoring organizations.  All’s well that ends well since Ms Bond’s arm is again in a normal position, healing nicely, and no longer needs a sling.

Somewhere in all this I was also admonished “to disclose (my) Rotary club conflicts of interest”.  While not sure that I have any conflicts of interest with or without Rotary, it is with some pride that I do disclose my membership in the Rotary Club of Nevada City and as an unabashed supporter of Rotary International.  In this I am happy to join with many of our community’s leaders in government and business to provide what we can of our ‘time, talent, and treasure’.  Guilty as charged.

Returning to the headline accusation – those who do know me would probably use some other and perhaps not so salutary descriptor for my relationship with our Board of Supervisors.  But then, this is just another matter of accuracy for which the Onion is famous.  Even though I am in general agreement with this Board’s governance of our county, the Supervisors would be the last to either identify or count on me as a shill for their concerted efforts.  As noted before in RR, Jo Ann and I have contributed to the campaigns of Nate Beason, Sue Horne, and other candidates who promise, according to our lights, to do the right thing in office.  In this regard, I challenge anyone in Nevada County to penetrate the carefully settled fog around our editor and elucidate his biases, ideology, or other interests.

To end this on a more productive note, I offer the Onion a constructive criticism.  This morning’s report on County Treasurer Christina Dabis and her announced 2010 run for the BoS was lacking in a fundamental element of balance and completeness.  The lady (as I am a gentleman) made a fairly naked and scurrilous charge against the sitting Board regarding its responsibility to appropriate and monitor county finances – “None of the supervisors ever called to see how the treasury was doing.  Are they asleep at the wheel or what?”

From my reliable spies at the Rood Center, the reader should know that –
1. The BoS receives and reviews a Treasurer’s report every month;
2. The BoS knows the stable nature of the County’s investments as instruments of low volatility – bonds, CDs, money market shares, etc.;

Furthermore, Ms Dabis called a member of the Board for advice on how best to reassure both the BoS and the public as to the integrity and safety of the county’s monies.  She was advised to get on the BoS agenda and give an update in public and with the press present, and/or provide the information directly to the media.  She apparently took the advice as witnessed by her 9oct08 news article and her 27oct08 Board appearance.  With a more robust application of what is taught in most schools of journalism, the Onion could have discovered this close consultation between the Treasurer and the Board, refreshed the lady’s memory, and appropriately advised its readers.

Posted in

5 responses to “Pelline – ‘Rebane is a BoS Shill’”

  1. Jeff Pelline Avatar
    Jeff Pelline

    George,
    •I’m flattered by your post, but for a Ph.D. you need to develop a much deeper understanding of some underpinnings of our culture here: How people sometimes use each other to get what they want, speaking altruistically but having a hidden agenda. It’s not always quaint in quainty-town. And the agenda is not always that hidden if you poke around. It’s political and it’s personal. I’m often surprised how it goes over people’s heads. I think I underestimate how much education is required to illuminate it. It is, sadly, the downside of life in a small town.
    •You also need to know that Ms. Dabis is entitled to her opinions, just like anybody else. She did make that statement and already is being held accountable. On the other hand, I’m not sure it was constructive to cast her in the 1985 movie “Lost in America.” It’s not a paper’s job to censor; it’s a paper’s job to discuss both sides: we did that. Just as we expressed both sides of the BOS pay raise (and you failed to mention, all the other raises that were approved previously).
    •As for being a “shill for the BOS,” you do make campaign contributions to board members whom you write about. Journalists don’t do that. I believe it clouds your objectivity. I also believe being friends with influential people here is somehow important to you above being objective. That’s OK but it’s not what journalists are supposed to do. Journalists, as you saw from the article on a “code of ethics” I wrote about last week in a column, have to tread a finer line. It’s not fun but it’s their job if they take it seriously. You also seem to contradict yourself all too often: for example, you blast Calpers, but aren’t you receiving Calpers benefits as a retired professor? Shouldn’t you disclose that.
    •As for “bush league,” you are totally misrepresenting my views about bloggers again, I guess to make some political hay. It is bush league to erase comments from people who raise issues that you disagree with. That’s supposedly the beauty of interactive dialogue. I’ve also said this repeatedly about the blogging community here: Anna Haynes has done an excellent job with her aggregation site, NC Voices. It is a wonderful tool that we all should bookmark. And Martin Light does a great job with his blog. Sure he is critical, but he also gives praise. With you, I don’t see that. It’s a pretty one sided discussion that revolves around your friends or people whom you want to become friends with. (I find that ironic, too, because I sometimes here a different side from them about their views of George Rebane).
    •As for me, I would imagine it’s nice that I take the time to write a thoughtful discussion to what sometimes like entertainment to you (running a photo of an onion, for example). It would be just as easy, and perhaps more constructive, to just ignore it all together. People urge me to do that.
    Look, I work full time here, my wife works and we are raising a son. We have a stake in this community as homeowners as well. It’s not a “parlor game” for us. We are working hard to improve the newspaper, too, with a great group of hard-working young people who also have a stake in this community. We expose issues at the paper that nobody else does. That is something that should be celebrated in a small community: transparency and accountability. In fact, based on my discussions with people, it is widely appreciated.

    Like

  2. Bob White Avatar
    Bob White

    George,
    I would like to thank you for your efforts in monitoring and exsposing the amature inadequacies of our local paper. This is a valuable contribution to our community. I would like to point out that The Union has been worse in the past even if it does still have room for a lot of improvement.
    In his response Jeff illustrates his inadequacies in many ways. He exposes himself by purporting that journalists don’t make campaign contributions to those they write about. Can he be that naive and still be an editor? Journalists, “code of ethics”? Jeff doesn’t seem to understand the difference between criticizing an entity you benefit from as opposed to criticizing one you benefit by criticizing, i.e. Calpers. On and on.

    Like

  3. Bob White Avatar
    Bob White

    PS: For M.A. I am surprised!

    Like

  4. George Rebane Avatar
    George Rebane

    Jeff, thank you for the extended comment, I especially appreciate its tone. Perhaps it may serve as a milestone in our attempt to understand each other. There are a few matters of fact in your missal on which I’d like to put in my two cents.
    Regarding the “underpinnings of our culture here”, I have heard of your expertise in this area, and look forward to the corrections and illuminations that you may deliver from time to time. I’m sure that other RR readers will benefit equally.
    Re Ms Dabis. Jeff, you apparently read my blog to levels deeper than it is written. I am somewhat abashed to admit that all I did was to quote the woman and point out that there was more to the story than you reported. Casting her in movies and censoring(?), was any of that in my report? And your “discuss(ing) both sides”, well clearly not. Because the facts which I reported made her “asleep at the wheel” remark a bit hard to swallow – but apparently not for everyone.
    Now that I understand your use of ‘shill’ to include anyone who makes campaign contributions, highlights how we each understand the King’s English. As I have stated to you several times before, I am not a journalist (see here http://rebaneruminations.typepad.com/rebanes_ruminations/2007/12/i-am-not-a-jour.html#more ). I have no desire to associate with a profession that is held in such low regard by our society (see State of Media reports); I can achieve such approval ratings all by myself. As far as “contradicting” myself – in your voluminous correspondence you probably have me confused with someone else. I have never said an unkind word about Calpers, and I don’t receive any benefits from them. (My university experience was primarily a labor of love as witnessed by Calpers’ sending me a very small check to clear my account after I quit teaching.) My blog is an open book, and I always welcome comments from folks who actually do read my posts. Substantiate your claim.
    Your “bush league” comments and related blogger comments on RR stand on their merit. Clarifications are always welcome. It is true that my commentary deals mostly with what I see as problems, and my own prescriptions and nostrums for their repair. This will not change. But the claim that I don’t praise or report progress may indicate that you are neither a regular nor careful RR reader. Again, my blog is an open book as, I believe, is the motivation for your characterizations.
    Re people urging you to ignore RR (and other blogs?) – I can only advise you to follow your star Jeff. Your industry is on its butt and fast sliding off the shelf-space of public attention. And this is primarily because you and yours have taken the “easy” and “more constructive” path of not figuring out how to participate in the new medium. I have contributed my best efforts to support a realistic plan forward for the Union. I don’t think that JeffA can show you a more thought out plan for this newspaper’s future from the community than the one he received from me, someone who is a subscriber to your print edition. In any case Jeff, based on your “discussions with people”, you can rejoice and probably will.
    But a “parlor game”?!, hardly Jeff, this is also my home. What we are doing here is the real thing, and the sooner your management at Swift Communications figures that out, the more chance we will all have of celebrating the 150th anniversary of The Union.

    Like

  5. jeffpelline Avatar
    jeffpelline

    George,
    Ah, now we’re getting down to brass tacks: Thanks for your plan, but The Union has a well thought out strategy to get the paper beyond your life and mine: both in print and online. The mainstream newspaper business will survive too. I worry more about the future of AM radio, bloggers who don’t really understand the underpinnings of our community and get snowed by their friends/confidents, and online publications that don’t tolerate open discourse. We have all of them here. Thanks for being a subscriber, though. It’s pretty hard to get along without The Union, and most media companies (and bloggers) would kill for its penetration rate.

    Like

Leave a comment